Building access to specialist care through e-consultation

Clare Liddy, Margo S Rowan, Amir Afkham, Julie Maranger, Erin Keely, Clare Liddy, Margo S Rowan, Amir Afkham, Julie Maranger, Erin Keely

Abstract

Background: Limited access to specialist care remains a major barrier to health care in Canada, affecting patients and primary care providers alike, in terms of both long wait times and inequitable availability. We developed an electronic consultation system, based on a secure web-based tool, as an alternative to face-to-face consultations, and ran a pilot study to evaluate its effectiveness and acceptability to practitioners.

Methods: In a pilot program conducted over 15 months starting in January 2010, the e-consultation system was tested with primary care providers and specialists in a large health region in Eastern Ontario, Canada. We collected utilization data from the electronic system itself (including quantitative data from satisfaction surveys) and qualitative information from focus groups and interviews with providers.

Results: Of 18 primary care providers in the pilot program, 13 participated in focus groups and 9 were interviewed; in addition, 10 of the 11 specialists in the program were interviewed. Results of our evaluation showed good uptake, high levels of satisfaction, improvement in the integration of referrals and consultations, and avoidance of unnecessary specialist visits. A total of 77 e-consultation requests were processed from 1 Jan. 2010 to 1 Apr. 2011. Less than 10% of the referrals required face-to-face follow-up. The most frequently noted benefits for patients (as perceived by providers) included improved access to specialist care and reduced wait times. Primary care providers valued the ability to assist with patient assessment and management by having access to a rapid response to clinical questions, clarifying the need for diagnostic tests or treatments, and confirming the need for a formal consultation. Specialists enjoyed the improved interaction with primary care providers, as well as having some control in the decision on which patients should be referred.

Interpretation: This low-cost referral system has potential for broader implementation, once payment models for physicians are adapted to cover e-consultation.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Steps in process of care involving both a primary care provider (PCP) and a specialist. Based on a prototype shared with the authors by the College of Family Physicians of Canada and a model proposed by the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Work flow for e-consultation service involving primary care providers (PCPs) and specialists
Table 1
Table 1
Perceived benefits of e-consultation, as reported by participating physicians

References

    1. Manuel D G, Maaten S, Thiruchelvam D, Jaakkimainen L, Upshur R. Primary care in the health care system. In: Jaakkimainen L, Upshur R, Klein-Geltink J, Leong A, Maaten S, Schultz S, Wang L, editors. Primary care in Ontario: ICES atlas. Toronto (ON): Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; 2006. pp. 1–14. .
    1. Berthelot J M, Sanmartin C. Access to health care services in Canada, January to December 2005. Ottawa (ON): Statistics Canada; 2006. Report No.: 82-575-XIE.
    1. Barua B, Rovere M, Skinner B J. Waiting your turn: wait times for health care in Canada. 2010 report. 20th ed. Calgary (AB): Fraser Institute; 2010.
    1. Tu J V, Pinfold S P, McColgan P, Laupacis A. Access to health services in Ontario. Toronto (ON): Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; 2006.
    1. Chan Benjamin T B. The declining comprehensiveness of primary care. CMAJ. 2002 Feb 19;166(4):429–434. .
    1. Horner Kathryn, Wagner Ed, Tufano Jim. Electronic consultations between primary and specialty care clinicians: early insights. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund) 2011;23:1–14.
    1. Bergus G R, Sinift S D, Randall C S, Rosenthal D M. Use of an e-mail curbside consultation service by family physicians. J Fam Pract. 1998;47(5):357–360. .
    1. Manian F A, Janssen D A. Curbside consultations. A closer look at a common practice. JAMA. 1996;275(2):145–147. doi: 10.1001/jama.1996.03530260059032. .
    1. Kuo D, Gifford D R, Stein M D. Curbside consultation practices and attitudes among primary care physicians and medical subspecialists. JAMA. 1998;280(10):905–909. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.10.905. .
    1. Borowitz S M, Wyatt J C. The origin, content, and workload of e-mail consultations. JAMA. 1998 Oct 21;280(15):1321–1324. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.15.1321. .
    1. Using email communication with your patients: legal risks. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Medical Protective Association; 2005. [revised 2009]. Report No. IS0586-E .
    1. Abbott Kevin C, Mann Scott, DeWitt Daisy, Sales Linda Y, Kennedy Sean, Poropatich Ron K. Physician-to-physician consultation via electronic mail: the Walter Reed Army Medical Center Ask a Doc system. Mil Med. 2002;167(3):200–204.
    1. Angstman Kurt B, Adamson Steven C, Furst Joseph W, Houston Margaret S, Rohrer James E. Provider satisfaction with virtual specialist consultations in a family medicine department. Health Care Manag (Frederick) 2009;28(1):14–18. doi: 10.1097/HCM.0b013e318196def8.
    1. Neufeld Jonathan D, Yellowlees Peter M, Hilty Donald M, Cobb Hattie, Bourgeois James A. The e-Mental Health Consultation Service: providing enhanced primary-care mental health services through telemedicine. Psychosomatics. 2007;48(2):135–141. doi: 10.1176/appi.psy.48.2.135. .
    1. Stoves John, Connolly John, Cheung Chee K, Grange Angela, Rhodes Penny, O'Donoghue Donal, Wright John. Electronic consultation as an alternative to hospital referral for patients with chronic kidney disease: a novel application for networked electronic health records to improve the accessibility and efficiency of healthcare. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(5):54. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2009.038984.
    1. Hjelm N M. Benefits and drawbacks of telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare. 2005;11(2):60–70. doi: 10.1258/1357633053499886. .
    1. Jacklin P B, Roberts J A, Wallace P, Haines A, Harrison R, Barber J A, Thompson S G, Lewis L, Currell R, Parker S, Wainwright P. Virtual outreach: economic evaluation of joint teleconsultations for patients referred by their general practitioner for a specialist opinion. BMJ. 2003;327(7406):84. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7406.84. .
    1. Wallace S, Wyatt J, Taylor P. Telemedicine in the NHS for the millennium and beyond. Postgrad Med J. 1998 Dec 1;74(878):721–728. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.74.878.721. .
    1. Bains N, Dall K, Hay C, Pacey M, Sarkella J, Ward M. Population health profile: Champlain LHIN. Toronto (ON): Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; 2008. Document no. HSIP-PHP-01.
    1. Creswell J W, Plano Clark V L. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2007.
    1. Patton M Q. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2002.
    1. Jaatinen Pekka T, Aarnio Pertti, Remes Jouko, Hannukainen Jorma, Köymäri-Seilonen Tarja. Teleconsultation as a replacement for referral to an outpatient clinic. J Telemed Telecare. 2002;8(2):102–106. doi: 10.1258/1357633021937550. .
    1. Nijland N, Gemert-Pijnen J E W C, Kelders S M, Brandenburg B J, Seydel E R. Evaluation of the use of an "ask-the-expert" e-consultation service for support on health-related requests. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;160(Pt 2):821–825.
    1. Greenhalgh Trisha, Robert Glenn, Macfarlane Fraser, Bate Paul, Kyriakidou Olivia. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q. 2004;82(4):581–629. doi: 10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.x. .

Source: PubMed

Sponsors en medewerkers

Medische omstandigheden

Geneesmiddelinterventies

3
Abonneren