An internet-based self-help intervention for people with psychological distress due to COVID-19: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Noemi Anja Brog, Julia Katharina Hegy, Thomas Berger, Hansjörg Znoj, Noemi Anja Brog, Julia Katharina Hegy, Thomas Berger, Hansjörg Znoj

Abstract

Background: The coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) has reached pandemic status and is affecting countries all over the world. The COVID-19 pandemic is accompanied by various stressors that require adjustment in everyday life and possibly changes in personal future prospects. While some individuals cope well with these challenges, some develop psychological distress including depressive symptoms, anxiety, or stress. Internet-based self-help interventions have proven to be effective in the treatment of various mental disorders such as depression and anxiety. Based on that, we developed an internet-based self-help program for individuals with psychological distress due to the situation surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic. The 3-week self-help program consists of 6 modules comprising texts, videos, figures, and exercises. Participants can request guidance within the self-help program (guidance on demand). The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of the self-help program compared to a waiting control condition.

Methods: The design is a parallel group randomized controlled trial. Participants are allocated to a 3-week self-help intervention plus care as usual or a 3-week waiting period with only care as usual. There are follow-ups after 6 weeks and 18 weeks. At least 80 participants with COVID-19 pandemic related psychological distress will be recruited. Primary outcome are depressive symptoms. Secondary outcomes include anxiety and chronic stress, suicidal experiences and behavior, health-related quality of life, generalized optimism and pessimism, embitterment, optimistic self-beliefs, emotion regulation skills, loneliness, resilience, and the satisfaction with and usability of the self-help program.

Discussion: To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the first studies investigating the efficacy of an internet-based self-help program for psychological distress due to the situation surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, the results of this study may give further insight into the use of internet-based self-help programs in pandemic-related psychological distress.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04380909 . Retrospectively registered on 8 May 2020.

Keywords: Anxiety; COVID-19; Coronavirus; Depression; Internet-based self-help; Psychological distress; Randomized controlled trial; Stress.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of the study design
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
SPIRIT figure, schedule of enrolment, interventions, and assessments

References

    1. Sritharan J, Sritharan A. Emerging mental health issues from the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. J Health Med Sci. 2020;3(2):157-162.
    1. Lau JT, Yang X, Pang E, Tsui H, Wong E, Wing YK. SARS-related perceptions in Hong Kong. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11(3):417.
    1. Qiu J, Shen B, Zhao M, Wang Z, Xie B, Xu Y. A nationwide survey of psychological distress among Chinese people in the COVID-19 epidemic: implications and policy recommendations. Gen Psychiatry. 2020;33(2):e100213corr1.
    1. Wissmath B, Mast FW, Kraus F, Weibel D. Understanding the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and containment measures: an empirical model of stress. medRxiv. 2020; 10.1101/2020.05.13.20100313.
    1. Rajkumar RP. COVID-19 and mental health: a review of the existing literature. Asian J Psychiatr. 2020;52:102066.
    1. Wang C, Pan R, Wan X, Tan Y, Xu L, Ho CS, et al. Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic among the general population in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(5):1729. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051729.
    1. Boyraz G, Legros DN. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and traumatic stress: probable risk factors and correlates of posttraumatic stress disorder. J Loss Trauma. 2020;25:1–20.
    1. Holmes TH, Rahe RH. The social readjustment rating scale. J Psychosom Res. 1967;11(2):213–218.
    1. Ridner SH. Psychological distress: concept analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2004;45(5):536–545. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02938.x.
    1. Bachem R, Casey P. Adjustment disorder: a diagnosis whose time has come. J Affect Disord. 2018;227:243–253. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.10.034.
    1. Maercker A, Einsle F, Köllner V. Adjustment disorders as stress response syndromes: a new diagnostic concept and its exploration in a medical sample. Psychopathology. 2007;40(3):135–146. doi: 10.1159/000099290.
    1. Kendler KS, Karkowski LM, Prescott CA. Causal relationship between stressful life events and the onset of major depression. Am J Psychiatr. 1999;156(6):837–841. doi: 10.1176/ajp.156.6.837.
    1. Halder S. COVID-19: psychological impact and psychotherapeutic intervention. EC Psychol Psychiatry. 2020;9:32–35.
    1. Rosen CS, Glassman LH, Morland LA. Telepsychotherapy during a pandemic: a traumatic stress perspective. J Psychother Integr. 2020;30(2):174. doi: 10.1037/int0000221.
    1. Wind TR, Rijkeboer M, Andersson G, Riper H. The COVID-19 pandemic: the ‘black swan’for mental health care and a turning point for e-health. Internet Interv. 2020;20:100317.
    1. Andersson G, Titov N. Advantages and limitations of internet-based interventions for common mental disorders. World Psychiatry. 2014;13(1):4–11. doi: 10.1002/wps.20083.
    1. Cuijpers P, Donker T, Johansson R, Mohr DC, van Straten A, Andersson G. Self-guided psychological treatment for depressive symptoms: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e21274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021274.
    1. Andersson G, Cuijpers P. Internet-based and other computerized psychological treatments for adult depression: a meta-analysis. Cogn Behav Ther. 2009;38(4):196–205. doi: 10.1080/16506070903318960.
    1. Richards D, Richardson T. Computer-based psychological treatments for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2012;32(4):329–342. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2012.02.004.
    1. Baumeister H, Reichler L, Munzinger M, Lin J. The impact of guidance on Internet-based mental health interventions—a systematic review. Internet Interv. 2014;1(4):205–215. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2014.08.003.
    1. Berger T, Caspar F, Richardson R, Kneubühler B, Sutter D, Andersson G. Internet-based treatment of social phobia: a randomized controlled trial comparing unguided with two types of guided self-help. Behav Res Ther. 2011;49(3):158–169. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2010.12.007.
    1. Krieger T, Reber F, von Glutz B, Urech A, Moser CT, Schulz A, et al. An internet-based compassion-focused intervention for increased self-criticism: a randomized controlled trial. Behav Ther. 2019;50(2):430–445. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2018.08.003.
    1. Kleiboer A, Donker T, Seekles W, van Straten A, Riper H, Cuijpers P. A randomized controlled trial on the role of support in internet-based problem solving therapy for depression and anxiety. Behav Res Ther. 2015;72:63–71. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.06.013.
    1. Rheker J, Andersson G, Weise C. The role of “on demand” therapist guidance vs. no support in the treatment of tinnitus via the internet: a randomized controlled trial. Internet Interv. 2015;2(2):189–199. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2015.03.007.
    1. Wei N, Huang B-C, Lu S-J, Hu J-B, Zhou X-Y, Hu C-C, et al. Efficacy of internet-based integrated intervention on depression and anxiety symptoms in patients with COVID-19. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2020;21(5):400-404.
    1. Qualtrics. . Accessed: 9 July 2020.
    1. Löwe B, Spitzer RL, Zipfel S, Herzog W. Gesundheitsfragebogen für Patienten (PHQ-D). Komplettversion und Kurzform. Testmappe mit Manual, Fragebögen, Schablonen. 2. Auflage. Karlsruhe: Pfizer; 2002. pp. 90–93.
    1. Osman A, Bagge CL, Gutierrez PM, Konick LC, Kopper BA, Barrios FX. The Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R): validation with clinical and nonclinical samples. Assessment. 2001;8(4):443–454. doi: 10.1177/107319110100800409.
    1. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL. The PHQ-9: a new depression diagnostic and severity measure. Psychiatr Ann. 2002;32(9):509–515. doi: 10.3928/0048-5713-20020901-06.
    1. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(9):606–613. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.
    1. Gräfe K, Zipfel S, Herzog W, Löwe B. Screening psychischer Störungen mit dem “Gesundheitsfragebogen für patienten (PHQ-D)”. Diagnostica. 2004;50(4):171–181. doi: 10.1026/0012-1924.50.4.171.
    1. Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF. Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales. Sydney: Psychology Founation of Australia; 1995.
    1. Nilges P, Essau C. Die depressions-angst-stress-skalen. Schmerz. 2015;29(6):649–657. doi: 10.1007/s00482-015-0019-z.
    1. Glaesmer H, Kapusta ND, Teismann T, Wagner B, Hallensleben N, Spangenberg L, et al. Psychometrische Eigenschaften der deutschen Version des Suicide Behaviors Questionnaire Revised (SBQ-R) Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2018;68(08):346–352. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-118335.
    1. Ware J, Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34(3):220–233. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003.
    1. Morfeld M, Kirchberger I, Bullinger M. SF-36. Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2011.
    1. Glaesmer H, Hoyer J, Klotsche J, Herzberg PY. Die deutsche version des life-orientation-tests (LOT-R) zum dispositionellen optimismus und pessimismus. Z Gesundheitspsychol. 2008;16(1):26–31. doi: 10.1026/0943-8149.16.1.26.
    1. Herzberg PY, Glaesmer H, Hoyer J. Separating optimism and pessimism: a robust psychometric analysis of the revised Life Orientation Test (LOT-R) Psychol Assess. 2006;18(4):433–438. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.18.4.433.
    1. Znoj HBVI. Berner verbitterungs-inventar. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2008.
    1. Znoj H, Abegglen S, Buchkremer U, Linden M. The embittered mind. J Individ Differ. 2016;37:213-222.
    1. Znoj H, Schnyder U. Verbitterungsfragebogen kurzversion. Bern: University of Bern; 2014.
    1. Jerusalem M, Schwarzer R. SWE. Skala zur allgemeinen Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung [Verfahrensdokumentation aus PSYNDEX Tests-Nr. 9001003, Autorenbeschreibung und Fragebogen]. 2003. In: Elektronisches Testarchiv [Internet]. Trier: ZPID Available from: 10.23668/psycharchives.307.
    1. Berking M, Znoj H. SEK-27. Fragebogen zur standardisierten Selbsteinschätzung emotionaler Kompetenzen [Verfahrensdokumentation aus PSYNDEX Tests-Nr. 9005957, Fragebogen und Auswertungsanweisung]. 2011 ed. (Hrsg.) ETTZ, editor: In Leibniz-Zentrum für Psychologische Information und Dokumentation (ZPID).
    1. Berking M, Znoj H. Entwicklung und Validierung eines Fragebogens zur standardisierten Selbsteinschätzung emotionaler Kompetenzen (SEK-27) Z Psychiatr Psychol Psychother. 2008;56(2):141–153.
    1. Döring N, Bortz J. Psychometrische Einsamkeitsforschung: Deutsche Neukonstruktion der UCLA Loneliness Scale. Diagnostica. 1993.
    1. Connor KM, Davidson JR. Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor-Davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC) Depress Anxiety. 2003;18(2):76–82. doi: 10.1002/da.10113.
    1. Sarubin N, Gutt D, Giegling I, Bühner M, Hilbert S, Krähenmann O, et al. Erste analyse der psychometrischen Eigenschaften und Struktur der deutschsprachigen 10-und 25-Item version der Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Z Gesundheitspsychol. 2015;23:112-122.
    1. Attkisson CC, Zwick R. The client satisfaction questionnaire. Psychometric properties and correlations with service utilization and psychotherapy outcome. Eval Program Plann. 1982;5(3):233–237. doi: 10.1016/0149-7189(82)90074-X.
    1. Schmidt J, Lamprecht F, Wittmann W. Zufriedenheit mit der stationären Versorgung. Entwicklung eines Fragebogens und erste Validitätsuntersuchungen. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 1989;39(7):248–255.
    1. Brooke J. SUS: a “quick and dirty” usability. Usability evaluation in industry. 1996.
    1. Lewis JR, Sauro J. The factor structure of the system usability scale. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2009.
    1. Bangor A, Kortum PT, Miller JT. An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Intl J Human–Comput Interact. 2008;24(6):574–594. doi: 10.1080/10447310802205776.
    1. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A-G. Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41(4):1149–1160. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
    1. Karyotaki E, Riper H, Twisk J, Hoogendoorn A, Kleiboer A, Mira A, et al. Efficacy of self-guided internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy in the treatment of depressive symptoms: a meta-analysis of individual participant data. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017;74(4):351–359. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0044.
    1. . . Accessed: 9 July 2020.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors en medewerkers

Medische omstandigheden

Geneesmiddelinterventies

3
Abonneren