Patient perspectives on hypertension management in health system of Sri Lanka: a qualitative study

Manuja Perera, Chamini Kanatiwela de Silva, Saeideh Tavajoh, Anuradhani Kasturiratne, Nathathasa Vihangi Luke, Dileepa Senajith Ediriweera, Channa D Ranasinha, Helena Legido-Quigley, H Asita de Silva, Tazeen H Jafar, Manuja Perera, Chamini Kanatiwela de Silva, Saeideh Tavajoh, Anuradhani Kasturiratne, Nathathasa Vihangi Luke, Dileepa Senajith Ediriweera, Channa D Ranasinha, Helena Legido-Quigley, H Asita de Silva, Tazeen H Jafar

Abstract

Introduction: Uncontrolled hypertension is the leading risk factor for mortality globally, including low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, pathways for seeking hypertension care and patients' experience with the utilisation of health services for hypertension in LMICs are not well understood.

Objectives: This study aimed to explore patients' perspectives on different dimensions of accessibility and availability of healthcare for the management of uncontrolled hypertension in Sri Lanka.

Setting: Primary care in rural areas in Sri Lanka.

Participants: 20 patients with hypertension were purposively sampled from an ongoing study of Control of Blood Pressure and Risk Attenuation in rural Bangladesh, Pakistan, Sri Lanka.

Method: We conducted in-depth interviews with patients. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed into local language (Sinhala) and translated to English. Thematic analysis was used and patient pathways on their experiences accessing care from government and private clinics are mapped out.

Results: Overall, most patients alluded to the fact that their hypertension was diagnosed accidentally in an unrelated visit to a healthcare provider and revealed lack of adherence and consuming alternatives as barriers to control hypertension. Referring to the theme 'Accessibility and availability of hypertension care', patients complained of distance to the hospitals, long waiting time and shortage of medicine supplies at government clinics as the main barriers to accessing health services. They often resorted to private physicians and paid out of pocket when they experienced acute symptoms attributable to hypertension. Considering the theme 'Approachability and ability to perceive', the majority of patients mentioned increasing public awareness, training healthcare professionals for effective communication as areas of improvement. Under the theme 'Appropriateness and ability to engage', few patients were aware of the names or purpose of their medications and reportedly missed doses frequently. Reminders from family members were considered a major facilitator to adherence to antihypertensive medications. Patients welcomed the idea of outreach services for hypertension and health education closer to home in the theme 'Things the patients reported to improve the system'.

Conclusion: Patients identified several barriers to accessing hypertension care in Sri Lanka. Measures recommended improving hypertension management in Sri Lanka including public education on hypertension, better communication between healthcare professionals and patients, and efforts to improve access and understanding of antihypertensive medications.

Trial registration number: NCT02657746.

Keywords: health services administration & management; hypertension; qualitative research.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The different pathways of which participants obtained hypertension-related services.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Patient pathway: non-hypertension symptoms. BP, blood pressue.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Patient pathway: acute hypertension symptoms. BP, blood pressure.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Patient pathway: acute to chronic symptoms. BP, blood pressure.

References

    1. Forouzanfar MH, Liu P, Roth GA, et al. . Global burden of hypertension and systolic blood pressure of at least 110 to 115 MM Hg, 1990-2015. JAMA 2017;317:165–82. 10.1001/jama.2016.19043
    1. Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, et al. . A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. The Lancet 2012;380:2224–60. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8
    1. Misra A, Tandon N, Ebrahim S, et al. . Diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and chronic kidney disease in South Asia: current status and future directions. BMJ 2017;357 10.1136/bmj.j1420
    1. Zhou B, Bentham J, Di Cesare M, et al. . Worldwide trends in blood pressure from 1975 to 2015: a pooled analysis of 1479 population-based measurement studies with 19·1 million participants. The Lancet 2017;389:37–55. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31919-5
    1. Organization WH Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2014; 2014.
    1. Jafar TH, Gandhi M, Jehan I, et al. . Determinants of uncontrolled hypertension in rural communities in South Asia—Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka. Am J Hypertens 2018;31:1205–14. 10.1093/ajh/hpy071
    1. Jafar TH, Hatcher J, Poulter N, et al. . Community-Based interventions to promote blood pressure control in a developing country. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:593–601. 10.7326/0003-4819-151-9-200911030-00004
    1. Legido-Quigley H, Naheed A, de Silva HA, et al. . Patients' experiences on accessing health care services for management of hypertension in rural Bangladesh, Pakistan and Sri Lanka: a qualitative study. PLoS One 2019;14:e0211100 10.1371/journal.pone.0211100
    1. Naheed A, Haldane V, Jafar TH, et al. . Patient pathways and perceptions of hypertension treatment, management, and control in rural Bangladesh: a qualitative study. Patient Prefer Adherence 2018;12:1437–49. 10.2147/PPA.S163385
    1. World Bank Group Sri Lanka country profile, 2016. Available:
    1. Katulanda P, Ranasinghe P, Jayawardena R, et al. . The prevalence, predictors and associations of hypertension in Sri Lanka: a cross-sectional population based national survey. Clin Exp Hypertens 2014;36:484–91. 10.3109/10641963.2013.863321
    1. Kasturiratne A, Warnakulasuriya T, Pinidiyapathirage J, et al. . P2-130 epidemiology of hypertension in an urban Sri Lankan population. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 2011;65(Suppl 1):A256–A56. 10.1136/jech.2011.142976i.65
    1. Levesque J-F, Harris MF, Russell G. Patient-Centred access to health care: conceptualising access at the interface of health systems and populations. Int J Equity Health 2013;12:18 10.1186/1475-9276-12-18
    1. Jafar TH, Jehan I, de Silva HA, et al. . Multicomponent intervention versus usual care for management of hypertension in rural Bangladesh, Pakistan and Sri Lanka: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. Trials 2017;18:272 10.1186/s13063-017-2018-0
    1. Strauss AL. Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press, 1987.
    1. Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage, 2006.
    1. Sacks FM, Svetkey LP, Vollmer WM, et al. . Effects on blood pressure of reduced dietary sodium and the dietary approaches to stop hypertension (DASH) diet. New England Journal of Medicine 2001;344:3–10. 10.1056/NEJM200101043440101
    1. Jolles EP, Clark AM, Braam B. Getting the message across: opportunities and obstacles in effective communication in hypertension care. J Hypertens 2012;30:1500–10. 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32835476e1
    1. Montgomery AA, Harding J, Fahey T. Shared decision making in hypertension: the impact of patient preferences on treatment choice. Fam Pract 2001;18:309–13. 10.1093/fampra/18.3.309

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren