EXperienceS and aTtitudes towards Agitated behaviours in Traumatic brain injury in the Intensive Care unit patients (EXSTATIC): a protocol for an interprofessional mixed-method study

Mar Saavedra-Mitjans, Pierre-Marie David, Anne-Julie Frenette, Caroline Arbour, Marc Perreault, Virginie Williams, Francis Bernard, David Williamson, Mar Saavedra-Mitjans, Pierre-Marie David, Anne-Julie Frenette, Caroline Arbour, Marc Perreault, Virginie Williams, Francis Bernard, David Williamson

Abstract

Introduction: Agitation and violent behaviours are common conditions developed by patients with acute traumatic brain injury (TBI) in intensive care units (ICUs). Healthcare professionals caring for these patients have various tools to manage these behaviours, but lack of a formal protocol to assess and manage them makes caring for these patients a challenge. Moreover, safety may often be compromised for both ICU professionals and patients encountering such situations. The EXperienceS and aTtitudes towards Agitated behaviours in Traumatic brain injury in the Intensive Care unit patients (EXSTATIC) study aims to explore the experiences and attitudes of ICU nurses and other ICU healthcare professionals on the management of agitated behaviours in patients with acute TBI.

Methods and analysis: EXSTATIC is a multicenter mixed methods convergent study exploring experiences and attitudes of ICU healthcare professionals caring of agitated patients with TBI. The study includes three qualitative methods (observation, semistructured interviews and focus groups) and one quantitative method (retrospective cohort). The integration of the different methods will be done using sequential steps of the research and by the integration of results for each step. Qualitative data will be evaluated following a thematic analysis derived from a grounded theory approach. Quantitative data will be analysed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative and quantitative results will be combined in a convergent interactive interpretative design. Gender and race perspective will be integrated in collection, analysis and interpretation of data.

Ethics and dissemination: This study has been approved by the Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du nord de l'île de Montréal (CIUSSS-NÎM) Research Ethics Board. The findings will be disseminated locally with ICU staff and health managers, international peer-reviewed journals, a PhD dissertation, and national and international conferences. The knowledge derived from this study is key in the development of clinical protocols to manage agitation and related behaviours in patients with TBI and designing further interventional studies targeting this specific problematic.

Trial registration number: NCT04741399.

Keywords: adult intensive & critical care; neurological injury; trauma management.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work (except for DW, MS-M and CA); no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. MS-M is supported by a Fundación Alfonso Martín Escudero research scholarships in universities or centers abroad. CA is supported by a Fonds de recherche du Québec- Santé (FRQ-S) scientist career grant. DW is supported by a Fonds de recherche du Québec-Santé (FRQ-S) clinical scientist career grant.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Integration strategy of the mixed-method study.

References

    1. Menon DK, Schwab K, Wright DW, et al. . Position statement: definition of traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:1637–40. 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.05.017
    1. Langlois JA, Rutland-Brown W, Wald MM. The epidemiology and impact of traumatic brain injury: a brief overview. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2006;21:375–8. 10.1097/00001199-200609000-00001
    1. Ruttan L, Martin K, Liu A, et al. . Long-Term cognitive outcome in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis examining timed and untimed tests at 1 and 4.5 or more years after injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89:S69–76. 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.07.007
    1. Maas AIR, Menon DK, Adelson PD, et al. . Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research. Lancet Neurol 2017;16:987–1048. 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30371-X
    1. Chen A, Bushmeneva K, Zagorski B, et al. . Direct cost associated with acquired brain injury in Ontario. BMC Neurol 2012;12:76. 10.1186/1471-2377-12-76
    1. Tuominen R, Joelsson P, Tenovuo O. Treatment costs and productivity losses caused by traumatic brain injuries. Brain Inj 2012;26:1697–701. 10.3109/02699052.2012.722256
    1. Williamson DR, Cherifa SI, Frenette AJ. Agitation, confusion, and aggression in critically ill traumatic brain injury-a pilot cohort study (ACACIA-PILOT). Pilot Feasibility Stud 2020;11:193. 10.1186/s40814-020-00736-5
    1. Almeida TMLde, Azevedo LCPde, Nosé PMG, et al. . Risk factors for agitation in critically ill patients. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva 2016;28:413–9. 10.5935/0103-507X.20160074
    1. Jaber S, Chanques G, Altairac C, et al. . A prospective study of agitation in a medical-surgical ICU: incidence, risk factors, and outcomes. Chest 2005;128:2749–57. 10.1378/chest.128.4.2749
    1. Warren AM, Rainey EE, Weddle RJ, et al. . The intensive care unit experience: psychological impact on family members of patients with and without traumatic brain injury. Rehabil Psychol 2016;61:179–85. 10.1037/rep0000080
    1. Gerberich SG, Church TR, McGovern PM, et al. . An epidemiological study of the magnitude and consequences of work related violence: the Minnesota nurses' study. Occup Environ Med 2004;61:495–503. 10.1136/oem.2003.007294
    1. Luauté J, Plantier D, Wiart L, et al. . Care management of the agitation or aggressiveness crisis in patients with TBI. systematic review of the literature and practice recommendations. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2016;59:58–67. 10.1016/j.rehab.2015.11.001
    1. Williamson D, Perreault M, Rose L, et al. . Antipsychotics use in critically ill TBI patients: a Canadian multicenter observational cohort study. 17th Annual Meeting, Neurocritical Care Society; Oct 2019, Vancouver, Canada, 2019. 10.1007/s12028-019-00857-7
    1. Williamson D, Frenette AJ, Burry LD, et al. . Pharmacological interventions for agitated behaviours in patients with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2019;9:e029604. 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029604
    1. Sandel ME, Mysiw WJ. The agitated brain injured patient. Part 1: definitions, differential diagnosis, and assessment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:617–23. 10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90306-8
    1. Maldonado JR. Neuropathogenesis of delirium: review of current etiologic theories and common pathways. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2013;21:1190–222. 10.1016/j.jagp.2013.09.005
    1. Ganau M, Lavinio A, Prisco L. Delirium and agitation in traumatic brain injury patients: an update on pathological hypotheses and treatment options. Minerva Anestesiol 2018;84:632–40. 10.23736/S0375-9393.18.12294-2
    1. Palacios-Ceña D, Cachón-Pérez JM, Martínez-Piedrola R, et al. . How do doctors and nurses manage delirium in intensive care units? A qualitative study using focus groups. BMJ Open 2016;6:e009678. 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009678
    1. Tsang JLY, Ross K, Miller F, et al. . Qualitative descriptive study to explore nurses' perceptions and experience on pain, agitation and delirium management in a community intensive care unit. BMJ Open 2019;9:e024328. 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024328
    1. Tan CM, Camargo M, Miller F, et al. . Impact of a nurse engagement intervention on pain, agitation and delirium assessment in a community intensive care unit. BMJ Open Qual 2019;8:e000421. 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000421
    1. LeBlanc A, Bourbonnais FF, Harrison D, et al. . The experience of intensive care nurses caring for patients with delirium: a phenomenological study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2018;44:92–8. 10.1016/j.iccn.2017.09.002
    1. Wong AH-W, Combellick J, Wispelwey BA, et al. . The patient care paradox: an interprofessional qualitative study of agitated patient care in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2017;24:226–35. 10.1111/acem.13117
    1. Creswell JW. Research design : qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, 2014.
    1. Kawulich BB. Participant observation as a data collection method, 2005.
    1. MacNaghten PMG. Focus groups. qualitative research practice. London: Sage, 2004: 65–79.
    1. Rusinová K, Pochard F, Kentish-Barnes N, et al. . Qualitative research: adding drive and dimension to clinical research. Crit Care Med 2009;37:S140–6. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819207e7
    1. Mahmood S, Mahmood O, El-Menyar A, et al. . Predisposing factors, clinical assessment, management and outcomes of agitation in the trauma intensive care unit. World J Emerg Med 2018;9:105–12. 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2018.02.004
    1. Devlin JW, Skrobik Y, Gélinas C, et al. . Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of pain, Agitation/Sedation, delirium, immobility, and sleep disruption in adult patients in the ICU. Crit Care Med 2018;46:e825–73. 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003299
    1. Teasdale G, Maas A, Lecky F, et al. . The Glasgow coma scale at 40 years: standing the test of time. Lancet Neurol 2014;13:844–54. 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70120-6
    1. Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, et al. . The REDCap Consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform 2019;95:103208. 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208
    1. Chapman AL, Hadfield M, Chapman CJ. Qualitative research in healthcare: an introduction to grounded theory using thematic analysis. J R Coll Physicians Edinb 2015;45:201–5. 10.4997/JRCPE.2015.305
    1. QSR International Pty Ltd . NVivo qualitative data analysis software. version 10, 2020.
    1. Guest GMK, Namey EE. Applied thematic analysis, 2012. Thousand oaks, California: SAGE publications, Inc. Available:
    1. SPSS: IBM Corp . IBM SPSS statistics for windows, 2020.
    1. Morgan R, George A, Ssali S, et al. . How to do (or not to do)… gender analysis in health systems research. Health Policy Plan 2016;31:1069–78. 10.1093/heapol/czw037

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren