Comparison of storage conditions for human vaginal microbiome studies

Guoyun Bai, Pawel Gajer, Melissa Nandy, Bing Ma, Hongqiu Yang, Joyce Sakamoto, May H Blanchard, Jacques Ravel, Rebecca M Brotman, Guoyun Bai, Pawel Gajer, Melissa Nandy, Bing Ma, Hongqiu Yang, Joyce Sakamoto, May H Blanchard, Jacques Ravel, Rebecca M Brotman

Abstract

Background: The effect of storage conditions on the microbiome and metabolite composition of human biological samples has not been thoroughly investigated as a potential source of bias. We evaluated the effect of two common storage conditions used in clinical trials on the bacterial and metabolite composition of the vaginal microbiota using pyrosequencing of barcoded 16S rRNA gene sequencing and (1)H-NMR analyses.

Methodology/principal findings: Eight women were enrolled and four mid-vaginal swabs were collected by a physician from each woman. The samples were either processed immediately, stored at -80°C for 4 weeks or at -20°C for 1 week followed by transfer to -80°C for another 4 weeks prior to analysis. Statistical methods, including Kolmogorovo-Smirnov and Wilcoxon tests, were performed to evaluate the differences in vaginal bacterial community composition and metabolites between samples stored under different conditions. The results showed that there were no significant differences between samples processed immediately after collection or stored for varying durations. (1)H-NMR analysis of the small molecule metabolites in vaginal secretions indicated that high levels of lactic acid were associated with Lactobacillus-dominated communities. Relative abundance of lactic acid did not appear to correlate with relative abundance of individual Lactobacillus sp. in this limited sample, although lower levels of lactic acid were observed when L. gasseri was dominant, indicating differences in metabolic output of seemingly similar communities.

Conclusions/significance: These findings benefit large-scale, field-based microbiome and metabolomic studies of the vaginal microbiota.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1. Heatmap of the relative abundance…
Figure 1. Heatmap of the relative abundance of microbial taxa characterized by 16S rRNA gene sequencing (left) and metabolic content featured by NMR (right) in samples from 8 participants (S01-S08) stored under three different conditions (C1-C3).
The community state types, the relative content of lactic acid and Nugent score are also shown. The unassigned NMR integration regions were labeled by chemical shift.
Figure 2. Distribution of 16S rRNA sequence…
Figure 2. Distribution of 16S rRNA sequence data in UniFrac principal coordinates analysis (PCoA).
The symbols represent the 23 samples from 8 subjects summarized in Table 1 and 2. Symbols are colored by subject (shown in legend). The scatterplot is of principal coordinate 1 (PC1) plotted against principal coordinate 2 (PC2). The percentage of the variation in the samples described by the plotted principal coordinates in indicated on the axes.
Figure 3. 1 H NMR spectrum for…
Figure 3. 1H NMR spectrum for subject #S08 at condition 1.
Enlarged spectral region of δ = 0.85–1.10 ppm from S08 in inset A and S03 in inset B. The major metabolites are labeled: 1) lactate; 2) alanine; 3) acetate; 4) succinate; 5) glutamate; 6) glutamine; 7) citrate; 8) creatine; 9) choline; 10) glucose; 11) maltose; residual lubricant ingredient 12) PEG; 13) n-butyrate; 14) iso-valerate; 15) Isoleucine; 16) leucine; 17) valine and 18) propionate.
Figure 4. One-dimensional 1 H NMR spectra…
Figure 4. One-dimensional 1H NMR spectra of 24 aqueous vaginal samples from 8 participants (S01-S08) stored under three different conditions (C1 in black, C2 in red, and C3 in blue).
The Ward hierarchical clustering of samples was based on the normalized spectral integrals representing the relative proton abundance of the metabolites.

References

    1. Dolfing J, Vos A, Bloem J, Ehlert PA, Naumova NB, et al. Microbial diversity in archived soils. Science. 2004;306:813.
    1. Klammer S, Mondini C, Insam H. Microbial community fingerprints of composts stored under different conditions. Ann Microbiol. 2005;55:299–305.
    1. Nechvatal JM, Ram JL, Basson MD, Namprachan P, Niec SR, et al. Fecal collection, ambient preservation, and DNA extraction for PCR amplification of bacterial and human markers from human feces. J Microbiol Methods. 2008;72:124–132.
    1. Roesch LF, Casella G, Simell O, Krischer J, Wasserfall CH, et al. Influence of fecal sample storage on bacterial community diversity. Open Microbiol J. 2009;3:40–46.
    1. Lauber CL, Zhou N, Gordon JI, Knight R, Fierer N. Effect of storage conditions on the assessment of bacterial community structure in soil and human-associated samples. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2010;307:80–86.
    1. Tzeneva VA, Salles JF, Naumova N, de Vos WM, Kuikman PJ, et al. Effect of soil sample preservation, compared to the effect of other environmental variables, on bacterial and eukaryotic diversity. Res Microbiol. 2009;160:89–98.
    1. Ott SJ, Musfeldt M, Timmis KN, Hampe J, Wenderoth DF, et al. In vitro alterations of intestinal bacterial microbiota in fecal samples during storage. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2004;50:237–245.
    1. Troyer D. Biorepository standards and protocols for collecting, processing, and storing human tissues. Methods Mol Biol. 2008;441:193–220.
    1. Barton RH, Nicholson JK, Elliott P, Holmes E. High-throughput 1H NMR-based metabolic analysis of human serum and urine for large-scale epidemiological studies: validation study. Int J Epidemiol. 2008;37(Suppl 1):i31–40.
    1. Peakman TC, Elliott P. The UK Biobank sample handling and storage validation studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2008;37(Suppl 1):i2–6.
    1. Dunn WB, Broadhurst D, Ellis DI, Brown M, Halsall A, et al. A GC-TOF-MS study of the stability of serum and urine metabolomes during the UK Biobank sample collection and preparation protocols. Int J Epidemiol. 2008;37(Suppl 1):i23–30.
    1. Saude EJ, Sykes, D B. Urine stability for metabolomics studies: effects of preparation and storage. Metabolomics. 2007;3:19–27.
    1. Meijer-Severs GJ, van Santen E. Short-chain fatty acids and succinate in feces of healthy human volunteers and their correlation with anaerobe cultural counts. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1987;22:672–676.
    1. Saric J, Wang Y, Li J, Coen M, Utzinger J, et al. Species variation in the fecal metabolome gives insight into differential gastrointestinal function. J Proteome Res. 2008;7:352–360.
    1. Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Costello EK, Berg-Lyons D, Gonzalez A, et al. Moving pictures of the human microbiome. Genome Biol. 2011;12:R50.
    1. Keun HC, Ebbels TM, Antti H, Bollard ME, Beckonert O, et al. Analytical reproducibility in (1)H NMR-based metabonomic urinalysis. Chem Res Toxicol. 2002;15:1380–1386.
    1. Bertram HC, Malmendal A, Petersen BO, Madsen JC, Pedersen H, et al. Effect of magnetic field strength on NMR-based metabonomic human urine data. Comparative study of 250, 400, 500, and 800 MHz. Anal Chem. 2007;79:7110–7115.
    1. Nelson DB, Bellamy S, Gray TS, Nachamkin I. Self-collected versus provider-collected vaginal swabs for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis: an assessment of validity and reliability. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:862–866.
    1. Forney LJ, Gajer P, Williams CJ, Schneider GM, Koenig SS, et al. Comparison of self-collected and physician-collected vaginal swabs for microbiome analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:1741–1748.
    1. Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. JClinMicrobiol. 1991;29:297–301.
    1. Gupta K, Stapleton AE, Hooton TM, Roberts PL, Fennell CL, et al. Inverse association of H2O2-producing lactobacilli and vaginal Escherichia coli colonization in women with recurrent urinary tract infections. J Infect Dis. 1998;178:446–450.
    1. Ravel J, Gajer P, Abdo Z, Schneider GM, Koenig SS, et al. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;108(Suppl 1):4680–4687.
    1. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods. 2010;7:335–336.
    1. Edgar RC. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:2460–2461.
    1. Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC, Quince C, Knight R. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:2194–2200.
    1. Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:5261–5267.
    1. Rao S, Rodriguez A, Benson G. Evaluating distance functions for clustering tandem repeats. Genome Inform. 2005;16:3–12.
    1. Lilliefors HW. On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Normality with Mean and Variance Unknown. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1967;62:399–402.
    1. Schloss PD, Gevers D, Westcott SL. Reducing the effects of PCR amplification and sequencing artifacts on 16S rRNA-based studies. PloS one. 2011;6:e27310.
    1. Wichman BA, Hill ID. Algorithm AS 183: An Efficient and Portable Pseudo-Random Number Generator. Applied Statistics. 1982;31:188–190.
    1. Wichman BA, Hill ID. BYTE; 1987. Building a Random-Number Generator. pp. 127–128.
    1. Caporaso JG, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, DeSantis TZ, Andersen GL, et al. PyNAST: a flexible tool for aligning sequences to a template alignment. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:266–267.
    1. McDonald D, Price MN, Goodrich J, Nawrocki EP, DeSantis TZ, et al. An improved Greengenes taxonomy with explicit ranks for ecological and evolutionary analyses of bacteria and archaea. The ISME journal. 2012;6:610–618.
    1. Stamatakis A. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2006;22:2688–2690.
    1. Lozupone C, Knight R. UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:8228–8235.
    1. Claus RA, Otto GP, Deigner HP, Bauer M. Approaching clinical reality: markers for monitoring systemic inflammation and sepsis. Curr Mol Med. 2010;10:227–235.
    1. Bax A, Davis DG. MLEV-17-based two-dimensional homonuclear magnetization transfer spectroscopy. J Magn Reson. 1985;65:355–360.
    1. Delaglio F, Grzesiek S, Vuister GW, Zhu G, Pfeifer J, et al. NMRPipe: a multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes. J Biomol NMR. 1995;6:277–293.
    1. Wilcoxon F. Individual comparisons of grouped data by ranking methods. J Econ Entomol. 1946;39:269.
    1. Ravel J, Gajer P, Abdo Z, Schneider GM, Koenig SS, et al. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(Suppl 1):4680–4687.
    1. Hyman RW, Fukushima M, Diamond L, Kumm J, Giudice LC, et al. Microbes on the human vaginal epithelium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:7952–7957.
    1. Boskey ER, Telsch KM, Whaley KJ, Moench TR, Cone RA. Acid production by vaginal flora in vitro is consistent with the rate and extent of vaginal acidification. Infect Immun. 1999;67:5170–5175.
    1. Boskey ER, Cone RA, Whaley KJ, Moench TR. Origins of vaginal acidity: high D/L lactate ratio is consistent with bacteria being the primary source. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:1809–1813.
    1. Lai SK, Hida K, Shukair S, Wang YY, Figueiredo A, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 is trapped by acidic but not by neutralized human cervicovaginal mucus. J Virol. 2009;83:11196–11200.
    1. O'Hanlon DE, Moench TR, Cone RA. In vaginal fluid, bacteria associated with bacterial vaginosis can be suppressed with lactic acid but not hydrogen peroxide. BMC Infect Dis. 2011;11:200.
    1. Chaudry AN, Travers PJ, Yuenger J, Colletta L, Evans P, et al. Analysis of vaginal acetic acid in patients undergoing treatment for bacterial vaginosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:5170–5175.
    1. Al-Mushrif S, Eley A, Jones BM. Inhibition of chemotaxis by organic acids from anaerobes may prevent a purulent response in bacterial vaginosis. J Med Microbiol. 2000;49:1023–1030.
    1. Mirmonsef P, Zariffard MR, Gilbert D, Makinde H, Landay AL, et al. Am J Reprod Immunol; 2011. Short-Chain Fatty Acids Induce Pro-Inflammatory Cytokine Production Alone and in Combination with Toll-Like Receptor Ligands.
    1. Mirmonsef P, Gilbert D, Zariffard MR, Hamaker BR, Kaur A, et al. The effects of commensal bacteria on innate immune responses in the female genital tract. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2011;65:190–195.
    1. Brotman RM, Klebanoff MA, Nansel TR, Yu KF, Andrews WW, et al. Bacterial vaginosis assessed by gram stain and diminished colonization resistance to incident gonococcal, chlamydial, and trichomonal genital infection. J Infect Dis. 2010;202:1907–1915.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren