Metformin treatment before and during IVF or ICSI in women with polycystic ovary syndrome

Leopoldo O Tso, Michael F Costello, Luiz Eduardo T Albuquerque, Regis B Andriolo, Cristiane R Macedo, Leopoldo O Tso, Michael F Costello, Luiz Eduardo T Albuquerque, Regis B Andriolo, Cristiane R Macedo

Abstract

Background: The use of insulin-sensitising agents, such as metformin, in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) who are undergoing ovulation induction or in vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycles has been widely studied. Metformin reduces hyperinsulinaemia and suppresses the excessive ovarian production of androgens. It is suggested that as a consequence metformin could improve assisted reproductive techniques (ART) outcomes, such as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), pregnancy, and live birth rates.

Objectives: To determine the effectiveness and safety of metformin as a co-treatment during IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in achieving pregnancy or live birth in women with PCOS.

Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL via the Cochrane Register of Studies Online (CRSO), MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, LILACS, the trial registries for ongoing trials, and reference lists of articles (from inception to 13 February 2020).

Selection criteria: Types of studies: randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing metformin treatment with placebo or no treatment in women with PCOS who underwent IVF or ICSI treatment.

Types of participants: women of reproductive age with anovulation due to PCOS with or without co-existing infertility factors. Types of interventions: metformin administered before and during IVF or ICSI treatment.

Primary outcome measures: live birth rate, incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently selected the studies, extracted the data according to the protocol, and assessed study quality. We assessed the overall quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach.

Main results: This updated review includes 13 RCTs involving a total of 1132 women with PCOS undergoing IVF/ICSI treatments. We stratified the analysis by type of ovarian stimulation protocol used (long gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-agonist) or short gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-antagonist)) to determine whether the type of stimulation used influenced the outcomes. We did not perform meta-analysis on the overall (both ovarian stimulation protocols combined) data for the outcomes of live birth and clinical pregnancy rates per woman because of substantial heterogeneity. In the long protocol GnRH-agonist subgroup, the pooled evidence showed that we are uncertain of the effect of metformin on live birth rate per woman when compared with placebo/no treatment (risk ratio (RR) 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94 to 1.79; 6 RCTs; 651 women; I2 = 47%; low-quality evidence). This suggests that if the chance for live birth following placebo/no treatment is 28%, the chance following metformin would be between 27% and 51%. Only one study used short protocol GnRH-antagonist and reported live birth rate. Metformin may reduce live birth rate compared with placebo/no treatment (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.79; 1 RCT; 153 women; low-quality evidence). This suggests that if the chance for live birth following placebo/no treatment is 43%, the chance following metformin would be between 13% and 34% (short GnRH-antagonist protocol). We found that metformin may reduce the incidence of OHSS (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.72; 11 RCTs; 1091 women; I2 = 38%; low-quality evidence). This suggests that for a woman with a 20% risk of OHSS without metformin, the corresponding risk using metformin would be between 6% and 14%. Using long protocol GnRH-agonist stimulation, metformin may increase clinical pregnancy rate per woman compared with placebo/no treatment (RR 1.32, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.63; 10 RCTs; 915 women; I2 = 13%; low-quality evidence). Using short protocol GnRH-antagonist, we are uncertain of the effect of metformin on clinical pregnancy rate per woman compared with placebo/no treatment (RR 1.38, 95% CI 0.21 to 9.14; 2 RCTs; 177 women; I2 = 87%; very low-quality evidence). We are uncertain of the effect of metformin on miscarriage rate per woman when compared with placebo/no treatment (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.32; 8 RCTs; 821 women; I2 = 0%; low-quality evidence). Metformin may result in an increase in side effects compared with placebo/no treatment (RR 3.35, 95% CI 2.34 to 4.79; 8 RCTs; 748 women; I2 = 0%; low-quality evidence). The overall quality of evidence ranged from very low to low. The main limitations were inconsistency, risk of bias, and imprecision.

Authors' conclusions: This updated review on metformin versus placebo/no treatment before or during IVF/ICSI treatment in women with PCOS found no conclusive evidence that metformin improves live birth rates. In a long GnRH-agonist protocol, we are uncertain whether metformin improves live birth rates, but metformin may increase the clinical pregnancy rate. In a short GnRH-antagonist protocol, metformin may reduce live birth rates, although we are uncertain about the effect of metformin on clinical pregnancy rate. Metformin may reduce the incidence of OHSS but may result in a higher incidence of side effects. We are uncertain of the effect of metformin on miscarriage rate per woman.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03086005 NCT00159575 NCT01233206.

Conflict of interest statement

Leopoldo de Oliveira Tso: none known.

Dr Michael Costello has declared shares in Virtus Health and past sponsorship from Merck Serono for scientific conference presentations. These relationships are declared in the interests of transparency and do not constitute a conflict of interest in this review.

Luiz Eduardo T Albuquerque: none known.

Regis B Andriolo: none known.

Cristiane R Macedo: none known.

Copyright © 2020 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Figures

1
1
Study flow diagram.
2
2
Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
3
3
Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
4
4
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, outcome: 1.1 Live birth rate per woman.
5
5
Sensitivity analysis by excluding Palomba 2011 due to a data discrepancy (suspected risk of bias).
6
6
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, outcome: 1.2 Incidence of OHSS per woman.
7
7
Sensitivity analysis including only studies with low risk of bias (An 2014; Jacob 2016; Kjotrod 2004; Kjotrod 2011; Palomba 2011; Tang 2006).
8
8
Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, outcome: 1.2 Incidence of OHSS per woman.
9
9
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, outcome: 1.3 Clinical pregnancy rate per woman.
10
10
Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, outcome: 1.3 Clinical pregnancy rate per woman.
1.1. Analysis
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1: Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 1: Live birth rate per woman
1.2. Analysis
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1: Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 2: Incidence of OHSS per woman
1.3. Analysis
1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1: Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 3: Clinical pregnancy rate per woman
1.4. Analysis
1.4. Analysis
Comparison 1: Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 4: Miscarriage rate per woman
1.5. Analysis
1.5. Analysis
Comparison 1: Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 5: Miscarriage rate per pregnant woman
1.6. Analysis
1.6. Analysis
Comparison 1: Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 6: Side effects per woman
1.7. Analysis
1.7. Analysis
Comparison 1: Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 7: Number of oocytes retrieved per woman
1.8. Analysis
1.8. Analysis
Comparison 1: Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 8: Mean total dose of FSH (IU) per woman
1.9. Analysis
1.9. Analysis
Comparison 1: Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 9: Mean days of gonadotrophin per woman
1.10. Analysis
1.10. Analysis
Comparison 1: Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 10: Cycle cancellation rate (after ovulation induction)
1.11. Analysis
1.11. Analysis
Comparison 1: Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 11: Serum oestradiol level (nmol/L) per woman
1.14. Analysis
1.14. Analysis
Comparison 1: Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 14: Fertilisation rate
1.15. Analysis
1.15. Analysis
Comparison 1: Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 15: Sensitivity analysis live birth by excluding Palomba 2011 due to a data discrepancy (suspected risk of bias)

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren