Nephrology care prior to end-stage renal disease and outcomes among new ESRD patients in the USA

Brenda W Gillespie, Hal Morgenstern, Elizabeth Hedgeman, Anca Tilea, Natalie Scholz, Tempie Shearon, Nilka Rios Burrows, Vahakn B Shahinian, Jerry Yee, Laura Plantinga, Neil R Powe, William McClellan, Bruce Robinson, Desmond E Williams, Rajiv Saran, Brenda W Gillespie, Hal Morgenstern, Elizabeth Hedgeman, Anca Tilea, Natalie Scholz, Tempie Shearon, Nilka Rios Burrows, Vahakn B Shahinian, Jerry Yee, Laura Plantinga, Neil R Powe, William McClellan, Bruce Robinson, Desmond E Williams, Rajiv Saran

Abstract

Background: Longer nephrology care before end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has been linked with better outcomes.

Methods: We investigated whether longer pre-end-stage renal disease (ESRD) nephrology care was associated with lower mortality at both the patient and state levels among 443 761 incident ESRD patients identified in the USA between 2006 and 2010.

Results: Overall, 33% of new ESRD patients had received no prior nephrology care, while 28% had received care for >12 months. At the patient level, predictors of >12 months of nephrology care included having health insurance, white race, younger age, diabetes, hypertension and US region. Longer pre-ESRD nephrology care was associated with lower first-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.58 for >12 months versus no care; 95% confidence interval 0.57-0.59), higher albumin and hemoglobin, choice of peritoneal dialysis and native fistula and discussion of transplantation options. Living in a state with a 10% higher proportion of patients receiving >12 months of pre-ESRD care was associated with a 9.3% lower relative mortality rate, standardized for case mix (R (2) = 0.47; P < 0.001).

Conclusions: This study represents the largest cohort of incident ESRD patients to date. Although we did not follow patients before ESRD onset, our findings, both at the individual patient and state levels, reflect the importance of early nephrology care among those with chronic kidney disease.

Keywords: dialysis; glomerular filtration rate; kidney transplantation; nephrology referral; vascular access.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Adjusted hazard ratios (and 95% confidence intervals) for mortality during the first year of dialysis, by duration of pre-ESRD nephrology care (12 months versus no care). Models were adjusted for age, gender, race, ethnicity, insurance, body mass index, diabetes as a cause of ESRD, comorbidities, year of incidence and nursing home residence. ESRD, end stage renal disease; Ref, reference category.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
First-year state-specific standardized mortality ratio (SMR) by adjusted state-specific probability of >12 months of pre-ESRD nephrology care among US dialysis patients, 2007–10. The fitted regression line (Yˆ=1.22−0.93X; R2 = 0.47, P < 0.001) is given with pointwise 95% confidence intervals. Each state SMR is based on an adjusted comparison of first-year mortality in the dialysis populations of that state versus the USA, standardized to the US mean covariate values. Both the SMR and proportion with >12 months of pre-ESRD nephrology care were adjusted for the same covariates: patient's age, sex, race, ethnicity, body mass index, comorbidities at incidence, diabetes as the listed cause of ESRD, duration of ESRD, nursing home status and population death rates (SMR only). ESRD, end stage renal disease.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Adjusted1 OR (95% CI) for >12 months of pre-ESRD nephrology care versus no care by category of selected covariates. ASHD, atherosclerotic heart disease; BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; CMS, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; CVA, cerebrovascular atherosclerosis; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ESRD, end-stage renal disease; OR, odds ratio. 1Adjusted for age, sex, race, ethnicity, BMI, diabetes as a cause of ESRD, comorbidities (hypertension, cardiac failure, ASHD, CVA, COPD, cancer), insurance status, nursing home residence, year of incidence and CMS region. Regions are as follows—I: CT, MA, ME, NH, RI and VT; II: NJ, NY, VI and PR; III: DE, MD, PA, VA, WV and DC; IV: AL, FL, GA, KY, MS, NC, SC and TN; V: IL, IN, MI, MN, OH and WI; VI: AR, LA, NM, OK and TX; VII: IA, KS, MO and NE; VIII: CO, MT, ND, SD, UT and WY; IX: AZ, CA, HI, NV, AS, GU and MP; X: AK, ID, OR and WA. For state abbreviations, see http://www.stateabbreviations.us.

References

    1. U.S. Renal Data System. USRDS 2012 Annual Data Report: Atlas of Chronic Kidney Disease and End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD: USRDS, 2012
    1. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD Work Group. KDIGO 2012 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int Suppl 2012; 2: 1–138
    1. Thanamayooran S, Rose C, Hirsch DJ. Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary kidney disease clinic in achieving treatment guideline targets. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2005; 20: 2385–2393
    1. Astor BC, Eustace JA, Powe NR, et al. Timing of nephrologist referral and arteriovenous access use: the choice study. Am J Kidney Dis 2001; 38: 494–501
    1. Winkelmayer WC, Glynn RJ, Levin R, et al. Late referral and modality choice in end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int 2001; 60: 1547–1554
    1. Avorn J, Winkelmayer WC, Bohn RL, et al. Delayed nephrologist referral and inadequate vascular access in patients with advanced chronic kidney failure. J Clin Epidemiol 2002; 55: 711–716
    1. Winkelmayer WC, Glynn RJ, Levin R, et al. Late nephrologist referral and access to renal transplantation. Transplantation 2002; 73: 1918–1923
    1. Kinchen KS, Sadler J, Fink N, et al. The timing of specialist evaluation in chronic kidney disease and mortality. Ann Intern Med 2002; 137: 479–486
    1. Avorn J, Bohn RL, Levy E, et al. Nephrologist care and mortality in patients with chronic renal insufficiency. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162: 2002–2006
    1. Stack AG. Impact of timing of nephrology referral and pre-ESRD care on mortality risk among new ESRD patients in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis 2003; 41: 310–318
    1. Khan SS, Xue JL, Kazmi WH, et al. Does predialysis nephrology care influence patient survival after initiation of dialysis? Kidney Int 2005; 67: 1038–1046
    1. Chan MR, Dall AT, Fletcher KE, et al. Outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease referred late to nephrologists: a meta-analysis. Am J Med 2007; 120: 1063–1070
    1. Hasegawa T, Bragg-Gresham JL, Yamazaki S, et al. Greater first-year survival on hemodialysis in facilities in which patients are provided earlier and more frequent pre-nephrology visits. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 4: 595–602
    1. Vascular Access Work Group. Clinical practice guidelines for vascular access. Am J Kidney Dis 2006; 48(Suppl 1): S248–S273
    1. McClellan WM, Wasse H, McClellan AC, et al. Treatment center and geographic variability in pre-ESRD care associate with increased mortality. J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 20: 1078–1085
    1. Dialysis Facility Reports. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Kidney Epidemiology and Cost Center, 2014. (15 February 2010, date last accessed)
    1. Robinson BM, Zhang J, Morgenstern H, et al. Worldwide, mortality risk is high soon after initiation of hemodialysis. Kidney Int 2013; 85: 158–165
    1. Technical Notes on the Standardized Mortality Ratio (SMR) for the Dialysis Facility Reports. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Kidney Epidemiology and Cost Center, 2014. (19 January 2015, date last accessed)
    1. Jones C, Roderick P, Harris S, et al. Decline in kidney function before and after nephrology referral and the effect on survival in moderate to advanced chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006; 21: 2133–2143
    1. Dogan E, Erkoc R, Sayarlioglu H, et al. Effects of late referral to a nephrologist in patients with chronic renal failure. Nephrology 2005; 10: 516–519
    1. Gorriz J, Sancho A, Pallardo L, et al. [Prognostic significance of programmed dialysis in patients who initiate renal substitutive treatment. Multicenter study in Spain]. Nefrologia 2001; 22: 49–59
    1. Mendelssohn DC, Malmberg C, Hamandi B. An integrated review of ‘unplanned’ dialysis initiation: reframing the terminology to ‘suboptimal’ initiation. BMC Nephrol 2009; 10: 22.
    1. Khan S, Amedia CA. Economic burden of chronic kidney disease. J Eval Clin Pract 2008; 14: 422–434
    1. Morgenstern H. Ecologic studies. In: Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL. (eds). Modern Epidemiology. 3rd edn Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2008, pp. 511–531
    1. Bradbury BD, Fissell RB, Albert JM, et al. Predictors of early mortality among incident US hemodialysis patients in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns study (DOPPS). Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2007; 2: 89–99
    1. Crews DC, Charles RF, Evans MK, et al. Poverty, race, and CKD in a racially and socioeconomically diverse urban population. Am J Kidney Dis 2010; 55: 992–1000
    1. Whaley-Connell A, Sowers JR, McCullough PA, et al. Diabetes mellitus and CKD awareness: the Kidney Early Evaluation Program (KEEP) and National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Am J Kidney Dis 2009; 53: S11–S21
    1. Ferris M, Shoham DA, Pierre-Louis M, et al. High prevalence of unlabeled chronic kidney disease among inpatients at a tertiary-care hospital. Am J Med Sci 2009; 337: 93–97
    1. Flessner MF, Wyatt SB, Akylbekova EL, et al. Prevalence and awareness of CKD among African Americans: the Jackson Heart Study. Am J Kidney Dis 2009; 53: 238–247
    1. Plantinga LC, Boulware LE, Coresh J, et al. Patient awareness of chronic kidney disease: trends and predictors. Arch Intern Med 2008; 168: 2268–2275
    1. Narva AS, Briggs M. The National Kidney Disease Education Program: improving understanding, detection, and management of CKD. Am J Kidney Dis 2009; 53: S115–S120
    1. Kohan DE, Rosenberg ME. The chronic kidney disease epidemic: a challenge for nephrology training programs. In: Levin A and Himmelfarb J (eds). Seminars in Nephrology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, Abstract 29, 2009, pp. 539–547.
    1. Pogue VA, Norris KC, Dillard MG. Kidney disease physician workforce: where is the emerging pipeline? J Natl Med Assoc 2002; 94: 39S.
    1. Levin A. Consequences of late referral on patient outcomes. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2000; 15: 8–13
    1. Patel TG, Pogach LM, Barth RH. CKD screening and management in the Veterans Health Administration: the impact of system organization and an innovative electronic record. Am J Kidney Dis 2009; 53: S78–S85
    1. den Hartog JR, Reese PP, Cizman B, et al. The costs and benefits of automatic estimated glomerular filtration rate reporting. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 4: 419–427
    1. Feldman HI, Appel LJ, Chertow GM, et al. The Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) study: design and methods. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14: S148–S153
    1. Kim JP, Desai M, Chertow GM, et al. Validation of reported predialysis nephrology care of older patients initiating dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2012; 23: 1078–1085
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2020 Topics & Objectives. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, 2010. (19 January 2015, date last accessed)
    1. Narva AS, Briggs M, Jordan R, et al. Toward a more collaborative federal response to chronic kidney disease. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2010; 17: 282–288

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren