Multi-material three dimensional printed models for simulation of bronchoscopy

Brian Han Khai Ho, Cecilia Jiayu Chen, Gerald Jit Shen Tan, Wai Yee Yeong, Heang Kuan Joel Tan, Albert Yick Hou Lim, Michael Alan Ferenczi, Sreenivasulu Reddy Mogali, Brian Han Khai Ho, Cecilia Jiayu Chen, Gerald Jit Shen Tan, Wai Yee Yeong, Heang Kuan Joel Tan, Albert Yick Hou Lim, Michael Alan Ferenczi, Sreenivasulu Reddy Mogali

Abstract

Background: Bronchoscopy involves exploration of a three-dimensional (3D) bronchial tree environment using just two-dimensional (2D) images, visual cues and haptic feedback. Sound knowledge and understanding of tracheobronchial anatomy as well as ample training experience is mandatory for technical mastery. Although simulated modalities facilitate safe training for inexperienced operators, current commercial training models are expensive or deficient in anatomical accuracy, clinical fidelity and patient representation. The advent of Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology may resolve the current limitations with commercial simulators. The purpose of this report is to develop and test the novel multi-material three-dimensional (3D) printed airway models for bronchoscopy simulation.

Methods: Using material jetting 3D printing and polymer amalgamation, human airway models were created from anonymized human thoracic computed tomography images from three patients: one normal, a second with a tumour obstructing the right main bronchus and third with a goitre causing external tracheal compression. We validated their efficacy as airway trainers by expert bronchoscopists. Recruited study participants performed bronchoscopy on the 3D printed airway models and then completed a standardized evaluation questionnaire.

Results: The models are flexible, life size, anatomically accurate and patient specific. Five expert respiratory physicians participated in validation of the airway models. All the participants agreed that the models were suitable for training bronchoscopic anatomy and access. Participants suggested further refinement of colour and texture of the internal surface of the airways. Most respondents felt that the models are suitable simulators for tracheal pathology, have a learning value and recommend it to others for use in training.

Conclusion: Using material jetting 3D printing to create patient-specific anatomical models is a promising modality of simulation training. Our results support further evaluation of the printed airway model as a bronchoscopic trainer, and suggest that pathological airways may be simulated using this technique.

Keywords: 3D printing; airway pathology; bronchial tree; bronchoscopy; multi-material; simulation.

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare no conflict of interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
3D virtual model after reconstruction of the normal airways
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Standard airway trainer, comprising detachable lower airway model attached to upper airway structures. Surrounding this are a series of 3D printed models derived from CT scans as described in the Methods section
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Three 3D printed models are shown: a Normal tracheobronchial anatomy to the extent of the third order of bronchi (segmental bronchi), b pathologic specimen, with occluding tumour (arrow), and c pathologic specimen, with displacement of the trachea by a retrosternal goitre
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Bronchoscopic validation questionnaire responses in segmented bar chart
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Upper row: bronchoscopic view of carina showing left mainstem bronchus orifice (LMB) and right mainstem bronchus orifice (RMB), as seen from a standard airway trainer, b 3D printed normal of normal anatomy and c 3D printed model of right mainstem bronchus tumour (*). Middle row: bronchoscopic view of right mainstem bronchus, as seen from d standard airway trainer and e 3D printed model of normal anatomy, showing right middle lobe orifice (RML), right lower lobe orifice (RLL) and superior basal segment orifice (B6). The tumour model is not shown because the model was truncated after the first order of bronchi. Lower row: Bronchoscopic view of left inferior lobar bronchus, as seen from f standard airway trainer and g 3D printed normal of normal anatomy showing superior basal segment orifice (B6), medial basal segment orifice (B7), anterior basal segment orifice (B8), lateral basal segment orifice (B9) and posterior basal segment orifice (B10)

References

    1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(2):69–90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107.
    1. Walters S, Maringe C, Coleman MP, et al. Lung cancer survival and stage at diagnosis in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the UK: a population-based study, 2004–2007. Thorax. 2013;68(6):551. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-202297.
    1. Weinberger SMS. Diagnostic evaluation and management of the solitary pulmonary nodule. Waltham: Ted. W. Post; 2017.
    1. Becker HD. Bronchoscopy: the past, the present, and the future. Clin Chest Med. 2010;31(1):1–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2009.11.001.
    1. Snell Andrew, Mackay Jonathan. Bronchoscopic anatomy. Anaesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine. 2008;9(12):542–544. doi: 10.1016/j.mpaic.2008.09.022.
    1. Ernst A, Wahidi MM, Read CA, et al. Adult Bronchoscopy Training: Current State and Suggestions for the Future: CHEST Expert Panel Report. Chest. 2015;148(2):321–332. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-0678.
    1. Fielding DI, Maldonado F, Murgu S. Achieving competency in bronchoscopy: challenges and opportunities. Respirology (Carlton, Vic) 2014;19(4):472–482. doi: 10.1111/resp.12279.
    1. Kennedy CC, Maldonado F, Cook DA. Simulation-based bronchoscopy training: systematic review and meta-analysis. Chest. 2013;144(1):183–192. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-1786.
    1. McSparron JI, Michaud GC, Gordan PL, et al. Simulation for Skills-based Education in Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015;12(4):579–586. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201410-461AR.
    1. Han B, Liu Y, Zhang X, et al. Three-dimensional printing as an aid to airway evaluation after tracheotomy in a patient with laryngeal carcinoma. BMC Anesthesiol. 2016;16(6). 10.1186/s12871-015-0170-1.
    1. Tam MD, Laycock SD, Jayne D, et al. 3-D printouts of the tracheobronchial tree generated from CT images as an aid to management in a case of tracheobronchial chondromalacia caused by relapsing polychondritis. J Radiol Case Rep. 2013;7(8):34–43. doi: 10.3941/jrcr.v7i8.1390.
    1. Wilson CA, Arthurs OJ, Black AE, et al. Printed three-dimensional airway model assists planning of single-lung ventilation in a small child. Br J Anaesth. 2015;115(4):616–620. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev305.
    1. Pedersen TH, Gysin J, Wegmann A, et al. A randomised, controlled trial evaluating a low cost, 3D-printed bronchoscopy simulator. Anaesthesia. 2017;72(8):1005–1009. doi: 10.1111/anae.13951.
    1. Cheng George, McSparron Jakob, Ochoa Sebastian, Folch Erik, Brik Robert, Majid Adnan. A Comparison of 3D-Printed Airway Model Versus Standard Model for Bronchoscopy Training. Chest. 2015;148(4):458A. doi: 10.1378/chest.2270076.
    1. Byrne T, Yong SA, Steinfort DP. Development and Assessment of a Low-Cost 3D-printed Airway Model for Bronchoscopy Simulation Training. J Bronchol Interven Pulm. 2016;23(3):251–254. doi: 10.1097/lbr.0000000000000257.
    1. Al-Ramahi J, Luo H, Fang R, et al. Development of an Innovative 3D Printed Rigid Bronchoscopy Training Model. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2016;125(12):965–969. doi: 10.1177/0003489416667742.
    1. Osswald Martin, Wegmann Annigna, Greif Robert, Theiler Lorenz, Pedersen Tina H. Facilitation of bronchoscopy teaching with easily accessible low-cost 3D-printing. Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care. 2017;15:37–41. doi: 10.1016/j.tacc.2017.07.001.
    1. Hornung A, Kumpf M, Baden W, et al. Realistic 3D-Printed Tracheobronchial Tree Model from a 1-Year-Old Girl for Pediatric Bronchoscopy Training. Respiration Int Rev Thoracic Dis. 2017;93(4):293–295. doi: 10.1159/000459631.
    1. Di Domenico S, Simonassi C, Chessa L. Inexpensive anatomical trainer for bronchoscopy. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2007;6(4):567–569. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2007.153601.
    1. Suter MJ, Reinhardt JM, McLennan G. Integrated Ct/Bronchoscopy in the central airways: preliminary results. Acad Radiol. 2008;15(6):786–798. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.03.001.
    1. Volonghi P, Baronio G, Signoroni A. 3D scanning and geometry processing techniques for customised hand orthotics: an experimental assessment. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2018;13(2):105–116. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2018.1426328.
    1. Santos S, Soares B, Leite M, et al. Design and development of a customised knee positioning orthosis using low cost 3D printers. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2017;12(4):322–332. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2017.1350552.
    1. Javan R, Herrin D, Tangestanipoor A. Understanding spatially complex segmental and branch anatomy using 3D printing: liver, lung, prostate, coronary arteries, and circle of willis. Acad Radiol. 2016;23(9):1183–1189. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.04.010.
    1. Mogali Sreenivasulu Reddy, Yeong Wai Yee, Tan Heang Kuan Joel, Tan Gerald Jit Shen, Abrahams Peter H., Zary Nabil, Low-Beer Naomi, Ferenczi Michael Alan. Evaluation by medical students of the educational value of multi-material and multi-colored three-dimensional printed models of the upper limb for anatomical education. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2017;11(1):54–64. doi: 10.1002/ase.1703.
    1. Chen S, Pan Z, Wu Y, et al. The role of three-dimensional printed models of skull in anatomy education: a randomized controlled trail. Sci Rep. 2017;7:575. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00647-1.
    1. Jones Trahern W., Seckeler Michael D. Use of 3D models of vascular rings and slings to improve resident education. Congenital Heart Disease. 2017;12(5):578–582. doi: 10.1111/chd.12486.
    1. Loke YH, Harahsheh AS, Krieger A, et al. Usage of 3D models of tetralogy of Fallot for medical education: impact on learning congenital heart disease. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0889-0.
    1. Rose AS, Kimbell JS, Webster CE, et al. Multi-material 3D Models for Temporal Bone Surgical Simulation. Rhinol Laryngol. 2015;124(7):528–536. doi: 10.1177/0003489415570937.
    1. Waran V, Narayanan V, Karuppiah R, et al. Utility of multimaterial 3D printers in creating models with pathological entities to enhance the training experience of neurosurgeons. J Neurosurg. 2013;120(2):489–492. doi: 10.3171/2013.11.JNS131066.
    1. Mogali SR, Yeong WY, Tan HKJ, et al. Evaluation by medical students of the educational value of multi-material and multi-colored three-dimensional printed models of the upper limb for anatomical education. Anat Sci Educ. 2018;11(1):54–64. doi: 10.1002/ase.1703.
    1. Yang H, Lim JC, Liu Y, et al. Performance evaluation of ProJet multi-material jetting 3D printer. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2017;12(1):95–103. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2016.1242915.
    1. Yap YL, Wang C, Sing SL, et al. Material jetting additive manufacturing: An experimental study using designed metrological benchmarks. Precis Eng. 2017;50:275–285. doi: 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2017.05.015.
    1. Kavanagh KR, Cote V, Tsui Y, et al. Pediatric laryngeal simulator using 3D printed models: A novel technique. Laryngoscope. 2017;127(4):E132–EE37. doi: 10.1002/lary.26326.
    1. Bustamante S, Bose S, Bishop P, et al. Novel application of rapid prototyping for simulation of bronchoscopic anatomy. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2014;28(4):1122–1125. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2013.08.015.
    1. Bartel Thomas, Rivard Andrew, Jimenez Alejandro, Mestres Carlos A, Müller Silvana. Medical three-dimensional printing opens up new opportunities in cardiology and cardiac surgery. European Heart Journal. 2017;39(15):1246–1254. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx016.
    1. Marro A, Bandukwala T, Mak W. Three-Dimensional Printing and Medical Imaging: A Review of the Methods and Applications. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2016;45(1):2–9. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2015.07.009.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren