A diverse group of previously unrecognized human rhinoviruses are common causes of respiratory illnesses in infants

Wai-Ming Lee, Christin Kiesner, Tressa Pappas, Iris Lee, Kris Grindle, Tuomas Jartti, Bogdan Jakiela, Robert F Lemanske Jr, Peter A Shult, James E Gern, Wai-Ming Lee, Christin Kiesner, Tressa Pappas, Iris Lee, Kris Grindle, Tuomas Jartti, Bogdan Jakiela, Robert F Lemanske Jr, Peter A Shult, James E Gern

Abstract

Background: Human rhinoviruses (HRVs) are the most prevalent human pathogens, and consist of 101 serotypes that are classified into groups A and B according to sequence variations. HRV infections cause a wide spectrum of clinical outcomes ranging from asymptomatic infection to severe lower respiratory symptoms. Defining the role of specific strains in various HRV illnesses has been difficult because traditional serology, which requires viral culture and neutralization tests using 101 serotype-specific antisera, is insensitive and laborious.

Methods and findings: To directly type HRVs in nasal secretions of infants with frequent respiratory illnesses, we developed a sensitive molecular typing assay based on phylogenetic comparisons of a 260-bp variable sequence in the 5' noncoding region with homologous sequences of the 101 known serotypes. Nasal samples from 26 infants were first tested with a multiplex PCR assay for respiratory viruses, and HRV was the most common virus found (108 of 181 samples). Typing was completed for 101 samples and 103 HRVs were identified. Surprisingly, 54 (52.4%) HRVs did not match any of the known serotypes and had 12-35% nucleotide divergence from the nearest reference HRVs. Of these novel viruses, 9 strains (17 HRVs) segregated from HRVA, HRVB and human enterovirus into a distinct genetic group ("C"). None of these new strains could be cultured in traditional cell lines.

Conclusions: By molecular analysis, over 50% of HRV detected in sick infants were previously unrecognized strains, including 9 strains that may represent a new HRV group. These findings indicate that the number of HRV strains is considerably larger than the 101 serotypes identified with traditional diagnostic techniques, and provide evidence of a new HRV group.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1. Schematic representation of the first…
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the first 1100 base of a HRV genome showing the locations of the highly conserved regions (P1, P2 and P3) and variable region between P1 and P2 (P1-P2 in red) at the 5'NCR and the PCR fragments used in this study.
P1, P2 and P3 are located at bases 163–181, 443–463 and 535–551, respectively in HRV16 genome. PCR fragment A (about 900bps) was used to determine the 5'NCR sequences of all 101 HRV serotypes. It was amplified using pan-HRV PCR forward primer P1-1, which anneals to conserved region P1, and a serotype-specific reverse primer annealed to the 5' end of VP2 gene (between base# 1000 and 1100). PCR fragment B (about 390 bps) was generated with pan-HRV PCR forward primer P1-1 and reverse primer P3-1. PCR fragment C (about 300 bps) was generated with forward primer P1-1 and an equimolar mixture of reverse primers P2-1, P2-2 and P2-3. The variable sequences of P1-P2 were used for the molecular typing assay.
Figure 2. Distribution of pairwise nucleotide divergence…
Figure 2. Distribution of pairwise nucleotide divergence values between 101 HRV serotypes.
The horizontal axis shows the value of divergence (%) in pairwise comparisons and the column height indicates the frequency of observations. Divergence values were calculated as distance value×100%.
Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree depicting the relationships…
Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree depicting the relationships among all 101 HRV serotypes in the P1-P2 region of 5'NCR.
This tree was constructed using the neighbor joining method according to the distances (divergences) between all pairs of sequences in a multiple alignment. The confidence of sequence clustering was evaluated by bootstrapping (1000 replicates). Only significant bootstrap values (>500) were shown. The scale bar (top left) represents the genetic distance (nucleotide substitutions per site). The 101 HRV serotypes (R) clustered into 2 previously defined groups: HRVA and HRVB with a perfect bootstrap value (1000). HRVA group had 76 serotypes and HRVB, 25 serotypes.
Figure 4. Phylogenetic tree depicting the relationships…
Figure 4. Phylogenetic tree depicting the relationships among 101 HRV serotypes (R) and 26 new strains (W) in the P1-P2 region of 5'NCR.
This tree was generated as described in Figure 3. None of the new strains clustered with HRVB viruses. Seventeen new strains (blue) belonged to HRVA group, and 9 strains (red) cluster into a new group (“C”) that is separate from groups A and B.
Figure 5. Phylogenetic tree depicting the relationships…
Figure 5. Phylogenetic tree depicting the relationships between 9 HRVC strains (W in red) and all known HEV (n = 74) in the P1-P2 region of 5'NCR. HEV include polioviruses (PV), coxsackieviruses A (CA), coxsackieviruses B (CB), echoviruses (E) and the newer numbered EVs.
For 5 serotypes (CA16, CA24, CB4, CB5 and EV71), 2 different P1-P2 sequences were found in GenBank. This tree was generated as described in Figure 3. HRVC and HEV clustered into 2 different groups.

References

    1. Rueckert RR. Picornavirus structure and multiplication. In: Fields BN, Knipe DM, Howley PM, editors. Virology. 3rd ed. New York, N.Y.: Raven Press, Ltd; 1996. pp. 609–654.
    1. Pelon W, Mogabgab WJ, Phillips IA, Pierce WE. A cytopathogenic agent isolated from naval recruits with mild respiratory illnesses. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1957;94:262–267.
    1. Price WH. The Isolation of a New Virus Associated with Respiratory Clinical Disease in Humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1956;42:892–896.
    1. Kapikian AZ, Conant RM, Hamparian VV, Chanock RM, Dick EC, et al. A collaborative report: rhinoviruses–extension of the numbering system. Virology. 1971;43:524–526.
    1. Kapikian AZ, Conant RM, Hamparian VV, Chanock RM, Chapple PJ, et al. Rhinoviruses: a numbering system. Nature. 1967;213:761–762.
    1. Hamparian VV, Colonno RJ, Cooney MK, Dick EC, Gwaltney JM, Jr, et al. A collaborative report: rhinoviruses–extension of the numbering system from 89 to 100. Virology. 1987;159:191–192.
    1. Monto AS, Bryan ER, Ohmit S. Rhinovirus infections in Tecumseh, Michigan: frequency of illness and number of serotypes. J Infect Dis. 1987;156:43–49.
    1. Couch RB. Rhinoviruses. In: Knipe DM, Howley PM, editors. Fields Virology. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2001. pp. 777–797.
    1. Heikkinen T, Jarvinen A. The common cold. Lancet. 2003;361:51–59.
    1. Pitkaranta A, Hayden FG. Rhinoviruses: important respiratory pathogens. Ann Med. 1998;30:529–537.
    1. Monto AS. Epidemiology of viral respiratory infections. Am J Med. 2002;112(Suppl 6A):4S–12S.
    1. Gwaltney JM, Jr, Heinz BA. Rhinovirus. In: Richman DD, Whitley RJ, Hayden FG, editors. Clinical virology. 2nd ed. Washington, D.C.: ASM Press; 2002. pp. 995–1018.
    1. Graat JM, Schouten EG, Heijnen ML, Kok FJ, Pallast EG, et al. A prospective, community-based study on virologic assessment among elderly people with and without symptoms of acute respiratory infection. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:1218–1223.
    1. Johnston NW, Johnston SL, Duncan JM, Greene JM, Kebadze T, et al. The September epidemic of asthma exacerbations in children: a search for etiology. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005;115:132–138.
    1. Johnston SL, Sanderson G, Pattemore PK, Smith S, Bardin PG, et al. Use of polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of picornavirus infection in subjects with and without respiratory symptoms. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31:111–117.
    1. van Benten I, Koopman L, Niesters B, Hop W, van Middelkoop B, et al. Predominance of rhinovirus in the nose of symptomatic and asymptomatic infants. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2003;14:363–370.
    1. Winther B, Hayden FG, Hendley JO. Picornavirus infections in children diagnosed by RT-PCR during longitudinal surveillance with weekly sampling: Association with symptomatic illness and effect of season. J Med Virol. 2006;78:644–650.
    1. Monto AS, Fendrick AM, Sarnes MW. Respiratory illness caused by picornavirus infection: a review of clinical outcomes. Clin Ther. 2001;23:1615–1627.
    1. Rotbart HA, Hayden FG. Picornavirus infections: a primer for the practitioner. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:913–920.
    1. Turner RB. Rhinovirus: more than just a common cold virus. J Infect Dis. 2007;195:765–766.
    1. Gern JE. Rhinovirus respiratory infections and asthma. Am J Med. 2002;112(Suppl 6A):19S–27S.
    1. Hershenson MB, Johnston SL. Rhinovirus infections: more than a common cold. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;174:1284–1285.
    1. Louie JK, Yagi S, Nelson FA, Kiang D, Glaser CA, et al. Rhinovirus outbreak in a long term care facility for elderly persons associated with unusually high mortality. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41:262–265.
    1. Oberste MS, Nix WA, Maher K, Pallansch MA. Improved molecular identification of enteroviruses by RT-PCR and amplicon sequencing. J Clin Virol. 2003;26:375–377.
    1. Oberste MS, Maher K, Kilpatrick DR, Flemister MR, Brown BA, et al. Typing of human enteroviruses by partial sequencing of VP1. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:1288–1293.
    1. McCormack GP, Clewley JP. The application of molecular phylogenetics to the analysis of viral genome diversity and evolution. Rev Med Virol. 2002;12:221–238.
    1. Holmes EC. Molecular epidemiology and evolution of emerging infectious diseases. Br Med Bull. 1998;54:533–543.
    1. Laine P, Savolainen C, Blomqvist S, Hovi T. Phylogenetic analysis of human rhinovirus capsid protein VP1 and 2A protease coding sequences confirms shared genus-like relationships with human enteroviruses. J Gen Virol. 2005;86:697–706.
    1. Savolainen C, Blomqvist S, Mulders MN, Hovi T. Genetic clustering of all 102 human rhinovirus prototype strains: serotype 87 is close to human enterovirus 70. J Gen Virol. 2002;83:333–340.
    1. Ledford RM, Patel NR, Demenczuk TM, Watanyar A, Herbertz T, et al. VP1 sequencing of all human rhinovirus serotypes: insights into genus phylogeny and susceptibility to antiviral capsid-binding compounds. J Virol. 2004;78:3663–3674.
    1. Kistler AL, Webster DR, Rouskin S, Magrini V, Credle JJ, et al. Genome-wide diversity and selective pressure in the human rhinovirus. Virol J. 2007;4:40.
    1. Witwer C, Rauscher S, Hofacker IL, Stadler PF. Conserved RNA secondary structures in Picornaviridae genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:5079–5089.
    1. Lee WM, Grindle K, Pappas T, Marshall D, Moser M, et al. High-throughput, sensitive, and accurate multiplex PCR-microsphere flow cytometry system for large-scale comprehensive detection of respiratory viruses. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:2626–2634.
    1. Palacios G, Casas I, Tenorio A, Freire C. Molecular identification of enterovirus by analyzing a partial VP1 genomic region with different methods. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:182–192.
    1. Oberste MS, Maher K, Kilpatrick DR, Pallansch MA. Molecular evolution of the human enteroviruses: correlation of serotype with VP1 sequence and application to picornavirus classification. J Virol. 1999;73:1941–1948.
    1. Kopecka H, Brown B, Pallansch M. Genotypic variation in coxsackievirus B5 isolates from three different outbreaks in the United States. Virus Res. 1995;38:125–136.
    1. Lamson D, Renwick N, Kapoor V, Liu Z, Palacios G, et al. MassTag polymerase-chain-reaction detection of respiratory pathogens, including a new rhinovirus genotype, that caused influenza-like illness in New York State during 2004–2005. J Infect Dis. 2006;194:1398–1402.
    1. McErlean P, Shackelton LA, Lambert SB, Nissen MD, Sloots TP, et al. Characterisation of a newly identified human rhinovirus, HRV-QPM, discovered in infants with bronchiolitis. J Clin Virol. 2007;39:67–75.
    1. Oberste MS, Maher K, Schnurr D, Flemister MR, Lovchik JC, et al. Enterovirus 68 is associated with respiratory illness and shares biological features with both the enteroviruses and the rhinoviruses. J Gen Virol. 2004;85:2577–2584.
    1. Blomqvist S, Savolainen C, Raman L, Roivainen M, Hovi T. Human rhinovirus 87 and enterovirus 68 represent a unique serotype with rhinovirus and enterovirus features. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:4218–4223.
    1. Lemanske RFJ, Jackson DJ, Gangnon RE, Evans MD, Li Z, et al. Rhinovirus illnesses during infancy predict subsequent childhood wheezing. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005;116:571–577.
    1. Gern JE, Martin MS, Anklam KA, Shen K, Roberg KA, et al. Relationships among specific viral pathogens, virus-induced interleukin-8, and respiratory symptoms in infancy. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2002;13:386–393.
    1. Chenna R, Sugawara H, Koike T, Lopez R, Gibson TJ, et al. Multiple sequence alignment with the Clustal series of programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:3497–3500.
    1. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;24:4876–4882.
    1. Harris JR, Racaniello VR. Amino acid changes in proteins 2B and 3A mediate rhinovirus type 39 growth in mouse cells. J Virol. 2005;79:5363–5373.
    1. Callahan PL, Mizutani S, Colonno RJ. Molecular cloning and complete sequence determination of RNA genome of human rhinovirus type 14. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985;82:732–736.
    1. Stanway G, Hughes PJ, Mountford RC, Minor PD, Almond JW. The complete nucleotide sequence of a common cold virus: human rhinovirus 14. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984;12:7859–7875.
    1. Hughes PJ, North C, Jellis CH, Minor PD, Stanway G. The nucleotide sequence of human rhinovirus 1B: molecular relationships within the rhinovirus genus. J Gen Virol. 1988;69 ( Pt 1):49–58.
    1. Lee WM, Monroe SS, Rueckert RR. Role of maturation cleavage in infectivity of picornaviruses: activation of an infectosome. J Virol. 1993;67:2110–2122.
    1. Lee WM, Wang W, Rueckert RR. Complete sequence of the RNA genome of human rhinovirus 16, a clinically useful common cold virus belonging to the ICAM-1 receptor group. Virus Genes. 1995;9:177–181.
    1. Duechler M, Skern T, Sommergruber W, Neubauer C, Gruendler P, et al. Evolutionary relationships within the human rhinovirus genus: comparison of serotypes 89, 2, and 14. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987;84:2605–2609.
    1. Skern T, Sommergruber W, Blaas D, Gruendler P, Fraundorfer F, et al. Human rhinovirus 2: complete nucleotide sequence and proteolytic processing signals in the capsid protein region. Nucleic Acids Res. 1985;13:2111–2126.
    1. Savolainen C, Laine P, Mulders MN, Hovi T. Sequence analysis of human rhinoviruses in the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase coding region reveals large within-species variation. J Gen Virol. 2004;85:2271–2277.
    1. Loens K, Ieven M, Ursi D, De Laat C, Sillekens P, et al. Improved detection of rhinoviruses by nucleic acid sequence-based amplification after nucleotide sequence determination of the 5' noncoding regions of additional rhinovirus strains. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:1971–1976.
    1. Andeweg AC, Bestebroer TM, Huybreghs M, Kimman TG, de Jong JC. Improved detection of rhinoviruses in clinical samples by using a newly developed nested reverse transcription-PCR assay. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:524–530.
    1. Deffernez C, Wunderli W, Thomas Y, Yerly S, Perrin L, et al. Amplicon sequencing and improved detection of human rhinovirus in respiratory samples. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:3212–3218.
    1. Nix WA, Oberste MS, Pallansch MA. Sensitive, seminested PCR amplification of VP1 sequences for direct identification of all enterovirus serotypes from original clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:2698–2704.
    1. Oberste MS, Maher K, Flemister MR, Marchetti G, Kilpatrick DR, et al. Comparison of classic and molecular approaches for the identification of untypeable enteroviruses. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:1170–1174.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren