Early and sustained symptom improvement with umeclidinium/vilanterol versus monotherapy in COPD: a post hoc analysis of the EMAX randomised controlled trial

Edward M Kerwin, Isabelle H Boucot, Claus F Vogelmeier, Francois Maltais, Ian P Naya, Lee Tombs, Paul W Jones, David A Lipson, Tom Keeley, Leif Bjermer, Edward M Kerwin, Isabelle H Boucot, Claus F Vogelmeier, Francois Maltais, Ian P Naya, Lee Tombs, Paul W Jones, David A Lipson, Tom Keeley, Leif Bjermer

Abstract

Background: In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), both the time needed for patients to gain symptom improvement with long-acting bronchodilator therapy and whether an early response is predictive of a sustained response is unknown. This study aimed to investigate how quickly meaningful symptom responses are seen in patients with COPD with bronchodilator therapy and whether these responses are sustained.

Methods: Early MAXimisation of bronchodilation for improving COPD stability (EMAX) was a 24-week, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group trial that randomised patients to umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI), umeclidinium or salmeterol. Daily Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms in COPD (E-RS:COPD) score and rescue salbutamol use were captured via an electronic diary and analysed initially in 4-weekly periods. Post hoc analyses assessed change from baseline in daily E-RS:COPD score and rescue medication use weekly (Weeks 1-8), and association between E-RS:COPD responder status at Weeks 1-4 and later time points.

Results: In the intent-to-treat population (n = 2425), reductions from baseline in E-RS:COPD scores and rescue medication use were apparent from Day 2 with all treatments. Treatment differences for UMEC/VI versus either monotherapy plateaued by Week 4-8 and were sustained at Weeks 21-24; improvements were consistently greater with UMEC/VI. For all treatments, most patients (60-85%) retained their Weeks 1-4 E-RS:COPD responder/non-responder status at Weeks 21-24. Among patients receiving UMEC/VI who were E-RS:COPD responders at Weeks 1-4, 70% were responders at Weeks 21-24.

Conclusion: Patients with symptomatic COPD had greater potential for early symptom improvements with UMEC/VI versus either monotherapy. This benefit was generally maintained for 24 weeks. Early monitoring of treatment response can provide clinicians with an early indication of a patient's likely longer-term response to prescribed bronchodilator treatment and will facilitate appropriate early adjustments in care.

Clinical trial registration: NCT03034915, 2016-002513-22 (EudraCT Number). The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.

Keywords: COPD; E-RS:COPD; bronchodilator therapy; rescue medication; symptoms.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: EMK has served on advisory boards, speaker panels or received travel reimbursement for Amphastar, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, Mylan, Novartis, Pearl, Sunovion, Teva and Theravance, and has received consulting fees from Cipla and GSK. IHB, DAL, TK and PWJ are employees of GSK and hold stocks and shares in GSK. CFV has received grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GSK, Grifols, Mundipharma, Novartis and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) Competence Network Asthma and COPD (ASCONET), and has received personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Berlin Chemie/Menarini, Chiesi, Cipla, CSL Behring, GSK, Grifols, MedUpdate, Mundipharma, Novartis, Nuvaira and Teva. FM has received research grants for participating in multicentre trials for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, Sanofi and Novartis, and has received unrestricted research grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Grifols and Novartis. IPN was an employee of GSK at the time of the study, holds stocks and shares in GSK and is a contingent worker on assignment at AstraZeneca. LT is a contingent worker on assignment at GSK. LB has received honoraria for giving a lecture or attending an advisory board for Airsonett, ALK-Abelló, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GSK, Meda, Novartis and Teva.

ELLIPTA and DISKUS are owned by/licensed to the GSK group of companies.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Daily mean change from baselinea over time in E-RS:COPD total score (a) and LS mean change from baseline in E-RS:COPD total score (b). aBaseline (Day 0) is defined as the average of the measurements recorded from Day –28 to –1 inclusive. E-RS:COPD, Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms in COPD; LS, least squares; SAL, salmeterol; UMEC, umeclidinium; VI, vilanterol.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
E-RS:COPD total score responders (⩾2-point reduction from baseline) CI, confidence interval; E-RS:COPD, Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms in COPD; OR, odds ratio; SAL, salmeterol; UMEC, umeclidinium; VI, vilanterol.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Daily mean change from baseline rescue medication use (puffs/day) (a) LS mean change from baseline rescue medication use (puffs/day) (b). Analyses for Weeks 21–24 were pre-specified, and for Weeks 1, 4 and 8 were conducted post hoc. E-RS:COPD, Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms in COPD; LS, least squares; SAL, salmeterol; UMEC, umeclidinium; VI, vilanterol.

References

    1. Cazzola M, Molimard M. The scientific rationale for combining long-acting β2-agonists and muscarinic antagonists in COPD. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2010; 23: 257–267.
    1. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. 2020.
    1. Leidy NK, Murray LT, Monz BU, et al. Measuring respiratory symptoms of COPD: performance of the EXACT- Respiratory Symptoms Tool (E-RS) in three clinical trials. Respir Res 2014; 15: 124.
    1. Leidy NK, Wilcox TK, Jones PW, et al. Standardizing measurement of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations. Reliability and validity of a patient-reported diary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011; 183: 323–329.
    1. European Medicines Agency. Draft qualification opinion of qualification of exacerbations of chronic pulmonary disease tool (EXACT), and EXACT respiratory symptoms measure (E-RS) for evaluating treatment outcomes in clinical trials in COPD (EMA/CHMP/SAWP/178465/2015). 2015.
    1. Food and Drug Administration. Attachment to guidance on quantification process for drug development tools: Evaluating respiratory symptoms in chronic obstructive disease, a patient-reported outcome instrument for the measurement of severity of respiratory symptoms in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: qualification for exploratory use. 2016.
    1. Jones PW, Quirk FH, Baveystock CM. The St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire. Respir Med 1991; 85: 25–31.
    1. Mahler DA, Weinberg DH, Wells CK, et al. The measurement of dyspnea: contents, interobserver agreement, and physiologic correlates of two new clinical indexes. Chest 1984; 85: 751–758.
    1. Maltais F, Bjermer L, Kerwin EM, et al. Efficacy of umeclidinium/vilanterol versus umeclidinium and salmeterol monotherapies in symptomatic patients with COPD not receiving inhaled corticosteroids: the EMAX randomised trial. Respir Res 2019; 20: 238.
    1. Wedzicha JA, Decramer M, Ficker JH, et al. Analysis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations with the dual bronchodilator QVA149 compared with glycopyrronium and tiotropium (SPARK): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study. Lancet Respir Med 2013; 1: 199–209.
    1. Bateman ED, Ferguson GT, Barnes N, et al. Dual bronchodilation with QVA149 versus single bronchodilator therapy: the SHINE study. Eur Respir J 2013; 42: 1484–1494.
    1. Oba Y, Sarva ST, Dias S. Efficacy and safety of long-acting beta-agonist/long-acting muscarinic antagonist combinations in COPD: a network meta-analysis. Thorax 2016; 71: 15–25.
    1. Maleki-Yazdi MR, Kaelin T, Richard N, et al. Efficacy and safety of umeclidinium/vilanterol 62.5/25.0 mcg and tiotropium 18.0 mcg in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: results of a 24-week, randomized, controlled trial. Respir Med 2014; 108: 1752–1760.
    1. Jones PW, Gelhorn H, Wilson H, et al. Responder analyses for treatment effects in COPD using the St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire. Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis 2017; 4: 124–131.
    1. Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA). Global strategy for asthma management and prevention. 2019.
    1. Jenkins CR, Postma DS, Anzueto AR, et al. Reliever salbutamol use as a measure of exacerbation risk in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. BMC Pulm Med 2015; 15: 97.
    1. European Medicines Agency. Guideline on clinical investigation of medicinal products in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). 2012.
    1. Maleki-Yazdi MR, Singh D, Anzueto A, et al. Assessing short-term deterioration in maintenance-naïve patients with COPD receiving umeclidinium/vilanterol and tiotropium: A pooled analysis of three randomized trials. Adv Ther 2016; 33: 2188–2199.
    1. Donohue JF, Jones PW, Bartels C, et al. Correlations between FEV1 and patient-reported outcomes: A pooled analysis of 23 clinical trials in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Pulm Pharm Ther 2018; 49: 11–19.
    1. Punekar YS, Sharma S, Pahwa A, et al. Rescue medication use as a patient-reported outcome in COPD: a systematic review and regression analysis. Respir Res 2017; 18: 86.
    1. Jones PW, Leidy NK, Hareendran A, et al. The effect of aclidinium bromide on daily respiratory symptoms of COPD, measured using the Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms in COPD (E-RS: COPD) diary: pooled analysis of two 6-month Phase III studies. Respir Res 2016; 17: 61.
    1. Maltais F, Naya I, Kerwin E, et al. Influence of salbutamol use on symptomatic outcomes with maintenance bronchodilators: a pre-specified analysis of the EMAX trial. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: OA2108.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren