Genome-wide study of resistant hypertension identified from electronic health records

Logan Dumitrescu, Marylyn D Ritchie, Joshua C Denny, Nihal M El Rouby, Caitrin W McDonough, Yuki Bradford, Andrea H Ramirez, Suzette J Bielinski, Melissa A Basford, High Seng Chai, Peggy Peissig, David Carrell, Jyotishman Pathak, Luke V Rasmussen, Xiaoming Wang, Jennifer A Pacheco, Abel N Kho, M Geoffrey Hayes, Martha Matsumoto, Maureen E Smith, Rongling Li, Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoff, Iftikhar J Kullo, Christopher G Chute, Rex L Chisholm, Gail P Jarvik, Eric B Larson, David Carey, Catherine A McCarty, Marc S Williams, Dan M Roden, Erwin Bottinger, Julie A Johnson, Mariza de Andrade, Dana C Crawford, Logan Dumitrescu, Marylyn D Ritchie, Joshua C Denny, Nihal M El Rouby, Caitrin W McDonough, Yuki Bradford, Andrea H Ramirez, Suzette J Bielinski, Melissa A Basford, High Seng Chai, Peggy Peissig, David Carrell, Jyotishman Pathak, Luke V Rasmussen, Xiaoming Wang, Jennifer A Pacheco, Abel N Kho, M Geoffrey Hayes, Martha Matsumoto, Maureen E Smith, Rongling Li, Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoff, Iftikhar J Kullo, Christopher G Chute, Rex L Chisholm, Gail P Jarvik, Eric B Larson, David Carey, Catherine A McCarty, Marc S Williams, Dan M Roden, Erwin Bottinger, Julie A Johnson, Mariza de Andrade, Dana C Crawford

Abstract

Resistant hypertension is defined as high blood pressure that remains above treatment goals in spite of the concurrent use of three antihypertensive agents from different classes. Despite the important health consequences of resistant hypertension, few studies of resistant hypertension have been conducted. To perform a genome-wide association study for resistant hypertension, we defined and identified cases of resistant hypertension and hypertensives with treated, controlled hypertension among >47,500 adults residing in the US linked to electronic health records (EHRs) and genotyped as part of the electronic MEdical Records & GEnomics (eMERGE) Network. Electronic selection logic using billing codes, laboratory values, text queries, and medication records was used to identify resistant hypertension cases and controls at each site, and a total of 3,006 cases of resistant hypertension and 876 controlled hypertensives were identified among eMERGE Phase I and II sites. After imputation and quality control, a total of 2,530,150 SNPs were tested for an association among 2,830 multi-ethnic cases of resistant hypertension and 876 controlled hypertensives. No test of association was genome-wide significant in the full dataset or in the dataset limited to European American cases (n = 1,719) and controls (n = 708). The most significant finding was CLNK rs13144136 at p = 1.00x10-6 (odds ratio = 0.68; 95% CI = 0.58-0.80) in the full dataset with similar results in the European American only dataset. We also examined whether SNPs known to influence blood pressure or hypertension also influenced resistant hypertension. None was significant after correction for multiple testing. These data highlight both the difficulties and the potential utility of EHR-linked genomic data to study clinically-relevant traits such as resistant hypertension.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors of this manuscript have read the journal's policy and have the following competing interests: Dr. Dana Crawford is an academic editor of PLOS ONE. Dr. Crawford is not involved in the review of this manuscript per journal policy. This disclosed competing interest does not alter the authors' adherence to PLOS ONE editorial policies and criteria. The remaining authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Resistant hypertension genome-wide association study…
Fig 1. Resistant hypertension genome-wide association study in the eMERGE Network.
The eMERGE Network conducted a genome-wide association study for resistant hypertension among adults drawn from the two funding phases of the network. The eMERGE Network I study sites that contributed data are denoted in blue and include Group Health/University of Washington in Seattle, WA; Marshfield Clinic in Marshfield, WI; Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN; Northwestern University in Chicago, IL; and Vanderbilt University in Nashville, TN. The eMERGE Network II study sites that contributed data are denoted in red and include Geisinger Health System in Danville, PA and Mount Sinai School of Medicine in Manhattan, NY. Denoted in gray are eMERGE Phase II pediatric study sites not included in the present study (Boston Children’s Hospital in Boston, MA; Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia in Philadelphia, PA; and Cincinnati Children’s Hospital in Cincinnati, OH).
Fig 2. Genome-wide association analysis of individuals…
Fig 2. Genome-wide association analysis of individuals with resistant hypertension versus controlled hypertensives.
A total of 2,830 cases of resistant hypertension and 876 controlled hypertensives from eMERGE I and II was available for analysis after quality control. After removing imputed genotypes for ESR1 rs9479122, single-SNP tests of association were performed for 2,530,149 SNPs using logistic regression, assuming an additive genetic model, adjusted for sex, decade of birth, median body mass index, genotyping platform, and genetic ancestry (principal components 1 through 10). Results of each test of association are plotted as p-values (expressed as–log10 on the y-axis) by chromosome (x-axis).
Fig 3. Q-Q plot of genome-wide association…
Fig 3. Q-Q plot of genome-wide association analysis of individuals with resistant hypertension versus controlled hypertensives.
The Q-Q plots were re-generated after removal of ESR1 rs9479122.

References

    1. Guo F, He D, Zhang W, Walton RG. Trends in Prevalence, Awareness, Management, and Control of Hypertension Among United States Adults, 1999 to 2010. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2012;60(7):599–606. 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.04.026
    1. Fields LE, Burt VL, Cutler JA, Hughes J, Roccella EJ, Sorlie P. The Burden of Adult Hypertension in the United States 1999 to 2000: A Rising Tide. Hypertension. 2004;44(4):398–404. 10.1161/01.HYP.0000142248.54761.56
    1. Lenfant C. Reflections on hypertension control rates: A message from the director of the national heart, lung, and blood institute. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2002;162(2):131–2.
    1. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL, et al. Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension. 2003;42(6):1206–52. 10.1161/01.HYP.0000107251.49515.c2
    1. Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Blaha MJ, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2014 Update. A Report From the American Heart Association. 2014;129(3):e28–e292.
    1. Bakris G, Sarafidis P, Agarwal R, Ruilope L. Review of blood pressure control rates and outcomes. Journal of the American Society of Hypertension. 2014;8(2):127–41. 10.1016/j.jash.2013.07.009
    1. Calhoun DA, Jones D, Textor S, Goff DC, Murphy TP, Toto RD, et al. Resistant Hypertension: Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Treatment: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Professional Education Committee of the Council for High Blood Pressure Research. Circulation. 2008;117(25):e510–e26. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.189141
    1. Sarafidis PA, Georgianos P, Bakris GL. Resistant hypertension—its identification and epidemiology. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2013;9(1):51–8. 10.1038/nrneph.2012.260
    1. Sarafidis PA, Bakris GL. Resistant Hypertension: An Overview of Evaluation and Treatment. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2008;52(22):1749–57. 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.036
    1. El Rouby N, Cooper-DeHoff R. Genetics of Resistant Hypertension: a Novel Pharmacogenomics Phenotype. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2015;17(9):1–11.
    1. Franceschini N, Reiner AP, Heiss G. Recent Findings in the Genetics of Blood Pressure and Hypertension Traits. American Journal of Hypertension. 2011;24(4):392–400. 10.1038/ajh.2010.218
    1. Binder A. A review of the genetics of essential hypertension. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2007;22(3):176–84. 10.1097/HCO.0b013e3280d357f9
    1. Johnson JA. Advancing management of hypertension through pharmacogenomics. Annals of Medicine. 2012;44(sup1):S17–S22.
    1. Lupton SJ, Chiu CL, Lind JM. A hypertension gene: are we there yet? Twin Res Hum Genet. 2011;14(4):295–304. 10.1375/twin.14.4.295
    1. Gong Y, McDonough CW, Beitelshees AL, El Rouby N, Hiltunen TP, O'Connell JR, et al. PTPRD gene associated with blood pressure response to atenolol and resistant hypertension. J Hyertens. 2015;33(11):2278–85.
    1. Cruz-Gonzalez I, Corral E, Sanchez-Ledesma M, Sanchez-Rodriguez A, Martin-Luengo C, Gonzalez-Sarmiento R. An association between resistant hypertension and the null GSTM1 genotype. J Hum Hypertens. 2009;23(8):556–8. 10.1038/jhh.2009.19
    1. Hannila-Handelberg T, Kontula K, Tikkanen I, Tikkanen T, Fyhrquist F, Helin K, et al. Common variants of the beta and gamma subunits of the epithelial sodium channel and their relation to plasma renin and aldosterone levels in essential hypertension. BMC Medical Genetics. 2005;6(1):1–13.
    1. Ho H, Pinto A, Hall SD, Flockhart DA, Li L, Skaar TC, et al. Association Between the CYP3A5 Genotype and Blood Pressure. Hypertension. 2005;45(2):294–8. 10.1161/01.HYP.0000151361.31736.96
    1. Cruz-González I, Corral E, Sánchez-Ledesma M, Sánchez-Rodríguez A, Martín-Luengo C, González-Sarmiento R. Association between -T786C NOS3 polymorphism and resistant hypertension: a prospective cohort study. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders. 2009;9(1):1–6.
    1. Jáchymová M, Horký K, Bultas J, Kožich V, Jindra A, Peleška J, et al. Association of the Glu298Asp Polymorphism in the Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase Gene with Essential Hypertension Resistant to Conventional Therapy. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2001;284(2):426–30. 10.1006/bbrc.2001.5007
    1. Fontana V, McDonough CW, Gong Y, El Rouby NM, Sa AC, Taylor KD, et al. Large-scale gene-centric analysis identifies polymorphisms for resistant hypertension. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014;3(6):e001398 10.1161/JAHA.114.001398
    1. McCarty C, Chisholm R, Chute C, Kullo I, Jarvik G, Larson E, et al. The eMERGE Network: A consortium of biorepositories linked to electronic medical records data for conducting genomic studies. BMC Medical Genomics. 2011;4(1):13.
    1. Gottesman O, Kuivaniemi H, Tromp G, Faucett WA, Li R, Manolio TA, et al. The Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network: past, present, and future. Genet Med. 2013;15(10):761–71. 10.1038/gim.2013.72
    1. Roden DM, Pulley JM, Basford MA, Bernard GR, Clayton EW, Balser JR, et al. Development of a Large-Scale De-Identified DNA Biobank to Enable Personalized Medicine. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008;84(3):362–9. 10.1038/clpt.2008.89
    1. Pulley J, Clayton E, Bernard GR, Roden DM, Masys DR. Principles of Human Subjects Protections Applied in an Opt-Out, De-identified Biobank. Clinical and Translational Science. 2010;3(1):42–8. 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2010.00175.x
    1. Kho AN, Pacheco JA, Peissig PL, Rasmussen L, Newton KM, Weston N, et al. Electronic Medical Records for Genetic Research: Results of the eMERGE Consortium. Science Translational Medicine. 2011;3(79):79re1–re1. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001807
    1. Denny JC, Crawford DC, Ritchie MD, Bielinski SJ, Basford MA, Bradford Y, et al. Variants near FOXE1 are associated with hypothyroidism and other thyroid conditions: using electronic medical records for genome- and phenome-wide studies. Am J Hum Genet. 2011;89(4):529–42. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.09.008
    1. White WB, Turner JR, Sica DA, Bisognano JD, Calhoun DA, Townsend RR, et al. Detection, evaluation, and treatment of severe and resistant hypertension: Proceedings from an American Society of Hypertension Interactive Forum held in Bethesda, MD, USA, October 10th 2013. Journal of the American Society of Hypertension. 2014;8(10):743–57.
    1. Myat A, Redwood SR, Qureshi AC, Spertus JA, Williams B. Resistant hypertension. BMJ. 2012;345.
    1. Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D. A More Accurate Method To Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate from Serum Creatinine: A New Prediction Equation. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1999;130(6):461–70.
    1. Newton KM, Peissig PL, Kho AN, Bielinski SJ, Berg RL, Choudhary V, et al. Validation of electronic medical record-based phenotyping algorithms: results and lessons learned from the eMERGE network. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2013;20(e1):e147–e54. 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000896
    1. Kirby JC, Speltz P, Rasmussen LV, Basford M, Gottesman O, Peissig PL, et al. PheKB: a catalog and workflow for creating electronic phenotype algorithms for transportability. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2016.
    1. Turner S, Armstrong LL, Bradford Y, Carlson CS, Crawford DC, Crenshaw AT, et al. Quality Control Procedures for Genome-Wide Association Studies. Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2011;68(1.18):1–19. PMC3066182.
    1. Zuvich RL, Armstrong LL, Bielinski SJ, Bradford Y, Carlson CS, Crawford DC, et al. Pitfalls of merging GWAS data: lessons learned in the eMERGE network and quality control procedures to maintain high data quality. Genetic Epidemiology. 2011;35(8):887–98. 10.1002/gepi.20639
    1. Verma SS, de Andrade M, Tromp G, Kuivaniemi H, Pugh E, Namjou-Khales B, et al. Imputation and quality control steps for combining multiple genome-wide datasets. Frontiers in Genetics. 2014;5:370 10.3389/fgene.2014.00370
    1. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of Population Structure Using Multilocus Genotype Data. Genetics. 2000;155(2):945–59.
    1. Price AL, Patterson NJ, Plenge RM, Weinblatt ME, Shadick NA, Reich D. Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2006;38(8):904–9. 10.1038/ng1847
    1. Dumitrescu L, Ritchie MD, Brown-Gentry K, Pulley JM, Basford M, Denny JC, et al. Assessing the accuracy of observer-reported ancestry in a biorepository linked to electronic medical records. Genet Med. 2010;12(10):648–50. PMC2952033. 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181efe2df
    1. Hall JB, Dumitrescu L, Dilks HH, Crawford DC, Bush WS. Accuracy of Administratively-Assigned Ancestry for Diverse Populations in an Electronic Medical Record-Linked Biobank. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(6):e99161 PMC4045967. 10.1371/journal.pone.0099161
    1. An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes. Nature. 2012;491(7422):56–65. 10.1038/nature11632
    1. Delaneau O, Zagury JF, Marchini J. Improved whole-chromosome phasing for disease and population genetic studies. Nat Meth. 2013;10(1):5–6.
    1. Howie B, Fuchsberger C, Stephens M, Marchini J, Abecasis GR. Fast and accurate genotype imputation in genome-wide association studies through pre-phasing. Nat Genet. 2012;44(8):955–9. 10.1038/ng.2354
    1. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, Bender D, et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analysis. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81(3):559–75. 10.1086/519795
    1. Grady BJ, Torstenson E, Dudek SM, Giles J, Sexton D, Ritchie MD. Finding unique filter sets in PLATO: a precursor to efficient interaction analysis in GWAS data. Pac Symp Biocomput. 2010:315–26.
    1. Pruim RJ, Welch RP, Sanna S, Teslovich TM, Chines PS, Gliedt TP, et al. LocusZoom: regional visualization of genome-wide association scan results. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(18):2336–7. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq419
    1. Hindorff LA, Sethupathy P, Junkins HA, Ramos EM, Mehta JP, Collins FS, et al. Potential etiologic and functional implications of genome-wide association loci for human diseases and traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2009;106(23):9362–7.
    1. Welter D, MacArthur J, Morales J, Burdett T, Hall P, Junkins H, et al. The NHGRI GWAS Catalog, a curated resource of SNP-trait associations. Nucleic Acids Research. 2014;42(D1):D1001–D6.
    1. Skol AD, Scott LJ, Abecasis GR, Boehnke M. Joint analysis is more efficient than replication-based analysis for two-stage genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2006;38(2):209–13. 10.1038/ng1706
    1. Pepine CJ, Handberg EM, Cooper-DeHoff RM, et al. A calcium antagonist vs a non–calcium antagonist hypertension treatment strategy for patients with coronary artery disease: The international verapamil-trandolapril study (invest): a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003;290(21):2805–16. 10.1001/jama.290.21.2805
    1. The SPSSG. Blood-pressure targets in patients with recent lacunar stroke: the SPS3 randomised trial. The Lancet. 382(9891):507–15.
    1. Kato N, Takeuchi F, Tabara Y, Kelly TN, Go MJ, Sim X, et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies identifies common variants associated with blood pressure variation in east Asians. Nat Genet. 2011;43(6):531–8. 10.1038/ng.834
    1. Levy D, Ehret GB, Rice K, Verwoert GC, Launer LJ, Dehghan A, et al. Genome-wide association study of blood pressure and hypertension. Nat Genet. 2009;41(6):677–87. 10.1038/ng.384
    1. Franceschini N, Fox E, Zhang Z, Edwards T-á, Nalls M-á, Sung Y-á, et al. Genome-wide Association Analysis of Blood-Pressure Traits in African-Ancestry Individuals Reveals Common Associated Genes in African and Non-African Populations. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 2013;93(3):545–54. PMC3769920. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.07.010
    1. Lu X, Wang L, Lin X, Huang J, Charles Gu C, He M, et al. Genome-wide association study in Chinese identifies novel loci for blood pressure and hypertension. Human Molecular Genetics. 2015;24(3):865–74. 10.1093/hmg/ddu478
    1. Sung YJ, de Las Fuentes L, Schwander KL, Simino J, Rao DC. Gene-smoking interactions identify several novel blood pressure loci in the Framingham Heart Study. Am J Hypertens. 2015;28(3):343–54. PMC4402348. 10.1093/ajh/hpu149
    1. Simino J, Shi G, Bis Joshua C, Chasman Daniel I, Ehret Georg B, Gu X, et al. Gene-Age Interactions in Blood Pressure Regulation: A Large-Scale Investigation with the CHARGE, Global BPgen, and ICBP Consortia. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 2014;95(1):24–38. PMC4085636. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.05.010
    1. Kim YK, Kim Y, Hwang MY, Shimokawa K, Won S, Kato N, et al. Identification of a genetic variant at 2q12.1 associated with blood pressure in East-Asians by genome-wide scan including gene-environment interactions. BMC Medical Genetics. 2014;15(1):1–8. PMC4059884.
    1. He J, Kelly TN, Zhao Q, Li H, Huang J, Wang L, et al. Genome-Wide Association Study Identifies 8 Novel Loci Associated With Blood Pressure Responses to Interventions in Han Chinese. Circulation: Cardiovascular Genetics. 2013;6(6):598–607. PMC3952335. 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.113.000307
    1. Hong K-W, Kim SS, Kim Y. Genome-Wide Association Study of Orthostatic Hypotension and Supine-Standing Blood Pressure Changes in Two Korean Populations. Genomics Inform. 2013;11(3):129–34. PMC3794085. 10.5808/GI.2013.11.3.129
    1. Kelly TN, Takeuchi F, Tabara Y, Edwards TL, Kim YJ, Chen P, et al. Genome-Wide Association Study Meta-Analysis Reveals Transethnic Replication of Mean Arterial and Pulse Pressure Loci. Hypertension. 2013;62(5):853–9. PMC3972802. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.01148
    1. Melka MG, Bernard M, Mahboubi A, Abrahamowicz M, Paterson AD, Syme C, et al. Genome-wide scan for loci of adolescent obseity and their relationship with blood pressure. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(1):E145–50. 10.1210/jc.2011-1801
    1. Ehret GB, Munroe PB, Rice KM, Bochud M, Johnson AD, Chasman DI, et al. Genetic variants in novel pathways influence blood pressure and cardiovascular disease risk. Nature. 2011;478.
    1. Wain LV, Verwoert GC, O'Reilly PF, Shi G, Johnson T, Johnson AD, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies six new loci influencing pulse pressure and mean arterial pressure. Nat Genet. 2011;43(10):1005–11. PMC3445021. 10.1038/ng.922
    1. Blech I, Katzenellenbogen M, Katzenellenbogen A, Wainstein J, Rubinstein A, Harman-Boehm I, et al. Predicting Diabetic Nephropathy Using a Multifactorial Genetic Model. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(4):e18743 10.1371/journal.pone.0018743
    1. Slavin TP, Feng T, Schnell A, Zhu X, Elston RC. Two-marker association tests yield new disease associations for coronary artery disease and hypertension. Human Genetics. 2011;130(6):725–33. PMC3576836. 10.1007/s00439-011-1009-6
    1. Kraja AT, Vaidya D, Pankow JS, Goodarzi MO, Assimes TL, Kullo IJ, et al. A Bivariate Genome-Wide Approach to Metabolic Syndrome. STAMPEED Consortium. 2011;60(4):1329–39. PMC3064107.
    1. Lettre G, Palmer CD, Young T, Ejebe KG, Allayee H, Benjamin EJ, et al. Genome-Wide Association Study of Coronary Heart Disease and Its Risk Factors in 8,090 African Americans: The NHLBI CARe Project. PLoS Genet. 2011;7(2):e1001300 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001300
    1. Padmanabhan S, Melander O, Johnson T, Di Blasio AM, Lee WK, Gentilini D, et al. Genome-Wide Association Study of Blood Pressure Extremes Identifies Variant near UMOD Associated with Hypertension. PLoS Genet. 2010;6(10):e1001177 PMC2965757. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001177
    1. Newton-Cheh C, Johnson T, Gateva V, Tobin MD, Bochud M, Coin L, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies eight loci associated with blood pressure. Nat Genet. 2009;41. PMC2891673.
    1. Consortium GP. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature. 2015;526(7571):68–74. 10.1038/nature15393
    1. Kim SJ, Lee SK, Kim SH, Yun C-H, Kim JH, Thomas RJ, et al. Genetic Association of Short Sleep Duration With Hypertension Incidence—A 6-Year Follow-up in the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study. Circulation Journal. 2012;76(4):907–13.
    1. Crawford DC, Crosslin DR, Tromp G, Kullo IJ, Kuivaniemi H, Hayes MG, et al. eMERGEing progress in genomics—the first seven years. Frontiers in Genetics. 2014;5:184 PMC4060012. 10.3389/fgene.2014.00184
    1. Keating BJ, Tischfield S, Murray SS, Bhangale T, Price TS, Glessner JT, et al. Concept, Design and Implementation of a Cardiovascular Gene-Centric 50 K SNP Array for Large-Scale Genomic Association Studies. PLoS ONE. 2008;3(10):e3583 10.1371/journal.pone.0003583
    1. Daly AK. Using Genome-Wide Association Studies to Identify Genes Important in Serious Adverse Drug Reactions. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology. 2012;52(1):21–35.
    1. Voight BF, Scott LJ, Steinthorsdottir V, Morris AP, Dina C, Welch RP, et al. Twelve type 2 diabetes susceptibility loci identified through large-scale association analysis. Nat Genet. 2010;42(7):579–89. 10.1038/ng.609
    1. Consortium DGRAM-aD, Type AGEN, South AT, Mexican AT, (DGEbN-gsim-ES, Mahajan A, et al. Genome-wide trans-ancestry meta-analysis provides insight into the genetic architecture of type 2 diabetes susceptibility. Nat Genet. 2014;46(3):234–44. 10.1038/ng.2897
    1. Teslovich TM, Musunuru K, Smith AV, Edmondson AC, Stylianou IM, Koseki M, et al. Biological, clinical and population relevance of 95 loci for blood lipids. Nature. 2010;466(7307):707–13. 10.1038/nature09270
    1. Global Lipids Genetics C. Discovery and refinement of loci associated with lipid levels. Nat Genet. 2013;45(11):1274–83. . 10.1038/ng.2797
    1. Salfati E, Morrison AC, Boerwinkle E, Chakravarti A. Direct Estimates of the Genomic Contributions to Blood Pressure Heritability within a Population-Based Cohort (ARIC). PLoS ONE. 2015;10(7):e0133031 10.1371/journal.pone.0133031
    1. Collins FS, Varmus H. A New Initiative on Precision Medicine. New England Journal of Medicine. 2015;372(9):793–5. 10.1056/NEJMp1500523
    1. Group PMIPW. The Precision Medicine Initiative Cohort Program—Building a Research Foundation for 21st Century Medicine. 2015 9/17/2015. Report No.
    1. Banda Y, Kvale MN, Hoffmann TJ, Hesselson SE, Ranatunga D, Tang H, et al. Characterizing Race/Ethnicity and Genetic Ancestry for 100,000 Subjects in the Genetic Epidemiology Research on Adult Health and Aging (GERA) Cohort. Genetics. 2015;200(4):1285–95. 10.1534/genetics.115.178616
    1. Kvale MN, Hesselson S, Hoffmann TJ, Cao Y, Chan D, Connell S, et al. Genotyping Informatics and Quality Control for 100,000 Subjects in the Genetic Epidemiology Research on Adult Health and Aging (GERA) Cohort. Genetics. 2015;200(4):1051–60. 10.1534/genetics.115.178905
    1. Gaziano JM, Concato J, Brophy M, Fiore L, Pyarajan S, Breeling J, et al. Million Veteran Program: A mega-biobank to study genetic influences on health and disease. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2016.
    1. Roden DM, Xu H, Denny JC, Wilke RA. Electronic Medical Records as a Tool in Clinical Pharmacology: Opportunities and Challenges. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2012;91(6):1083–6.
    1. Ong KL, Cheung BMY, Man YB, Lau CP, Lam KSL. Prevalence, Awareness, Treatment, and Control of Hypertension Among United States Adults 1999–2004. Hypertension. 2007;49(1):69–75. 10.1161/01.HYP.0000252676.46043.18
    1. Cutler JA, Sorlie PD, Wolz M, Thom T, Fields LE, Roccella EJ. Trends in Hypertension Prevalence, Awareness, Treatment, and Control Rates in United States Adults Between 1988–1994 and 1999–2004. Hypertension. 2008;52(5):818–27. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.113357
    1. Caro JJ, Speckman JL, Salas M, Raggio G, Jackson JD. Effect of initial drug choice on persistence with antihypertensive therapy: the importance of actual practice data. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 1999;160(1):41–6.
    1. Mazzaglia G, Mantovani LG, Sturkenboom MCJM, Filippi A, Trifiro G, Cricelli C, et al. Patterns of persistence with antihypertensive medications in newly diagnosed hypertensive patients in Italy: a retrospective cohort study in primary care. Journal of Hypertension. 2005;23(11):2093–100.
    1. Payne KA, Esomonde-White S. Observational studies of anti-hypertensive medication use and compliance: is drug choice a factor in treatment adherence? Curr Hypertens Rep. 2000;2(6):515–24.
    1. Rolnick SJ, Pawloski PA, Hedblom BD, Asche SE, Bruzek RJ. Patient Characteristics Associated with Medication Adherence. Clinical Medicine & Research. 2013;11(2):54–65.
    1. Friedman O, McAlister FA, Yun L, Campbell NRC, Tu K. Antihypertensive Drug Persistence and Compliance Among Newly Treated Elderly Hypertensives in Ontario. The American Journal of Medicine. 2010;123(2):173–81. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.08.008
    1. Salvi E, Wang Z, Rizzi F, Gong Y, McDonough CW, Padmanabhan S, et al. Genome-Wide and Gene-Based Meta-Analyses Identify Novel Loci Influencing Blood Pressure Response to Hydrochlorothiazide. Hypertension. 2017;69(1):51–9. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.08267

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren