Real-world clinical outcome and toxicity data and economic aspects in patients with advanced breast cancer treated with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy: the experience of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group

Elena Fountzilas, Georgia-Angeliki Koliou, Athanassios Vozikis, Vassiliki Rapti, Achilleas Nikolakopoulos, Anastasios Boutis, Athina Christopoulou, Ioannis Kontogiorgos, Sofia Karageorgopoulou, Efthalia Lalla, Dimitrios Tryfonopoulos, Ioannis Boukovinas, Cleopatra Rapti, Adamantia Nikolaidi, Sofia Karteri, Evangelia Moirogiorgou, Ioannis Binas, Davide Mauri, Gerasimos Aravantinos, Flora Zagouri, Zacharenia Saridaki, Amanda Psyrri, Dimitrios Bafaloukos, Anna Koumarianou, Eleni Res, Helena Linardou, Giannis Mountzios, Evangelia Razis, George Fountzilas, Georgios Koumakis, Elena Fountzilas, Georgia-Angeliki Koliou, Athanassios Vozikis, Vassiliki Rapti, Achilleas Nikolakopoulos, Anastasios Boutis, Athina Christopoulou, Ioannis Kontogiorgos, Sofia Karageorgopoulou, Efthalia Lalla, Dimitrios Tryfonopoulos, Ioannis Boukovinas, Cleopatra Rapti, Adamantia Nikolaidi, Sofia Karteri, Evangelia Moirogiorgou, Ioannis Binas, Davide Mauri, Gerasimos Aravantinos, Flora Zagouri, Zacharenia Saridaki, Amanda Psyrri, Dimitrios Bafaloukos, Anna Koumarianou, Eleni Res, Helena Linardou, Giannis Mountzios, Evangelia Razis, George Fountzilas, Georgios Koumakis

Abstract

Background: We evaluated real-world clinical outcomes and toxicity data and assessed treatment-related costs in patients with advanced breast cancer who received treatment with cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CDKi).

Patients and methods: We conducted a prospective-retrospective analysis of patients with advanced hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer who received a CDKi, in combination with endocrine therapy, at any line of treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Cost analysis was conducted from a public third-payer (National Organization for Healthcare Services Provision (EOPYY)) perspective, assessing only costs related to direct medical care, including drug therapy costs and adverse drug reaction (ADR)-related costs.

Results: From July 2015 to October 2019, 365 women received endocrine therapy combined with CDKi; median age was 61 years, postmenopausal 290 (80.6%) patients. CDKi were administered as first-line treatment in 149 (40.9%) patients, second-line treatment in 96 (26.4%) and third-line treatment and beyond in 119 (32.7%) patients. The most common adverse events were neutropenia, anaemia, thrombocytopenia and fatigue. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 86 (23.6%) patients, whereas 8 (2.2%) patients permanently discontinued treatment due to toxicity. The median PFS for patients who received CDKi as first-line, second-line and third-line treatment and beyond was 18.7, 12 and 7.4 months, respectively. The median overall survival since the initiation of CDKi treatment was 29.9 months (95% CI: 23.0-not yet reached (NR)). The mean pharmaceutical therapy cost estimated per cycle was 2 724.12 € for each patient, whereas the main driver of the ADR-related costs was haematological adverse events.

Conclusions: Treatment with CDKi was well tolerated, with a low drug discontinuation rate. Patients who received CDKi as first-line treatment had improved PFS and OS compared with second-line treatment and beyond. The main component of direct medical costs assessed in the cost analysis comprises CDKi pharmaceutical therapy costs.

Trial registration number: NCT04133207.

Keywords: aromatase inhibitors; endocrine treatment; health economics; hormone receptor-positive; real-world evidence.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: EF: stock ownership: GENPREX INC, ARIAD and Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Travel grant: Merck, Pfizer and K.A.M Oncology/Hematology. Advisory: LEO Pharma. Speaker fees: Roche and Pfizer. AV: advisory boards: Angelini and Takeda. Speaker fees: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche and MSD. Training programmes: Astellas, Genesis Pharma, Pfizer, LEO, Abbvie and TEVAAN. Travel fees: Pfizer, Merck, Hospira, Sanofi, Roche, Astra Zeneca, Kyowa Kirin-Anabiosis and Rafarm. AB: advisory role and honorarium: Pfizer and Novartis. SK: consultation/advisory: Astra Zeneca and Roche. Research: Novartis and Roche. Speaker: Astra Zeneca, Novartis and Roche. IB: advisory board: Pfizer and Novartis. Educational grant: Pfizer. Research Fund: Novartis and Lilly. AN: advisory board and speaker fees: Pfizer and Novartis. GA: advisory boards: Novartis, BMS, Roche Hellas, Astra Zeneca, Sanofi, Amgen, Genesis Pharma, Merck and Pfizer. AP: consultation fees: Amgen, Merck Serono, Roche, BMS, Astra Zeneca and MSD. Honoraria: Amgen, Merck Serono, Roche, BMS, Astra Zeneca and MSD. Research funds: BMS and Kura. AK: advisory role: Genesis Pharma. Honoraria: Pfizer. Speaker’s bureau: Roche. Research funding: Merck. Travel: MSD. Educational grants: Novartis, Pfizer, Merck, Roche, BMS, MSD, Genesis and Ipsen. GM: honoraria/consultancy: Astra Zeneca, Roche, Pfizer, BMS, MSD, Takeda, Boehringer, Merck, Novartis and Amgen. Travel fees: Astra Zeneca, Roche, Pfizer, BMS, MSD, Takeda, Boehringer, Merck, Novartis, Astellas and Pierre Fabre. ER: consulting or advisory role: Astra Zeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer. Research funding: Novartis, Demo Pharmaceutical, EORTC, Radius Pharmaceuticals, Tesaro, Parexel and Anabiosis Pharmaceuticals. Travel: Sanofi, Ipsen, Genesis Pharmaceuticals, LEO Pharma, Merck, Roche and Genekor. GF: advisory board: Pfizer, Sanofi and Roche. Honoraria: Astra Zeneca. Stock ownership: ARIAD and GENPREX. The rest of the authors declare no conflict of interest.

© Author (s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Proportion of patients who received treatment with CDKi according to the line of therapy and year of treatment initiation. (B) Dose modification and treatment discontinuation rates in patients who received CDKi. CDKi, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Progression-free survival (PFS) rates in all patients of the study. (B) PFS by the line of treatment. (C) Overall survival (OS) rates in all patients of the study. (D) OS by the line of treatment. Two patients who received CDKi in combination with tamoxifen were excluded from the OS and PFS analyses. CDKi, cyclin-dependentkinase inhibitor; NE, not evaluable.

References

    1. Sherr CJ, Beach D, Shapiro GI. Targeting CDK4 and CDK6: from discovery to therapy. Cancer Discov 2016;6:353–67. 10.1158/-15-0894
    1. O'Leary B, Finn RS, Turner NC. Treating cancer with selective CDK4/6 inhibitors. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2016;13:417–30. 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.26
    1. Sherr CJ. A New Cell-Cycle Target in Cancer - Inhibiting Cyclin D-Dependent Kinases 4 and 6. N Engl J Med 2016;375:1920–3. 10.1056/NEJMp1612343
    1. Cristofanilli M, Turner NC, Bondarenko I, et al. . Fulvestrant plus palbociclib versus fulvestrant plus placebo for treatment of hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer that progressed on previous endocrine therapy (PALOMA-3): final analysis of the multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2016;17:425–39. 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00613-0
    1. Finn RS, Martin M, Rugo HS, et al. . Palbociclib and letrozole in advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2016;375:1925–36. 10.1056/NEJMoa1607303
    1. Turner NC, Slamon DJ, Ro J, et al. . Overall survival with Palbociclib and fulvestrant in advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2018;379:1926–36. 10.1056/NEJMoa1810527
    1. Hortobagyi GN, Stemmer SM, Burris HA, et al. . Ribociclib as first-line therapy for HR-positive, advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2016;375:1738–48. 10.1056/NEJMoa1609709
    1. Im S-A, Lu Y-S, Bardia A, et al. . Overall survival with Ribociclib plus endocrine therapy in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2019;381:307–16. 10.1056/NEJMoa1903765
    1. Tripathy D, Im S-A, Colleoni M, et al. . Ribociclib plus endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive, advanced breast cancer (MONALEESA-7): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2018;19:904–15. 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30292-4
    1. Slamon DJ, Neven P, Chia S, et al. . Overall survival with Ribociclib plus fulvestrant in advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2020;382:514–24. 10.1056/NEJMoa1911149
    1. Sledge GW, Toi M, Neven P, et al. . Monarch 2: Abemaciclib in combination with fulvestrant in women with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer who had progressed while receiving endocrine therapy. J Clin Oncol 2017;35:2875–84. 10.1200/JCO.2017.73.7585
    1. Sledge GW, Toi M, Neven P, et al. . The effect of Abemaciclib plus fulvestrant on overall survival in hormone receptor-positive, ERBB2-Negative breast cancer that progressed on endocrine Therapy-MONARCH 2: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 2019;6:116–24. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.4782
    1. Goetz MP, Toi M, Campone M, et al. . Monarch 3: Abemaciclib as initial therapy for advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2017;35:3638–46. 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.6155
    1. EMA Ibrance, 2016. Available: [Accessed 3/8/2020].
    1. EMA Kisqali, 2016. Available: [Accessed 3/8/2020].
    1. Murthy VH, Krumholz HM, Gross CP. Participation in cancer clinical trials: race-, sex-, and age-based disparities. JAMA 2004;291:2720–6. 10.1001/jama.291.22.2720
    1. Bui TBV, Burgers DM, Agterof MJ, et al. . Real-World effectiveness of Palbociclib versus clinical trial results in patients with advanced/metastatic breast cancer that progressed on previous endocrine therapy. Breast Cancer 2019;13:1178223418823238. 10.1177/1178223418823238
    1. Kish JK, Ward MA, Garofalo D, et al. . Real-world evidence analysis of palbociclib prescribing patterns for patients with advanced/metastatic breast cancer treated in community oncology practice in the USA one year post approval. Breast Cancer Res 2018;2010.1186/s13058-018-0958-2
    1. Watson GA, Deac O, Aslam R, et al. . Real-World experience of Palbociclib-Induced adverse events and compliance with complete blood count monitoring in women with hormone Receptor-Positive/HER2-Negative metastatic breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 2019;19:e186–94. 10.1016/j.clbc.2018.09.002
    1. Darden C, Mitra D, McSorley D, et al. . Treatment satisfaction in women receiving palbociclib combination therapies for advanced/metastatic breast cancer. Future Oncol 2019;15:141–50. 10.2217/fon-2018-0531
    1. Taylor-Stokes G, Mitra D, Waller J, et al. . Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among patients receiving palbociclib in combination with an aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant for HR+/HER2-negative advanced/metastatic breast cancer in real-world settings in the US: results from the iris study. Breast 2019;43:22–7. 10.1016/j.breast.2018.10.009
    1. Waller J, Mitra D, Mycock K, et al. . Real-World treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients receiving Palbociclib for hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-Negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer in Argentina: the iris study. J Glob Oncol 2019;5:JGO1800239. 10.1200/JGO.18.00239
    1. Wedam S, Fashoyin-Aje L, Bloomquist E, et al. . Fda approval summary: Palbociclib for male patients with metastatic breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2020;26:1208–12. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-2580
    1. FDA Submitting documents using real-world data and real-world evidence to FDA for drugs and biologics guidance for industry, 2019.
    1. Health Mo Updated list of compensated medicines, 2019. Available: [Accessed 3/8/2020].
    1. National Medicines Agency ΥΑ F.4//2012) list of diseases whose medicinal products are administered with reduced or no participation of the insured, 2012.
    1. Ministry of Health Bulletin of revised prices for human medicines, 2019. Available: [Accessed 3/8/2020].
    1. Tax heaven Drug pricing provision, 2019. Available:
    1. Legislative Affairs Government Gazette 74 / a / 19-5-2017, 2017.
    1. SFEE The pharmaceutical market in Greece, 2016.
    1. Mistry R, May JR, Suri G, et al. . Cost-Effectiveness of Ribociclib plus letrozole versus Palbociclib plus letrozole and letrozole monotherapy in the first-line treatment of postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2- advanced or metastatic breast cancer: a U.S. payer perspective. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 2018;24:514–23. 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.6.514
    1. Mamiya H, Tahara RK, Tolaney SM, et al. . Cost-Effectiveness of palbociclib in hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. Annals of Oncology 2017;28:1825–31. 10.1093/annonc/mdx201
    1. Zhang B, Long EF. Cost-Effectiveness analysis of palbociclib or ribociclib in the treatment of advanced hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019;175:775–9. 10.1007/s10549-019-05190-3

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren