Bimanual dexterity assessment: validation of a revised form of the turning subtest from the Minnesota Dexterity Test

Luigi Tesio, Anna Simone, Giuliano Zebellin, Viviana Rota, Calogero Malfitano, Laura Perucca, Luigi Tesio, Anna Simone, Giuliano Zebellin, Viviana Rota, Calogero Malfitano, Laura Perucca

Abstract

Bimanual coordination underlies many daily activities. It is tested by various versions of the old Minnesota Dexterity Test (dating back to 1931, 'turning' subtest). This, however, is ill standardized, may be time-consuming, and has poor normative data. A timed-revised form of the turning subtest (MTTrf) is presented. Age-related norms and test-retest reliability were computed. Sixty-four healthy individuals, 24-79 years, comprising 34 women, were required to pick up 60 small plastic disks from wells, rotate each disk, and transfer it to the other hand, which must replace it, as quickly as possible. Two trials were requested for each hand (ABBA sequence). The average time (seconds) across the 4 trials gave the test score. Participants were grouped (CART algorithm) into 3 statistically distinct (P<0.05) age×score strata, with cutoff 53+ and 73+ years, and tested at baseline and after 1 week. Test-retest reliability was measured both as consistency [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICCs) model 2.1] and as agreement (Bland-Altman plot). From the ICCs, the individual test-retest minimal real difference (in seconds) was computed. The whole MTTrf took less than 4 min to administer. Baseline scores ranged from 40 to 78 s. The ICCs ranged from 0.45 to 0.81 and the minimal real difference ranged from 6.68 to 13.40 s across the age groups. Fifty-nine out of 64 observations (92%) fell within the confidence limits of the Bland-Altman plot. The MTTrf is a reliable and practical test of bimanual coordination. It may be a useful addition to protocols of manual testing in occupational therapy.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Sketch of the MTTrf (modified from the CMDT battery): (a) general setup; sequence of manipulations; (b) pick-up phase. Initially, the red side of the disk faces upward (here it is white); (c) transfer between hands; (d) turning and (e) replacement; later the black side of the disk faces upward (in the Figure also it is black). CMDT, Complete Minnesota Dexterity Test; MTTrf, timed-revised form of Minnesota turning test.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Time in seconds to complete the MTTrf (on the ordinate) at baseline (left box in each pair) and on retest, 1 week apart (right box in each pair), as a function of age group (on the abscissa). For each participant, the completion time is given as the average of four runs, two per each beginning hand (ABBA sequence). Each box spans from the 10th to the 90th percentile of the distribution. The internal horizontal segment gives the median. The upper and lower ‘whiskers’ are extended to the minimum and the maximum observed values, respectively. See Table 1 for mean and SD. MTTrf, revised form of Minnesota turning test.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Bland–Altman reliability plot of the MTTrf, performed at baseline and at 1-week retest. The ordinate gives the baseline–retest difference (in seconds). The abscissa provides the average results between the two time points. The intermediate horizontal line marks the average difference, and the upper and lower dashed lines mark the 95% confidence limits. Pitman’s test of difference in variance: r=0.066, n=64, P=0.602. MTTrf, revised form of Minnesota turning test.

References

    1. Bangert AS, Reuter-Lorenz PA, Walsh CM, Schachter AB, Seidler RD. (2010). Bimanual coordination and aging: neurobehavioral implications. Neuropsychologia 48:1165–1170.
    1. Bland JM, Altman DG. (1986). Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 327:307–310.
    1. Breiman I, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ. (1984). Classification and regression trees. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
    1. Brinkman J, Kuypers HG. (1973). Cerebral control of contralateral and ipsilateral arm, hand and finger movements in the split-brain rhesus monkey. Brain 96:653–674.
    1. Bruttini C, Esposti R, Bolzoni F, Vanotti A, Mariotti C, Cavallari P. (2015). Temporal disruption of upper-limb anticipatory postural adjustments in cerebellar ataxic patients. Exp Brain Res 233:197–203.
    1. Campbell D, Stanley J. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago, IL: Rand-McNally.
    1. D’Alisa S, Miscio G, Baudo S, Simone A, Tesio L, Mauro A. (2006). Depression is the main determinant of quality of life in multiple sclerosis: a classification- regression (CART) study. Disabil Rehabil 28:307–314.
    1. de Boer B, Perper C, Beek PJ. (2012). Development of temporal and spatial bimanual coordination during childhood. Motor control 16:537–559.
    1. Elfant IL. (1977). Correlation between kinesthetic discrimination & manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther 31:23–28.
    1. Endo H, Kawahara K. (2011). Gender differences in hand stability of normal young people assessed at low force levels. Ergonomics 54:273–281.
    1. Esposti R, Limonta E, Esposito F, Baldissera FG. (2013). The role of anticipatory postural adjustments in interlimb coordination of coupled arm movements in the parasagittal plane: III. Difference in the energy cost of postural actions during cyclic flexion-extension arm movements, ISO- and ANTI-directionally coupled. Exp Brain Res 231:293–303.
    1. Jebsen RH, Taylor N, Trieschmann RB, Trotter MJ, Howard LA. (1969). An objective and standardized test of hand function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 50:311–319.
    1. Lin CH, Chou LW, Wei SH, Lieu FK, Chiang SL, Sung WH. (2014). Influence of aging on bimanual coordination control. Exp Gerontol 53:40–47.
    1. Mochizuki H, Huang YZ, Rothwell JC. (2004). Interhemispheric interaction between human dorsal premotor and contralateral primary motor cortex. J Physiol 561:331–338.
    1. Obhi SS. (2004). Bimanual coordination: an unbalance field of research. Motor Control 8:111–120.
    1. Oldfield RC. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113.
    1. Poisson A, Ballanger B, Metereau E, Redouté J, Ibarolla D, Comte JC, et al. (2013). A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of pathophysiological changes responsible for mirror movements in Parkinson’s disease. PLoS One 8:e66910.
    1. Ruff RM, Parker SB. (1993). Gender- and age-specific changes in motor speed and eye-hand coordination in adults: normative values for the Finger Tapping and Grooved Pegboard Tests. Percept Mot Skills 76:219–230.
    1. Sartorio F, Bravini E, Vercelli S, Ferriero G, Plebani G, Foti C, Franchignoni F. (2013). The Functional Dexterity Test: test-retest reliability analysis and up-to date reference norms. J Hand Ther 26:62–67.
    1. Shetty AK, Shankar MSV, Annamalai N. (2014). Bimanual coordination: influence of age and gender. J Clin Diagn Res 8:15–16.
    1. Simone A, Rota V, Tesio L, Perucca L. (2011). The generic ABILHAND questionnaire can measure manual ability across a variety of motor impairments. Int J Rehab Res 34:131–140.
    1. Surrey LR, Nelson K, Delelio C, Mathie-Majors D, Omel-Edwards N, Shumaker J, Thurber G. (2003). A comparison of performance outcomes between the Minnesota Rate of Manipulation Test and the Minnesota Manual Dexterity Test. Work 20:97–102.
    1. Swinnen SP. (2002). Intermanual coordination: from behavioural principles to neural-network interactions. Nat Rev Neurosci 3:348–359.
    1. Tesio L. (2012). Outcome measurement in behavioural sciences: a view on how to shift attention from means to individuals and why. Int J Rehab Res 35:1–12.
    1. Tesio L. (2014a). Causing and being caused: items in a questionnaire may play a different role, depending on the complexity of the variable. Rasch Measurement Transactions 28:1454–1456.
    1. Tesio L. (2014b). Items and variables, thinner and thicker variables: gradients, not dichotomies. Rasch Measurement Transactions 28:1477.
    1. Tesio L, Rota V, Longo S, Grzeda MT. (2013). Measuring standing balance in adults: reliability and minimal real difference of 14 instrumental measures. Int J Rehab Res 36:362–374.
    1. WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
    1. Wang YC, Bohannon RW, Kapellusch J, Garg A, Gershon RC. (2015). Dexterity as measured with the 9-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT) across the age span. J Hand Ther 28:53–59.
    1. Yancosek KE, Howell D. (2009). A narrative review of dexterity assessments. J Hand Ther 22:258–269.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren