Modified Sick Neonatal Score (MSNS): A Novel Neonatal Disease Severity Scoring System for Resource-Limited Settings

K P Mansoor, S R Ravikiran, Vaman Kulkarni, Kiran Baliga, Suchetha Rao, Kamalakshi G Bhat, B Shantharam Baliga, Nutan Kamath, K P Mansoor, S R Ravikiran, Vaman Kulkarni, Kiran Baliga, Suchetha Rao, Kamalakshi G Bhat, B Shantharam Baliga, Nutan Kamath

Abstract

Neonatal disease severity scoring systems are needed to make standardized comparison between performances of different units and to give prognostic information to parents of individual babies admitted. Existing scoring systems are unsuitable for resource-limited settings which lack investigations like pH, pO2/FiO2 ratio, and base excess. This study was planned to evaluate Modified Sick Neonatal Score (MSNS), a novel neonatal disease severity score designed for resource-constrained settings. It was a facility-based cross-sectional analytical study, conducted in the "Special Newborn Care Unit" (SNCU) of government district hospital, attached to Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, India from November 2016 to October 2017. A convenience sample of 585 neonates was included. Disease severity was assessed immediately at admission using MSNS. MSNS had 8 parameters with 0, 1, and 2 scores for each. 41% of study population was preterm (n=240), and 84.1% had birth weight less than 2500 grams (n=492). The mean (SD) of the total MSNS scores for neonates who expired and discharged was, respectively, 8.22 (2.96) and 13.4 (2.14), a difference being statistically significant at P < 0.001. Expired newborns had statistically significant frequency of lower scores across each of the parameters. An optimum cutoff score of ≤10 with 80% sensitivity and 88.8% specificity in predicting mortality was obtained when the ROC curve was generated with the MSNS score as the test variable. Area under the curve was 0.913 (95% CI: 0.879-0.946). In conclusion, MSNS is a practicable disease severity score in resource-restricted settings like district SNCUs. It is for application in both term and preterm neonates. Total score ≤10 has a good sensitivity and specificity in predicting mortality of admitted neonates when used early during the course of hospitalization. MSNS could be used as a tool to compare performance of SNCUs and also enable early referral of individual cases to units with better facilities.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve generated with total MSNS score as the test variable to predict mortality.

References

    1. Dorling J. S., Field D. J., Manktelow B. Neonatal diseases severity scoring systems. Archives of Disease in Childhood—Fetal and Neonatal Edition. 2005;90(1):F11–F16. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.048488.
    1. Aluvaala J., Collins G. S., Maina M., Berkley J. A., English M. A systematic review of neonatal treatment intensity scores and their potential application in low-resource setting hospitals for predicting mortality, morbidity and estimating resource use. Systematic Reviews. 2017;6(1):1–12. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0649-6.
    1. NITI Aayog. Neonatal Mortality Rate. New Delhi, India: Government of India; 2018. .
    1. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Care of Small and Sick Newborns in Special Newborn Care Units (SNCUs) of India Two Year. New Delhi, India: Government of India; 2018. .
    1. Rathod D., Adhisivam B., Vishnu Bhat B. Sick neonate score—a simple clinical score for predicting mortality of sick neonates in resource restricted settings. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics. 2016;83(2):103–106. doi: 10.1007/s12098-015-1884-2.
    1. Shrestha D., Dhoubhadel B. G., Parry C. M., Prajapati B., Ariyoshi K., Mahaseth C. Predicting deaths in a resource-limited neonatal intensive care unit in Nepal. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2017;111(7):287–293. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/trx053.
    1. Harsha S. S., Archana B. R. SNAPPE-II (score for neonatal acute physiology with perinatal extension-II) in predicting mortality and morbidity in NICU. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2015;9(10):SC10–SC12. doi: 10.7860/jcdr/2015/14848.6677.
    1. Richardson D. K., Corcoran J. D., Escobar G. J., Lee S. K. SNAP-II and SNAPPE-II: simplified newborn illness severity and mortality risk scores. Journal of Pediatrics. 2001;138(1):92–100. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2001.109608.
    1. Radfar M., Hashemieh M., Fallahi M., Masihi R. Utilization of SNAP II and SNAPPE II scores for predicting the mortality rate among a cohort of Iranian newborns. Archives of Iranian Medicine. 2018;21(4):153–157.
    1. Mesquita Ramirez M. N., Godoy L. E., Alvarez Barrientos E. SNAP II and SNAPPE II as predictors of neonatal mortality in a pediatric intensive care unit: does postnatal age play a role? International Journal of Pediatrics. 2014;2014:5. doi: 10.1155/2014/298198.298198
    1. Richardson D. K., Shah B. L., Frantz I. D., Bednarek F., Rubin L. P., McCormick M. C. Perinatal risk and severity of illness in newborns at 6 neonatal intensive care units. American Journal of Public Health. 1999;89(4):511–516. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.4.511.
    1. Asker H. S., Satar M., Yıldızdaş H. Y., et al. Evaluation of score for neonatal acute physiology and perinatal extension II and clinical risk index for babies with additional parameters. Pediatrics International. 2016;58(10):984–987. doi: 10.1111/ped.12973.
    1. Vasudevan A., Malhotra A., Lodha R., Kabra S. K. For neonatal acute physiology (SNAP) Indian Pediatrics. 2006;43(4):344–348.
    1. Ramírez-huerta A. C., Grober-páez F., Higareda-almaraz M. A. Clinical risk index for babies II (CRIB II) and weight to predict mortality in preterm infants less than 32 weeks treated with surfactant. Gaceta Medica de Mexico. 2015;151(2):192–196.
    1. Eldin Z. M. E., Hamid T. A. A., Rene M., Youssef L., Nabil H. E. Clinical risk index for babies (CRIB II) scoring system in prediction of mortality in premature babies. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2015;9(6):SC08–SC11.
    1. Marete I. K., Wasunna A. O., Otieno P. A. Clinical risk index for babies (CRIB II) scoring system in prediction of mortality in premature babies. East African Medical Journal. 2011;88(1):18–23.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren