Achievement of lipid targets with the combination of rosuvastatin and fenofibric Acid in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Robert S Rosenson, Dawn M Carlson, Maureen T Kelly, Carolyn M Setze, Boaz Hirshberg, James C Stolzenbach, Laura A Williams, Robert S Rosenson, Dawn M Carlson, Maureen T Kelly, Carolyn M Setze, Boaz Hirshberg, James C Stolzenbach, Laura A Williams

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the proportion of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) attaining individual and combined targets of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides (TG), non-HDL-C, and apolipoprotein B (ApoB) after treatment with rosuvastatin (R) + fenofibric acid (FA) compared with corresponding-dose R monotherapy.

Methods: This post hoc analysis evaluated data from the T2DM subset of patients with mixed dyslipidemia (LDL-C ≥130 mg/dL, HDL-C <40/50 mg/dL in men/women, and TG ≥150 mg/dL) from 2 randomized studies. Patients included in the analysis (N = 456) were treated with R (5, 10, or 20 mg), FA 135 mg, or R (5, 10, or 20 mg) + FA 135 mg for 12 weeks. Attainment of LDL-C <100 mg/dL, HDL-C >40/50 mg/dL in men/women, TG <150 mg/dL, non-HDL-C <130 mg/dL, ApoB <90 mg/dL, and the combined targets of these parameters was assessed.

Results: Treatment with R + FA resulted in a significantly higher proportion of patients achieving optimal levels of HDL-C (46.8% vs. 20.8%, P = 0.009 for R 10 mg + FA), TG (60.0% vs. 34.0%, P = 0.02 for R 10 mg + FA; 54.0% vs. 26.4%, P = 0.005 for R 20 mg + FA), non-HDL-C (55.1% vs. 36.4%, P = 0.04 for R 5 mg + FA), ApoB (58.0% vs. 36.4%, P = 0.02 for R 5 mg + FA); and the combined targets of LDL-C, HDL-C, and TG (28.3% vs. 8.3%, P = 0.02 for R 10 mg + FA) and all 5 parameters (26.1% vs. 8.3%, P = 0.03 for R 10 mg + FA) than corresponding-dose R monotherapies.

Conclusions: A significantly greater proportion of T2DM patients achieved individual and combined lipid targets when treated with the combination of R + FA than corresponding-dose R monotherapies.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00300482 NCT00463606.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient flowchart. aThe R 40 mg group was not included in predefined statistical comparisons. bPatients may have been counted for more than one reason for discontinuation. cOther reasons for discontinuation included: FA: protocol violation and physician decision; R 5 mg: protocol violation; R 5 mg + FA: error by study coordinator, patient randomized in error, and physician decision; R 10 mg: personal reason, investigator decision, and physician decision; R 10 mg + FA: concomitant illness; and R 20 mg + FA: investigator decision, physician decision, and patient unable to comply with protocol. FA, fenofibric acid 135 mg; R, rosuvastatin (5, 10, or 20 mg)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a–e. Proportion of T2DM patients achieving individual target of (a) LDL-C <100 mg/dL; (b) HDL-C >40/50 mg/dL in men/women; (c) TG <150 mg/dL; (d) non-HDL-C <130 mg/dL; and (e) ApoB <90 mg/dL at final visit. P-values were obtained using Fisher’s exact test to test for a difference between each rosuvastatin (R) + fenofibric acid (FA) combination-therapy group and the corresponding-dose R monotherapy group. ApoB, apolipoprotein B; FA, fenofibric acid 135 mg; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; R, rosuvastatin (5, 10, or 20 mg); T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; TG, triglycerides
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
a–c. Proportion of T2DM patients achieving combined targets of (a) LDL-C and non-HDL-C; (b) LDL-C, HDL-C, and TG; and (c) LDL-C, HDL-C, TG, non-HDL-C, and ApoB. Targets were defined as LDL-C <100 mg/dL, HDL-C >40/50 mg/dL in men/women, TG <150 mg/dL, non-HDL-C <130 mg/dL, and ApoB <90 mg/dL at final visit. ApoB, apolipoprotein B; FA, fenofibric acid 135 mg; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; R, rosuvastatin (5, 10, or 20 mg); T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; TG, triglycerides

References

    1. Steiner G. Treating lipid abnormalities in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol. 2001;88(suppl):37N–40N. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9149(01)02151-8.
    1. Kendall DM. The dyslipidemia of diabetes mellitus: giving triglycerides and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol a higher priority? Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am. 2005;34:27–48. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2004.11.004.
    1. Brunzell JD, Davidson M, Furburg CD, Goldberg RB, Howard BV, Stein JH, et al. Lipoprotein management in patients with cardiometabolic risk. Consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association and the American College of Cardiology Foundation. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:811–822. doi: 10.2337/dc08-9018.
    1. Rosenson RS, Otvos JD, Hsia J. Effects of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin on LDL and HDL particle concentrations in patients with metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:1087–1091. doi: 10.2337/dc08-1681.
    1. Garvey WT, Kwon S, Zheng D, Shaughnessy S, Wallace P, Hutto A, et al. Effects of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes on lipoprotein subclass particle size and concentration determined by nuclear magnetic resonance. Diabetes. 2003;52:453–462. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.52.2.453.
    1. Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation. 2002;106:3143–3421.
    1. American Diabetes Association 2009 Executive summary: Standards of medical care in diabetes–2009. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(Suppl 1):S6–S12.
    1. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Merz CNB, Brewer HB, Jr, Clark LT, Hunninghake DB, et al. Coordinating Committee of the National Cholesterol Education Program. Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III Guidelines. Circulation. 2004;110:227–239. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000133317.49796.0E.
    1. Fruchart JC, Sacks FM, Hermans MP, Assmann G, Brown WV, Ceska R, et al. The residual risk reduction initiative: a call to action to reduce residual vascular risk in dyslipidaemic patient. Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2008;5:319–335. doi: 10.3132/dvdr.2008.046.
    1. Roth EM, Rosenson RS, Carlson DM, Fukumoto SM, Setze CM, Blasetto JW, et al. Efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin 5 mg in combination with fenofibric acid 135 mg in patients with mixed dyslipidemia—A phase 3 study. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2010
    1. Jones PH, Davidson MH, Kashyap ML, Kelly MT, Buttler SM, Setze CM, et al. Efficacy and safety of ABT-335 (fenofibric acid) in combination with rosuvastatin in patients with mixed dyslipidemia: a phase 3 study. Atherosclerosis. 2009;204:208–215. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2008.09.027.
    1. Jones PH, Bays HE, Davidson MH, Kelly MT, Buttler SM, Setze CM, et al. Evaluation of a new formulation of fenofibric acid, ABT-335, co-administered with statins: study design and rationale of a phase III clinical programme. Clin Drug Investig. 2008;28:625–634. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200828100-00003.
    1. American Heart Association. An eating plan for healthy Americans—our American Heart Association diet. Dallas (TX): AHA, 2004. AHA Publication No. 50-1481A.
    1. Roth EM, McKenney JM, Kelly MT, Setze CM, Carlson DM, Gold A, et al. Efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin and fenofibric acid combination therapy versus simvastatin monotherapy in patients with hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia: a randomized, double-blind study. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2010;10:175–186. doi: 10.2165/11533430-000000000-00000.
    1. Rosenson RS, Davidson MH, Pourfarzib R. Underappreciated opportunities for low-density lipoprotein management in patients with cardiometabolic residual risk. Atherosclerosis. 2010
    1. Berne C, Siewert-Delle A. URANUS study investigators. Comparison of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin for lipid lowering in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: results from the URANUS study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2005;4:7. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-4-7.
    1. Ballantyne CM, Abate N, Yuan Z, King TR, Palmisano J. Dose-comparison study of the combination of ezetimibe and simvastatin (Vytorin) versus atorvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia: the Vytorin versus atorvastatin (VYVA) study. Am Heart J. 2004;149:464–473. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.11.023.
    1. Davidson MH, Ballantyne CM, Kerzner B, Melani L, Sager PT, Lipka L, Ezetimibe Study Group et al. Efficacy and safety of ezetimibe coadministered with statins: randomised, placebo-controlled, blinded experience in 2382 patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. Int J Clin Pract. 2005;58:746–755. doi: 10.1111/j.1368-5031.2004.00289.x.
    1. Jones PH, Davidson MH, Stein EA, Bays HE, McKenney JM, Miller E, STELLAR Study Group et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin across doses (STELLAR* trial) Am J Cardiol. 2003;92:152–160. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9149(03)00530-7.
    1. McKenney J, Ballantyne CM, Feldman TA, Brady WE, Shah A, Davies MJ, et al. LDL-C goal attainment with ezetimibe plus simvastatin coadministration vs atorvastatin or simvastatin monotherapy in patients at high risk of CHD. MedGenMed. 2005;7:3.
    1. McKenney JM, Jones PH, Angeli Adamczyk M, Cain VA, Bryzinski BS, STELLAR Study Group et al. Comparison of the efficacy of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin in achieving lipid goals: results from the STELLAR trial. Curr Med Res Opin. 2003;19:689–698. doi: 10.1185/030079903125002405.
    1. Stalenhoef AFH, Ballantye CM, Sarti C, Murin J, Tonstad S, Rose H, et al. A COmparative study with rosuvastatin in subjects with METabolic Syndrome: results of the COMETS study. Eur Heart J. 2005;26:2664–2672. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi482.
    1. Wolffenbuttel BHR, Franken AAM, Vincent HH, Dutch CORALL Study Group Cholesterol-lowering effects of rosuvastatin compared with atorvastatin in patients with type 2 diabetes—CORALL study. J Intern Med. 2005;257:531–539. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2005.01499.x.
    1. Lemieux I, Laperrière L, Dzavik V, Tremblay G, Bourgeois J, Després JP. A 16-week fenofibrate treatment increases LDL particle size in type IIA dyslipidemic patients. Atherosclerosis. 2002;162:363–371. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9150(01)00711-0.
    1. Elisaf M. Effects of fibrates on serum metabolic parameters. Curr Med Res Opin. 2002;18:269–276. doi: 10.1185/030079902125000516.
    1. Rosenson RS, Wolff DA, Huskin AL, Helenowski IB, Rademaker AW. Fenofibrate therapy ameliorates fasting and postprandial lipoproteinemia, oxidative stress, and the inflammatory response in subjects with hypertriglyceridemia and the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:1945–1951. doi: 10.2337/dc07-0015.
    1. Campos H, Genest JJ, Jr, Blijlevens E, McNamara JR, Jenner JL, Ordovas JM, et al. Low density lipoprotein particle size and coronary artery disease. Arterioscler Thromb. 1992;12:187–195.
    1. Campos H, Blijlevens E, McNamara JR, Ordovas JM, Posner BM, Wilson PW, et al. LDL particle size distribution. Results from the Framingham Offspring Study. Arterioscler Thromb. 1992;12:1410–1419.
    1. Griffin BA, Freeman DJ, Tait GW, Thomson J, Caslake MJ, Packard CJ, et al. Role of plasma triglyceride in the regulation of plasma low density lipoprotein (LDL) subfractions: relative contribution of small, dense LDL to coronary heart disease risk. Atherosclerosis. 1994;106:241–253. doi: 10.1016/0021-9150(94)90129-5.
    1. Assmann G, Schulte H. Relation of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides to incidence of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease (the PROCAM experience). Prospective Cardiovascular Munster study. Am J Cardiol. 1992;70:733–737. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90550-I.
    1. Assmann G, Schulte H, Cullen P, Seedorf U. Assessing risk of myocardial infarction and stroke: new data from the Prospective Cardiovascular Munster (PROCAM) study. Eur J Clin Invest. 2007;37:925–932. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2007.01888.x.
    1. Hokanson JE, Austin MA. Plasma triglyceride level is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease independent of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level: a meta-analysis of population-based prospective studies. J Cardiovasc Risk. 1996;3:213–219. doi: 10.1097/00043798-199604000-00014.
    1. Sarwar N, Danesh J, Eiriksdottir G, Sigurdsson G, Wareham N, Bingham S, et al. Triglycerides and the risk of coronary heart disease: 10, 158 incident cases among 262, 565 participants in 29 Western prospective studies. Circulation. 2007;115:450–458. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.637793.
    1. Durrington PN, Tuomilehto J, Hamann A, Kallend D, Smith K. Rosuvastatin and fenofibrate alone and in combination in type 2 diabetes patients with combined hyperlipidaemia. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2004;64:137–151. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2003.11.012.
    1. The ACCORD Study Group Effects of combination lipid therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(17):1563–1574. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1001282.
    1. The ACCORD Study Group and ACCORD Eye Study Group Effects of medical therapies on retinopathy progression in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2010;263:233–244.
    1. Bays HE, Jones PH, Mohiuddin SM, Kelly MT, Sun H, Setze CM, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of fenofibric acid in combination with statin therapy for the treatment of patients with mixed dyslipidemia. J Clin Lipidol. 2008;2:426–435. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2008.10.001.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren