Novel Application of the Two-Period Microtracer Approach to Determine Absolute Oral Bioavailability and Fraction Absorbed of Ertugliflozin

Sangeeta Raje, Ernesto Callegari, Vaishali Sahasrabudhe, Alfin Vaz, Haihong Shi, Eric Fluhler, Eric J Woolf, Klaas Schildknegt, Kyle Matschke, Christine Alvey, Susan Zhou, Dimitris Papadopoulos, Robert Fountaine, Didier Saur, Steven G Terra, Lloyd Stevens, Daniel Gaunt, David L Cutler, Sangeeta Raje, Ernesto Callegari, Vaishali Sahasrabudhe, Alfin Vaz, Haihong Shi, Eric Fluhler, Eric J Woolf, Klaas Schildknegt, Kyle Matschke, Christine Alvey, Susan Zhou, Dimitris Papadopoulos, Robert Fountaine, Didier Saur, Steven G Terra, Lloyd Stevens, Daniel Gaunt, David L Cutler

Abstract

Ertugliflozin, a sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor, is approved in the United States for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. A novel two-period study design with 14 C microtracer dosing in each period was used to determine absolute oral bioavailability (F) and fraction absorbed (Fa ) of ertugliflozin. Eight healthy adult men received 100-μg i.v. 14 C-ertugliflozin (400 nCi) dose 1 h after a 15-mg oral unlabeled ertugliflozin dose (period 1), followed by 100 μg 14 C-ertugliflozin orally along with 15 mg oral unlabeled ertugliflozin (period 2). Unlabeled ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined using high-performance liquid-chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). 14 C-ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined using HPLC-accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) and 14 C urine concentrations were determined using AMS. F ((area under the curve (AUC)p.o. /14 C-AUCi.v. )*(14 C-Dosei.v. /Dosep.o. )) and Fa ((14 C_Total_Urinep.o. /14 C_Total_Urinei.v. )* (14 C-Dosei.v. /14 C-Dosep.o. )) were estimated. Estimates of F and Fa were 105% and 111%, respectively. Oral absorption of ertugliflozin was complete under fasted conditions and F was ∼100%. Ertugliflozin was well tolerated.

© 2018 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design. Tmax, time to maximum concentration.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Median plasma concentration‐time profiles for oral (unlabeled; 15 mg) and i.v. (14C‐labeled; 100 μg) ertugliflozin.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Individual and geometric mean dose‐normalized area under the plasma concentration‐time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf(dn)) values for unlabeled ertugliflozin and 14C‐ertugliflozin. Circles represent individual values and dots represent geometric means. Box plot provides median and 25%/75% quartiles with whiskers to the last point within 1.5 × interquartile range.

References

    1. Kalgutkar, A.S. et al Preclinical species and human disposition of PF‐04971729, a selective inhibitor of the sodium‐dependent glucose cotransporter 2 and clinical candidate for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Drug Metab. Dispos. 39, 1609–1619 (2011).
    1. Miao, Z. et al Pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and excretion of the antidiabetic agent ertugliflozin (PF‐04971729) in healthy male subjects. Drug Metab. Dispos. 41, 445–456 (2013).
    1. Terra, S.G. et al Phase III, efficacy and safety study of ertugliflozin monotherapy in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with diet and exercise alone. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 19, 721–728 (2017).
    1. Pratley, R.E. et al Ertugliflozin plus sitagliptin versus either individual agent over 52 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with metformin: the VERTIS FACTORIAL randomized trial. Diabetes Obes. Metab. [Epub ahead of print] (2018).
    1. Dagogo‐Jack, S. et al Efficacy and safety of the addition of ertugliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with metformin and sitagliptin: the VERTIS SITA2 placebo-controlled randomized study. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 20, 530–540 (2018).
    1. Food and Drug Administration . Guidance for Industry: Drug interaction studies — study design, data analysis, implications for dosing, and labeling recommendations. (2012).
    1. Boulton, D.W. et al Simultaneous oral therapeutic and intravenous 14C‐microdoses to determine the absolute oral bioavailability of saxagliptin and dapagliflozin. Br. J. Pharmacol. 75, 763–768 (2013).
    1. International Conference on Harmonisation . ICH Topic M 3 (R2). Non‐clinical safety studies for the conduct of human clinical trials and marketing authorization for pharmaceuticals. International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (2009).
    1. Sarapa, N. , Hsyu, P.H. , Lappin, G. & Garner R.C. The application of accelerator mass spectrometry to absolute bioavailability studies in humans: simultaneous administration of an intravenous microdose of 14C‐nelfinavir mesylate solution and oral nelfinavir to healthy volunteers. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 45, 1198–1205 (2005).
    1. Lappin, G. et al Use of microdosing to predict pharmacokinetics at the therapeutic dose: experience with 5 drugs. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 80, 203–215 (2006).
    1. Lappin, G. et al Pharmacokinetics of fexofenadine: evaluation of a microdose and assessment of absolute oral bioavailability. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 40, 125–131 (2010).
    1. Smith, D.A. The debate is over: accelerator MS provides the route to better drug‐development paradigms/protocols. Bioanalysis 3, 391–392 (2011).
    1. Food and Drug Administration . Guidance for Industry. Waiver of in vivo bioavailability and bioequivalence studies for immediate‐release solid oral dosage forms based on a biopharmaceutics classification system. (2017).
    1. Yang, J. , Jamei, M. , Yeo, K.R. , Tucker, G.T. & Rostami‐Hodjegan, A . Prediction of intestinal first‐pass drug metabolism. Curr. Drug Metab. 8, 676–684 (2007).
    1. Yu, L.X. & Amidon, G.L. A compartmental absorption and transit model for estimating oral drug absorption. Int. J. Pharm. 186, 119–125 (1999).
    1. Levey, A.S. et al Using standardized serum creatinine values in the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate. Ann. Intern. Med. 145, 247–254 (2006).
    1. Evans, W.E. , Schentag, J.J. & Jusko, W.J. Guidelines for collection and analysis of pharmacokinetic data. Applied Pharmacokinetics. 3rd edn (Applied Therapeutics Inc., Spokane, WA, 1992).
    1. Gibaldi, M. & Perrier, D. Pharmacokinetics. 2nd edn (Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, NY, 1982).
    1. Gobburu, J.V. & Holford, N.H. Vz , the terminal phase volume: time for its terminal phase? J. Biopharm. Stat. 11, 373–375 (2001).
    1. Sahasrabudhe V., et al The effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ertugliflozin in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 57, 1432–1443 (2017).

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren