Intraocular Pressure Rise in Subjects with and without Glaucoma during Four Common Yoga Positions

Jessica V Jasien, Jost B Jonas, C Gustavo de Moraes, Robert Ritch, Jessica V Jasien, Jost B Jonas, C Gustavo de Moraes, Robert Ritch

Abstract

Purpose: To measure changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) in association with yoga exercises with a head-down position.

Methods: The single Center, prospective, observational study included 10 subjects with primary open-angle glaucoma and 10 normal individuals, who performed the yoga exercises of Adho Mukha Svanasana, Uttanasana, Halasana and Viparita Karani for two minutes each. IOP was measured by pneumatonometry at baseline and during and after the exercises.

Results: All yoga poses were associated with a significant (P < 0.01) rise in IOP within one minute after assuming the yoga position. The highest IOP increase (P < 0.01) was measured in the Adho Mukha Svanasana position (IOP increase from 17 ± 3.2 mmHg to 28 ± 3.8 mmHg in glaucoma patients; from 17 ± 2.8 mmHg to 29 ± 3.9 mmHg in normal individuals), followed by the Uttanasana position (17 ± 3.9 mmHg to 27 ± 3.4 mmHg (glaucoma patients) and from 18 ± 2.5 mmHg to 26 ± 3.6 mmHg normal individuals)), the Halasana position (18 ± 2.8 mmHg to 24 ± 3.5 mmHg (glaucoma patients); 18 ± 2.7 mmHg to 22 ± 3.4 mmHg (normal individuals)), and finally the Viparita Kirani position (17 ± 4 mmHg to 21 ± 3.6 mmHg (glaucoma patients); 17 ± 2.8 to 21 ± 2.4 mmHg (normal individuals)). IOP dropped back to baseline values within two minutes after returning to a sitting position. Overall, IOP rise was not significantly different between glaucoma and normal subjects (P = 0.813), all though glaucoma eyes tended to have measurements 2 mm Hg higher on average.

Conclusions: Yoga exercises with head-down positions were associated with a rapid rise in IOP in glaucoma and healthy eyes. IOP returned to baseline values within 2 minutes. Future studies are warranted addressing whether yoga exercise associated IOP changes are associated with similar changes in cerebrospinal fluid pressure and whether they increase the risk of glaucoma progression.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT01915680.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. CONSORT Flow Diagram.
Fig 1. CONSORT Flow Diagram.
Fig 2. Scheme Illustrating the Various Yoga…
Fig 2. Scheme Illustrating the Various Yoga Positions.
Fig 3. Histogram and test for homoscedasticity…
Fig 3. Histogram and test for homoscedasticity of the mixed effects linear model.
Fig 4. Least squares means and mean…
Fig 4. Least squares means and mean values of the covariates of the changes in IOP in the Adho Mukha Svanasana position over time.
The X axis represents each time point an IOP measurement was taken (0 = Baseline seated; 1 = Immediate position; 2 = 2 minutes position; 3 = Post position seated; and 4 = 10 minutes post position seated). The Y axis represents the IOP in mmHg after adjusting for the covariates. Subjects with glaucoma diagnosis are depicted ‘Glaucoma = 1’; controls are ‘Glaucoma = 0’.
Fig 5. Least squares means and mean…
Fig 5. Least squares means and mean values of the covariates of the changes in IOP in the Uttanasana position over time.
The X axis represents each time point an IOP measurement was taken (0 = Baseline seated; 1 = Immediate position; 2 = 2 minutes position; 3 = Post position seated; and 4 = 10 minutes post position seated). The Y axis represents the IOP in mmHg after adjusting for the covariates. Subjects with glaucoma diagnosis are depicted ‘Glaucoma = 1’; controls are ‘Glaucoma = 0’.
Fig 6. Least squares means and mean…
Fig 6. Least squares means and mean values of the covariates of the changes in IOP in the Halasana position over time.
The X axis represents each time point an IOP measurement was taken (0 = Baseline seated; 1 = Immediate position; 2 = 2 minutes position; 3 = Post position seated; and 4 = 10 minutes post position seated). The Y axis represents the IOP in mmHg after adjusting for the covariates. Subjects with glaucoma diagnosis are depicted ‘Glaucoma = 1’; controls are ‘Glaucoma = 0’.
Fig 7. Least squares means and mean…
Fig 7. Least squares means and mean values of the covariates of the changes in IOP in the Viparita Karani position over time.
The X axis represents each time point an IOP measurement was taken (0 = Baseline seated; 1 = Immediate position; 2 = 2 minutes position; 3 = Post position seated; and 4 = 10 minutes post position seated). The Y axis represents the IOP in mmHg after adjusting for the covariates. Subjects with glaucoma diagnosis are depicted ‘Glaucoma = 1’; controls are ‘Glaucoma = 0’.
Fig 8. Predictive Margins of Diagnostic Groups…
Fig 8. Predictive Margins of Diagnostic Groups versus Time with 95% Confidence Intervals.
Fig 9. Predictive Margins of Yoga Pose…
Fig 9. Predictive Margins of Yoga Pose versus Time with 95% Confidence Intervals.

References

    1. Tarkkanen A, Leikola J. Postural variations of the intraocular pressure as measured with the Mackay-Marg tonometer. Acta ophthalmologica. 1967;45(4):569–75.
    1. Klatz RM, Goldman RM, Pinchuk BG, Nelson KE, Tarr RS. The effects of gravity inversion procedures on systemic blood pressure, intraocular pressure, and central retinal arterial pressure. The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. 1983;82(11):853–7.
    1. LeMarr JD, Golding LA, Adler JG. Intraocular pressure response to inversion. American journal of optometry and physiological optics. 1984;61(11):679–82.
    1. Buchanan RA, Williams TD. Intraocular pressure, ocular pulse pressure, and body position. American journal of optometry and physiological optics. 1985;62(1):59–62.
    1. Hirooka K, Shiraga F. Relationship between postural change of the intraocular pressure and visual field loss in primary open-angle glaucoma. Journal of glaucoma. 2003;12(4):379–82.
    1. Prata TS, De Moraes CG, Kanadani FN, Ritch R, Paranhos A Jr. Posture-induced intraocular pressure changes: considerations regarding body position in glaucoma patients. Survey of ophthalmology. 2010;55(5):445–53. 10.1016/j.survophthal.2009.12.002
    1. Wilensky JT. Diurnal variations in intraocular pressure. Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society. 1991;89:757
    1. Anderson DR, Grant WM. The influence of position on intraocular pressure. Investigative ophthalmology. 1973;12(3):204–12.
    1. Weber AK, Price J. Pressure differential of intraocular pressure measured between supine and sitting position. Annals of ophthalmology. 1981;13(3):323–6.
    1. Tsukahara S, Sasaki T. Postural change of IOP in normal persons and in patients with primary wide open-angle glaucoma and low-tension glaucoma. British journal of ophthalmology. 1984;68(6):389–92.
    1. Carlson KH, McLaren JW, Topper JE, Brubaker RF. Effect of body position on intraocular pressure and aqueous flow. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 1987;28(8):1346–52.
    1. Mosaed S, Liu JH, Weinreb RN. Correlation between office and peak nocturnal intraocular pressures in healthy subjects and glaucoma patients. American journal of ophthalmology. 2005;139(2):320–4.
    1. Weinreb RN, Cook J, Friberg TR. Effect of inverted body position on intraocular pressure. American journal of ophthalmology. 1984;98(6):784–7.
    1. Friberg TR, Sanborn G. Optic nerve dysfunction during gravity inversion. Pattern reversal visual evoked potentials. Archives of ophthalmology. 1985;103(11):1687–9.
    1. Linder BJ, Trick GL, Wolf ML. Altering body position affects intraocular pressure and visual function. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 1988;29(10):1492–7.
    1. Baskaran M, Raman K, Ramani KK, Roy J, Vijaya L, Badrinath SS. Intraocular pressure changes and ocular biometry during Sirsasana (headstand posture) in yoga practitioners. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(8):1327–32.
    1. Kiuchi T, Motoyama Y, Oshika T. Relationship of progression of visual field damage to postural changes in intraocular pressure in patients with normal-tension glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(12):2150–5.
    1. Bertschinger DR, Mendrinos E, Dosso A. Yoga can be dangerous—glaucomatous visual field defect worsening due to postural yoga. The British journal of ophthalmology. 2007;91(10):1413–4.
    1. Saper RB, Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Culpepper L, Phillips RS. Prevalence and patterns of adult yoga use in the United States: results of a national survey. Alternative Therapies In Health And Medicine. 2004;10(2):44–9.
    1. Cramer H, Krucoff C, Dobos G. Adverse events associated with yoga: a systematic review of published case reports and case series. PloS one. 2013;8(10):e75515 10.1371/journal.pone.0075515
    1. Gallardo MJ, Aggarwal N, Cavanagh HD, Whitson JT. Progression of glaucoma associated with the Sirsasana (headstand) yoga posture. Advances in therapy. 2006;23(6):921–5.
    1. Monteiro de Barros DS, Bazzaz S, Gheith ME, Siam GA, Moster MR. Progressive Optic Neuropathy in Congenital Glaucoma Associated with the Sirsasana Yoga Posture. Ophthalmic Surgery, Lasers, and Imaging. 2008;39(4):339–40.
    1. Pettinato Y. Simply Yoga. Hinkler Books Pty, Limited2002. p. 22–3.
    1. Almubrad TM, Ogbuehi KC. On repeated corneal applanation with the Goldmann and two non-contact tonometers. Clinical & experimental optometry: journal of the Australian Optometrical Association. 2010;93(2):77–82.
    1. Gaton DD, Ehrenberg M, Lusky M, Wussuki-Lior O, Dotan G, Weinberger D, et al. Effect of repeated applanation tonometry on the accuracy of intraocular pressure measurements. Current eye research. 2010;35(6):475–9. 10.3109/02713681003678824
    1. Jóhannesson G, Hallberg P, Eklund A, Behndig A, Lindén C. Effects of topical anaesthetics and repeated tonometry on intraocular pressure. Acta ophthalmologica. 2014;92(2):111–5. 10.1111/aos.12058
    1. Jain MR, Marmion VJ. Rapid pneumatic and Mackey-Marg applanation tonometry to evaluate the postural effect on intraocular pressure. The British journal of ophthalmology. 1976;60(10):687–93.
    1. Sit AJ, Nau CB, McLaren JW, Johnson DH, Hodge D. Circadian variation of aqueous dynamics in young healthy adults. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2008;49(4):1473–9.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren