Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and risk of past or future sick leave

Joakim Dillner, K Miriam Elfström, Jonas Blomqvist, Carina Eklund, Camilla Lagheden, Sara Nordqvist-Kleppe, Cecilia Hellström, Jennie Olofsson, Eni Andersson, August Jernbom Falk, Sofia Bergström, Emilie Hultin, Elisa Pin, Anna Månberg, Peter Nilsson, My Hedhammar, Sophia Hober, Johan Mattsson, Laila Sara Arroyo Mühr, Kalle Conneryd Lundgren, Joakim Dillner, K Miriam Elfström, Jonas Blomqvist, Carina Eklund, Camilla Lagheden, Sara Nordqvist-Kleppe, Cecilia Hellström, Jennie Olofsson, Eni Andersson, August Jernbom Falk, Sofia Bergström, Emilie Hultin, Elisa Pin, Anna Månberg, Peter Nilsson, My Hedhammar, Sophia Hober, Johan Mattsson, Laila Sara Arroyo Mühr, Kalle Conneryd Lundgren

Abstract

The extent that antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 may protect against future virus-associated disease is unknown. We invited all employees (n = 15,300) at work at the Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden to participate in a study examining SARS-Cov-2 antibodies in relation to registered sick leave. For consenting 12,928 healthy hospital employees antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 could be determined and compared to participant sick leave records. Subjects with viral serum antibodies were not at excess risk for future sick leave (adjusted odds ratio (OR) controlling for age and sex: 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI) (0.85 (0.43-1.68)]. By contrast, subjects with antibodies had an excess risk for sick leave in the weeks prior to testing [adjusted OR in multivariate analysis: 3.34 (2.98-3.74)]. Thus, presence of viral antibodies marks past disease and protection against excess risk of future disease. Knowledge of whether exposed subjects have had disease in the past or are at risk for future disease is essential for planning of control measures.Trial registration: First registered on 02/06/20, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04411576.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
STROBE flowchart of study participants.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Proportion (%) of healthcare workers on sick leave during the study period, by serology test result. Dashed lines around the lines denote the 95% confidence intervals. (A) Follow-up restricted to the 2 weeks after testing when participants had no knowledge of testing results. (B) Follow-up up to 14 weeks after testing.

References

    1. Lipsitch M, Swerdlow DL, Finelli L. Defining the epidemiology of Covid-19—Studies needed. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:1194–1196. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2002125.
    1. He X, et al. Temporal dynamics in viral shedding and transmissibility of COVID-19. Nat. Med. 2020;26:672–675. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0869-5.
    1. Arons MM, et al. Presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections and transmission in a skilled nursing facility. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:2081–2090. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2008457.
    1. Xiao AT, Tong YX, Zhang S. Profile of RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2: A preliminary study from 56 COVID-19 patients. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020 doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa460.
    1. Gandhi M, Yokoe DS, Havlir DV. Asymptomatic transmission, the achilles' heel of current strategies to control Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:2158–2160. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe2009758.
    1. Kellam P, Barclay W. The dynamics of humoral immune responses following SARS-CoV-2 infection and the potential for reinfection. J. Gen. Virol. 2020;101:791–797. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.001439.
    1. Long QX, et al. Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19. Nat. Med. 2020;26:845–848. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0897-1.
    1. Edridge AWD, et al. Seasonal coronavirus protective immunity is short-lasting. Nat. Med. 2020;26:1691–1693. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1083-1.
    1. Hassan SS, et al. SARS-CoV-2 infections among personnel providing home care services for the elderly in Stockholm, Sweden. medRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.12.18.20248511.
    1. Pimenoff VN, Elfström M, Baussano I, Björnstedt M, Dillner J. Estimating total excess mortality during a coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak in Stockholm, Sweden. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;15:93. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1593.
    1. Wrapp D, et al. Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. Science. 2020;367:1260–1263. doi: 10.1126/science.abb2507.
    1. Neiman M, et al. Individual and stable autoantibody repertoires in healthy individuals. Autoimmunity. 2019;52:1–11. doi: 10.1080/08916934.2019.1581774.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren