Risk for hospital readmission following bariatric surgery

Abstract

Background and objectives: Complications resulting in hospital readmission are important concerns for those considering bariatric surgery, yet present understanding of the risk for these events is limited to a small number of patient factors. We sought to identify demographic characteristics, concomitant morbidities, and perioperative factors associated with hospital readmission following bariatric surgery.

Methods: We report on a prospective observational study of 24,662 patients undergoing primary RYGB and 26,002 patients undergoing primary AGB at 249 and 317 Bariatric Surgery Centers of Excellence (BSCOE), respectively, in the United States from January 2007 to August 2009. Data were collected using standardized assessments of demographic factors and comorbidities, as well as longitudinal records of hospital readmissions, complications, and mortality.

Results: The readmission rate was 5.8% for RYGB and 1.2% for AGB patients 30 days after discharge. The greatest predictors for readmission following RYGB were prolonged length of stay (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0-2.7), open surgery (OR, 1.8; CI, 1.4-2.2), and pseudotumor cerebri (OR, 1.6; CI, 1.1-2.4). Prolonged length of stay (OR, 2.3; CI, 1.6-3.3), history of deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism (OR, 2.1; CI, 1.3-3.3), asthma (OR, 1.5; CI, 1.1-2.1), and obstructive sleep apnea (OR, 1.5; CI, 1.1-1.9) were associated with the greatest increases in readmission risk for AGB. The 30-day mortality rate was 0.14% for RYGB and 0.02% for AGB.

Conclusion: Readmission rates are low and mortality is very rare following bariatric surgery, but risk for both is significantly higher after RYGB. Predictors of readmission were disparate for the two procedures. Results do not support excluding patients with certain comorbidities since any reductions in overall readmission rates would be very small on the absolute risk scale. Future research should evaluate the efficacy of post-surgical managed care plans for patients at higher risk for readmission and adverse events.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1. Flow diagram of patient selection.

Figure 2. Cumulative incidence of 30-day readmission by surgery.

Figure 3. Loess plot of RYGB readmission rates on follow-up rates.

Circles represent BSCOE hospitals with the size weighted by the number of patients who underwent the procedure in the hospital during the study period.

Figure 4. Loess plot of AGB readmission rates on follow-up rates.

Circles represent BSCOE hospitals with the size weighted by the number of patients who underwent the procedure in the hospital during the study period.