Double versus single intrauterine insemination (IUI) in stimulated cycles for subfertile couples

Lidija Rakic, Elena Kostova, Ben J Cohlen, Astrid Ep Cantineau, Lidija Rakic, Elena Kostova, Ben J Cohlen, Astrid Ep Cantineau

Abstract

Background: In subfertile couples, couples who have tried to conceive for at least one year, intrauterine insemination (IUI) with ovarian hyperstimulation (OH) is one of the treatment modalities that can be offered. When IUI is performed a second IUI in the same cycle might add to the chances of conceiving. In a previous update of this review in 2010 it was shown that double IUI increases pregnancy rates when compared to single IUI. Since 2010, different clinical trials have been published with differing conclusions about whether double IUI increases pregnancy rates compared to single IUI.

Objectives: To determine the effectiveness and safety of double intrauterine insemination (IUI) compared to single IUI in stimulated cycles for subfertile couples.

Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility (CGF) Group trials register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL in July 2020 and LILACS, Google scholar and Epistemonikos in February 2021, together with reference checking and contact with study authors and experts in the field to identify additional studies.

Selection criteria: We included randomised controlled, parallel trials of double versus single IUIs in stimulated cycles in subfertile couples.

Data collection and analysis: Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information.

Main results: We identified in nine studies involving subfertile women. The evidence was of low quality; the main limitations were unclear risk of bias, inconsistent results for some outcomes and imprecision, due to small trials with imprecise results. We are uncertain whether double IUI improves live birth rate compared to single IUI (odds ratio (OR) 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71 to 1.88; I2 = 29%; studies = 3, participants = 468; low quality evidence). The evidence suggests that if the chance of live birth following single IUI is 16%, the chance of live birth following double IUI would be between 12% and 27%. Performing a sensitivity analysis restricted to only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with low risk of selection bias showed similar results. We are uncertain whether double IUI reduces miscarriage rate compared to single IUI (OR 1.78, 95% CI 0.98 to 3.24; I2 = 0%; studies = 6, participants = 2363; low quality evidence). The evidence suggests that chance of miscarriage following single IUI is 1.5% and the chance following double IUI would be between 1.5% and 5%. The reported clinical pregnancy rate per woman randomised may increase with double IUI group (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.86; I2 = 34%; studies = 9, participants = 2716; low quality evidence). This result should be interpreted with caution due to the low quality of the evidence and the moderate inconsistency. The evidence suggests that the chance of a pregnancy following single IUI is 14% and the chance following double IUI would be between 16% and 23%. We are uncertain whether double IUI affects multiple pregnancy rate compared to single IUI (OR 2.04, 95% CI 0.91 to 4.56; I2 = 8%; studies = 5; participants = 2203; low quality evidence). The evidence suggests that chance of multiple pregnancy following single IUI is 0.7% and the chance following double IUI would be between 0.85% and 3.7%. We are uncertain whether double IUI has an effect on ectopic pregnancy rate compared to single IUI (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.35 to 4.28; I2 = 0%; studies = 4, participants = 1048; low quality evidence). The evidence suggests that the chance of an ectopic pregnancy following single IUI is 0.8% and the chance following double IUI would be between 0.3% and 3.2%.

Authors' conclusions: Our main analysis, of which the evidence is low quality, shows that we are uncertain if double IUI improves live birth and reduces miscarriage compared to single IUI. Our sensitivity analysis restricted to studies of low risk of selection bias for both outcomes is consistent with the main analysis. Clinical pregnancy rate may increase in the double IUI group, but this should be interpreted with caution due to the low quality evidence. We are uncertain whether double IUI has an effect on multiple pregnancy rate and ectopic pregnancy rate compared to single IUI.

Conflict of interest statement

LR: none.

EK: none.

BJC: none.

AEPC: received an unrestricted research grant Ferring B.V.; support for attending ESHRE meeting – Ferring B.V., Theramex B.V.

Copyright © 2021 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Figures

1
1
Study flow diagram.
2
2
Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
3
3
Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
4
4
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Single intrauterine insemination (IUI) versus double IUI in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles, outcome: 1.1 Live birth per woman randomised.
5
5
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Single intrauterine insemination (IUI) versus double IUI in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles, outcome: 1.2 Miscarriage rate per woman randomised.
1.1. Analysis
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1: Double intrauterine insemination (IUI) versus single IUI in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles, Outcome 1: Live birth rate per woman randomised
1.2. Analysis
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1: Double intrauterine insemination (IUI) versus single IUI in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles, Outcome 2: Miscarriage rate per woman randomised
1.3. Analysis
1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1: Double intrauterine insemination (IUI) versus single IUI in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles, Outcome 3: Clinical pregnancy rate per woman randomised
1.4. Analysis
1.4. Analysis
Comparison 1: Double intrauterine insemination (IUI) versus single IUI in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles, Outcome 4: Multiple pregnancy rate per woman randomised
1.5. Analysis
1.5. Analysis
Comparison 1: Double intrauterine insemination (IUI) versus single IUI in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles, Outcome 5: Ectopic pregnancy per woman randomised
2.1. Analysis
2.1. Analysis
Comparison 2: Sensitivity analysis, Outcome 1: Live birth rate per woman randomised
2.2. Analysis
2.2. Analysis
Comparison 2: Sensitivity analysis, Outcome 2: Miscarriage rate per pregnancy
2.3. Analysis
2.3. Analysis
Comparison 2: Sensitivity analysis, Outcome 3: Miscarriage rate per woman randomised
2.4. Analysis
2.4. Analysis
Comparison 2: Sensitivity analysis, Outcome 4: Clinical pregnancy rate per woman
2.5. Analysis
2.5. Analysis
Comparison 2: Sensitivity analysis, Outcome 5: Multiple pregnancy rate per pregnancy

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren