Decompression and Enucleation of a Mandibular Radicular Cyst, Followed by Bone Regeneration and Implant-Supported Dental Restoration

M AboulHosn, Z Noujeim, N Nader, A Berberi, M AboulHosn, Z Noujeim, N Nader, A Berberi

Abstract

Odontogenic cysts are usually treated by enucleation (cystectomy). Limited cysts (less than 5 cm) are usually managed by primary excision (total cystectomy), whereas larger ones (exceeding 5 cm) are often decompressed or marsupialized. Because it consists only of opening a much smaller surgical window, decompression is regarded as a more conservative method of treatment: this method associates the creation of an opening (window) into the cystic cavity with the suturing of a decompressing device (plastic tube or stent) at the periphery of the cyst. Apart from releasing intraluminal pressure in the pathological cavity, this procedure helps the lesion to progressively decrease in volume "with a gradual increase in bone apposition" and preserves pulp vitality and periodontal integrity of the adjacent teeth. We are reporting a case of a mandibular radicular cyst that was treated by decompression, followed by enucleation, bone reconstruction, and restoration with two osseointegrated dental implants. The cystic cavity progressively decreased in volume and increased in bone density.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Clinical aspect of left mandibular vestibule (premolar and molar regions). (b) Aspiration syringe yielding blood and pus from the radiolucent image. (c) OPG of the patient displaying the radiolucent image in left mandible (34 to 37).
Figure 2
Figure 2
CBCT reconstruction of the left mandible. (a) The sagittal reconstruction with the approximative measurement of the bone destruction (30.7 mm × 19.7 mm). (b) Para-axial cut showing the discontinuity of the buccal cortical bone. (c) Para-axial cut showing the position of the mandibular canal.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) Clinical aspect of alveolar cavities of 35 and 36, immediately after their extraction. (b) Plastic tubes secured in alveolar cavities of teeth 35 and 36 with sutures. A disposable syringe (with needle) injecting a normal saline solution (sodium chloride in water) in distal tube in order to regularly irrigate the lesions. After injection of antiseptic solution in distal tube (A), irrigating liquid is evacuated from mesial tube (B).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Gingival healing around decompressing devices (tubes), 3 weeks after their placement and suturing.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(a) Panoramic radiograph 7 months after decompression, showing a reduction of the volume of the lesion. (b) CBCT of the same time period time, the para-axial cut shows a bone healing toward the center of the lesions with approximately ±4 mm buccally and ±2.4 mm lingually. (c) Sagittal reconstruction of the CBCT shows a volume reduction of the lesion approximately.
Figure 6
Figure 6
(a) Six months after the beginning of decompression, a mucoperiosteal flap was performed and decompression tubes removed, leading to the roof of the radiolucent lesion. (b) Upper aspect of the bony pathological cavity, immediately after the lesion's enucleation. Notice that the bone was formed all around external surfaces of both decompression devices (tubes). (c) The pathological cavity filled with Puros® cortico-cancellous particulate allograft, a mixture of 70% cortical and 30% cancellous bone particulate. (d) Puros® biomaterial covered with collagen cones (CollaPlug®) and mucosal wound sutured with 5/0 nylon sutures.
Figure 7
Figure 7
(a) Clinical mucosal healing after one week. (b) Radiological aspect of the graft and surrounding bone.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Histopathology of the cyst. (a) Stratified squamous nonkeratinized epithelium with rete ridges and inflamed connective tissue wall (H&E × 20). (b) Cystic lumen is filled with liquid containing cholesterol crystals (H&E × 40). Mucoperiosteal flap showing the buccolingual thickness of mandibular ridge before implant placement.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Para-axial cuts of a control CBCT before implant placement showing a complete bone regeneration of the cyst area.
Figure 10
Figure 10
(a) Clinical view of the bone healing before implant placement. (b) Two Swiss Plus Zimmer® implants placed in postalveolar locations of teeth 35 and 36. (c) Clinical aspects of cover screws and sutures, immediately after implants placement. (d) Clinical aspect of restored implants (35 and 36). (e) Panoramic radiograph showing the final situation of the bone and the restored implants.

References

    1. Partsch C. Uber kiefercyzten. Dtsch Mschr Zahnheilkd. 1892;10:271–304.
    1. Thoma K. H. Oral Surgery. 3rd. St. Louis, MO, USA: Mosby; 1958.
    1. Tolstunov L. Marsupialization catheter. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2008;66(5):1077–1079. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.11.027.
    1. Neaverth E. J., Burg H. A. Decompression of large periapical cystic lesions. Journal of Endodontics. 1982;8(4):175–182. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(82)80214-8.
    1. Rawashdeh M. A., Telfah H. Secondary alveolar bone grafting: the dilemma of donor site selection and morbidity. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2008;46(8):665–670. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2008.07.184.
    1. Ettl T., Gosau M., Sader R., Reichert T. E. Jaw cysts – filling or no filling after enucleation? A review. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. 2012;40(6):485–493. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2011.07.023.
    1. Pradel W., Eckelt U., Lauer G. Bone regeneration after enucleation of mandibular cyst: comparing autogenous grafts from tissue-engineered bone and iliac bone. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics. 2006;101(3):285–290. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.06.001.
    1. Stoor P., Apajalahti S., Kontio R. Regeneration of cystic bone cavities and bone defects with bioactive glass S53P4 in the upper and lower jaws. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2017;28(5):1197–1205. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003649. -1205, 2017.
    1. Shear M. Cysts of the Oral Regions. 3rd. Boston: Wright. Radicular and residual cysts; 1992.
    1. Domingos R. P., Goncalves Eduardo S., Neto E. S. Surgical approaches of extensive periapical cyst. Considerations about surgical technique. Salusvita Bauru. 2004;23:317–328.
    1. Bellizzi R., Loushine R. Decompression in “ A clinical atlas of endodontic surgery”. Chicago, London, Berlin: Quintessence books, quintessence publishing co, Inc.; 1991.
    1. Kubota Y., Imajo I., Itonaga R., Takenoshita Y. Effects of the patient's age and the size of the primary lesion on the speed of shrinkage after marsupialisation of keratocystic odontogenic tumours, dentigerous cysts, and radicular cysts. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2013;51(4):358–362. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2012.07.017.
    1. Enislidis G., Fock N., Sulzbacher I., Ewers R. Conservative treatment of large cystic lesions of the mandible: a prospective study of the effect of decompression. The British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery. 2004;42(6):546–550. doi: 10.1016/S0266-4356(04)00152-4.
    1. Oliveros-Lopez L., Fernandez-Olavarria A., Torres-Lagares D., et al. Reduction rate by decompression as a treatment of odontogenic cysts. Medicina Oral Patología Oral y Cirugia Bucal. 2017;22(5):e643–e650. doi: 10.4317/medoral.21916.
    1. Asutay F., Atalay Y., Turamanlar O., Horata E., Burdurlu M. C. Three-dimensional volumetric assessment of the effect of decompression on large mandibular odontogenic cystic lesions. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2016;74(6):1159–1166. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.12.010.
    1. Lee S.-T., Kim S.-G., Moon S.-Y., Oh J. S., You J. S., Kim J. S. The effect of decompression as treatment of the cysts in the jaws: retrospective analysis. Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. 2017;43(2):83–87. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2017.43.2.83.
    1. Kolokythas A., Fernandes R. P., Pazoki A., Ord R. A. Odontogenic keratocyst: to decompress or not to decompress? A comparative study of decompression and enucleation versus resection/peripheral ostectomy. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2007;65(4):640–644. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.06.284.
    1. August M., Faquin W. C., Troulis M. J., Kaban L. B. Dedifferentiation of odontogenic keratocyst epithelium after cyst decompression. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2003;61(6):678–683. doi: 10.1053/joms.2003.50137.
    1. Schlieve T., Miloro M., Kolokythas A. Does decompression of odontogenic cysts and cystlike lesions change the histologic diagnosis? Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2014;72(6):1094–1105. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.12.028.
    1. Awni S., Conn B. Decompression of keratocystic odontogenic tumors leading to increased fibrosis, but without any change in epithelial proliferation. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology. 2017;123(6):634–644. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2016.12.007.
    1. Rodrigues J. T., Dos Santos Antunes H., Armada L., Pires F. R. Influence of surgical decompression on the expression of inflammatory and tissue repair biomarkers in periapical cysts. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology. 2017;124(6):561–567. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2017.06.121.
    1. Stavropoulos F., Nale J. C., Ruskin J. D. Guided bone regeneration. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America. 2002;14(1):15–27. doi: 10.1016/S1042-3699(02)00013-4.
    1. Seo M. H., Eo M. Y., Cho Y. J., Kim S. M., Lee S. K. Autogenous partial bone chip grafting on the exposed inferior alveolar nerve after cystic enucleation. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2018;29(2):1–490. doi: 10.1097/scs.0000000000004077.
    1. Meltzer J. A. Lateral periodontal cyst: report of a case with 1-year reentry. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry. 1999;19(3):299–303.
    1. Angelopoulou E., Angelopoulos A. P. Lateral periodontal cyst. Review of the literature and report of a case. Journal of Periodontology. 1990;61(2):126–131. doi: 10.1902/jop.1990.61.2.126.
    1. Pearrocha-Diago M., Sanchis-Bielsa J. M., Bonet-Marco J., Minguez-Sanz J. M. Surgical treatment and follow-up of solitary bone cyst of the mandible: a report of seven cases. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2001;39(3):221–223. doi: 10.1054/bjom.2000.0559.
    1. Pappalardo S., Coronella M., Lanza M. L., et al. Multidetector CT Dentascan evaluation of bone regeneration obtained with deproteinised bovine graft in residual cavity after mandibular cyst enucleation. La Radiologia Medica. 2013;118(4):523–533. doi: 10.1007/s11547-012-0911-x.
    1. Sivolella S., Perin C., Capecchi M., Buongiorno V., Valente M. Guided bone regeneration in the treatment of a lateral periodontal cyst: 2-year clinical and radiologic follow-up. The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry. 2018;38(5):747–754. doi: 10.11607/prd.2767.
    1. Noumbissi S. S., Lozada J. L., Boyne P. J., et al. Clinical, histologic, and histomorphometric evaluation of mineralized solvent- dehydrated bone allograft (Puros) in human maxillary sinus grafts. The Journal of Oral Implantology. 2005;31(4):171–179. doi: 10.1563/1548-1336(2005)31[171:CHAHEO];2.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren