Chemohormonal Therapy in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: Long-Term Survival Analysis of the Randomized Phase III E3805 CHAARTED Trial

Christos E Kyriakopoulos, Yu-Hui Chen, Michael A Carducci, Glenn Liu, David F Jarrard, Noah M Hahn, Daniel H Shevrin, Robert Dreicer, Maha Hussain, Mario Eisenberger, Manish Kohli, Elizabeth R Plimack, Nicholas J Vogelzang, Joel Picus, Matthew M Cooney, Jorge A Garcia, Robert S DiPaola, Christopher J Sweeney, Christos E Kyriakopoulos, Yu-Hui Chen, Michael A Carducci, Glenn Liu, David F Jarrard, Noah M Hahn, Daniel H Shevrin, Robert Dreicer, Maha Hussain, Mario Eisenberger, Manish Kohli, Elizabeth R Plimack, Nicholas J Vogelzang, Joel Picus, Matthew M Cooney, Jorge A Garcia, Robert S DiPaola, Christopher J Sweeney

Abstract

Purpose Docetaxel added to androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) significantly increases the longevity of some patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Herein, we present the outcomes of the CHAARTED (Chemohormonal Therapy Versus Androgen Ablation Randomized Trial for Extensive Disease in Prostate Cancer) trial with more mature follow-up and focus on tumor volume. Patients and Methods In this phase III study, 790 patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer were equally randomly assigned to receive either ADT in combination with docetaxel 75 mg/m2 for up to six cycles or ADT alone. The primary end point of the study was overall survival (OS). Additional analyses of the prospectively defined low- and high-volume disease subgroups were performed. High-volume disease was defined as presence of visceral metastases and/or ≥ four bone metastases with at least one outside of the vertebral column and pelvis. Results At a median follow-up of 53.7 months, the median OS was 57.6 months for the chemohormonal therapy arm versus 47.2 months for ADT alone (hazard ratio [HR], 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.89; P = .0018). For patients with high-volume disease (n = 513), the median OS was 51.2 months with chemohormonal therapy versus 34.4 months with ADT alone (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.79; P < .001). For those with low-volume disease (n = 277), no OS benefit was observed (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.55; P = .86). Conclusion The clinical benefit from chemohormonal therapy in prolonging OS was confirmed for patients with high-volume disease; however, for patients with low-volume disease, no OS benefit was discerned.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00309985.

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
CONSORT diagram. Overview of screened and randomly assigned patients. ADT, androgen-deprivation therapy; NA, not applicable.
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
Overall survival (OS) by treatment arm among all patients. ADT, androgen-deprivation therapy; HR, hazard ratio.
Fig 3.
Fig 3.
Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival (OS) for (A) High-volume total patient population, (B) Low-volume total patient population, (C) High-volume de novo metastatic patients, (D) Low-volume de novo metastatic patients, (E) High-volume patients with prior local therapy, (F) Low-volume patients with prior local therapy. HR, hazard ratio; NR, not reached.
Fig 4.
Fig 4.
Test of heterogeneity between patients with high- and low-volume disease. ADT, androgen-deprivation therapy. The size of the squares is proportional to the inverse of the variance of the log hazard ratio (small squares correspond to large variances).

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren