Changes in gait and fatigue from morning to afternoon in people with multiple sclerosis

M E Morris, C Cantwell, L Vowels, K Dodd, M E Morris, C Cantwell, L Vowels, K Dodd

Abstract

Objectives: The aim was to measure changes in walking patterns and self rated fatigue in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) compared with age matched control subjects, from the morning to the afternoon within a single day.

Methods: Fourteen patients with MS and the same number of matched control subjects performed four 10 m gait trials at their preferred walking speed at 10 00 am and then again at 3 00 pm on the same day. Gait speed, stride length, cadence, and the percentage of the gait cycle spent in double limb support were measured using a foot switch stride analyzer. Patients with MS also self rated their fatigue levels in the morning and afternoon using an 11 point scale.

Results: Compared with control subjects, patients walked very slowly, with reduced stride length and around twice as much variability in gait performance. Although self rated fatigue significantly increased from the morning to the afternoon, walking patterns remained consistent in both groups over the course of the day.

Conclusions: These findings imply that mechanisms controlling locomotion are separate from those regulating perceived fatigue. Objective measures of performance, rather than self report, should be used to monitor change in patients with multiple sclerosis.

References

    1. Arch Neurol. 1988 Apr;45(4):435-7
    1. Mult Scler. 1999 Oct;5(5):363-8
    1. Brain. 1989 Feb;112 ( Pt 1):133-46
    1. Brain. 1994 Aug;117 ( Pt 4):759-65
    1. Brain. 1994 Oct;117 ( Pt 5):1169-81
    1. Neurol Clin. 1995 Feb;13(1):119-46
    1. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 Feb;77(2):165-70
    1. Acta Neurol Scand. 1995 Nov;92(5):353-5
    1. Brain. 1996 Jun;119 ( Pt 3):701-8
    1. Mult Scler. 1996 Oct;2(3):142-56
    1. Muscle Nerve. 1998 Aug;21(8):1068-70
    1. J Neurol Sci. 1998 Oct 8;160(2):164-70
    1. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1999 Oct 29;354(1390):1615-22
    1. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1999 Oct 29;354(1390):1635-40
    1. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1999 Oct 29;354(1390):1649-73
    1. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1999 Jul;36(3):183-8
    1. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Feb;81(2):215-21
    1. Acta Neurol Scand. 2000 Apr;101(4):244-8
    1. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 1978 Mar-Apr;4(2):151-62
    1. J Neurol Sci. 1979 Feb;40(2-3):159-68
    1. Brain. 1980 Jun;103(2):281-300
    1. N Y State J Med. 1980 Aug;80(9):1395-400
    1. Arch Neurol. 1982 Jun;39(6):337-41
    1. Neurology. 1983 Nov;33(11):1444-52
    1. Phys Ther. 1984 Jan;64(1):35-40
    1. J Gerontol. 1984 Nov;39(6):662-6
    1. Thorax. 1984 Nov;39(11):818-22
    1. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1986 Aug;67(8):536-9
    1. Acta Neurol Scand. 1987 Jul;76(1):12-7
    1. Brain. 1999 Jan;122 ( Pt 1):17-26
    1. Acta Neurol Scand. 1999 Sep;100(3):156-62
    1. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988 Oct;69(10):846-9

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren