Cross-sectional imaging of acute gynaecologic disorders: CT and MRI findings with differential diagnosis-part II: uterine emergencies and pelvic inflammatory disease
Pietro Valerio Foti, Massimo Tonolini, Valeria Costanzo, Luca Mammino, Stefano Palmucci, Antonio Cianci, Giovanni Carlo Ettorre, Antonio Basile, Pietro Valerio Foti, Massimo Tonolini, Valeria Costanzo, Luca Mammino, Stefano Palmucci, Antonio Cianci, Giovanni Carlo Ettorre, Antonio Basile
Abstract
Due to the growing use of cross-sectional imaging in emergency departments, acute gynaecologic disorders are increasingly diagnosed on urgent multidetector computed tomography (CT) studies, often requested under alternative presumptive diagnoses in reproductive-age women. If clinical conditions and state-of-the-art scanner availability permit, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is superior to CT due to its more in-depth characterisationof abnormal or inconclusive gynaecological findings, owing to excellent soft-tissue contrast, intrinsic multiplanar capabilities and lack of ionising radiation.This pictorial review aims to provide radiologists with a thorough familiarity with gynaecologic emergencies by illustrating their CT and MRI appearances, in order to provide a timely and correct imaging diagnosis. Specifically, this second instalment reviews with examples and emphasis on differential diagnosis the main non-pregnancy-related uterine emergencies (including endometrial polyps, degenerated leiomyomas and uterine inversion) and the spectrum of pelvic inflammatory disease.
Keywords: Computed tomography (CT); Gynaecologic emergencies; Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Pelvic inflammatory disease; Uterus.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures
References
- Bennett GL, Slywotzky CM, Giovanniello G. Gynecologic causes of acute pelvic pain: spectrum of CT findings. Radiographics. 2002;22:785–801.
- Potter AW, Chandrasekhar CA. US and CT evaluation of acute pelvic pain of gynecologic origin in nonpregnant premenopausal patients. Radiographics. 2008;28:1645–1659. doi: 10.1148/rg.286085504.
- Swart JE, Fishman EK. Gynecologic pathology on multidetector CT: a pictorial review. Emerg Radiol. 2008;15:383–389. doi: 10.1007/s10140-008-0732-3.
- Cano Alonso Raquel, Borruel Nacenta Susana, Díez Martínez Patricia, María Navallas Irujo, Ibáñez Sanz Laín, Zabía Galíndez Elena. Role of multidetector CT in the management of acute female pelvic disease. Emergency Radiology. 2009;16(6):453–472. doi: 10.1007/s10140-009-0808-8.
- Ditkofsky Noah G., Singh Ajay, Avery Laura, Novelline Robert A. The role of emergency MRI in the setting of acute abdominal pain. Emergency Radiology. 2014;21(6):615–624.
- Ayyala Rama S., Khwaja Asef, Anupindi Sudha A. Pelvic pain in the middle of the night: use of MRI for evaluation of pediatric female pathology in the emergent setting. Emergency Radiology. 2017;24(6):681–688. doi: 10.1007/s10140-017-1520-8.
- Pedrosa I, Zeikus EA, Levine D, et al. MR imaging of acute right lower quadrant pain in pregnant and nonpregnant patients. Radiographics. 2007;27:721–743. doi: 10.1148/rg.273065116.
- Roche O, Chavan N, Aquilina J, et al. Radiological appearances of gynaecological emergencies. Insights Imaging. 2012;3:265–275.
- Iraha Y, Okada M, Iraha R, et al. CT and MR imaging of gynecologic emergencies. Radiographics. 2017;37:1569–1586.
- Sadro CT. Imaging the endometrium: a pictorial essay. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2016;67:254–262. doi: 10.1016/j.carj.2015.09.012.
- Bignardi T, Van den Bosch T, Condous G. Abnormal uterine and post-menopausal bleeding in the acute gynaecology unit. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;23:595–607. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.05.001.
- Dueholm M, Lundorf E, Hansen ES, et al. Evaluation of the uterine cavity with magnetic resonance imaging, transvaginal sonography, hysterosonographic examination, and diagnostic hysteroscopy. Fertil Steril. 2001;76:350–357. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)01900-8.
- Hileeto D, Fadare O, Martel M, et al. Age dependent association of endometrial polyps with increased risk of cancer involvement. World J Surg Oncol. 2005;3:8. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-3-8.
- Dreisler E, Stampe Sorensen S, Ibsen PH, et al. Prevalence of endometrial polyps and abnormal uterine bleeding in a Danish population aged 20-74 years. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33:102–108. doi: 10.1002/uog.6259.
- Nalaboff KM, Pellerito JS, Ben-Levi E. Imaging the endometrium: disease and normal variants. Radiographics. 2001;21:1409–1424. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.21.6.g01nv211409.
- Grasel RP, Outwater EK, Siegelman ES, et al. Endometrial polyps: MR imaging features and distinction from endometrial carcinoma. Radiology. 2000;214:47–52. doi: 10.1148/radiology.214.1.r00ja3647.
- American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL): Advancing Minimally Invasive Gynecology Worldwide AAGL practice report: practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of submucous leiomyomas. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012;19:152–171. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.09.005.
- Nougaret S, Horta M, Sala E, et al. Endometrial cancer MRI staging: updated guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology. Eur Radiol. 2019;29:792–805. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5515-y.
- Hauth E, Libera H, Kimmig R, et al. MR imaging of the pelvis in the diagnosis of the endometrium in breast cancer patients in tamoxifen therapy. ROFO. 2006;178:316–323. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-858934.
- Shitano F, Kido A, Kataoka M, et al. MR appearance of normal uterine endometrium considering menstrual cycle: differentiation with benign and malignant endometrial lesions. Acta Radiol. 2016;57:1540–1548. doi: 10.1177/0284185115626478.
- Murase E, Siegelman ES, Outwater EK, et al. Uterine leiomyomas: histopathologic features, MR imaging findings, differential diagnosis, and treatment. Radiographics. 1999;19:1179–1197. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.19.5.g99se131179.
- Kido A, Togashi K, Koyama T, et al. Diffusely enlarged uterus: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiographics. 2003;23:1423–1439. doi: 10.1148/rg.236035033.
- Kubik-Huch RA, Weston M, Nougaret S, et al. European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines: MR imaging of leiomyomas. Eur Radiol. 2018;28:3125–3137. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5157-5.
- Lakhman Y, Veeraraghavan H, Chaim J, et al. Differentiation of uterine leiomyosarcoma from atypical leiomyoma: diagnostic accuracy of qualitative MR imaging features and feasibility of texture analysis. Eur Radiol. 2017;27:2903–2915. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4623-9.
- Tasaki A, Asatani MO, Umezu H, et al. Differential diagnosis of uterine smooth muscle tumors using diffusion-weighted imaging: correlations with the apparent diffusion coefficient and cell density. Abdom Imaging. 2015;40:1742–1752. doi: 10.1007/s00261-014-0324-5.
- Bulman Julie C., Ascher Susan M., Spies James B. Current Concepts in Uterine Fibroid Embolization. RadioGraphics. 2012;32(6):1735–1750. doi: 10.1148/rg.326125514.
- Bruno Jill, Sterbis Kathleen, Flick Pamela, McCullough Michael, Cramp Michelle, Murphy-Skrynarz Kerry, Spies James B. Recovery after Uterine Artery Embolization for Leiomyomas: A Detailed Analysis of its Duration and Severity. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. 2004;15(8):801–807. doi: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000136983.45640.E4.
- Ruuskanen A, Sipola P, Hippelainen M, et al. Pain after uterine fibroid embolisation is associated with the severity of myometrial ischaemia on magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:2977–2985. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1481-8.
- Verma Sachit K., Gonsalves Carin F., Baltarowich Oksana H., Mitchell Donald G., Lev-Toaff Anna S., Bergin Diane. Spectrum of imaging findings on MRI and CT after uterine artery embolization. Abdominal Imaging. 2008;35(1):118–128. doi: 10.1007/s00261-008-9483-6.
- Deshmukh Sandeep P., Gonsalves Carin F., Guglielmo Flavius F., Mitchell Donald G. Role of MR Imaging of Uterine Leiomyomas before and after Embolization. RadioGraphics. 2012;32(6):E251–E281. doi: 10.1148/rg.326125517.
- Tibrewal R, Goswami S, Chakravorty PS. Non puerperal uterine inversion. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2012;62:452–453. doi: 10.1007/s13224-011-0099-3.
- Darji P, Banker H, Gandhi V, et al. Postmenopausal woman with vaginal mass: do not forget to see for uterine inversion. BMJ Case Rep. 2012;2012:bcr0220125841.
- Tonolini M (2018) Case 15871. Non-puerperal uterine inversion without underlying tumour. EuroRAD URL:
- Mihmanli V, Kilic F, Pul S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of non-puerperal complete uterine inversion. Iran J Radiol. 2015;12:e9878. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.9878v2.
- Saxena R, Shah T, Thirumalappa S, et al. Technique of abdominal hysterectomy for non-puerperal uterine inversion. BMJ Case Rep. 2011;2011:bcr0120113729. doi: 10.1136/bcr.01.2011.3729.
- Samraj GP, Curry RW., Jr Acute pelvic pain: evaluation and management. Compr Ther. 2004;30:173–184. doi: 10.1007/s12019-004-0015-1.
- Revzin MV, Mathur M, Dave HB, et al. Pelvic inflammatory disease: multimodality imaging approach with clinical-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2016;36:1579–1596. doi: 10.1148/rg.2016150202.
- Czeyda-Pommersheim F, Kalb B, Costello J, et al. MRI in pelvic inflammatory disease: a pictorial review. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2017;42:935–950. doi: 10.1007/s00261-016-1004-4.
- Tukeva TA, Aronen HJ, Karjalainen PT, et al. MR imaging in pelvic inflammatory disease: comparison with laparoscopy and US. Radiology. 1999;210:209–216. doi: 10.1148/radiology.210.1.r99ja04209.
- Mutter GL, Prat J (2014) Pathology of the Female Reproductive Tract, 3rd edn. London Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, London
- Foti PV, Ognibene N, Spadola S, et al. Non-neoplastic diseases of the fallopian tube: MR imaging with emphasis on diffusion-weighted imaging. Insights Imaging. 2016;7:311–327. doi: 10.1007/s13244-016-0484-7.
- Moyle PL, Kataoka MY, Nakai A, et al. Nonovarian cystic lesions of the pelvis. Radiographics. 2010;30:921–938. doi: 10.1148/rg.304095706.
- Rezvani M, Shaaban AM. Fallopian tube disease in the nonpregnant patient. Radiographics. 2011;31:527–548. doi: 10.1148/rg.312105090.
- Harisinghani M. Atlas of lymph node anatomy. New York: Springer; 2013.
- Foti PV, Attina G, Spadola S, et al. MR imaging of ovarian masses: classification and differential diagnosis. Insights Imaging. 2016;7:21–41. doi: 10.1007/s13244-015-0455-4.
- Veloso Gomes F, Dias JL, Lucas R, et al. Primary fallopian tube carcinoma: review of MR imaging findings. Insights Imaging. 2015;6:431–439. doi: 10.1007/s13244-015-0416-y.
- Ma FH, Cai SQ, Qiang JW, et al. MRI for differentiating primary fallopian tube carcinoma from epithelial ovarian cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;42:42–47. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24740.
- Grabowska-Derlatka L, Szeszkowski W, Sienko J, et al. Magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging in diagnostics of primary fallopian tube carcinoma - is it useful? Pol J Radiol. 2018;83:e161–e165. doi: 10.5114/pjr.2018.75642.
- Orlowski HL, Mellnick VM, Dahiya N, et al. The imaging findings of typical and atypical genital and gynecologic infections. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2016;41:2294–2309. doi: 10.1007/s00261-016-0749-0.
- Tonolini M, Bonzini M (2016) Case 14163. Female genital tuberculosis. EuroRAD. Available at: URL:
Source: PubMed