Interprofessional team assessments of the patient safety climate in Swedish operating rooms: a cross-sectional survey

Camilla Göras, Maria Unbeck, Ulrica Nilsson, Anna Ehrenberg, Camilla Göras, Maria Unbeck, Ulrica Nilsson, Anna Ehrenberg

Abstract

Background: A positive patient safety climate within teams has been associated with higher safety performance. The aim of this study was to describe and compare attitudes to patient safety among the various professionals in surgical teams in Swedish operating room (OR) departments. A further aim was to study nurse managers in the OR and medical directors' estimations of their staffs' attitudes to patient safety.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey with the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) was used to elicit estimations from surgical teams. To evoke estimations from nurse managers and medical directors about staff attitudes to patient safety, a short questionnaire, based on SAQ, was used. Three OR departments at three different hospitals in Sweden participated. All licensed practical nurses (n=124), perioperative nurses (n=233), physicians (n=184) and their respective manager (n=22) were invited to participate.

Results: Mean percentage positive scores for the six SAQ factors and the three professional groups varied, and most factors (safety climate, teamwork climate, stress recognition, working conditions and perceptions of management), except job satisfaction, were below 60%. Significantly lower mean values were found for perioperative nurses compared with physicians for perceptions of management (56.4 vs 61.4, p=0.013) and working conditions (63.7 vs 69.8, p=0.007). Nurse managers and medical directors' estimations of their staffs' ratings of the safety climate cohered fairly well.

Conclusions: This study shows variations and some weak areas for patient safety climate in the studied ORs as reported by front-line staff and acknowledged by nurse managers and medical directors. This finding is a concern because a weak patient safety climate has been associated with poor patient outcomes. To raise awareness, managers need to support patient safety work in the OR.

Keywords: Interprofessional Team; Managers; Operating Room; Safety Attitudes Questionnaire; Safety Climate.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Means and ratios of the respective nurse managers and medical directors’ estimations of their staffs’ mean safety climate scores for respective staff group to the six actual factor scores in the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire Operating Room version index. A ratio of >1.0 reflects overestimation and 

References

    1. Bergeur R. Bogner MS, ed Misadventures in health care: inside stories. Misadventures in general surgery 2004.
    1. World Health Organization. Summary of the evidence in patient safety: Implications for research. 2008.
    1. Gaba DM, Howard SK, Jump B. Production pressure in the work environment. California anesthesiologists' attitudes and experiences. Anesthesiology 1994;81:488–500.
    1. Schimpff SC. Improving operating room and perioperative safety: background and specific recommendations. Surg Innov 2007;14:127–35.10.1177/1553350607301746
    1. World Health Organization. Patient safety A World Alliance for Safer Health Care. Human Factors in Patient Safety, Review of Topics and Tools 2009.
    1. Vogus TJ, Sutcliffe KM, Weick KE. Doing no harm: enabling, enacting, and elaborating a culture of safety in health care. The Academy of Management Perspectives 2010;24:60–77.
    1. Huang DT, Clermont G, Sexton JB, et al. . Perceptions of safety culture vary across the intensive care units of a single institution. Crit Care Med 2007;35:165–76.10.1097/
    1. Kristensen S, Túgvustein N, Zachariassen H, et al. . The virgin land of quality management: a first measure of patient safety climate at the National Hospital of the Faroe Islands. Drug Healthc Patient Saf 2016;8:49–57.10.2147/DHPS.S100575
    1. Singer SJ, Falwell A, Gaba DM, et al. . Patient safety climate in US hospitals: variation by management level. Med Care 2008;46:1149–56.10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817925c1
    1. Kunzle B, Kolbe M, Grote G. Ensuring patient safety through effective leadership behaviour: A literature review. Saf Sci 2010;48:1–17.10.1016/j.ssci.2009.06.004
    1. Schein EH. Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2010.
    1. Zohar D, Livne Y, Tenne-Gazit O, et al. . Healthcare climate: a framework for measuring and improving patient safety. Crit Care Med 2007;35:1312–7.10.1097/01.CCM.0000262404.10203.C9
    1. Leonard M, Frankel AF. How can leaders influence a safety culture? The Health Foundation 2012.
    1. Birkmeyer NJ, Finks JF, Greenberg CK, et al. . Safety culture and complications after bariatric surgery. Ann Surg 2013;257:260–5.10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826c0085
    1. DiCuccio MH. The relationship between patient safety culture and patient outcomes: a systematic review. J Patient Saf 2015;11:135–42.10.1097/PTS.0000000000000058
    1. Singer S, Lin S, Falwell A, et al. . Relationship of safety climate and safety performance in hospitals. Health Serv Res 2009;44(2 Pt 1):399–421.10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00918.x
    1. Halligan M, Zecevic A. Safety culture in healthcare: a review of concepts, dimensions, measures and progress. BMJ Qual Saf 2011;20:338–43.10.1136/bmjqs.2010.040964
    1. Robb G, Seddon M. Measuring the safety culture in a hospital setting: a concept whose time has come? N Z Med J 2010;123:68–78.
    1. Kristensen S, Bartels S. European Union Network for Patient Safety. Use of patient safety culture instruments and recommendations. 2010.
    1. Sexton JB, Helmreich RL, Neilands TB, et al. . The Safety attitudes Questionnaire: psychometric properties, benchmarking data, and emerging research. BMC Health Serv Res 2006;6:44.10.1186/1472-6963-6-44
    1. Schwendimann R, Zimmermann N, Küng K, et al. . Variation in safety culture dimensions within and between US and Swiss Hospital Units: an exploratory study. BMJ Qual Saf 2013;22:32–41.10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000446
    1. Carney BT, Mills PD, Bagian JP, et al. . Sex differences in operating room care giver perceptions of patient safety: a pilot study from the Veterans Health Administration Medical Team Training Program. Qual Saf Health Care 2010;19:128–31.10.1136/qshc.2008.028233
    1. de Wet C, Johnson P, Mash R, et al. . Measuring perceptions of safety climate in primary care: a cross-sectional study. J Eval Clin Pract 2012;18:135–42.10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01537.x
    1. Gabrani A, Hoxha A, Simaku A, et al. . Application of the safety attitudes questionnaire (SAQ) in albanian hospitals: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2015;5:e00652810.1136/bmjopen-2014-006528
    1. Flin R, Yule S, McKenzie L, et al. . Attitudes to teamwork and safety in the operating theatre. Surgeon 2006;4:145–51.10.1016/S1479-666X(06)80084-3
    1. Makary MA, Sexton JB, Freischlag JA, et al. . Operating room teamwork among physicians and nurses: teamwork in the eye of the beholder. J Am Coll Surg 2006;202:746–52.10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.01.017
    1. Sexton JB, Makary MA, Tersigni AR, et al. . Teamwork in the operating room: frontline perspectives among hospitals and operating room personnel. Anesthesiology 2006;105:877–84.
    1. Erestam S, Haglind E, Bock D, et al. . Changes in safety climate and teamwork in the operating room after implementation of a revised WHO checklist: a prospective interventional study. Patient Saf Surg 2017;11:4.10.1186/s13037-017-0120-6
    1. Göras C, Wallentin FY, Nilsson U, et al. . Swedish translation and psychometric testing of the safety attitudes questionnaire (operating room version). BMC Health Serv Res 2013;13:104.10.1186/1472-6963-13-104
    1. SAQ Short form Scale items. The University of Texas at Houston – Memorial Hermann Center for Healthcare Quality and Safety Houston T. USA.
    1. George D, Mallery P. SPSS for Windows step by step: a simple guide and reference 18.0 update. 2011.
    1. World Health Organization. 2008. (accessed 1 March 2016).
    1. Lyons VE, Popejoy LL. Meta-analysis of surgical safety checklist effects on teamwork, communication, morbidity, mortality, and safety. West J Nurs Res 2014;36:245–61.10.1177/0193945913505782
    1. The National Board of Health and Welfare. Injuries in healthcare. 2015.
    1. Nguyen G, Gambashidze N, Ilyas SA, et al. . Validation of the safety attitudes questionnaire (short form 2006) in Italian in hospitals in the northeast of Italy. BMC Health Serv Res 2015;15:284.10.1186/s12913-015-0951-8
    1. Profit J, Etchegaray J, Petersen LA, et al. . Neonatal intensive care unit safety culture varies widely. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2012;97:F120–F126.10.1136/archdischild-2011-300635
    1. Sammer CE, Lykens K, Singh KP, et al. . What is patient safety culture? A review of the literature. J Nurs Scholarsh 2010;42:156–65.10.1111/j.1547-5069.2009.01330.x
    1. Rollenhagen C. Safety culture and safety quality : Oughton D, Hansson SO, Social and Ethical Aspects of Radiation Risk Management. Oxford: Elsevier, 2013.
    1. Törner M, Eklöf M, Larsman P, et al. . Safety climate in health care. underlying factors and the importance of staff safety and patient safety. In Swedish 2013.
    1. Aiken LH, Sloane DM, Bruyneel L, et al. . Nurses' reports of working conditions and hospital quality of care in 12 countries in Europe. Int J Nurs Stud 2013;50:143–53.10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.11.009
    1. Griffiths P, Dall'Ora C, Simon M, et al. . Nurses' shift length and overtime working in 12 European countries: the association with perceived quality of care and patient safety. Med Care 2014;52:975–81.10.1097/MLR.0000000000000233
    1. Rasmussen J. Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem. Saf Sci 1997;27(2-3):183–213.10.1016/S0925-7535(97)00052-0
    1. Zenere A, Zanolin ME, Negri R, et al. . Assessing safety culture in NICU: psychometric properties of the Italian version of Safety Attitude Questionnaire and result implications. J Eval Clin Pract 2016;22:275–82.10.1111/jep.12472
    1. Kristensen S, Christensen KB, Jaquet A, et al. . Strengthening leadership as a catalyst for enhanced patient safety culture: a repeated cross-sectional experimental study. BMJ Open 2016;6:e010180.10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010180
    1. Vincent C, Amalberti R. Safer healthcare: Strategies for the Real World. Springer Open, 2016.
    1. Hollnagel E, Wears RL, Braithwaite J. From Safety-I to Safety-II: a White Paper: National Library of Congress . 2015. (accessed 1 March 2016).
    1. Kristensen S. Patient safety culture - Measurement - leadership - improvement. Aalborg University; 2016.
    1. Weberg D. Complexity leadership: a healthcare imperative. Nurs Forum 2012;47:268–77.10.1111/j.1744-6198.2012.00276.x
    1. Johnson TP, Wislar JS. Response rates and nonresponse errors in surveys. JAMA 2012;307:1805–6.10.1001/jama.2012.3532
    1. Hall P, Weaver L. Interdisciplinary education and teamwork: a long and winding road. Med Educ 2001;35:867–75.10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00919.x

Source: PubMed

Sponsors en medewerkers

Medische omstandigheden

Geneesmiddelinterventies

3
Abonneren