Challenges in Predicting Recurrence After Resection of Node-Negative Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Lucas W Thornblade, Michael S Mulligan, Katherine Odem-Davis, Billanna Hwang, Rachel L Waworuntu, Erika M Wolff, Larry Kessler, Douglas E Wood, Farhood Farjah, Lucas W Thornblade, Michael S Mulligan, Katherine Odem-Davis, Billanna Hwang, Rachel L Waworuntu, Erika M Wolff, Larry Kessler, Douglas E Wood, Farhood Farjah

Abstract

Background: One in 5 patients with completely resected early-stage non-small cell lung cancer will recur within 2 years. Risk stratification may facilitate a personalized approach to the use of adjuvant therapy and surveillance imaging. We developed a prediction model for recurrence based on five clinical variables (tumor size and grade, visceral pleural and lymphovascular invasion, and sublobar resection), and tested the hypothesis that the addition of several new molecular markers of poor long-term outcome (vascular endothelial growth factor C; microRNA precursors 486 and 30d) would enhance prediction.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with completely resected, node-negative non-small cell lung cancer from 2011 to 2014 (follow-up through 2016) using the Lung Cancer Biospecimen Resource Network. Cox regression was used to estimate the 2-year risk of recurrence. Our primary measure of model performance was the optimism-corrected C statistic.

Results: Among 173 patients (mean tumor size, 3.6 cm; 12% sublobar resection, 32% poorly differentiated, 16% lymphovascular invasion, 26% visceral pleural invasion), the 2-year recurrence rate was 23% (95% confidence interval, 17% to 31%). A prediction model using five known risk factors for recurrence performed only slightly better than chance in predicting recurrence (optimism-corrected C statistic, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.51 to 0.68). The addition of biomarkers did not improve the model's ability to predict recurrence (corrected C statistic, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.52 to 0.71).

Conclusions: We were unable to predict lung cancer recurrence using a risk-prediction model based on five well-known clinical risk factors and several biomarkers. Further research should consider novel predictors of recurrence to stratify patients with completely resected early-stage non-small cell lung cancer according to their risk of recurrence.

Copyright © 2018 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
Diagram of cohort selection. (LCBRN = Lung Cancer Biospecimen Resource Network.)
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
(A) Kaplan-Meier survival estimates for recurrence-free survival among patients with completely resected, node-negative non-small cell lung cancer and for five pre-specified clinical risk-factors: (B) tumor size, (C) lymphovascular invasion (LVI), (D) visceral pleural invasion (VPI), (E) tumor grade, and (F) sublobar resection.
Fig 3.
Fig 3.
Receiver operating characteristic curves (left) and calibration plots (right) for (A) model A (visceral pleural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, log-tumor size, tumor grade, and sublobar resection and (B) model B (model A plus vascular endothelial growth factor C, micro-RNA [miR]-486, and miR-30d). The time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve was evaluated at 2 years using nearest neighbor estimator smoothing with a span equal to 0.25 × n−0.2, with n equal to the number of patients. The calibration plot reflects “predicted” survival probabilities at 24 months (recurrence-free survival) and corresponding “observed” survival probabilities by Kaplan-Meier (fraction recurrence-free at 24 months). The tick marks at the top of this figure indicate points observed with corresponding predicted survival. (AUC = area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; CI = confidence interval.)

References

    1. Torre LA, Siegel RL, Jemal A. Lung Cancer Statistics. Adv Exp Med Biol 2016;893:1–19.
    1. Little AG, Gay EG, Gaspar LE, Stewart AK. National survey of non-small cell lung cancer in the United States: epidemiology, pathology and patterns of care. Lung Cancer 2007;57:253–60.
    1. Gould MK, Tang T, Liu ILA, et al. Recent trends in the identification of incidental pulmonary nodules. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015;192:1208–14.
    1. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 2011;365:395–409.
    1. Kiankhooy A, Taylor MD, LaPar DJ, et al. Predictors of early recurrence for node-negative T1 to T2b non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2014;98:1175–83.
    1. Lou F, Huang J, Sima CS, Dycoco J, Rusch V, Bach PB. Patterns of recurrence and second primary lung cancer in earlystage lung cancer survivors followed with routine computed tomography surveillance. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013;145: 75–82.
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Non-small cell lung cancer (Version 5.2017). Available at . Accessed March 18, 2017.
    1. Srikantharajah D, Ghuman A, Nagendran M, Maruthappu M. Is computed tomography follow-up of patients after lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer of benefit in terms of survival? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2012;15:893–8.
    1. Backhus LM, Farjah F, Zeliadt SB, et al. Predictors of imaging surveillance for surgically treated early-stage lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2014;98:1944–52.
    1. Ko KH, Hsu HH, Huang TW, et al. Predictive value of 18F-FDG PET and CT morphologic features for recurrence in pathological stage IA non-small cell lung cancer. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94:e434.
    1. Zhang Y, Sun Y, Xiang J, Zhang Y, Hu H, Chen H. A clinicopathologic prediction model for postoperative recurrence in stage Ia non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014;148:1193–9.
    1. Kuo SW, Chen JS, Huang PM, Hsu HH, Lai HS, Lee JM. Prognostic significance of histologic differentiation, carcinoembryonic antigen value, and lymphovascular invasion in stage I non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014;148:1200–7.e3.
    1. Chen YY, Huang TW, Tsai WC, et al. Risk factors of postoperative recurrences in patients with clinical stage I NSCLC. World J Surg Oncol 2014;12:10.
    1. Neri S, Yoshida J, Ishii G, et al. Prognostic impact of microscopic vessel invasion and visceral pleural invasion in non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective analysis of 2657 patients. Ann Surg 2014;0:1–6.
    1. Al-Alao BS, Gately K, Nicholson S, McGovern E, Young VK, O’Byrne KJ. Prognostic impact of vascular and lymphovascular invasion in early lung cancer. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2014;22:55–64.
    1. Koike T, Koike T, Yoshiya K, Tsuchida M, Toyabe S. Risk factor analysis of locoregional recurrence after sublobar resection in patients with clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013;146:372–8.
    1. Hung JJ, Jeng WJ, Chou TY, et al. Prognostic value of the new International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Lung Adenocarcinoma classification on death and recurrence in completely resected stage I lung adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 2013;258:1079–86.
    1. Lopez Guerra JL, Gomez DR, Lin SH, et al. Risk factors for local and regional recurrence in patients with resected N0-N1 non-small-cell lung cancer, with implications for patient selection for adjuvant radiation therapy. Ann Oncol 2013;24: 67–74.
    1. Tang Y, Qiao G, Xu E, Xuan Y, Liao M, Yin G. Biomarkers for early diagnosis, prognosis, prediction, and recurrence monitoring of non-small cell lung cancer. Onco Targets Ther 2017;10:4527–34.
    1. Lung Cancer Biospecimen Resource Network. Available at . Accessed May 11, 2017.
    1. McShane LM, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W, Taube SE, Gion M, Clark GM. REporting recommendations for tumor MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK). Breast Cancer Res Treat 2006;100:229–35.
    1. Alitalo K, Tammela T, Petrova TV. Lymphangiogenesis in development and human disease. Nature 2005;438:946–53.
    1. Chen G, Liu XY, Wang Z, Liu FY. Vascular endothelial growth factor C: the predicator of early recurrence in patients with N2 non-small-cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010;37:546–51.
    1. Farjah F, Madtes DK, Wood DE, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor C complements the ability of positron emission tomography to predict nodal disease in lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015;150: 796–803.
    1. Hu Z, Chen X, Zhao Y, et al. Serum microRNA signatures identified in a genome-wide serum microRNA expression profiling predict survival of non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:1721–6.
    1. al-Kattan K, Sepsas E, Fountain SW, Townsend ER. Disease recurrence after resection for stage I lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1997;12:380–4.
    1. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and. Methods 2001;25:402–8.
    1. Reed GF, Lynn F, Meade BD. Use of coefficient of variation in assessing variability of quantitative assays. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2002;9:1235–9.
    1. Heagerty PJ, Lumley T, Pepe MS. Time-dependent ROC curves for censored survival data and a diagnostic marker. Biometrics 2000;56:337–44.
    1. Uno H, Cai T, Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB, Wei LJ. On the Cstatistics for evaluating overall adequacy of risk prediction procedures with censored survival data. Stat Med 2011;30: 1105–17.
    1. May S, Hosmer DW. A simplified method of calculating an overall goodness-of-fit test for the Cox proportional hazards model. Lifetime Data Anal 1998;4:109–20.
    1. Harrell FE Jr. Regression modeling strategies with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis Springer Series in Statistics. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2001.
    1. Carpenter J, Bithell J. Bootstrap confidence intervals: when, which, what? A practical guide for medical statisticians. Stat Med 2000;19:1141–64.
    1. Pepe MS, Janes H, Li CI. Net risk reclassification P values: valid or misleading? J Natl Cancer Inst 2014;106: dju041.
    1. The R Foundation. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; Available at . Accessed May 22, 2017.
    1. Pepe MS, Janes H, Longton G, Leisenring W, Newcomb P. Limitations of the odds ratio in gauging the performance of a diagnostic, prognostic, or screening marker. Am J Epidemiol 2004;159:882–90.
    1. Storey J The positive false discovery rate: a Bayesian interpretation and the q-value. Ann Stat 2003;31:2013–35.
    1. Thornblade LW, Wood DE, Mulligan MS, et al. Variability in invasive mediastinal staging for lung cancer: a multicenter regional study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018;155: 2658–71.
    1. Jamal-Hanjani M, Wilson GA, McGranahan N, et al. Tracking the evolution of non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2017;376:2109–21.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren