Perineural Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant Reduces the Median Effective Concentration of Lidocaine for Obturator Nerve Blocking: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

Yuechun Lu, Jian Sun, Xinqi Zhuang, Guoyi Lv, Yize Li, Haiyun Wang, Guolin Wang, Yuechun Lu, Jian Sun, Xinqi Zhuang, Guoyi Lv, Yize Li, Haiyun Wang, Guolin Wang

Abstract

Research suggests that the addition of dexmedetomidine to local anesthetics can prolong peripheral nerve blocks; however, it is not known whether dexmedetomidine can reduce the quantity of local anesthetic needed. We hypothesized that adding dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to an obturator nerve block could reduce the median effective concentration of lidocaine. In this double-blinded randomized trial, 60 patients scheduled for elective transurethral resection of bladder tumors on the lateral wall were randomly divided into two groups: the control group (C group, n = 30) and the dexmedetomidine group (D group, n = 30). Two main branches of the obturator nerve (i.e., anterior and posterior) were identified using neural stimulation at the inguinal level, with only lidocaine used for the C group and 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine combined with lidocaine used for the D group. The median effective concentration was determined by an up-and-down sequential trial. The ratio of two consecutive concentrations was 1.2. The median effective concentration (95% confidence interval) of lidocaine was 0.57% (0.54%-0.62%) in the C group and 0.29% (0.28%-0.38%) in the D group. The median effective concentration of lidocaine was significantly lower in the D group than in the C group (p < 0.05). These results indicate that dexmedetomidine (1 μg/kg) in combination with lidocaine for obturator nerve block decreases the median effective concentration of lidocaine.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02066727.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Trial flow chart.
Fig 1. Trial flow chart.
Fig 2. Dose-response data of consecutive patients…
Fig 2. Dose-response data of consecutive patients for both groups.
The sequences of positive responses (solid dots) and negative responses (hollow dots) recorded in consecutive patients (A) for the C group and (B) for the D group.
Fig 3. Observed and pooled-adjacent-violators algorithm response…
Fig 3. Observed and pooled-adjacent-violators algorithm response rate.
The estimator of the observed response rate (round dots, dotted line) and the PAVA-adjusted response rate (squares, solid line) at various lidocaine concentrations are plotted on the y-axis (A) for the C group and (B) for the D group. PAVA = pooled-adjacent-violators algorithm.

References

    1. Hradec E, Soukup F, Novák J, Bures E.Preventing damage of the bladder wall during transurethral Urol Nephrol. 1983; 15: 149–153.
    1. Tekgül ZT, Divrik RT, Turan M, Konyalioğlu E, Şimşek E, Gönüllü M. Impact of obturator nerve block on the short-term recurrence of superficial bladder tumors on the lateral wall. Urol J. 2014; 11: 1248–1252.
    1. Akata T, Murakami J, Yoshinaga. A life-threatening haemorrhage following obturator artery injury during transurethral bladder surgery: a sequel of an unsuccessful obturator nerve block. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1999; 43: 784–788.
    1. Berglund RK, Herr HW. Surgery for bladder cancer In: Walsh PC, editor. Campbell’s urology. 8th ed Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2002. pp. 2375–85.
    1. Deliveliotis C, Alexopoulou K, Picramenos D, Econornacos G, Goulandris N, Kostakopoulos A. The contribution of the obturator nerve block in the transurethral resection of bladder tumors. Acta Urol Belg. 1995; 63: 51–54.
    1. Tatlisen A, Sofikerim M. Obturator nerve block and transurethral surgery for bladder cancer. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2007; 59: 137–141.
    1. Esmaoglu A, Yegenoglu F, Akin A, Turk CY. Dexmedetomidine added to levobupivacaine prolongs axillary brachial plexus block. Anesth Analg. 2010; 111: 1548–1551. 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181fa3095
    1. Marhofer D, Kettner SC, Marhofer P, Pils S, Weber M, Zeitlinger M. Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine prolongs peripheral nerve block: a volunteer study. Br J Anaesth. 2013; 110: 438–442. 10.1093/bja/aes400
    1. Agarwal S, Aggarwal R, Gupta P. Dexmedetomidine prolongs the effect of bupivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2014; 30: 36–40. 10.4103/0970-9185.125701
    1. Song JH, Shim HY, Lee TJ, Jung JK, Cha YD, Lee DI, et al. Comparison of dexmedetomidine and epinephrine as an adjuvant to 1% mepivacaine in brachial plexus block. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2014; 66: 283–289. 10.4097/kjae.2014.66.4.283
    1. Rancourt MP, Albert NT, Cote M, Letourneau DR, Bernard PM. Posterior tibial nerve sensory blockade duration prolonged by adding dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine. Anesth Analg. 2012; 115: 958–962.
    1. Dixon WJ. Staircase bioassay: the up-and-down method. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1991; 15: 47–50.
    1. Jo YY, Choi E, Kil HK. Comparison of the success rate of inguinal approach with classical pubic approach for obturator nerve block in patients undergoing TURB. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2011; 61: 143–147. 10.4097/kjae.2011.61.2.143
    1. Moningi S, Durga P, Ramachandran G, Murthy PV, Chilumala RR. Comparison of inguinal versus classic approach for obturator nerve block in patients undergoing transurethral resection of bladder tumors under spinal anesthesia. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2014; 30: 41–45. 10.4103/0970-9185.125702
    1. Lang SA, Yip RW, Chang PC, Gerard MA. The femoral 3-in-1 block revisited. J Clin Anesth. 1993; 5: 292–296.
    1. Pace NL, Stylianou MP. Advances in and limitations of up-and-down methodology: a precis of clinical use, study design, and dose estimation in anesthesia research. Anesthesiology. 2007; 107: 144–152.
    1. Brummett CM, Norat MA, Palmisano JM, Lydic R. Perineural administration of dexmedetomidine in combination with bupivacaine enhances sensory and motor blockade in sciatic nerve block without inducing neurotoxicity in rat. Anesthesiology. 2008; 109: 502–511. 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318182c26b
    1. Brummett CM, Padda AK, Amodeo FS, Welch KB, Lydic R. Perineural dexmedetomidine added to ropivacaine causes a dose-dependent increase in the duration of thermal antinociception in sciatic nerve block in rat. Anesthesiology. 2009; 111: 1111–1119. 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181bbcc26
    1. Brummett CM, Amodeo FS, Janda AM, Padda AK, Lydic R. Perineural dexmedetomidine provides an increased duration of analgesia to a thermal stimulus when compared with a systemic control in a rat sciatic nerve block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010;35: 427–431. 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181ef4cf0
    1. Brummett CM, Hong EK, Janda AM, Amodeo FS, Lydic R. Perineural dexmedetomidine added to ropivacaine for sciatic nerve block in rats prolongs the duration of analgesia by blocking the hyperpolarization-activated cation current. Anesthesiology. 2011; 115: 836–843. 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318221fcc9
    1. Xiang Q, Huang DY, Zhao YL, Wang GH, Liu YX, Zhong L, et al. Caudal dexmedetomidine combined with bupivacaine inhibit the response to hernial sac traction in children undergoing inguinal hernia repair. Br J Anaesth. 2013; 110: 420–424. 10.1093/bja/aes385
    1. Candiotti KA, Bergese SD, Bokesch PM, Feldman MA, Wisemandle W, Bekker AY, et al. Monitored anesthesia care with dexmedetomidine: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial. Anesth Analg.2010; 110: 47–56. 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181ae0856
    1. Choquet O, Capdevila X, Bennourine K, Feugeas JL, Bringuier-Branchereau S, Manelli JC. A new inguinal approach for the obturator nerve block: Anatomical and randomized clinical studies. Anesthesiology. 2005; 103: 1238–1245.
    1. Bouaziz H, Vial F, Jochum D, Macalou D, Heck M, Meuret P, et al. An evaluation of the cutaneous distribution after obturator nerve block. Anesth Analg.2002; 94: 445–449.
    1. Manassero A,Bossolasco M, Ugues S, Palmisano S, De Bonis U, Coletta G. Ultrasound-guided obturator nerve block:interfascial injection versus a neurostimulation-assisted technique. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012; 37: 67–71. 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31823e77d5
    1. El-Hennawy AM, Abd-Elwahab AM, Abd-Elmaksoud AM, El-Ozairy HS, Boulis SR. Addition of clonidine or dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine prolongs caudal analgesia in children. Br J Anaesth. 2009; 103: 268–274. 10.1093/bja/aep159
    1. Saadawy I, Boker A, Elshahawy MA, Almazrooa A, Melibary S, Abdellatif AA, et al. Effect of dexmedetomidine on the characteristics of bupivacaine in a caudal block in pediatrics. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009; 53: 251–256. 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01818.x
    1. Maruta T, Nemoto T, Satoh S, Kanai T, Yanagita T, Wada A, et al. Dexmedetomidine and clonidine inhibit the function of Na(v)1.7 independent of α(2)-adrenoceptor in adrenal chromaffin cells. J Anesth. 2011; 25: 549–557. 10.1007/s00540-011-1168-6
    1. Chen BS, Peng H, Wu SN. Dexmedetomidine, an a2-adrenergic agonist, inhibits neuronal delayed-rectifier potassium current and sodium current. Br J Anaesth. 2009; 103: 244–254. 10.1093/bja/aep107
    1. Ebert TJ, Hall JE, Barney JA, Uhrich TD, Colinco MD. The effects of increasing plasma concentrations of dexmedetomidine in humans. Anesthesiology. 2000; 93: 382–394.
    1. Makii JM, Mirski MA, Lewin JJ 3rd. Sedation and analgesia in critically ill neurologic patients. J Pharm Pract. 2010; 23: 455–469. 10.1177/0897190010372339
    1. Kim SY, Kim JM, Lee JH, Song BM, Koo BN. Efficacy of intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion on emergence agitation and quality of recovery after nasal surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2013; 111: 222–228. 10.1093/bja/aet056
    1. Li Y, Zeng M, Chen W, Liu C, Wang F, Han X, et al. Dexmedetomidine reduces isoflurane-induced neuroapoptosis partly by preserving PI3K/Akt pathway in the hippocampus of neonatal rats. PLoS One. 2014; 9: e93639 10.1371/journal.pone.0093639
    1. Marhofer P, Harrop-Griffiths W, Kettner SC, Kirchmair L. Fifteen years of ultrasound guidance in regional anaesthesia: part 1. Br J Anaesth. 2010; 104: 538–546. 10.1093/bja/aeq069
    1. Marhofer P, Harrop-Griffiths W, Willschke H, Kirchmair L. Fifteen years of ultrasound guidance in regional anaesthesia: part 2—recent developments in block techniques. Br J Anaesth. 2010; 104: 673–683. 10.1093/bja/aeq086

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren