Predicting tumor response after preoperative chemoradiation using clinical parameters in rectal cancer

Chan Ho Park, Hee Cheol Kim, Yong Beom Cho, Seong Hyeon Yun, Woo Yong Lee, Young Suk Park, Doo Ho Choi, Ho-Kyung Chun, Chan Ho Park, Hee Cheol Kim, Yong Beom Cho, Seong Hyeon Yun, Woo Yong Lee, Young Suk Park, Doo Ho Choi, Ho-Kyung Chun

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the clinical parameters and identify a better method of predicting pathological complete response (pCR).

Methods: We enrolled 249 patients from a database of 544 consecutive rectal cancer patients who underwent surgical resection after preoperative chemoradiation therapy (PCRT). A retrospective review of morphological characteristics was then performed to collect data regarding rectal examination findings. A scoring model to predict pCR was then created. To validate the ability of the scoring model to predict complete regression.

Results: Seventy patients (12.9%) achieved a pCR. A multivariate analysis found that pre-CRT movability (P = 0.024), post-CRT size (P = 0.018), post-CRT morphology (P = 0.023), and gross change (P = 0.009) were independent predictors of pCR. The accuracy of the scoring model was 76.8% for predicting pCR with the threshold set at 4.5. In the validation set, the accuracy was 86.7%.

Conclusion: Gross changes and morphological findings are important predictors of pathological response. Accordingly, PCRT response is best predicted by a combination of clinical, laboratory and metabolic information.

Keywords: Downstaging; Preoperative chemoradiotherapy; Rectal cancer; Tumor regression; Validation.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. A: Risk score in the test set was 80.5%, suggesting it was a reasonable predictor of complete regression (P < 0.001, 95% confidence interval = 0.723-0.886, n = 151); B: In the validation set, risk score was 87.5%. (P < 0.031, 95% confidence interval = 0.672-1.078, n = 151).

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren