Enhancing the Effectiveness of Consumer-Focused Health Information Technology Systems Through eHealth Literacy: A Framework for Understanding Users' Needs

Lars Kayser, Andre Kushniruk, Richard H Osborne, Ole Norgaard, Paul Turner, Lars Kayser, Andre Kushniruk, Richard H Osborne, Ole Norgaard, Paul Turner

Abstract

Background: eHealth systems and applications are increasingly focused on supporting consumers to directly engage with and use health care services. Involving end users in the design of these systems is critical to ensure a generation of usable and effective eHealth products and systems. Often the end users engaged for these participatory design processes are not actual representatives of the general population, and developers may have limited understanding about how well they might represent the full range of intended users of the eHealth products. As a consequence, resulting information technology (IT) designs may not accommodate the needs, skills, cognitive capacities, and/or contexts of use of the intended broader population of health consumers. This may result in challenges for consumers who use the health IT systems, and could lead to limitations in adoption if the diversity of user attributes has not been adequately considered by health IT designers.

Objective: The objective of this paper is to propose how users' needs and competences can be taken into account when designing new information and communications technology solutions in health care by expanding the user-task-context matrix model with the domains of a new concept of eHealth literacy.

Methods: This approach expands an existing method for supporting health IT system development, which advocates use of a three-dimensional user-task-context matrix to comprehensively identify the users of health IT systems, and what their needs and requirements are under differing contexts of use. The extension of this model involved including knowledge about users' competences within the seven domains of eHealth literacy, which had been identified based on systematic engagement with computer scientists, academics, health professionals, and patients recruited from various patient organizations and primary care. A concept map was constructed based on a structured brainstorm procedure, card sorting, and computational analysis.

Results: The new eHealth literacy concept (based on 7 domains) was incorporated as a key factor in expanding the user-task-context matrix to describe and qualify user requirements and understanding related to eHealth literacy. This resulted in an expanded framework and a five-step process, which can support health IT designers in understanding and more accurately addressing end-users' needs, capabilities, and contexts to improve effectiveness and broader applicability of consumer-focused health IT systems. It is anticipated that the framework will also be useful for policy makers involved in the planning, procuring, and funding of eHealth infrastructure, applications, and services.

Conclusions: Developing effective eHealth products requires complete understanding of the end-users' needs from multiple perspectives. In this paper, we have proposed and detailed a framework for modeling users' needs for designing eHealth systems that merges prior work in development of a user-task-context matrix with the emerging area of eHealth literacy. This framework is intended to be used to guide design of eHealth technologies and to make requirements explicitly related to eHealth literacy, enabling a generation of well-targeted, fit-for-purpose, equitable, and effective products and systems.

Keywords: eHealth literacy; requirements; user involvement.

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
User-task-context matrix for health information technology systems design (adapted from Kushniruk and Turner [23]).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Framework for Design: Expanded User-task-context matrix incorporating eHealth literacy.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Information technology requirements gathering flowchart.

References

    1. Kujala S. User involvement: A review of the benefits and challenges. Behav Inf Technol. 2003 Jan;22(1):1–16. doi: 10.1080/01449290301782.
    1. Kushniruk AW, Bates DW, Bainbridge M, Househ MS, Borycki EM. National efforts to improve health information system safety in Canada, the United States of America and England. Int J Med Inform. 2013 May;82(5):e149–e160. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.12.006.
    1. Schramm W. The Process and Effects of Mass Communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press; 1954. How communication works; pp. 3–26.
    1. Nutbeam D. Health literacy as a public health goal: A challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promot Int. 2000;15(3):259–269. doi: 10.1093/heapro/15.3.259.
    1. Norman CD, Skinner HA. eHealth literacy: Essential skills for consumer health in a networked world. J Med Internet Res. 2006;8(2):e9. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.2.e9.
    1. International Organization for Standardization . Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs). ISO 9241-11:1998. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization; 1998. [2015-05-13]. Part 11: Guidance on Usability .
    1. Cho AH, Arar NH, Edelman DE, Hartwell PH, Oddone EZ, Yancy WS. Do diabetic veterans use the internet? Self-reported usage, skills, and interest in using My HealtheVet Web portal. Telemed J E Health. 2010 Jun;16(5):595–602. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2009.0164.
    1. Hargittai E. Survey measures of web-oriented digital literacy. Soc Sci Comput Rev. 2005 Aug 01;23(3):371–379. doi: 10.1177/0894439305275911.
    1. van Deursen AJ, van Dijk JA. Internet skills performance tests: Are people ready for eHealth? J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(2):e35. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1581.
    1. Norman CD, Skinner HA. eHEALS: The eHealth Literacy Scale. J Med Internet Res. 2006;8(4):e27. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.4.e27.
    1. Norman C. eHealth literacy 2.0: Problems and opportunities with an evolving concept. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4):e125. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2035.
    1. Ellis L, Showell C, Turner P. Social media and patient self-management: Not all sites are created equal. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;183:291–295.
    1. Syed-Abdul S, Fernandez-Luque L, Jian W-S, Li Y-C, Crain S, Hsu M-H, Wang Y-C, Khandregzen D, Chuluunbaatar E, Nguyen PA, Liou D-M. Misleading health-related information promoted through video-based social media: Anorexia on YouTube. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(2):e30. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2237.
    1. Hanson CL, Cannon B, Burton S, Giraud-Carrier C. An exploration of social circles and prescription drug abuse through Twitter. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(9):e189. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2741.
    1. Buchbinder R, Batterham R, Elsworth G, Dionne CE, Irvin E, Osborne RH. A validity-driven approach to the understanding of the personal and societal burden of low back pain: Development of a conceptual and measurement model. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011;13(5):R152. doi: 10.1186/ar3468.
    1. Osborne RH, Batterham RW, Elsworth GR, Hawkins M, Buchbinder R. The grounded psychometric development and initial validation of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) BMC Public Health. 2013;13:658. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-658.
    1. Osborne RH, Elsworth GR, Whitfield K. The Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ): An outcomes and evaluation measure for patient education and self-management interventions for people with chronic conditions. Patient Educ Couns. 2007 May;66(2):192–201. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.12.002.
    1. Osborne RH, Norquist JM, Elsworth GR, Busija L, Mehta V, Herring T, Gupta SB. Development and validation of the Influenza Intensity and Impact Questionnaire (FluiiQ™) Value Health. 2011 Aug;14(5):687–699. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.12.005.
    1. Busija L, Buchbinder R, Osborne RH. A grounded patient-centered approach generated the personal and societal burden of osteoarthritis model. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Sep;66(9):994–1005. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.03.012.
    1. Jordan JE, Buchbinder R, Briggs AM, Elsworth GR, Busija L, Batterham R, Osborne RH. The Health Literacy Management Scale (HeLMS): A measure of an individual's capacity to seek, understand and use health information within the healthcare setting. Patient Educ Couns. 2013 May;91(2):228–235. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.01.013.
    1. Trochim WM, Cook JA, Setze RJ. Using concept mapping to develop a conceptual framework of staff's views of a supported employment program for individuals with severe mental illness. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1994 Aug;62(4):766–775.
    1. Trochim MK. Concept Mapping for Planning and Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2007.
    1. Kushniruk A, Turner P. A framework for user involvement and context in the design and development of safe e-Health systems. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012;180:353–357.
    1. Hackos JT, Redish JC. User and Task Analysis for Interface Design. New York: Wiley; 1998.
    1. Rasmussen R, Kushniruk A. Digital video analysis of health professionals' interactions with an electronic whiteboard: A longitudinal, naturalistic study of changes to user interactions. J Biomed Inform. 2013 Dec;46(6):1068–1079. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2013.08.002.
    1. Li AC, Kannry JL, Kushniruk A, Chrimes D, McGinn TG, Edonyabo D, Mann DM. Integrating usability testing and think-aloud protocol analysis with "near-live" clinical simulations in evaluating clinical decision support. Int J Med Inform. 2012 Nov;81(11):761–772. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.02.009.
    1. Chan CV, Kaufman DR. A framework for characterizing eHealth literacy demands and barriers. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4):e94. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1750.
    1. Bødker K. Participatory IT Design: Designing for Business and Workplace Realities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2004.
    1. Holtzblatt K. Rapid Contextual Design: A How-To Guide to Key Techniques for User-Centered Design. San Francisco, CA: Elsevier/Morgan Kaufmann; 2005.
    1. Zenios SA, Makower J, Yock PG. Biodesign: The Process of Innovating Medical Technologies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
    1. Vang A, Knudsen A. Fokus på e-health Literacy ved Hjemmemonitorering af KOL-Borgere Internet Thesis from the BSc Health Informatics Program. University of Copenhagen: Copenhagen, Denmark; 2014. [2015-05-13]. .
    1. Phanareth K, Christensen AS, Vingtoft S, Kayser L. Int J Integr Care. 2013. [2015-05-13]. Epital Health: A disruptive and research based approach to service transformation of health care systems .
    1. Hesseldal L, Kayser L. Healthcare innovation - The Epital: A living lab in the intersection between the informal and formal structures. Qual Sociol Rev. 2016;12 (forthcoming)
    1. Kayser L, Osborne RH, Nørgaard O, Turner P. E-Sundhedskompetence - et Redskab til at Skabe Bro Mellem Borgere, Patienter og Vores Digitale Sundhedstilbud Internet. 2014. Oct 2, [2015-05-13]. .
    1. Kontos EZ, Bennett GG, Viswanath K. Barriers and facilitators to home computer and internet use among urban novice computer users of low socioeconomic position. J Med Internet Res. 2007;9(4):e31. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.4.e31.
    1. Montague E, Asan O. Trust in technology-mediated collaborative health encounters: Constructing trust in passive user interactions with technologies. Ergonomics. 2012;55(7):752–761. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2012.663002.
    1. Berkman ND, Sheridan SL, Donahue KE, Halpern DJ, Crotty K. Low health literacy and health outcomes: An updated systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jul 19;155(2):97–107. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005.
    1. Steventon A, Bardsley M, Billings J, Dixon J, Doll H, Hirani S, Cartwright M, Rixon L, Knapp M, Henderson C, Rogers A, Fitzpatrick R, Hendy J, Newman S, Whole System Demonstrator Evaluation Team Effect of telehealth on use of secondary care and mortality: Findings from the Whole System Demonstrator cluster randomised trial. BMJ. 2012;344:e3874. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e3874.
    1. Jakobsen NK, Jensen LS, Kayser L. Collaborative efforts are needed to ensure proper knowledge dissemination of telemedicine projects. Dan Med J. 2014 Sep;61(9):A4896.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren