Computerized cognitive stimulation and engagement programs in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: comparing feasibility, acceptability, and cognitive and psychosocial effects

Leila Djabelkhir, Ya-Huei Wu, Jean-Sébastien Vidal, Victoria Cristancho-Lacroix, Fabienne Marlats, Hermine Lenoir, Ariela Carno, Anne-Sophie Rigaud, Leila Djabelkhir, Ya-Huei Wu, Jean-Sébastien Vidal, Victoria Cristancho-Lacroix, Fabienne Marlats, Hermine Lenoir, Ariela Carno, Anne-Sophie Rigaud

Abstract

Purpose: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is associated with a higher risk of dementia and is becoming a topic of interest for pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions. With advances in technology, computer-based cognitive exercises are increasingly integrated into traditional cognitive interventions, such as cognitive training. Another type of cognitive intervention involving technology use is cognitive engagement, consisting of involving participants in highly motivational and mentally challenging activities, such as learning to use a form of new digital technology. This study examined the feasibility and acceptability of a computerized cognitive stimulation (CCS) program and a computerized cognitive engagement (CCE) program, and then compared their effects in older adults with MCI.

Patients and methods: In this randomized study, data from 19 MCI patients were analyzed (n=9 in CCS and n=10 in CCE). The patients attended a group weekly session for a duration of 3 months. Assessments of cognitive and psychosocial variables were conducted at baseline (M0) and at the end of the programs (M3).

Results: All of the participants attended the 12 sessions and showed a high level of motivation. Attrition rate was very low (one dropout at M3 assessment). At M3, the CCS participants displayed a significant improvement in part B of the Trail Making Test (TMT-B; p=0.03) and self-esteem (p=0.005), while the CCE participants showed a significant improvement in part A of the Trail Making Test (TMT-A; p=0.007) and a higher level of technology acceptance (p=0.006). The two groups did not differ significantly (p>0.05) in cognitive and psychosocial changes after the intervention. However, medium effect sizes (Cohen's d=0.56; 95% CI =-0.43:1.55) were found on the free recall, favoring the CCS group, as well as on TMT-A (d=0.51; 95% CI =-0.48:1.49) and technology acceptance (d=-0.65; 95% CI =-1.64:0.34), favoring the CCE group.

Conclusion: Both interventions were highly feasible and acceptable and allowed improvement in different aspects of cognitive and psychosocial functioning in MCI subjects.

Keywords: cognitive intervention; mild cognitive impairment; tablet computers; technology.

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram showing patients’ attrition from the screening phase to postintervention assessment. Abbreviation: MCI, mild cognitive impairment.

References

    1. Wimo A, Jönsson L, Bond J, Prince M, Winblad B, International AD. The worldwide economic impact of dementia 2010. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2013;9(1):1–11.e13.
    1. Farias S, Mungas D, Reed BR, Harvey D, DeCarli C. Progression of mild cognitive impairment to dementia in clinic- vs community-based cohorts. Arch Neurol. 2009;66(9):1151–1157.
    1. Petersen RC, Smith GE, Waring SC, Ivnik RJ, Tangalos EG, Kokmen E. Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome. Arch Neurol. 1999;56(3):303–308.
    1. Petersen RC, Stevens J, Ganguli M, Tangalos EG, Cummings JL, DeKosky S. Practice parameter: early detection of dementia: mild cognitive impairment (an evidence-based review) Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2001;56(9):1133–1142.
    1. Winblad B, Palmer K, Kivipelto M, et al. Mild cognitive impairment – beyond controversies, towards a consensus: report of the International Working Group on mild cognitive impairment. J Intern Med. 2004;256(3):240–246.
    1. Cavallo M, Zanalda E, Johnston H, Bonansea A, Angilletta C. Cognitive training in a large group of patients affected by early-stage Alzheimer’s disease can have long-lasting effects: a case-control study. Brain Impairment. 2016;17(2):182–192.
    1. Cavallo M, Hunter EM, van der Hiele K, Angilletta C. Computer-ized structured cognitive training in patients affected by early-stage Alzheimer’s disease is feasible and effective: a randomized controlled study. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2016;31(8):868–876.
    1. De Rotrou J, Wenisch E, Cantegreil I, et al. La stimulation cognitive. NPG Neurologie-Psychiatrie-Gériatrie. 2006;6(34):17–18.
    1. De Rotrou J. Méthodologie pour une stimulation psychologique des fonctions cognitives. Paper presented at: Démences du sujet âgé et environnement: actes du 2e colloque, les; 1985.
    1. De Rotrou J. Stimulation et rééducation de la memoire. Gazette Médicale de France. 1989;96(18):49–53.
    1. De Rotrou J. Stimulation et éducation cognitives. Gérontologie et Société. 2001;(2):175–192.
    1. Clare L, Woods RT. Cognitive training and cognitive rehabilitation for people with early-stage Alzheimer’s disease: a review. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2004;14(4):385–401.
    1. Breuil V, De Rotrou J, Forette F, et al. Cognitive stimulation of patients with dementia: preliminary results. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1994;9(3):211–217.
    1. Spector A, Thorgrimsen L, Woods B, et al. Efficacy of an evidence-based cognitive stimulation therapy programme for people with dementia. Br J Psychiatry. 2003;183(3):248–254.
    1. Orrell M, Spector A, Thorgrimsen L, Woods B. A pilot study examining the effectiveness of maintenance cognitive stimulation therapy (MCST) for people with dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005;20(5):446–451.
    1. Knapp M, Thorgrimsen L, Patel A, et al. Cognitive stimulation therapy for people with dementia: cost-effectiveness analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2006;188(6):574–580.
    1. Woods B, Aguirre E, Spector AE, Orrell M. Cognitive stimulation to improve cognitive functioning in people with dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(2):CD005562.
    1. Wenisch E, Cantegreil-Kallen I, De Rotrou J, et al. Cognitive stimulation intervention for elders with mild cognitive impairment compared to normal aged subjects: preliminary results. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2007;19(4):316.
    1. National Collaborating Centre for Mental H. National institute for health and clinical excellence: guidance . Dementia: A NICE-SCIE Guideline on Supporting People with Dementia and Their Carers in Health and Social Care. Leicester, UK: The British Psychological Society and The Royal College of Psychiatrists; 2007.
    1. Fiatarone Singh MA, Gates N, Saigal N, et al. The study of mental and resistance training (SMART) study resistance training and/or cognitive training in mild cognitive impairment: a randomized, double-blind, double-sham controlled trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014;15(12):873–880.
    1. Gagnon LG, Belleville S. Training of attentional control in mild cognitive impairment with executive deficits: results from a double-blind randomised controlled study. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2012;22(6):809–835.
    1. Oskoei AS, Nejati V, Ajilchi B. The effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation on improving the selective attention in patients with mild cognitive impairment. J Behav Brain Sci. 2013;3:474–478.
    1. Coyle H, Traynor V, Solowij N. Computerized and virtual reality cognitive training for individuals at high risk of cognitive decline: systematic review of the literature. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2015;23(4):335–359.
    1. Hill NTM, Mowszowski L, Naismith SL, Chadwick VL, Valenzuela M, Lampit A. Computerized cognitive training in older adults with mild cognitive impairment or dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 2016;174(4):329–340.
    1. Jak AJ, Seelye AM, Jurick SM. Crosswords to computers: a critical review of popular approaches to cognitive enhancement. Neuropsychol Rev. 2013;23(1):13–26.
    1. Gates N, Valenzuela M. Cognitive exercise and its role in cognitive function in older adults. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2010;12(1):20–27.
    1. Vaportzis E, Martin M, Gow AJ. A tablet for healthy ageing: the effect of a tablet computer training intervention on cognitive abilities in older adults. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017;25(8):841–851.
    1. Chan MY, Haber S, Drew LM, Park DC. Training older adults to use tablet computers: does it enhance cognitive function? Gerontologist. 2016;56(3):475–484.
    1. Thabane L, Hopewell S, Lancaster GA, et al. Methods and processes for development of a CONSORT extension for reporting pilot randomized controlled trials. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016;2(1):25.
    1. Winblad B, Palmer K, Kivipelto M, et al. Mild cognitive impairment–beyond controversies, towards a consensus: report of the International Working Group on Mild Cognitive Impairment. J Intern Med. 2004;256(3):240–246.
    1. Petersen RC. Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity. J Intern Med. 2004;256(3):183–194.
    1. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189–198.
    1. Reitan RM. Trail Making Test: Manual for Administration and Scoring. Tucson, AZ: Reitan Neuropsychology Laboratory; 1992.
    1. Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Loring DW. Neuropsychological Assessment. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004.
    1. Wechsler D. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale – Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) San Antonio, TX: Pearson; 2008.
    1. Grober E, Buschke H. Genuine memory deficits in dementia. Dev Neuropsychol. 1987;3(1):13–36.
    1. Van der Linden M, Coyette F, Poitrenaud J, et al. L’épreuve de rappel libre/rappel indicé à 16 items (RL/RI-16) Solal; 2004.
    1. De Rotrou J, Forette F, Hervy MP, et al. The cognitive efficiency profile: description and validation in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1991;6(7):501–509.
    1. Goldberg D, Bridges K, Duncan-Jones P, Grayson D. Detecting anxiety and depression in general medical settings. BMJ. 1988;297(6653):897–899.
    1. McNair DM, Kahn RJ. Self-assessment of cognitive deficits scale. In: Crook T, Ferris S, Bartus R, editors. Assessment in Geriatric Psychopharmacology. New Canaan, CT: Mark Powley Associates; 1983. pp. 137–143.
    1. Poitrenaud J, Israel L, Barrere H, Le Roc’h K. Version française de l’échelle de difficulties cognitive de McNair et Khan. In: Michel BF, Derouesne C, Gely-Nargeot MC, editors. de la plainte mnésique à la maladie d’Alzheimer. Marseille: Solal; 1997. pp. 159–177.
    1. Vallieres EF, Vallerand RJ. Traduction et validation canadienne-française de l’échelle de l’estime de soi de Rosenberg. Int J Psychol. 1990;25(2):305–316.
    1. Rosenberg M, Black SR, Self-Esteem W. The Urban School Child. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association; 1971.
    1. Petit S, Bergua V, Peres K, Bouisson J, Koleck M. Élaboration et validation d’une échelle de qualité de vie adaptée aux personnes âgées (EQVPA) Gériatrie et Psychologie Neuropsychiatrie du Vieillissement. 2014;12(4):379–386.
    1. Brangier E, Hammes S. Elaboration et validation d’un questionnaire de mesure de l’acceptation des technologies de l’information et de la communication basé sur le modèle de la symbiose humain-technologie-organisation [Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure the acceptance of the technologies of information and communication based on the model of the human-technology-organization symbiosis] In: Brangier E, Kolski C, Ruault JR, editors. L’humain comme acteur de performance des systèmes complexes. Actes du congrès Ergo’IA 2006 [The human as an actor of performance of complex systems. Acts of Congress Ergo’ AI 2006] Bidart: Estia Innovation éditeur; 2006. pp. 71–78. French.
    1. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
    1. Bellezza FS, Richards DL, Geiselman RE. Semantic processing and organization in free recall. Mem Cognit. 1976;4(4):415–421.
    1. Herrera C, Chambon C, Michel BF, Paban V, Alescio-Lautier B. Positive effects of computer-based cognitive training in adults with mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychologia. 2012;50(8):1871–1881.
    1. Belleville S, Gilbert B, Fontaine F, Gagnon L, Ménard E, Gauthier S. Improvement of episodic memory in persons with mild cognitive impairment and healthy older adults: evidence from a cognitive intervention program. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2006;22(5–6):486–499.
    1. Chao SY, Liu HY, Wu CY, et al. The effects of group reminiscence therapy on depression, self esteem, and life satisfaction of elderly nursing home residents. J Nurs Res. 2006;14(1):36–45.
    1. Aguirre E, Hoare Z, Streater A, et al. Cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) for people with dementia–who benefits most? Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013;28(3):284–290.
    1. Paddick SM, Mkenda S, Mbowe G, et al. Cognitive stimulation therapy as a sustainable intervention for dementia in sub-Saharan Africa: feasibility and clinical efficacy using a stepped-wedge design. Int Psychogeriatr. 2017;29(6):979–989.
    1. Yamanaka K, Kawano Y, Noguchi D, et al. Effects of cognitive stimulation therapy Japanese version (CST-J) for people with dementia: a single-blind, controlled clinical trial. Aging Ment Health. 2013;17(5):579–586.
    1. Spector A, Orrell M, Woods B. Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (CST): effects on different areas of cognitive function for people with dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010;25(12):1253–1258.
    1. Spector A, Gardner C, Orrell M. The impact of cognitive stimulation therapy groups on people with dementia: views from participants, their carers and group facilitators. Aging Ment Health. 2011;15(8):945–949.
    1. Wu YH, Damnée S, Kerhervé H, Ware C, Rigaud AS. Bridging the digital divide in older adults: a study from an initiative to inform older adults about new technologies. Clin Interv Aging. 2015;10:193–201.
    1. Woodward AT, Freddolino PP, Wishart DJ, et al. Outcomes from a peer tutor model for teaching technology to older adults. Ageing Soc. 2012;33(8):1315–1338.
    1. Ackerman PL, Kanfer R, Calderwood C. Use it or lose it? Wii brain exercise practice and reading for domain knowledge. Psychol Aging. 2010;25(4):753–766.
    1. Park DC, Gutchess AH, Meade ML, Stine-Morrow EAL. Improving cognitive function in older adults: nontraditional approaches. J Gerontol Ser B. 2007;62(Special_Issue_1):45–52.
    1. Ihaka R, Gentleman R. R: a language for data analysis and graphics. J Comput Graph Stat. 1996;5(3):299–314.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors en medewerkers

Medische omstandigheden

Geneesmiddelinterventies

3
Abonneren