Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors during the Initial Stage of the 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Epidemic among the General Population in China

Cuiyan Wang, Riyu Pan, Xiaoyang Wan, Yilin Tan, Linkang Xu, Cyrus S Ho, Roger C Ho, Cuiyan Wang, Riyu Pan, Xiaoyang Wan, Yilin Tan, Linkang Xu, Cyrus S Ho, Roger C Ho

Abstract

Background: The 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic is a public health emergency of international concern and poses a challenge to psychological resilience. Research data are needed to develop evidence-driven strategies to reduce adverse psychological impacts and psychiatric symptoms during the epidemic. The aim of this study was to survey the general public in China to better understand their levels of psychological impact, anxiety, depression, and stress during the initial stage of the COVID-19 outbreak. The data will be used for future reference. Methods: From 31 January to 2 February 2020, we conducted an online survey using snowball sampling techniques. The online survey collected information on demographic data, physical symptoms in the past 14 days, contact history with COVID-19, knowledge and concerns about COVID-19, precautionary measures against COVID-19, and additional information required with respect to COVID-19. Psychological impact was assessed by the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), and mental health status was assessed by the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21). Results: This study included 1210 respondents from 194 cities in China. In total, 53.8% of respondents rated the psychological impact of the outbreak as moderate or severe; 16.5% reported moderate to severe depressive symptoms; 28.8% reported moderate to severe anxiety symptoms; and 8.1% reported moderate to severe stress levels. Most respondents spent 20-24 h per day at home (84.7%); were worried about their family members contracting COVID-19 (75.2%); and were satisfied with the amount of health information available (75.1%). Female gender, student status, specific physical symptoms (e.g., myalgia, dizziness, coryza), and poor self-rated health status were significantly associated with a greater psychological impact of the outbreak and higher levels of stress, anxiety, and depression (p < 0.05). Specific up-to-date and accurate health information (e.g., treatment, local outbreak situation) and particular precautionary measures (e.g., hand hygiene, wearing a mask) were associated with a lower psychological impact of the outbreak and lower levels of stress, anxiety, and depression (p < 0.05). Conclusions: During the initial phase of the COVID-19 outbreak in China, more than half of the respondents rated the psychological impact as moderate-to-severe, and about one-third reported moderate-to-severe anxiety. Our findings identify factors associated with a lower level of psychological impact and better mental health status that can be used to formulate psychological interventions to improve the mental health of vulnerable groups during the COVID-19 epidemic.

Keywords: anxiety; coronavirus; depression; epidemic; knowledge; precaution; psychological impact; respiratory symptoms; stress.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
National epidemic trend of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak in China from 7 January to 2 February 2020.

References

    1. Wang C. A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern. Lancet. 2020;395:470–473. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30185-9.
    1. Hawryluck L. SARS control and psychological effects of quarantine, Toronto, Canada. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2004;10:1206–1212. doi: 10.3201/eid1007.030703.
    1. Nishiura H. The Extent of Transmission of Novel Coronavirus in Wuhan, China, 2020. J. Clin. Med. 2020;9:330. doi: 10.3390/jcm9020330.
    1. Mahase E. China coronavirus: WHO declares international emergency as death toll exceeds 200. BMJ Clin. Res. Ed. 2020;368:m408. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m408.
    1. Paules C.I., Marston H.D., Fauci A.S. Coronavirus Infections-More Than Just the Common Cold. JAMA. 2020 doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0757.
    1. Huang C. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395:497–506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5.
    1. Cao Z. Estimating the effective reproduction number of the 2019-nCoV in China. medRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.01.27.20018952.
    1. Zhao S. Estimating the Unreported Number of Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Cases in China in the First Half of January 2020: A Data-Driven Modelling Analysis of the Early Outbreak. J. Clin. Med. 2020;9:388. doi: 10.3390/jcm9020388.
    1. Li Q. Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001316.
    1. Rothe C. Transmission of 2019-nCoV Infection from an Asymptomatic Contact in Germany. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020 doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2001468.
    1. Ryu S., Chun B.C. Korean Society of Epidemiology-nCo, an interim review of the epidemiological characteristics of 2019 novel coronavirus. Epidemiol. Health. 2020;42:e2020006. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2020006.
    1. Chen N. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: A descriptive study. Lancet. 2020;395:507–513. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30211-7.
    1. Holshue M.L. First Case of 2019 Novel Coronavirus in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001191.
    1. Nishiura H. The Rate of Underascertainment of Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Infection: Estimation Using Japanese Passengers Data on Evacuation Flights. J. Clin. Med. 2020;9:419. doi: 10.3390/jcm9020419.
    1. Horton R. Offline: 2019-nCoV—“A desperate plea”. Lancet. 2020;395:400. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30299-3.
    1. Xiang Y.-T. Timely mental health care for the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak is urgently needed. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7:228–229. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30046-8.
    1. Hall R.C.W., Chapman M.J. The 1995 Kikwit Ebola outbreak: Lessons hospitals and physicians can apply to future viral epidemics. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry. 2008;30:446–452. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2008.05.003.
    1. Rubin G.J., Potts H.W.W., Michie S. The impact of communications about swine flu (influenza A H1N1v) on public responses to the outbreak: Results from 36 national telephone surveys in the UK. Health Technol. Assess. 2010;14:183–266. doi: 10.3310/hta14340-03.
    1. Van Bortel T. Psychosocial effects of an Ebola outbreak at individual, community and international levels. Bull. World Health Organ. 2016;94:210–214. doi: 10.2471/BLT.15.158543.
    1. Sim K. Psychosocial and coping responses within the community health care setting towards a national outbreak of an infectious disease. J. Psychosom. Res. 2010;68:195–202. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.04.004.
    1. Leung G.M. The impact of community psychological responses on outbreak control for severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong. J. Epidemiol. Community Health. 2003;57:857–863. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.11.857.
    1. Lu R. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: Implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet. 2020 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30251-8.
    1. Rubin G.J., Wessely S. The psychological effects of quarantining a city. BMJ Clin. Res. Ed. 2020;368:m313. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m313.
    1. Leung G.M. Community psycho-behavioural surveillance and related impact on outbreak control in Hong Kong and Singapore during the SARS epidemic. Hong Kong Med. J. 2009;15(Suppl. S9):30–34.
    1. Zhang M.W. Usage of social media and smartphone application in assessment of physical and psychological well-being of individuals in times of a major air pollution crisis. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2014;2:e16. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.2827.
    1. Zhang M.W.B. Methodology of developing a smartphone application for crisis research and its clinical application. Technol. Health Care Off. J. Eur. Soc. Eng. Med. 2014;22:547–559. doi: 10.3233/THC-140819.
    1. Creamer M., Bell R., Failla S. Psychometric properties of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised. Behav. Res. Ther. 2003;41:1489–1496. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2003.07.010.
    1. Le T.A. Multi-level predictors of psychological problems among methadone maintenance treatment patients in difference types of settings in Vietnam. Subst. Abus. Treat. Prev. Policy. 2019;14:39. doi: 10.1186/s13011-019-0223-4.
    1. Ho C.S.H. Relationship of Anxiety and Depression with Respiratory Symptoms: Comparison between Depressed and Non-Depressed Smokers in Singapore. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2019;16:163. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16010163.
    1. Quek T.C. Misophonia in Singaporean Psychiatric Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2018;15:1410. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15071410.
    1. McAlonan G.M. Immediate and sustained psychological impact of an emerging infectious disease outbreak on health care workers. Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie. 2007;52:241–247.
    1. Patel A., Jernigan D.B. Initial Public Health Response and Interim Clinical Guidance for the 2019 Novel Coronavirus Outbreak—United States, 31 December 2019–4 February 2020. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2020;69:140–146. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6905e1.
    1. Lim G.Y. Prevalence of Depression in the Community from 30 Countries between 1994 and 2014. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:2861. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21243-x.
    1. Zhang M.W.B., Ho C.S.H., Ho R.C.M. Methodology of development and students’ perceptions of a psychiatry educational smartphone application. Technol. Health Care Off. J. Eur. Soc. Eng. Med. 2014;22:847–855. doi: 10.3233/THC-140861.
    1. Do T.T.T. Receptiveness and preferences of health-related smartphone applications among Vietnamese youth and young adults. BMC Public Health. 2018;18:764. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5641-0.
    1. Geddie J.S.J. To Mask or Not to Mask: Confusion Spreads over Coronavirus Protection. 31 January 2020. [(accessed on 8 February 2020)]; Available online: .
    1. Organisation W.H. Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Advice for the Public: When and How to Use Masks. [(accessed on 8 February 2020)];2020 Available online: .
    1. Ho R.C. Impact of 2013 south Asian haze crisis: Study of physical and psychological symptoms and perceived dangerousness of pollution level. BMC Psychiatry. 2014;14:81. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-14-81.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors en medewerkers

Medische omstandigheden

Geneesmiddelinterventies

3
Abonneren