Evaluation of nepafenac in prevention of macular edema following cataract surgery in patients with diabetic retinopathy

Rishi Singh, Louis Alpern, Glenn J Jaffe, Robert P Lehmann, John Lim, Harvey J Reiser, Kenneth Sall, Thomas Walters, Dana Sager, Rishi Singh, Louis Alpern, Glenn J Jaffe, Robert P Lehmann, John Lim, Harvey J Reiser, Kenneth Sall, Thomas Walters, Dana Sager

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate nepafenac ophthalmic suspension 0.1% (Nevanac(®); Alcon Research Ltd) in the prevention of macular edema following cataract surgery in diabetic retinopathy patients.

Methods: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-masked, vehicle-controlled study of 263 adult diabetic patients with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy requiring cataract surgery. Patients were randomized (1:1) to instill nepafenac or vehicle three times daily beginning 1 day prior to surgery through day 90. Efficacy included the percentage of patients who developed macular edema (≥30% increase in central subfield macular thickness from baseline) and the percentage of patients with decreases of more than five letters in best-corrected visual acuity from day 7 to 90.

Results: A significantly lower percentage of patients in the nepafenac group developed macular edema relative to patients in the vehicle group (3.2% versus 16.7%; P < 0.001). A significantly lower percentage of patients in the nepafenac group had best-corrected visual acuity decreases of more than five letters relative to patients in the vehicle group on day 30 (P < 0.001), day 60 (P = 0.002), and day 90 (P = 0.006). The mean central subfield macular thickness and mean percent change from baseline in macular volume were also significantly lower in the nepafenac group versus the vehicle group at days 14 through 90 (P ≤ 0.005). No safety issues or trends were identified when dosing was increased to 90 days that negatively impacted the favorable benefit/risk profile of nepafenac.

Conclusion: Nepafenac demonstrated statistically significant and clinically relevant advantages compared with vehicle in preventing macular edema and maintaining visual acuity in diabetic patients following cataract surgery. These advantages were seen at multiple time points over the course of the 90-day therapy period. There was no clinically relevant increase in risk from 90 days dosing compared with 14 days. Therefore, with a similar safety profile and benefit in preventing macular edema and maintaining vision, the risk/benefit to the diabetic patient undergoing cataract surgery appears to be positive.

Keywords: cataract extraction; diabetes; macular edema; nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug; ocular surgery; retinopathy; topical.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean central subfield macular thickness (intent-to-treat data). Notes: Data are presented as the mean thickness in microns ± standard error. The study day identified as “B” represents the presurgical baseline. The sample sizes in the nepafenac group were 125 (baseline, and days 14, 30, 60, and 90) and 121 (day 7); the sample sizes in the vehicle group were 126 (baseline, and days 30, 60, and 90), 124 (day 7), and 125 (day 14). *On days 14, 30, 60, and 90, the difference between nepafenac and vehicle is significant (P < 0.001 in all comparisons based on a repeated-measures analysis of variance).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean percent change from presurgical baseline in macular volume (intent-to-treat data). Notes: Data are presented as the mean percent change in volume ± standard error. The sample sizes in the nepafenac group were 121 (day 7) and 125 (days 14, 30, 60, and 90); the sample sizes in the vehicle group were 124 (day 7), 125 (day 14), and 126 (days 30, 60, and 90). *On days 14, 30, 60, and 90, the difference between nepafenac and vehicle is significant (P = 0.005 for day 14 and P < 0.001 for days 30, 60, and 90, based on a repeated-measures analysis of variance).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean best-corrected visual acuity (intent-to-treat data). Notes: Data are presented as the mean number of letters read ± standard error. The study day identified as “B” represents the presurgical baseline. No P-values were calculated. The sample sizes in the nepafenac group were 125 (baseline, and days 14, 30, 60, and 90) and 124 (day 7); the sample sizes in the vehicle group were 124 (baseline), 123 (days 7 and 30), 122 (day 14), and 125 (days 60 and 90).

References

    1. Tranos PG, Wickremasinghe SS, Stangos NT, Topouzis T, Tsinopoulos I, Pavesio CE. Macular edema. Surv Ophthalmol. 2004;49:470–490.
    1. Gallemore RP. NSAIDs in treatment of retinal disorders. Rev Ophth. 2006;13:81–88.
    1. Powe NR, Schein OD, Gieser SC, et al. Synthesis of the literature on visual acuity and complications following cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation. Cataract Patient Outcome Research Team. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112:239–252.
    1. Ursell PG, Spalton DJ, Whitcup SM, Nussenblatt RB. Cystoid macular edema after phacoemulsification: relationship to blood-aqueous barrier damage and visual acuity. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:1492–1497.
    1. Hayashi K, Igarashi C, Hirata A, Hayashi H. Changes in diabetic macular oedema after phacoemulsification surgery. Eye (Lond) 2009;23:389–396.
    1. Degenring RF, Vey S, Kamppeter B, Budde WM, Jonas JB, Sauder G. Effect of uncomplicated phacoemulsification on the central retina in diabetic and non-diabetic subjects. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007;245:18–23.
    1. Rossetti L, Autelitano A. Cystoid macular edema following cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2000;11:65–72.
    1. Johnson MW. Etiology and treatment of macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;147:11–21.
    1. Dowler JG, Sehmi KS, Hykin PG, Hamilton AM. The natural history of macular edema after cataract surgery in diabetes. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:663–668.
    1. Pollack A, Leiba H, Bukelman A, Oliver M. Cystoid macular oedema following cataract extraction in patients with diabetes. Br J Ophthalmol. 1992;76:221–224.
    1. Pollack A, Leiba H, Bukelman A, Abrahami S, Oliver M. The course of diabetic retinopathy following cataract surgery in eyes previously treated by laser photocoagulation. Br J Ophthalmol. 1992;76:228–231.
    1. Krepler K, Biowski R, Schrey S, Jandrasits K, Wedrich A. Cataract surgery in patients with diabetic retinopathy: visual outcome, progression of diabetic retinopathy, and incidence of diabetic macular oedema. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002;240:735–738.
    1. Miyake K, Ibaraki N. Prostaglandins and cystoid macular edema. Surv Ophthalmol. 2002;47(Suppl 1):S203–S218.
    1. Flach AJ. The incidence, pathogenesis and treatment of cystoid macular edema following cataract surgery. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1998;96:557–634.
    1. O’Brien TP. Emerging guidelines for use of NSAID therapy to optimize cataract surgery patient care. Curr Med Res Opin. 2005;21:1131–1137.
    1. Rossetti L, Chaudhuri J, Dickersin K. Medical prophylaxis and treatment of cystoid macular edema after cataract surgery. The results of a meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:397–405.
    1. Henderson BA, Kim JY, Ament CS, Ferrufino-Ponce ZK, Grabowska A, Cremers SL. Clinical pseudophakic cystoid macular edema. Risk factors for development and duration after treatment. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:1550–1558.
    1. Gaynes BI, Onyekwuluje A. Topical ophthalmic NSAIDs: a discussion with focus on nepafenac ophthalmic suspension. Clin Ophthalmol. 2008;2:355–368.
    1. Ke TL, Graff G, Spellman JM, Yanni JM. Nepafenac, a unique nonsteroidal prodrug with potential utility in the treatment of trauma-induced ocular inflammation: II. In vitro bioactivation and permeation of external ocular barriers. Inflammation. 2000;24:371–384.
    1. Lane SS. Nepafenac: a unique nonsteroidal prodrug. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2006;46:13–20.
    1. Kapin MA, Yanni JM, Brady MT, et al. Inflammation-mediated retinal edema in the rabbit is inhibited by topical nepafenac. Inflammation. 2003;27:281–291.
    1. Wilkinson CP, Ferris FL, 3rd, Klein RE, et al. Proposed international clinical diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema disease severity scales. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1677–1682.
    1. Kim SJ, Belair ML, Bressler NM, et al. A method of reporting macular edema after cataract surgery using optical coherence tomography. Retina. 2008;28:870–876.
    1. Kim SJ, Equi R, Bressler NM. Analysis of macular edema after cataract surgery in patients with diabetes using optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:881–889.
    1. Hee MR, Puliafito CA, Duker JS, et al. Topography of diabetic macular edema with optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:360–370.
    1. Hee MR, Puliafito CA, Wong C, et al. Quantitative assessment of macular edema with optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:1019–1029.
    1. Goebel W, Kretzchmar-Gross T. Retinal thickness in diabetic retinopathy: a study using optical coherence tomography (OCT) Retina. 2002;22:759–767.
    1. Goebel W, Franke R. Retinal thickness in diabetic retinopathy: comparison of optical coherence tomography, the retinal thickness analyzer, and fundus photography. Retina. 2006;26:49–57.
    1. Campbell RJ, Coupland SG, Buhrmann RR, Kertes PJ. Optimal optical coherence tomography-based measures in the diagnosis of clinically significant macular edema: retinal volume vs foveal thickness. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125:619–623.
    1. Bressler NM, Edwards AR, Antoszyk AN, et al. Retinal thickness on Stratus optical coherence tomography in people with diabetes and minimal or no diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145:894–901.
    1. Wolf EJ, Braunstein A, Shih C, Braunstein RE. Incidence of visually significant pseudophakic macular edema after uneventful phacoemulsification in patients treated with nepafenac. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:1546–1549.
    1. Hariprasad SM, Akduman L, Clever JA, Ober M, Recchia FM, Mieler WF. Treatment of cystoid macular edema with the new-generation NSAID nepafenac 0.1% Clin Ophthalmol. 2009;3:147–154.
    1. Hariprasad SM, Callanan D, Gainey S, He YG, Warren K. Cystoid and diabetic macular edema treated with nepafenac 0.1% J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2007;23:585–590.
    1. Callanan D, Williams P. Topical nepafenac in the treatment of diabetic macular edema. Clin Ophthalmol. 2008;2:689–692.
    1. Krzystolik MG, Strauber SF, Aiello LP, et al. Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Reproducibility of macular thickness and volume using Zeiss optical coherence tomography in patients with diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:1520–1525.
    1. Nevanac® (full prescribing information) Fort Worth, TX: Alcon Laboratories Inc; 2008.
    1. Heier JS, Topping TM, Baumann W, Dirks MS, Chern S. Ketorolac versus prednisolone versus combination therapy in the treatment of acute pseudophakic cystoid macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:2034–2038.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren