Usability and Robustness of the Wixela Inhub Dry Powder Inhaler

Richard Allan, Kelly Canham, Roisin Wallace, Dave Singh, Jon Ward, Andrew Cooper, Claire Newcomb, Richard Allan, Kelly Canham, Roisin Wallace, Dave Singh, Jon Ward, Andrew Cooper, Claire Newcomb

Abstract

Background: Wixela Inhub is a generic version of Advair Diskus recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The Inhub inhaler delivers fluticasone propionate (FP)/salmeterol in a dry powder formulation. The goals of our studies were to demonstrate that the Inhub inhaler can be used by representative end users and confirm the robustness of the Inhub inhaler. Methods: Study 1: A nondosing usability assessment, the device orientation study, confirmed that intended users (represented by patients diagnosed with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD] who were naive to dry powder inhalers and current Advair Diskus users) could use the Inhub inhaler safely and effectively. Subjects were provided with an Inhub inhaler in commercial packaging, including instructions for use, and were asked to undertake three dose simulations using the inhaler. Subjects were encouraged to interact with this new drug delivery device as they would at home. Subjects were not provided with training on the use of the device. Subjects were observed interacting with the Inhub inhaler, and those who currently use Diskus were also observed interacting with the Diskus to determine whether their mental model of the use of Diskus impacted their interaction with the Inhub device, this assessment was not a primary outcome of the study. Study 2: This is an open-label clinical study to confirm the robustness of the Inhub inhaler after at home patient use. Subjects diagnosed with asthma or COPD were provided Inhub inhaler training and subsequently self-administered 3 weeks of twice daily doses of Wixela Inhub 250 μg FP/50 μg salmeterol in the home environment. The Inhub inhalers were returned to the investigator after ∼3 weeks of outpatient use for in vitro tests on the drug remaining in each inhaler. Results: Study 1 enrolled 110 subjects, and all completed the study. Most subjects (100/110) held the Inhub inhaler in the correct orientation and of those who did not, 9 still achieved a peak inhalation flow rate of ≥30 L/min and a total inhaled volume of ≥1 L, thus meeting the requirements of the study success criteria. In Study 2, 111 pediatric, adult, and elderly subjects with asthma or COPD received the study drug. After ∼3 weeks of outpatient use of the Inhub inhaler by subjects, comprehensive in vitro testing demonstrated that the FP and salmeterol pharmaceutical performance in the Inhub inhaler was preserved. Conclusions: The majority of subjects demonstrated safe and effective use of the Inhub inhaler. In vitro testing and inspections confirmed the robustness of the Inhub inhaler after outpatient use. Clinical trial registration number: NCT02474017.

Keywords: COPD; asthma; device orientation; fluticasone propionate/salmeterol.

Conflict of interest statement

R.A., K.C., R.W., J.W., A.C., and C.N. are employees of Mylan and have stock ownership of Mylan. D.S. received sponsorship to attend and speak at international meetings, honoraria for lecturing or attending advisory boards, from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Cipla, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Glenmark, Menarini, Mundipharma, Novartis, Peptinnovate, Pfizer, Pulmatrix, Teva, Therevance, and Verona.

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
(A) Inhub Inhaler. (B) Diskus Inhaler.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Patient disposition for (A) Study 1 and (B) Study 2. aEnrolled set defined as all subjects who signed an informed consent form. bSafety analysis set defined as all subjects who received ≥1 dose of study drug. COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; DPI, dry powder inhaler; y, years.

References

    1. Chrystyn H: The Diskus: A review of its position among dry powder inhaler devices. Int J Clin Pract. 2007;61:1022–1036
    1. Dalby RN, Eicher J, and Zierenberg B: Development of Respimat® Soft Mist™ Inhaler and its clinical utility in respiratory disorders. Med Devices (Auckl). 2011;4:145–155
    1. Lavorini F, Fontana GA, and Usmani OS: New inhaler devices—the good, the bad and the ugly. Respiration. 2014;88:3–15
    1. Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA): Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention (2018). Available from: . Accessed February17, 2020
    1. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD): Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of COPD (2018). Available from: . Accessed February17, 2020
    1. Hoppentocht M, Hagedoorn P, Frijlink HW, and de Boer AH: Technological and practical challenges of dry powder inhalers and formulations. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014;75:18–31
    1. Newman SP, Weisz AW, Talaee N, and Clarke SW: Improvement of drug delivery with a breath actuated pressurised aerosol for patients with poor inhaler technique. Thorax. 1991;46:712–716
    1. Newman SP: Inhaler treatment options in COPD. Eur Respir Rev. 2005;14:102–108
    1. Steinfeld J, Yiu G, and Miller SD: Dose-ranging study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of four doses of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol multidose dry powder inhaler (FS MDPI) compared with fluticasone propionate (Fp) MDPI and FS DPI in subjects with persistent asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;135:AB6 [Abstract].
    1. Longphre MV, Getz EB, and Fuller R: Clinical bioequivalence of OT329 SOLIS and ADVAIR DISKUS in adults with asthma. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017;14:182–189
    1. Gerald JK: Generic competition for orally inhaled respiratory medications. Two steps forward, one step back. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017;14:165–167
    1. Kuna P, Thyroff-Friesinger U, Gath I, and Jones S: Randomized equivalence trial: A novel multidose dry powder inhaler and originator device in adult and adolescent asthma. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2015;36:352–364
    1. US Food and Drug Administration. Applying human factors and usability engineering to medical devices: Guidance for industry and food and drug administration staff. 2016. Available at: . Accessed February16, 2019
    1. Federal Register. Draft Guidance for Industry and Staff: Bioequivalence Recommendations for Fluticasone Propionate; Salmeterol Xinafoate; Availability. Federal Register, Vol. 78, No. 175/Notices, 2013
    1. Fluticasone Propionate and Salmeterol Inhalation Powder. USP monograph. USP42-NF37 accelerated revision official as of Feb 8, 2019. United States Pharmacopeia, Rockville, MD, 2019
    1. Faulkner L: Beyond the five-user assumption: Benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2003;35:379–383
    1. US Food and Drug Administration. Premarket information—device design and documentation processes. 2018. Available at: . Accessed February17, 2020
    1. Patient Data, IMS Information Solutions UK Ltd. 2015. Available at: . Accessed February17, 2020
    1. Lactose Monohydrate. NF monograph. USP42-NF37. United States Pharmacopeia, Rockville, MD, 2019
    1. Lavorini F, Magnan A, Dubus JC, Voshaar T, Corbetta L, Broeders M, Dekhuijzen R, Sanchis J, Viejo JL, Barnes P, Corrigan C, Levy M, and Crompton GK: Effect of incorrect use of dry powder inhalers on management of patients with asthma and COPD. Respir Med. 2008;102:593–604
    1. Molimard M, Raherison C, Lignot S, Depont F, Abouelfath A, and Moore N: Assessment of handling of inhaler devices in real life: An observational study in 3811 patients in primary care. J Aerosol Med. 2003;16:249–254
    1. Wieshammer S and Dreyhaupt J: Dry powder inhalers: Which factors determine the frequency of handling errors? Respiration. 2008;75:18–25

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren