Safety of Acupuncture: Overview of Systematic Reviews

Malcolm W C Chan, Xin Yin Wu, Justin C Y Wu, Samuel Y S Wong, Vincent C H Chung, Malcolm W C Chan, Xin Yin Wu, Justin C Y Wu, Samuel Y S Wong, Vincent C H Chung

Abstract

Acupuncture is increasingly used worldwide. It is becoming more accepted by both patients and healthcare providers. However, the current understanding of its adverse events (AEs) is fragmented. We conducted this overview to collect all systematic reviews (SRs) on the AEs of acupuncture and related therapies. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from inception to December 2015. Methodological quality of included reviews was assessed with a validated instrument. Evidence was narratively reported. Seventeen SRs covering various types of acupuncture were included. Methodological quality of the reviews was overall mediocre. Four major categories of AEs were identified, which are organ or tissue injuries (13 reviews, median: 36 cases, median deaths: 4), infections (11 reviews, median: 17 cases, median deaths: 0.5), local AEs or reactions (12 reviews, median: 8.5 cases, no deaths were reported), and other complications such as dizziness or syncope (11 reviews, median: 21 cases, no deaths were reported). Minor and serious AEs can occur during the use of acupuncture and related modalities, contrary to the common impression that acupuncture is harmless. Serious AEs are rare, but need significant attention as mortality can be associated with them. Referrals should consider acupuncturists' training credibility, and patient safety should be a core part of acupuncture education.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of literature selection on systematic reviews of acupuncture related adverse events.

References

    1. Burton, A., Falkenberg, T., Smith, M., Zhang, Q. & Zhang, X. WHO Traditional Medicine Strategy 2014–2023 Available at: (Assessed: 9th July 2016) (2013).
    1. Hopton AK, Curnoe S, Kanaan M, MacPherson H. Acupuncture in practice: mapping the providers, the patients and the settings in a national cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open. 2012;2:1–9. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000456.
    1. Cheng, X. Chinese Acupuncture and Moxibustion (Foreign Languages Pres, 2010).
    1. Barnes, P. M., Bloom, B. & Nahin, R. L. Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults and children: United States, 2007. National health statistics reports 1–23 (2008).
    1. Statistics Canada. Health reports: use of alternative health care. The Daily16 (2004).
    1. Tan, J. Y., Molassiotis, A., Wang, T. & Suen, L. K. P. Adverse events of auricular therapy: A systematic review. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med2014, doi: 10.1155/2014/506758 (2014).
    1. Zheng W, Zhang J, Shang H. Electro-acupuncture-related adverse events: A systematic review. Med Acupunct. 2012;24:77–81. doi: 10.1089/acu.2011.0858.
    1. McCulloch M, Nachat A, Schwartz J, Casella-Gordon V, Cook J. Acupuncture safety in patients receiving anticoagulants: a systematic review. Perm J. 2015;19:68–73. doi: 10.7812/TPP/14-057.
    1. Adams D, et al. The safety of pediatric acupuncture: A systematic review. Pediatrics. 2011;128:e1575–e1587. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-1091.
    1. Zhang J, Shang H, Gao X, Ernst E. Acupuncture-related adverse events: A systematic review of the chinese literature. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88:915–921. doi: 10.2471/BLT.10.076737.
    1. Ernst E, Sherman KJ. Is acupuncture a risk factor for hepatitis? Systematic review of epidemiological studies. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;18:1231–1236. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1746.2003.03135.x.
    1. Yamashita H, et al. Systematic review of adverse events following acupuncture: The Japanese literature. Complement Ther Med. 2001;9:98–104. doi: 10.1054/ctim.2001.0446.
    1. Norheim AJ. Adverse effects of acupuncture: a study of the literature for the years 1981–1994. J Altern Complement Med. 1996;2:291–297. doi: 10.1089/acm.1996.2.291.
    1. Gnatta JR, Kurebayashi LFS, Paes da Silva MJ. Atypical mycobacterias associated to acupuncuture: an integrative review. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2013;21:450–458. doi: 10.1590/S0104-11692013000100022.
    1. Ernst E, Zhang J. Cardiac tamponade caused by acupuncture: a review of the literature. Int J Cardiol. 2011;149:287–289. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.10.016.
    1. Lao L, Hamilton GR, Fu J, Berman BM. Is acupuncture safe? A systematic review of case reports. Altern Ther Health Med. 2003;9:72–83.
    1. Wu, J. et al. Systematic Review of Adverse Effects: A Further Step towards Modernization of Acupuncture in China. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med2015, doi:10.1155/2015/432467 (2015).
    1. Xu, S. et al. Adverse events of acupuncture: A systematic review of case reports. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med2013, doi:10.1155/2013/581203. Epub 2013 Mar 20 (2013).
    1. He W, Zhao X, Li Y, Xi Q, Guo Y. Adverse events following acupuncture: A systematic review of the chinese literature for the years 1956–2010. J Altern Complement Med. 2012;18:892–901. doi: 10.1089/acm.2011.0825.
    1. Bergqvist D. Vascular injuries caused by acupuncture. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008;36:160–163. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.04.004.
    1. Ernst E, White AR. Prospective studies of the safety of acupuncture: A systematic review. Am J Med. 2001;110:481–485. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9343(01)00651-9.
    1. Ernst E, Lee MS, Choi T-Y. Acupuncture: does it alleviate pain and are there serious risks? A review of reviews. Pain. 2011;152:755–764. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.11.004.
    1. Zeng X, et al. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review. J Evid Based Med. 2015;8:2–10. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12141.
    1. Loke YK, Price D, Herxheimer A. Systematic reviews of adverse effects: framework for a structured approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:32. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-7-32.
    1. Eypasch E, Lefering R, Kum CK, Troidl H. Probability of adverse events that have not yet occurred: a statistical reminder. BMJ. 1995;311:619–620. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7005.619.
    1. Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB. EMBASE search strategies achieved high sensitivity and specificity for retrieving methodologically sound systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:29–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.04.001.
    1. Montori VM, Wilczynski NL, Morgan D, Haynes RB. Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical survey. BMJ. 2005;330:68. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38336.804167.47.
    1. Golder S, Loke YK. Sensitivity and precision of adverse effects search filters in MEDLINE and EMBASE: a case study of fractures with thiazolidinediones. Health Info Libr J. 2012;29:28–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2011.00972.x.
    1. Zorzela, L. et al. PRISMA harms checklist: improving harms reporting in systematic reviews. BMJ352, doi:10.1136/bmj.i157 (2016).
    1. Shea BJ, et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:1–7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-7-10.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors en medewerkers

Medische omstandigheden

Geneesmiddelinterventies

3
Abonneren