The KEYNOTE-811 trial of dual PD-1 and HER2 blockade in HER2-positive gastric cancer

Yelena Y Janjigian, Akihito Kawazoe, Patricio Yañez, Ning Li, Sara Lonardi, Oleksii Kolesnik, Olga Barajas, Yuxian Bai, Lin Shen, Yong Tang, Lucjan S Wyrwicz, Jianming Xu, Kohei Shitara, Shukui Qin, Eric Van Cutsem, Josep Tabernero, Lie Li, Sukrut Shah, Pooja Bhagia, Hyun Cheol Chung, Yelena Y Janjigian, Akihito Kawazoe, Patricio Yañez, Ning Li, Sara Lonardi, Oleksii Kolesnik, Olga Barajas, Yuxian Bai, Lin Shen, Yong Tang, Lucjan S Wyrwicz, Jianming Xu, Kohei Shitara, Shukui Qin, Eric Van Cutsem, Josep Tabernero, Lie Li, Sukrut Shah, Pooja Bhagia, Hyun Cheol Chung

Abstract

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2, also known as ERBB2) amplification or overexpression occurs in approximately 20% of advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinomas1-3. More than a decade ago, combination therapy with the anti-HER2 antibody trastuzumab and chemotherapy became the standard first-line treatment for patients with these types of tumours4. Although adding the anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) antibody pembrolizumab to chemotherapy does not significantly improve efficacy in advanced HER2-negative gastric cancer5, there are preclinical6-19 and clinical20,21 rationales for adding pembrolizumab in HER2-positive disease. Here we describe results of the protocol-specified first interim analysis of the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III KEYNOTE-811 study of pembrolizumab plus trastuzumab and chemotherapy for unresectable or metastatic, HER2-positive gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma22 ( https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT03615326" title="See in ClinicalTrials.gov">NCT03615326). We show that adding pembrolizumab to trastuzumab and chemotherapy markedly reduces tumour size, induces complete responses in some participants, and significantly improves objective response rate.

© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Figures

Extended Data Fig. 1.. Treatment difference in…
Extended Data Fig. 1.. Treatment difference in objective response in subgroups of the efficacy population.
Response was assessed per RECIST, version 1.1, by blinded, independent central review. The estimated treatment difference between the pembrolizumab and placebo groups in the overall population was calculated using the Miettinen and Nurminen method stratified by geographic region (Australia/Europe/Israel/North America [Aus/Eur/Isr/NAm] vs Asia vs rest of world), PD-L1 combined positive score ([CPS]; ≥1 vs

Fig. 1.. Best percentage change from baseline…

Fig. 1.. Best percentage change from baseline in the size of target lesions among participants…

Fig. 1.. Best percentage change from baseline in the size of target lesions among participants in the efficacy population.
(a) pembrolizumab group; (b) placebo group. Only those participants in the efficacy population who had RECIST-measurable disease at baseline and at least one evaluable post-baseline measurement are evaluable for change from baseline (N=124 in the pembrolizumab group, N=122 in the chemotherapy group). The treatment regimen included trastuzumab and chemotherapy in both groups. Increases from baseline greater than 100% were truncated at 100%.
Fig. 1.. Best percentage change from baseline…
Fig. 1.. Best percentage change from baseline in the size of target lesions among participants in the efficacy population.
(a) pembrolizumab group; (b) placebo group. Only those participants in the efficacy population who had RECIST-measurable disease at baseline and at least one evaluable post-baseline measurement are evaluable for change from baseline (N=124 in the pembrolizumab group, N=122 in the chemotherapy group). The treatment regimen included trastuzumab and chemotherapy in both groups. Increases from baseline greater than 100% were truncated at 100%.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren