Gene expression signatures predict response to therapy with growth hormone

Adam Stevens, Philip Murray, Chiara De Leonibus, Terence Garner, Ekaterina Koledova, Geoffrey Ambler, Klaus Kapelari, Gerhard Binder, Mohamad Maghnie, Stefano Zucchini, Elena Bashnina, Julia Skorodok, Diego Yeste, Alicia Belgorosky, Juan-Pedro Lopez Siguero, Regis Coutant, Eirik Vangsøy-Hansen, Lars Hagenäs, Jovanna Dahlgren, Cheri Deal, Pierre Chatelain, Peter Clayton, Adam Stevens, Philip Murray, Chiara De Leonibus, Terence Garner, Ekaterina Koledova, Geoffrey Ambler, Klaus Kapelari, Gerhard Binder, Mohamad Maghnie, Stefano Zucchini, Elena Bashnina, Julia Skorodok, Diego Yeste, Alicia Belgorosky, Juan-Pedro Lopez Siguero, Regis Coutant, Eirik Vangsøy-Hansen, Lars Hagenäs, Jovanna Dahlgren, Cheri Deal, Pierre Chatelain, Peter Clayton

Abstract

Recombinant human growth hormone (r-hGH) is used as a therapeutic agent for disorders of growth including growth hormone deficiency (GHD) and Turner syndrome (TS). Treatment is costly and current methods to model response are inexact. GHD (n = 71) and TS patients (n = 43) were recruited to study response to r-hGH over 5 years. Analysis was performed using 1219 genetic markers and baseline (pre-treatment) blood transcriptome. Random forest was used to determine predictive value of transcriptomic data associated with growth response. No genetic marker passed the stringency criteria for prediction. However, we identified an identical set of genes in both GHD and TS whose expression could be used to classify therapeutic response to r-hGH with a high accuracy (AUC > 0.9). Combining transcriptomic markers with clinical phenotype was shown to significantly reduce predictive error. This work could be translated into a single genomic test linked to a prediction algorithm to improve clinical management. Trial registration numbers: NCT00256126 and NCT00699855.

Conflict of interest statement

AS and PM have received speaker honoraria from Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. P Ch has received investigator research support, consultant and speaker honoraria from Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. P Cl had received research investigator support and speaker honoraria from Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. EK is an employee of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1. The association of whole blood…
Fig. 1. The association of whole blood gene expression at baseline with response to recombinant human growth hormone (r-hGH) over all 5 years of therapy in patients with growth hormone deficiency (GHD) and Turner syndrome (TS).
Comparison of patient response to r-hGH using Discriminant Analysis of Principal Components (DAPC). Low quartile (green, LoQ) and high quartile (red, HiQ) of growth response over 5 years of therapy (cms grown) compared to the remaining patients (orange) in GHD (N = 50) and TS (N = 22). Unsupervised transcriptomic data with no normalisation for phenotype are shown, GHD = 8875 and TS = 8455 gene probesets. DAPC generates a discriminant function, a synthetic variable that optimises the variation between the groups whilst minimising the variation within a group. The frequency of the discriminant function of DAPC is plotted (colour figure online).
Fig. 2. Whole blood gene expression is…
Fig. 2. Whole blood gene expression is associated with response to recombinant human growth hormone (r-hGH) over 5 years of therapy in patients with growth hormone deficiency (GHD) and Turner syndrome (TS).
Partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) of unsupervised transcriptome using three components. The low and high quartiles of growth response are shown for response to r-hGH (cm) over 5 years in A GHD and B TS. Star plot shows sample distance from the centroid, the arithmetic mean position of all the points in each group.
Fig. 3. Predictive value of whole blood…
Fig. 3. Predictive value of whole blood gene expression associated with response to recombinant human growth hormone (r-hGH) in patients with growth hormone deficiency (GHD).
Classification of low quartile (LoQ) and high quartile (HiQ) of growth response (height velocity, cm/year) over each of 5 years of therapy with r-hGH (Y1-Y5) was performed in GHD patients and TS patients. Gene expression associated with growth response was determined using rank regression (p < 0.01) and Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) with two components (X-variate 1 and 2) was used to visualise response groups; PLS-DA is an analytical approach that determines the similarity between individual patients whilst maximising the difference between patient groups. Low quartile (green) and high quartile (red) compared to the rest of the data (orange) are shown for first year growth response to r-hGH in GHD (N = 71, 330 gene probesets with rank regression p < 0.01). Similarity between samples is represented by their proximity. The star plot shows sample distance from the centroid, the arithmetic mean position of all the points in each group (colour figure online).
Fig. 4. Overlap of the core interactome…
Fig. 4. Overlap of the core interactome models of height velocity-related gene expression in GHD and TS.
Interactome models were generated from the gene expression associated (p < 0.01) with the height velocity at each year of the study. The functional hierarchy of gene interaction modules within the interactome models was determined using the Moduland algorithm, and the core of the interactome model was defined as the unique sum of the top ten elements of the modules as ranked by network centrality. The overlap of the core of the interactome models between GHD and TS was then determined and visualised as a Venn diagram.
Fig. 5. Network structure of the common…
Fig. 5. Network structure of the common core network module shared in patients with growth hormone deficiency (GHD) and Turner syndrome (TS) related to response to recombinant human growth hormone (r-hGH).
A Similarities in the interactome models of the response of GHD and TS to r-hGH were identified by overlap at each year of therapy. Genes were selected that were significantly related to growth response in either or both GHD and TS. The genes related to each year of therapy were combined into a set of 58 uniquely identified genes and this set was used to generate an interactome module (reactome plugin for Cytoscape 3.6.0). Genes with a dark border also have a genetic association with growth response in either GHD or TS. Connecting lines represent known protein:protein interactions, size of the node is proportional to the number of connections made. B The clustering coefficient of the group of genes in the network module associated with each year of therapy was determined and presented as a histogram (average ± standard error of the mean). The clustering coefficient measures the tendency of nodes to cluster together within a network. C The correlation coefficient linking gene expression with growth response at each year of therapy was mapped to the network model, red = positive correlation, green = negative correlation. Genes with a thick border also have a genetic association with growth response in either GHD or TS (colour figure online).
Fig. 6. Predictive value of an identical…
Fig. 6. Predictive value of an identical set of blood gene expression markers identified by network analysis in the classification of response to recombinant human growth hormone (r-hGH) in patients with growth hormone deficiency (GHD) and Turner syndrome (TS).
First year growth response is used as an example. Similarities in the interactome models of the response of GHD and TS to r-hGH were identified by overlap at each year of therapy. Genes were selected that were significantly related to growth response in either or both GHD and TS, generating an identical set of gene probesets used for prediction of both high and low response in both GHD and TS. BORUTA, an all relevant feature selection wrapper random forest-based algorithm, was used to confirm the importance of gene expression probe-sets used for classification of response to r-hGH. The BORUTA algorithm uses a 100-fold permutation to define the noise present in the data; the noise is modelled as shadow variables and used as a basis to assess confidence in the data. Green = confirmed gene probeset, yellow = tentative gene probeset, red = rejected gene probeset, blue = shadow variables (high, medium and low shadow variables are derived to define the noise within the dataset). Low quartile (left column—LoQ) and high quartile (right column—HiQ) are shown for first year growth response to r-hGH in GHD and TS. The same group of gene probesets are used in each case (colour figure online).
Fig. 7. Gene level summary of DNA…
Fig. 7. Gene level summary of DNA methylation in GHD patients is related to growth response as measured by Knemometry.
Whole epigenome measurements of six GHD patients with growth response after 4 days of r-hGH therapy measured by knemometry were available from previously published data (GSE57107). A gene level summary of DNA methylation was conducted using median values in Qlucore Omics Explorer (version 3.3) (n = 20,618). A Rank regression of whole-genome DNA methylation against growth response after 4 days of r-hGH as measured by knemometry (p < 0.01) found 497 genes with differential methylation the majority of which showed increased methylation at low rates of growth (negative correlation). B Whole-genome methylation in the six GHD patients ordered by growth response in the sets of genes identified as predicting response to r-hGH in the first year of therapy in both GHD and TS.

References

    1. Excellence NIfHaC. Human growth hormone (somatropin) for the treatment of growth failure in children. 2010.
    1. Ranke MB, Lindberg A, Brosz M, Kaspers S, Loftus J, Wollmann H, et al. Accurate long-term prediction of height during the first four years of growth hormone treatment in prepubertal children with growth hormone deficiency or Turner Syndrome. Horm Res Paediatr. 2012;78:8–17. doi: 10.1159/000339468.
    1. Stevens A, De Leonibus C, Hanson D, Whatmore A, Murray P, Donn R, et al. Pediatric perspective on pharmacogenomics. Pharmacogenomics. 2013;14:1889–905. doi: 10.2217/pgs.13.193.
    1. Stevens A, De Leonibus C, Whatmore A, Hanson D, Murray P, Chatelain P, et al. Pharmacogenomics related to growth disorders. Horm Res Paediatr. 2013;80:477–90. doi: 10.1159/000355658.
    1. Stevens A, Murray P, Wojcik J, Raelson J, Koledova E, Chatelain P, et al. Validating genetic markers of response to recombinant human growth hormone in children with growth hormone deficiency and Turner syndrome: the PREDICT validation study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2016;175:633–43.. doi: 10.1530/EJE-16-0357.
    1. De Leonibus C, Chatelain P, Knight C, Clayton P, Stevens A. Effect of summer daylight exposure and genetic background on growth in growth hormone-deficient children. Pharmacogenomics J. 2016;16:540–50.. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2015.67.
    1. Clayton P, Chatelain P, Tato L, Yoo HW, Ambler GR, Belgorosky A, et al. A pharmacogenomic approach to the treatment of children with GH deficiency or Turner syndrome. Eur J Endocrinol. 2013;169:277–89. doi: 10.1530/EJE-13-0069.
    1. Stevens A, Hanson D, Whatmore A, Destenaves B, Chatelain P, Clayton P. Human growth is associated with distinct patterns of gene expression in evolutionarily conserved networks. BMC Genom. 2013;14:547. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-547.
    1. Ranke MB, Lindberg A, Chatelain P, Wilton P, Cutfield W, Albertsson-Wikland K, et al. Derivation and validation of a mathematical model for predicting the response to exogenous recombinant human growth hormone (GH) in prepubertal children with idiopathic GH deficiency. KIGS International Board. Kabi Pharmacia International Growth Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84:1174–83. doi: 10.1210/jcem.84.4.5634.
    1. Ranke MB, Lindberg A, Chatelain P, Wilton P, Cutfield W, Albertsson-Wikland K, et al. Prediction of long-term response to recombinant human growth hormone in Turner syndrome: development and validation of mathematical models. KIGS International Board. Kabi International Growth Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85:4212–8. doi: 10.1210/jcem.85.11.6976.
    1. Ranke MB, Lindberg A, Chatelain P, Wilton P, Cutfield W, Albertsson-Wikland K, et al. Predicting the response to recombinant human growth hormone in Turner syndrome: KIGS models. KIGS International Board. Kabi International Growth Study. Acta Paediatr (Oslo, Nor: 1992) Suppl. 1999;88:122–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1999.tb14420.x.
    1. Stevens A, Bonshek C, Whatmore A, Butcher I, Hanson D, De Leonibus C, et al. Insights into the pathophysiology of catch-up compared with non-catch-up growth in children born small for gestational age: an integrated analysis of metabolic and transcriptomic data. Pharmacogenomics J. 2014;14:376–84. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2014.4.
    1. De Leonibus C, Chatelain P, Knight C, Clayton P, Stevens A. Effect of summer daylight exposure and genetic background on growth in growth hormone-deficient children. Pharmacogenomics J. 2015;16:540–50.
    1. Gerber T, Willscher E, Loeffler-Wirth H, Hopp L, Schadendorf D, Schartl M, et al. Mapping heterogeneity in patient-derived melanoma cultures by single-cell RNA-seq. Oncotarget. 2017;8:846–62.. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13666.
    1. Grigoroiu M, Tagett R, Draghici S, Dima S, Nastase A, Florea R, et al. Gene-expression profiling in non-small cell lung cancer with invasion of mediastinal lymph nodes for prognosis evaluation. Cancer Genom Proteom. 2015;12:231–42.
    1. Cavalli FMG, Remke M, Rampasek L, Peacock J, Shih DJH, Luu B, et al. Intertumoral heterogeneity within medulloblastoma subgroups. Cancer Cell. 2017;31:737–54.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2017.05.005.
    1. Bhutani M, Zhang Q, Friend R, Voorhees PM, Druhan LJ, Barlogie B, et al. Investigation of a gene signature to predict response to immunomodulatory derivatives for patients with multiple myeloma: an exploratory, retrospective study using microarray datasets from prospective clinical trials. Lancet Haematol. 2017;4:e443–e51. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(17)30143-6.
    1. Kamel HFM, Al-Amodi H. Exploitation of gene expression and cancer biomarkers in paving the path to era of personalized medicine. Genom Proteom Bioinform. 2017;15:220–35. doi: 10.1016/j.gpb.2016.11.005.
    1. Sävendahl L, Polak M, Backeljauw P, Blair J, Miller BS, Rohrer TR, et al. Treatment of children with GH in the United States and Europe: long-term follow-up from NordiNet® IOS and ANSWER program. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;104:4730–42.. doi: 10.1210/jc.2019-00775.
    1. Shepherd S, Saraff V, Shaw N, Banerjee I, Patel L. Growth hormone prescribing patterns in the UK, 2013–2016. Arch Dis Child. 2019;104:583–7. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-316262.
    1. Stevens A, Clayton P, Tato L, Yoo HW, Rodriguez-Arnao MD, Skorodok J, et al. Pharmacogenomics of insulin-like growth factor-I generation during GH treatment in children with GH deficiency or Turner syndrome. Pharmacogenomics J. 2014;14:54–62. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2013.14.
    1. Murray PG, Stevens A, De Leonibus C, Koledova E, Chatelain P, Clayton PE. Transcriptomics and machine learning predict diagnosis and severity of growth hormone deficiency. JCI Insight. 2018;3:1–14.
    1. Chatr-Aryamontri A, Breitkreutz BJ, Oughtred R, Boucher L, Heinicke S, Chen D, et al. The BioGRID interaction database: 2015 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:D470–8. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1204.
    1. Smoot ME, Ono K, Ruscheinski J, Wang PL, Ideker T. Cytoscape 2.8: new features for data integration and network visualization. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:431–2. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq675.
    1. Yu H, Kim PM, Sprecher E, Trifonov V, Gerstein M. The importance of bottlenecks in protein networks: correlation with gene essentiality and expression dynamics. PLoS Comput Biol. 2007;3:e59. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030059.
    1. Sun J, Zhao Z. A comparative study of cancer proteins in the human protein-protein interaction network. BMC Genom. 2010;11:S5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-S3-S5.
    1. Szalay-Beko M, Palotai R, Szappanos B, Kovacs IA, Papp B, Csermely P. ModuLand plug-in for Cytoscape: determination of hierarchical layers of overlapping network modules and community centrality. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:2202–4. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts352.
    1. Chin CH, Chen SH, Wu HH, Ho CW, Ko MT, Lin CY. cytoHubba: identifying hub objects and sub-networks from complex interactome. BMC Syst Biol. 2014;8:S11. doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-8-S4-S11.
    1. Szklarczyk D, Franceschini A, Wyder S, Forslund K, Heller D, Huerta-Cepas J, et al. STRING v10: protein-protein interaction networks, integrated over the tree of life. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:D447–52. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1003.
    1. Kolarova J, Ammerpohl O, Gutwein J, Welzel M, Baus I, Riepe FG, et al. In vivo investigations of the effect of short- and long-term recombinant growth hormone treatment on DNA-methylation in humans. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0120463. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120463.
    1. RCoreTeam. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2016. .
    1. Jombart T, Devillard S, Balloux F. Discriminant analysis of principal components: a new method for the analysis of genetically structured populations. BMC Genet. 2010;11:94. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-11-94.
    1. Rohart F, Gautier B, Singh A, Le, Cao KA. mixOmics: an R package for ‘omics feature selection and multiple data integration. PLoS Comput Biol. 2017;13:e1005752. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005752.
    1. Liaw A, Wiener M. Classification and regression by RandomForest. R News. 2002;2:18–22.
    1. Chawla NV, Bowyer KW, Hall LO, Kegelmeyer WP. SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. J Artif Intell Res. 2002;16:321–57. doi: 10.1613/jair.953.
    1. Kursa MB, Rudnicki WR. Feature selection with the Boruta package. J Stat Softw. 2010;36:1–13.. doi: 10.18637/jss.v036.i11.
    1. Nilsson J, Fioretos T, Höglund M, Fontes M. Approximate geodesic distances reveal biologically relevant structures in microarray data. Bioinformatics. 2004;20:874–80. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg496.
    1. Fontes M, Soneson C. The projection score–an evaluation criterion for variable subset selection in PCA visualization. BMC Bioinform. 2011;12:307. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-307.
    1. Ranke MB, Lindberg A. Predicting growth in response to growth hormone treatment. Growth Horm IGF Res: Off J Growth Horm Res Soc Int IGF Res Soc. 2009;19:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ghir.2008.08.001.
    1. Tuo Y, An N, Zhang M. Feature genes in metastatic breast cancer identified by MetaDE and SVM classifier methods. Mol Med Rep. 2018;17:4281–90.
    1. Ranke MB, Wit JM. Growth hormone—past, present and future. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018;14:285–300. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2018.22.
    1. Wit JM, Ranke MB, Albertsson-Wikland K, Carrascosa A, Rosenfeld RG, Van Buuren S, et al. Personalized approach to growth hormone treatment: clinical use of growth prediction models. Horm Res Paediatr. 2013;79:257–70. doi: 10.1159/000351025.
    1. Ranke MB, Schweizer R, Martin DD, Ehehalt S, Schwarze CP, Serra F, et al. Analyses from a centre of short- and long-term growth in Turner’s syndrome on standard growth hormone doses confirm growth prediction algorithms and show normal IGF-I levels. Horm Res Paediatr. 2012;77:214–21. doi: 10.1159/000336806.
    1. Valsesia A, Chatelain P, Stevens A, Peterkova VA, Belgorosky A, Maghnie M, et al. GH deficiency status combined with GH receptor polymorphism affects response to GH in children. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;173:777–89. doi: 10.1530/EJE-15-0474.
    1. Dauber A, Meng Y, Audi L, Vedantam S, Weaver B, Carrascosa A, et al. A genome-wide pharmacogenetic study of growth hormone responsiveness. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105:1–12.
    1. Stevens A, De Leonibus C, Hanson D, Dowsey AW, Whatmore A, Meyer S, et al. Network analysis: a new approach to study endocrine disorders. J Mol Endocrinol. 2014;52:R79–93. doi: 10.1530/JME-13-0112.
    1. Kovacs IA, Palotai R, Szalay MS, Csermely P. Community landscapes: an integrative approach to determine overlapping network module hierarchy, identify key nodes and predict network dynamics. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:1–14.
    1. Kolarova J, Ammerpohl O, Gutwein J, Welzel M, Baus I, Riepe FG, et al. In vivo investigations of the effect of short- and long-term recombinant growth hormone treatment on DNA-methylation in humans. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0120463. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120463.
    1. Chicco D. Ten quick tips for machine learning in computational biology. BioData Min. 2017;10:35. doi: 10.1186/s13040-017-0155-3.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren