Low-Dose CT Lung Cancer Screening Practices and Attitudes among Primary Care Providers at an Academic Medical Center

Jennifer A Lewis, W Jeffrey Petty, Janet A Tooze, David P Miller, Caroline Chiles, Antonius A Miller, Christina Bellinger, Kathryn E Weaver, Jennifer A Lewis, W Jeffrey Petty, Janet A Tooze, David P Miller, Caroline Chiles, Antonius A Miller, Christina Bellinger, Kathryn E Weaver

Abstract

Background: Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening reduces lung cancer-specific and overall mortality. We sought to assess lung cancer screening practices and attitudes among primary care providers (PCPs) in the era of new LDCT screening guidelines.

Methods: In 2013, we surveyed PCPs at an academic medical center (60% response) and assessed: lung cancer screening use, perceived screening effectiveness, knowledge of screening guidelines, perceived barriers to LDCT use, and interest in LDCT screening education.

Results: Few PCPs (n = 212) reported ordering lung cancer screening: chest X-ray (21%), LDCT (12%), and sputum cytology (3%). Only 47% of providers knew three or more of six guideline components for LDCT screening; 24% did not know any guideline components. In multiple logistic regression analysis, providers who knew three or more guideline components were more likely to order LDCT (OR, 7.1; 95% confidence intervals, 2.0-25.6). Many providers (30%) were unsure of the effectiveness of LDCT. Mammography, colonoscopy, and Pap smear were rated more frequently as effective in reducing cancer mortality compared with LDCT (all P values < 0.0001). Common perceived barriers included patient cost (86.9% major or minor barrier), harm from false positives (82.7%), patients' lack of awareness (81.3%), risk of incidental findings (81.3%), and insurance coverage (80.1%).

Conclusions: LDCT lung cancer screening is currently an uncommon practice at an academic medical center. PCPs report ordering chest X-ray, a nonrecommended screening test, more often than LDCT. PCPs had a limited understanding of lung cancer screening guidelines and LDCT effectiveness. Provider educational interventions are needed to facilitate shared decision-making with patients.

Impact: This study describes some of the first data available about PCPs' use of lung cancer screening tests since the publication of multiple professional guidelines endorsing LDCT. Knowledge gaps were identified that may hinder the uptake of evidence-based lung cancer screening guidelines.

©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Reported Use of Lung Cancer Screening Modalities in the Past Year Among Primary Care Providers in an Academic Medical Center (N= 212) by Guideline Knowledge. Bars indicate upper 95% confidence interval for the estimate. CXR= Chest x-ray, LDCT= Low-dose computed tomography
Figure 2
Figure 2
Primary Care Providers’(N=212) Perceived Major and Minor Barriers to Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose Chest CT.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren