Spatiotemporal structure of intracranial electric fields induced by transcranial electric stimulation in humans and nonhuman primates
Alexander Opitz, Arnaud Falchier, Chao-Gan Yan, Erin M Yeagle, Gary S Linn, Pierre Megevand, Axel Thielscher, Ross Deborah A, Michael P Milham, Ashesh D Mehta, Charles E Schroeder, Alexander Opitz, Arnaud Falchier, Chao-Gan Yan, Erin M Yeagle, Gary S Linn, Pierre Megevand, Axel Thielscher, Ross Deborah A, Michael P Milham, Ashesh D Mehta, Charles E Schroeder
Abstract
Transcranial electric stimulation (TES) is an emerging technique, developed to non-invasively modulate brain function. However, the spatiotemporal distribution of the intracranial electric fields induced by TES remains poorly understood. In particular, it is unclear how much current actually reaches the brain, and how it distributes across the brain. Lack of this basic information precludes a firm mechanistic understanding of TES effects. In this study we directly measure the spatial and temporal characteristics of the electric field generated by TES using stereotactic EEG (s-EEG) electrode arrays implanted in cebus monkeys and surgical epilepsy patients. We found a small frequency dependent decrease (10%) in magnitudes of TES induced potentials and negligible phase shifts over space. Electric field strengths were strongest in superficial brain regions with maximum values of about 0.5 mV/mm. Our results provide crucial information of the underlying biophysics in TES applications in humans and the optimization and design of TES stimulation protocols. In addition, our findings have broad implications concerning electric field propagation in non-invasive recording techniques such as EEG/MEG.
Conflict of interest statement
A.O. is an inventor on patents and patent applications describing methods and devices for noninvasive brain stimulation.
Figures
References
- Paulus W. Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES - tDCS; tRNS, tACS) methods. Neuropsychological rehabilitation 21, 602–617 (2011).
- Nitsche M. A. & Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. The Journal of physiology 527 Pt 3, 633–639 (2000).
- Nitsche M. A. & Paulus W. Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology 57, 1899–1901 (2001).
- Ozen S. et al.. Transcranial electric stimulation entrains cortical neuronal populations in rats. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 30, 11476–11485 (2010).
- Ali M. M., Sellers K. K. & Frohlich F. Transcranial alternating current stimulation modulates large-scale cortical network activity by network resonance. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 33, 11262–11275 (2013).
- Helfrich R. F. et al.. Entrainment of brain oscillations by transcranial alternating current stimulation. Curr Biol 24, 333–339 (2014).
- Coffman B. A., Clark V. P. & Parasuraman R. Battery powered thought: enhancement of attention, learning, and memory in healthy adults using transcranial direct current stimulation. NeuroImage 85 Pt 3, 895–908 (2014).
- Kuo M.-F., Paulus W. & Nitsche M. A. Therapeutic effects of non-invasive brain stimulation with direct currents (tDCS) in neuropsychiatric diseases. NeuroImage 85, Part 3, 948–960 (2014).
- Bindman L. J., Lippold O. C. & Redfearn J. W. Long-lasting changes in the level of the electrical activity of the cerebral cortex produced bypolarizing currents. Nature 196, 584–585 (1962).
- Bikson M. et al.. Effects of uniform extracellular DC electric fields on excitability in rat hippocampal slices in vitro. The Journal of physiology 557, 175–190 (2004).
- Reato D., Rahman A., Bikson M. & Parra L. C. Low-intensity electrical stimulation affects network dynamics by modulating population rate and spike timing. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 30, 15067–15079 (2010).
- Frohlich F. & McCormick D. A. Endogenous electric fields may guide neocortical network activity. Neuron 67, 129–143 (2010).
- Anastassiou C. A., Perin R., Markram H. & Koch C. Ephaptic coupling of cortical neurons. Nature neuroscience 14, 217–223 (2011).
- Logothetis N. K., Kayser C. & Oeltermann A. In vivo measurement of cortical impedance spectrum in monkeys: implications for signal propagation. Neuron 55, 809–823 (2007).
- Kim D. et al.. Validation of Computational Studies for Electrical Brain Stimulation With Phantom Head Experiments. Brain stimulation 8, 914–925 (2015).
- Bedard C., Kroger H. & Destexhe A. Modeling extracellular field potentials and the frequency-filtering properties of extracellular space. Biophysical journal 86, 1829–1842 (2004).
- Bedard C., Rodrigues S., Roy N., Contreras D. & Destexhe A. Evidence for frequency-dependent extracellular impedance from the transfer function between extracellular and intracellular potentials: intracellular-LFP transfer function. J Comput Neurosci 29, 389–403 (2010).
- Michel C. M. et al.. EEG source imaging. Clinical neurophysiology: official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology 115, 2195–2222 (2004).
- Hahn C. et al.. Methods for extra-low voltage transcranial direct current stimulation: current and time dependent impedance decreases. Clinical neurophysiology: official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology 124, 551–556 (2013).
- Dykstra A. R. et al.. Individualized localization and cortical surface-based registration of intracranial electrodes. NeuroImage 59, 3563–3570 (2012).
- Groppe D. M. et al.. Dominant frequencies of resting human brain activity as measured by the electrocorticogram. NeuroImage 79, 223–233 (2013).
- Lyons R. & Reducing F. F. T. Scalloping Loss Errors Without Multiplication [DSP Tips and Tricks]. Signal Processing Magazine, IEEE 28, 112–116 (2011).
- Plonsey R. & Heppner D. B. Considerations of quasi-stationarity in electrophysiological systems. The Bulletin of mathematical biophysics 29, 657–664 (1967).
- Miranda P. C. Physics of effects of transcranial brain stimulation. Handbook of clinical neurology 116, 353–366 (2013).
- Gabriel C., Gabriel S. & Corthout E. The dielectric properties of biological tissues: I. Literature survey. Physics in medicine and biology 41, 2231–2249 (1996).
- Struber D., Rach S., Trautmann-Lengsfeld S. A., Engel A. K. & Herrmann C. S. Antiphasic 40 Hz oscillatory current stimulation affects bistable motion perception. Brain Topogr 27, 158–171 (2014).
- Polania R., Moisa M., Opitz A., Grueschow M. & Ruff C. C. The precision of value-based choices depends causally on fronto-parietal phase coupling. Nature communications 6, 8090 (2015).
- Vossen A., Gross J. & Thut G. Alpha Power Increase After Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation at Alpha Frequency (alpha-tACS) Reflects Plastic Changes Rather Than Entrainment. Brain stimulation 8, 499–508 (2015).
- Gabriel S., Lau R. W. & Gabriel C. The dielectric properties of biological tissues: II. Measurements in the frequency range 10 Hz to 20 GHz. Physics in medicine and biology 41, 2251–2269 (1996).
- Wagner T., Valero-Cabre A. & Pascual-Leone A. Noninvasive Human Brain Stimulation. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 9, 527–565 (2007).
- Wagner T. et al.. Impact of brain tissue filtering on neurostimulation fields: a modeling study. NeuroImage 85 Pt 3, 1048–1057 (2014).
- Gabriel C., Peyman A. & Grant E. H. Electrical conductivity of tissue at frequencies below 1 MHz. Physics in medicine and biology 54, 4863–4878 (2009).
- Plonsey R. Reciprocity Applied to Volume Conductors and the ECG. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 10, 9–12 (1963).
- Rush S. & Driscoll D. A. EEG Electrode Sensitivity-An Application of Reciprocity. Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on BME–16, 15–22 (1969).
- Pritchard W. S. The brain in fractal time: 1/f-like power spectrum scaling of the human electroencephalogram. The International journal of neuroscience 66, 119–129 (1992).
- Datta A. et al.. Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad. Brain stimulation 2, 201–207, 207 e201 (2009).
- Miranda P. C., Mekonnen A., Salvador R. & Ruffini G. The electric field in the cortex during transcranial current stimulation. NeuroImage 70, 48–58 (2013).
- Radman T., Su Y., An J. H., Parra L. C. & Bikson M. Spike timing amplifies the effect of electric fields on neurons: implications for endogenous field effects. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 27, 3030–3036 (2007).
- López-Alonso V., Cheeran B., Río-Rodríguez D. & Fernández-del-Olmo M. Inter-individual Variability in Response to Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Paradigms. BRAIN STIMULATION: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in Neuromodulation (2014).
- Wiethoff S., Hamada M. & Rothwell J. C. Variability in response to transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex. BRAIN STIMULATION: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in Neuromodulation (2014).
- Dmochowski J. P., Datta A., Bikson M., Su Y. & Parra L. C. Optimized multi-electrode stimulation increases focality and intensity at target. Journal of neural engineering 8, 046011 (2011).
- Opitz A., Paulus W., Will S., Antunes A. & Thielscher A. Determinants of the electric field during transcranial direct current stimulation. NeuroImage 109C, 140–150 (2015).
- Berenyi A., Belluscio M., Mao D. & Buzsaki G. Closed-loop control of epilepsy by transcranial electrical stimulation. Science 337, 735–737 (2012).
Source: PubMed