Application of In-Home Monitoring Data to Transition Decisions in Continuing Care Retirement Communities: Usability Study

Katherine Wild, Nicole Sharma, Nora Mattek, Jason Karlawish, Thomas Riley, Jeffrey Kaye, Katherine Wild, Nicole Sharma, Nora Mattek, Jason Karlawish, Thomas Riley, Jeffrey Kaye

Abstract

Background: Continuous in-home monitoring of older adults can provide rich and sensitive data capturing subtle behavioral and cognitive changes. Our previous work has identified multiple metrics that describe meaningful trends in daily activities over time. The continuous, multidomain nature of this technology may also serve to inform caregivers of the need for higher levels of care to maintain the health and safety of at-risk older adults. Accordingly, care decisions can be based on objective, systematically assessed real-time data.

Objective: This study deployed a suite of in-home monitoring technologies to detect changing levels of care needs in residents of independent living units in 7 retirement communities and to assess the efficacy of computer-based tools in informing decisions regarding care transitions.

Methods: Continuous activity data were presented via an interactive, web-based tool to the staff identified in each facility who were involved in decisions regarding transitions in care among residents. Comparisons were planned between outcomes for residents whose data were shared and those whose data were not made available to the staff. Staff use of the data dashboard was monitored throughout the study, and exit interviews with the staff were conducted to explicate staff interaction with the data platform. Residents were sent weekly self-report questionnaires to document any health- or care-related changes.

Results: During the study period, 30 of the 95 residents (32%) reported at least one incidence of new or increased provision of care; 6 residents made a permanent move to a higher level of care within their communities. Despite initial enthusiasm and an iterative process of refinement of measures and modes of data presentation based on staff input, actual inspection and therefore the use of resident data were well below expectation. In total, 11 of the 25 staff participants (44%) logged in to the activity dashboard throughout the study. Survey data and in-depth interviews provided insight into the mismatch between intended and actual use.

Conclusions: Most continuous in-home monitoring technology acceptance models focus on perceived usefulness and ease of use and equate the intent to use technology with actual use. Our experience suggests otherwise. We found that multiple intervening variables exist between perceived usefulness, intent to use, and actual use. Ethical, institutional, and social factors are considered in their roles as determinants of use.

Keywords: care transition; remote sensing technology; technology.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Katherine Wild, Nicole Sharma, Nora Mattek, Jason Karlawish, Thomas Riley, Jeffrey Kaye. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 13.01.2021.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sample dashboard display (screenshot) of continuously assessed in-home activity metrics in Ambient Independence Measures for Guiding Care Transitions (AIMS) residents. The display, showing data at the individual level, can be customized by the user to show higher-level summaries, single metrics, numerical detail, and different windows of time. In this custom view, multiple metrics are displayed (eg, time out of home, physiologic measures, sleep measures, bathroom trips). The gray shading indicates preset ranges.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Sample dashboard display of residents’ summary data. Exclamation points indicate departure from the usual level of behavior or activity for each resident (Temperature and Carbon Dioxide refer to environmental metrics and were not included in this study).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Sample page from the quarterly newsletter mailed to Ambient Independence Measures for Guiding Care Transitions (AIMS) study participants and staff. Study enrollment at the time of this newsletter was 89 residents and 20 staff.

References

    1. Callahan CM, Tu W, Unroe KT, LaMantia MA, Stump TE, Clark DO. Transitions in care in a nationally representative sample of older Americans with dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Aug;63(8):1495–502. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13540.
    1. Fong JH, Mitchell OS, Koh BS. Disaggregating activities of daily living limitations for predicting nursing home admission. Health Serv Res. 2015 Apr;50(2):560–78. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12235.
    1. Miller LM, Dieckmann NF, Mattek NC, Lyons KS, Kaye JA. Social activity decreases risk of placement in a long-term care facility for a prospective sample of community-dwelling older adults. Res Gerontol Nurs. 2014;7(3):106–12. doi: 10.3928/19404921-20140110-02.
    1. Nielsen AB, Siersma V, Waldemar G, Waldorff FB. The predictive value of self-rated health in the presence of subjective memory complaints on permanent nursing home placement in elderly primary care patients over 4-year follow-up. Age Ageing. 2014 Jan;43(1):50–7. doi: 10.1093/ageing/aft131.
    1. Kelsey SG, Laditka SB, Laditka JN. Dementia and transitioning from assisted living to memory care units: perspectives of administrators in three facility types. Gerontologist. 2010 Apr;50(2):192–203. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnp115.
    1. Lieto JM, Schmidt KS. Reduced ability to self-administer medication is associated with assisted living placement in a continuing care retirement community. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2005;6(4):246–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2005.04.002.
    1. Maxwell CJ, Soo A, Hogan DB, Wodchis WP, Gilbart E, Amuah J, Eliasziw M, Hagen B, Strain LA. Predictors of nursing home placement from assisted living settings in Canada. Can J Aging. 2013 Dec;32(4):333–48. doi: 10.1017/S0714980813000469.
    1. Rosenberg PB, Mielke MM, Samus QM, Rosenblatt A, Baker A, Brandt J, Rabins PV, Lyketsos CG. Transition to nursing home from assisted living is not associated with dementia or dementia-related problem behaviors. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2006 Feb;7(2):73–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2005.06.003.
    1. Couture M, Ducharme F, Lamontagne J. The role of health care professionals in the decision-making process of family caregivers regarding placement of a cognitively impaired elderly relative. Home Health Care Manag Pract. 2012 Apr 11;24(6):283–91. doi: 10.1177/1084822312442675.
    1. Georgiou A, Marks A, Braithwaite J, Westbrook JI. Gaps, disconnections, and discontinuities-the role of information exchange in the delivery of quality long-term care. Gerontologist. 2013 Oct;53(5):770–9. doi: 10.1093/geront/gns127.
    1. Demiris G, Thompson H. Smart homes and ambient assisted living applications: from data to knowledge-empowering or overwhelming older adults? Contribution of the IMIA smart homes and ambiant assisted living working group. Yearb Med Inform. 2011;6:51–7.
    1. Kaye JA, Maxwell SA, Mattek N, Hayes TL, Dodge H, Pavel M, Jimison HB, Wild K, Boise L, Zitzelberger TA. Intelligent systems for assessing aging changes: home-based, unobtrusive, and continuous assessment of aging. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2011 Jul;66(Suppl 1):i180–90. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbq095.
    1. Lyons BE, Austin D, Seelye A, Petersen J, Yeargers J, Riley T, Sharma N, Mattek N, Wild K, Dodge H, Kaye JA. Pervasive computing technologies to continuously assess alzheimer's disease progression and intervention efficacy. Front Aging Neurosci. 2015;7:102. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00102. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00102.
    1. Austin J, Klein K, Mattek N, Kaye J. Variability in medication taking is associated with cognitive performance in nondemented older adults. Alzheimers Dement (Amst) 2017;6:210–3. doi: 10.1016/j.dadm.2017.02.003.
    1. Hayes TL, Larimer N, Adami A, Kaye JA. Medication adherence in healthy elders: small cognitive changes make a big difference. J Aging Health. 2009 Jun;21(4):567–80. doi: 10.1177/0898264309332836.
    1. Dodge HH, Mattek NC, Austin D, Hayes TL, Kaye JA. In-home walking speeds and variability trajectories associated with mild cognitive impairment. Neurology. 2012 Jun 12;78(24):1946–52. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318259e1de.
    1. Akl A, Chikhaoui B, Mattek N, Kaye J, Austin D, Mihailidis A. Clustering home activity distributions for automatic detection of mild cognitive impairment in older adults. J Ambient Intell Smart Environ. 2016;8(4):437–51. doi: 10.3233/AIS-160385.
    1. Mancini M, Schlueter H, El-Gohary M, Mattek N, Duncan C, Kaye J, Horak FB. Continuous monitoring of turning mobility and its association to falls and cognitive function: a pilot study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2016 Aug;71(8):1102–8. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glw019.
    1. Hayes TL, Riley T, Mattek N, Pavel M, Kaye JA. Sleep habits in mild cognitive impairment. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2014;28(2):145–50. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000010.
    1. Kaye J, Mattek N, Dodge HH, Campbell I, Hayes T, Austin D, Hatt W, Wild K, Jimison H, Pavel M. Unobtrusive measurement of daily computer use to detect mild cognitive impairment. Alzheimers Dement. 2014 Jan;10(1):10–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2013.01.011.
    1. Seelye A, Mattek N, Howieson DB, Austin D, Wild K, Dodge HH, Kaye JA. Embedded online questionnaire measures are sensitive to identifying mild cognitive impairment. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2016;30(2):152–9. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000100.
    1. Seelye A, Mattek N, Sharma N, Witter P, Brenner A, Wild K, Dodge H, Kaye J. Passive assessment of routine driving with unobtrusive sensors: a new approach for identifying and monitoring functional level in normal aging and mild cognitive impairment. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;59(4):1427–37. doi: 10.3233/JAD-170116.
    1. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly. 1989 Sep;13(3):319. doi: 10.2307/249008.
    1. Holden RJ, Karsh B. The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. J Biomed Inform. 2010 Feb;43(1):159–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2009.07.002.
    1. Venkatesh V, Morris M, Davis F. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly. 2003;27(3):425–78. doi: 10.2307/30036540.
    1. de Veer AJ, Francke AL. Attitudes of nursing staff towards electronic patient records: a questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Jul;47(7):846–54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.11.016.
    1. Weber S, Crago EA, Sherwood PR, Smith T. Practitioner approaches to the integration of clinical decision support system technology in critical care. J Nurs Adm. 2009 Nov;39(11):465–9. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0b013e3181bd5fc2.
    1. Whitten P, Holtz B, Meyer E, Nazione S. Telehospice: reasons for slow adoption in home hospice care. J Telemed Telecare. 2009;15(4):187–90. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2009.080911.
    1. Tak SH, Benefield LE, Mahoney DF. Technology for long-term care. Res Gerontol Nurs. 2010 Jan;3(1):61–72. doi: 10.3928/19404921-20091103-01.
    1. Wild K, Boise L. In-home monitoring technologies: Perspectives and priorities of older adults. In: Augusto JC, editor. Handbook of Ambient Assisted Living. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2012.
    1. Wu P. A mixed methods approach to technology acceptance research. J Assoc Inf Syst. 2012 Mar;13(3):172–87. doi: 10.17705/1jais.00287.
    1. Saborowski M, Kollak I. 'How do you care for technology?' – Care professionals' experiences with assistive technology in care of the elderly. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2015 Apr;93:133–40. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.05.006.
    1. Sävenstedt S, Sandman PO, Zingmark K. The duality in using information and communication technology in elder care. J Adv Nurs. 2006 Oct;56(1):17–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03975.x.
    1. Doran D, Haynes BR, Estabrooks CA, Kushniruk A, Dubrowski A, Bajnok I, Hall LM, Li M, Carryer J, Jedras D, Bai YQ. The role of organizational context and individual nurse characteristics in explaining variation in use of information technologies in evidence based practice. Implement Sci. 2012 Dec 31;7:122. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-122.
    1. Cresswell KM, Bates DW, Sheikh A. Ten key considerations for the successful implementation and adoption of large-scale health information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jun;20(e1):e9–e13. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001684.
    1. Cresswell K, Sheikh A. Organizational issues in the implementation and adoption of health information technology innovations: an interpretative review. Int J Med Inform. 2013 May;82(5):e73–86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.10.007.
    1. Schoville RR. Discovery of implementation factors that lead to technology adoption in long-term care. J Gerontol Nurs. 2017 Oct 1;43(10):21–6. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20170914-06.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren