Short- and long-term subjective medical treatment outcome of trauma surgery patients: the importance of physician empathy

Simone Steinhausen, Oliver Ommen, Sunya-Lee Antoine, Thorsten Koehler, Holger Pfaff, Edmund Neugebauer, Simone Steinhausen, Oliver Ommen, Sunya-Lee Antoine, Thorsten Koehler, Holger Pfaff, Edmund Neugebauer

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate accident casualties' long-term subjective evaluation of treatment outcome 6 weeks and 12 months after discharge and its relation to the experienced surgeon's empathy during hospital treatment after trauma in consideration of patient-, injury-, and health-related factors. The long-term results are compared to the 6-week follow-up outcomes.

Patients and methods: Two hundred and seventeen surgery patients were surveyed at 6 weeks, and 206 patients at 12 months after discharge from the trauma surgical general ward. The subjective evaluation of medical treatment outcome was measured 6 weeks and 12 months after discharge with the respective scale from the Cologne Patient Questionnaire. Physician Empathy was assessed with the Consultation and Relational Empathy Measure. The correlation between physician empathy and control variables with the subjective evaluation of medical treatment outcome 12 months after discharge was identified by means of logistic regression analysis under control of sociodemographic and injury-related factors.

Results: One hundred and thirty-six patients were included within the logistic regression analysis at the 12-month follow-up. Compared to the 6-week follow-up, the level of subjective evaluation of medical treatment outcome was slightly lower and the association with physician empathy was weaker. Compared to patients who rated the empathy of their surgeon lower than 31 points, patients with ratings of 41 points or higher had a 4.2-fold higher probability to be in the group with a better medical treatment outcome (3.5 and above) on the Cologne Patient Questionnaire scale 12 months after discharge from hospital (P=0.009, R (2)=33.5, 95% confidence interval: 1.440-12.629).

Conclusion: Physician empathy is the strongest predictor for a higher level of trauma patients' subjective evaluation of treatment outcome 6 weeks and 12 months after discharge from the hospital. Interpersonal factors between surgeons and their patients are possible key levers for improving patient outcomes in an advanced health system. Communication trainings for surgeons might prepare them to react appropriately to their patients' needs and lead to satisfactory outcomes for both parties.

Keywords: accident; communication; injury; long-term outcome; patient-reported outcome; physician–patient interaction; trauma surgery.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of study participants.

References

    1. Soberg HL, Finset A, Bautz-Holter E, Sandvik L, Roise O. Return to work after severe multiple injuries: a multidimensional approach on status 1 and 2 years postinjury. J Trauma. 2007;62(2):471–481.
    1. Soberg HL, Roise O, Bautz-Holter E, Finset A. Returning to work after severe multiple injuries: multidimensional functioning and the trajectory from injury to work at 5 years. J Trauma. 2011;71(2):425–434.
    1. Berecki-Gisolf J, Collie A, McClure R. Work disability after road traffic injury in a mixed population with and without hospitalisation. Accid Anal Prev. 2013;51:129–134.
    1. Anke AG, Stanghelle JK, Finset A, Roaldsen KS, Pillgram-Larsen J, Fugl-Meyer AR. Long-term prevalence of impairments and disabilities after multiple trauma. J Trauma. 1997;42(1):54–61.
    1. Hours M, Chossegros L, Charnay P, et al. Outcomes one year after a road accident: Results from the ESPARR cohort. Accid Anal Prev. 2013;50:92–102.
    1. Nhac-Vu HT, Hours M, Charnay P, et al. Predicting self-reported recovery one year after major road traffic accident trauma. J Rehabil Med. 2011;43(9):776–782.
    1. Holbrook TL, Hoyt DB. The impact of major trauma: quality-of-life outcomes are worse in women than in men, independent of mechanism and injury severity. J Trauma. 2004;56(2):284–290.
    1. Soberg HL, Bautz-Holter E, Roise O, Finset A. Mental health and posttraumatic stress symptoms 2 years after severe multiple trauma: self-reported disability and psychosocial functioning. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(3):481–488.
    1. Vles WJ, Steyerberg EW, Essink-Bot ML, van Beeck EF, Meeuwis JD, Leenen LP. Prevalence and determinants of disabilities and return to work after major trauma. J Trauma. 2005;58(1):126–135.
    1. Pirente N, Blum C, Wortberg S, et al. Quality of life after multiple trauma: the effect of early onset psychotherapy on quality of life in trauma patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2007;392(6):739–745.
    1. Kehlet H. Principles of fast track surgery. Multimodal perioperative therapy programme. Chirurg. 2009;80(8):687–689. German.
    1. Kosar S, Seelen HA, Hemmen B, Evers SM, Brink PR. Cost-effectiveness of an integrated ‘fast track’ rehabilitation service for multi-trauma patients involving dedicated early rehabilitation intervention programs: design of a prospective, multi-centre, non-randomised clinical trial. J Trauma Manag Outcomes. 2009;3:1.
    1. Petersen C, Ullrich A, Wahls F, et al. Psychosocial impairments and resources of multiple injured patients. Phys Med Rehab Kuror. 2008;18(6):313–317.
    1. Bouillon B, Kreder HJ, Eypasch E, et al. MI Consensus Group Quality of life in patients with multiple injuries – basic issues, assessment, and recommendations. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2002;20(3–4):125–134.
    1. Neugebauer E, Bouillon B, Bullinger M, Wood-Dauphinée S. Quality of life after multiple trauma – summary and recommendations of the consensus conference. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2002;20(3–4):161–167.
    1. Koller M, Neugebauer EA, Augustin M, et al. Assessment of quality of life in health services research – conceptual, methodological and structural prerequisites. Gesundheitswesen. 2009;71(12):864–872. German.
    1. Pfaff H, Glaeske G, Neugebauer EA, Schrappe M, Zentrum für Versorgungsforschung Köln (ZVFK) der Uniklinik Köln. Zentrum für Sozialpolitik (ZeS), Universität Bremen. IFOM-Institut für Forschung in der Operativen Medizin der Privaten Universität Witten/Herdecke. Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main Memorandum III: “Methods for Health Services Research” (Part 1) Gesundheitswesen. 2009;71(8–9):505–510. German.
    1. Soberg HL, Bautz-Holter E, Roise O, Finset A. Long-term multidimensional functional consequences of severe multiple injuries two years after trauma: a prospective longitudinal cohort study. J Trauma. 2007;62(2):461–470.
    1. Swiontkowski MF. Outcomes measurement in orthopaedic trauma surgery. Injury. 1995;26(10):653–657.
    1. Gosling CM, Gabbe BJ, Williamson OD, Sutherland AM, Cameron PA. Validity of outcome measures used to assess one and six month outcomes in orthopaedic trauma patients. Injury. 2011;42(12):1443–1448.
    1. Shearer D, Morshed S. Common generic measures of health related quality of life in injured patients. Injury. 2011;42(3):241–247.
    1. Janssen C, Ommen O, Ruppert G, Pfaff H. Patient- and hospital-related determinants on subjective evaluation of medical treatment outcome of severely injured patients. Int J Public Health. 2008;16(1):53–60.
    1. Revicki DA. Patient assessment of treatment satisfaction: methods and practical issues. Gut. 2004;53(Suppl 4):iv40–iv44.
    1. Kravitz RL. Patients’ expectations for medical care: an expanded formulation based on review of the literature. Med Care Res Rev. 1996;53(1):3–27.
    1. Sørlie T, Sexton HC, Busund R, Sørlie D. Predictors of satisfaction with surgical treatment. Int J Qual Health Care. 2000;12(1):31–40.
    1. Pfaff H, Freise DC, Mager G, Schrappe M. Der Kölner Patienten-fragebogen (KPF): Entwicklung und Validierung eines Fragebogens zur Erfassung der Einbindung des Patienten als Kotherapeuten [The Cologne Patient Questionnare (CPQ): Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure patient involvement as co-therapist] Sankt Augustin: Asgard-Verlag; 2003. German.
    1. Mercer SW, Neumann M, Wirtz M, Fitzpatrick B, Vojt G. General practitioner empathy, patient enablement, and patient-reported outcomes in primary care in an area of high socio-economic deprivation in Scotland – a pilot prospective study using structural equation modeling. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73(2):240–245.
    1. Steinhausen S, Ommen O, Thüm S, et al. Physician empathy and subjective evaluation of medical treatment outcome in trauma surgery patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;95(1):53–60.
    1. Hax P-M, Hax-Schopenhorst T. Kommunikation mit Patienten in der Chirurgie: Praxisempfehlungen für Ärzte aller operativen Fächer [Communication with patients in surgery: praxical recommendations for physicians of all surgical specialties] Stuttgart: Kohlhammer; 2012. German.
    1. Macnaughton J. The dangerous practice of empathy. Lancet. 2009;373(9679):1940–1941.
    1. Kravitz RL, Callahan EJ, Paterniti D, Antonius D, Dunham M, Lewis CE. Prevalence and sources of patients’ unmet expectations for care. Ann Intern Med. 1996;125(9):730–737.
    1. Mercer SW, Reynolds WJ. Empathy and quality of care. Br J Gen Pract. 2002;52( Suppl):S9–S12.
    1. Strietzel FP, Reichart PA. Oral rehabilitation using Camlog screw-cylinder implants with a particle-blasted and acid-etched microstructured surface. Results from a prospective study with special consideration of short implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(5):591–600.
    1. Ahrens W, Bellach B-M, Jöckel KH. Messung soziodemographischer Merkmale in der Epidemiologie [Measurement of sociodemographic characteristics in epidemiology] München: MMV, Medizin-Verlag; 1998. German.
    1. Dillman DA. Mail and telephone surveys: the total design method. New York: Wiley; 1978.
    1. Buecken R, Galushko M, Golla H, et al. Patients feeling severely affected by multiple sclerosis: How do patients want to communicate about end-of-life issues? Patient Educ Couns. 2012;88(2):318–324.
    1. Kowalski C, Nitzsche A, Scheibler F, Steffen P, Albert US, Pfaff H. Breast cancer patients’ trust in physicians: the impact of patients’ perception of physicians’ communication behaviors and hospital organizational climate. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;77(3):344–348.
    1. Ommen O, Thuem S, Pfaff H, Janssen C. The relationship between social support, shared decision-making and patient’s trust in doctors: a cross-sectional survey of 2,197 inpatients using the Cologne Patient Questionnaire. Int J Public Health. 2011;56(3):319–327.
    1. Ommen O, Wirtz M, Janssen C, Neumann M, Ernstmann N, Pfaff H. Validation of a theory-based instrument measuring patient-reported psychosocial care by physicians using a multiple indicators and multiple causes model. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;80(1):100–106.
    1. Neumann M, Wirtz M, Bollschweiler E, Warm M, Wolf J, Pfaff H. Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the “Consultation and Relational Empathy” (CARE) measure at the example of cancer patients. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2008;58(1):5–15. German.
    1. Mercer SW, Maxwell M, Heaney D, Watt GC. The consultation and relational empathy (CARE) measure: development and preliminary validation and reliability of an empathy-based consultation process measure. Fam Pract. 2004;21(6):699–705.
    1. Mercer SW. The CARE Measure [Internet] 2004. [Accessed Nov 19, 2013]. Available from: .
    1. Mercer SW, Jani BD, Maxwell M, Wong SY, Watt GC. Patient enablement requires physician empathy: a cross-sectional study of general practice consultations in areas of high and low socioeconomic deprivation in Scotland. BMC Fam Pract. 2012;13:6.
    1. Mercer SW, McConnachie A, Maxwell M, Heaney D, Watt GC. Relevance and practical use of the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure in general practice. Fam Pract. 2005;22(3):328–334.
    1. Neumann M, Wirtz M, Bollschweiler E, et al. Determinants and patient-reported long-term outcomes of physician empathy in oncology: a structural equation modelling approach. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;69(1–3):63–75.
    1. Bullinger M, Kirchberger I. SF-36: Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand; Handanweisung [Questionnaire on state of health Short-Form 36; Manual] Z Med Psychol. 1998;7(4):190–191. German.
    1. Ommen O, Wirtz M, Janssen C, et al. Psychometric evaluation of an instrument to assess patient-reported ‘psychosocial care by physicians’: a structural equation modeling approach. Int J Qual Health Care. 2009;21(3):190–197.
    1. Copes WS, Champion HR, Sacco WJ, et al. Progress in characterizing anatomic injury. J Trauma. 1990;30(10):1200–1207.
    1. Herrmann-Lingen C, Buss U, Snaith RP. HADS-D: Hospital anxiety and depression scale; ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung von Angst und Depressivität in der somatischen Medizin; Testdokumentation und Handanweisung. 2nd ed. Bern: Huber; 2005. German.
    1. Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Br J Gen Pract. 1990;40(336):305.
    1. Maercker A, Schutzwohl M. Erfassung von psychischen Belastungss-folgen: Die Impact of Event Skala – revidierte Version. [Assessment of post-traumatic stress reactions: The impact of Event Scale – Revised] Diagnostica. 1998;44(3):130–141. German.
    1. Holtslag HR, van Beeck EF, Lindeman E, Leenen LP. Determinants of long-term functional consequences after major trauma. J Trauma. 2007;62(4):919–927.
    1. Holbrook TL, Anderson JP, Sieber WJ, Browner D, Hoyt DB. Outcome after major trauma: discharge and 6-month follow-up results from the Trauma Recovery Project. J Trauma. 1998;45(2):315–323. discussion 323–314.
    1. Holbrook TL, Anderson JP, Sieber WJ, Browner D, Hoyt DB. Outcome after major trauma: 12-month and 18-month follow-up results from the Trauma Recovery Project. J Trauma. 1999;46(5):765–771. discussion 771–773.
    1. Khati I, Hours M, Charnay P, et al. Quality of life one year after a road accident: results from the adult ESPARR cohort. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74(1):301–311.
    1. Kurth BM, Ellert U. The SF-36 questionnaire and its usefulness in population studies: results of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey 1998. Soz Praventivmed. 2002;47(4):266–277.
    1. Goldstein MS, Elliott SD, Guccione AA. The development of an instrument to measure satisfaction with physical therapy. Phys Ther. 2000;80(9):853–863.
    1. Ferreira PL. Stability of Patient Perception of Quality of Hospital Care Over Time. In: Lun KC, Degoulet P, Piemme TE, Rienhoff O, editors. MEDINFO 92. Proceedings of the Seventh World Congress on: Medical Informatics, Geneva Palexpo, Switzerland, 6–10; September 1992. Amsterdam: North Holland; 1992. pp. 1535–1539.
    1. Trout A, Magnusson AR, Hedges JR. Patient satisfaction investigations and the emergency department: what does the literature say? Acad Emerg Med. 2000;7(6):695–709.
    1. Powers TL, Bendall D. The influence of time on changes in health status and patient satisfaction. Health Care Manage Rev. 2004;29(3):240–248.
    1. Jackson JL, Chamberlin J, Kroenke K. Predictors of patient satisfaction. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52(4):609–620.
    1. Nguyen Thi PL, Briançon S, Empereur F, Guillemin F. Factors determining inpatient satisfaction with care. Soc Sci Med. 2002;54(4):493–504.
    1. Hekkert KD, Cihangir S, Kleefstra SM, van den Berg B, Kool RB. Patient satisfaction revisited: a multilevel approach. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69(1):68–75.
    1. Michaels AJ, Michaels CE, Smith JS, Moon CH, Peterson C, Long WB. Outcome from injury: general health, work status, and satisfaction 12 months after trauma. J Trauma. 2000;48(5):841–848. discussion 848–850.
    1. Duberstein P, Meldrum S, Fiscella K, Shields CG, Epstein RM. Influences on patients’ ratings of physicians: Physicians demographics and personality. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;65(2):270–274.
    1. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(5):879–903.
    1. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff NP. Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annu Rev Psychol. 2012;63:539–569.
    1. Hudak PL, Hogg-Johnson S, Bombardier C, McKeever PD, Wright JG. Testing a new theory of patient satisfaction with treatment outcome. Med Care. 2004;42(8):726–739.
    1. Swiontkowski MF, Chapman JR. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 318. 1995. Cost and effectiveness issues in care of injured patients; pp. 17–24.
    1. United Nations General Assembly . Global road safety crisis. Report of the Secretary-General. United Nations: 2003. [Accessed August 12, 2014]. pp. 1–11. Available from .
    1. Leitgeb J, Mauritz W, Brazinova A, et al. Glasgow Coma Scale score at intensive care unit discharge predicts the 1-year outcome of patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2013;39(3):285–292.
    1. Harris IA, Dao AT, Young JM, Solomon MJ, Jalaludin BB. Predictors of patient and surgeon satisfaction after orthopaedic trauma. Injury. 2009;40(4):377–384.
    1. Burcher P. Emotional intelligence and empathy: its relevance in the clinical encounter. Patient Intelligence. 2011;3:23–28.
    1. Kaptchuk TJ, Kelley JM, Conboy LA, et al. Components of placebo effect: randomised controlled trial in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. BMJ. 2008;336(7651):999–1003.
    1. Di Blasi Z, Harkness E, Ernst E, Georgiou A, Kleijnen J. Influence of context effects on health outcomes: a systematic review. Lancet. 2001;357(9258):757–762.
    1. Brody H. Medicine’s continuing quest for an excuse to avoid relationships with patients. Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(12):13–15.
    1. Merrill JM, Laux L, Thornby JI. Troublesome aspects of the patient-physician relationship: a study of human factors. South Med J. 1987;80(10):1211–1215.
    1. Dunn SM. Barriers and challenges in training health care providers for patient education. Patient Educ Couns. 1995;26(1–3):131–138.
    1. Halpern J. Empathy and patient-physician conflicts. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(5):696–700.
    1. Halpern J. What is clinical empathy? J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(8):670–674.
    1. Halpern J. Practicing medicine in the real world: challenges to empathy and respect for patients. J Clin Ethics. 2003;14(4):298–307.
    1. Gleichgerrcht E, Decety J. Empathy in clinical practice: how individual dispositions, gender, and experience moderate empathic concern, burnout, and emotional distress in physicians. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e61526.
    1. Neumann M, Scheffer C, Längler A, et al. Relevance and barriers of physician empathy in daily practice – current state of research and qualitative survey of physicians. Rehabilitation (Stuttg) 2010;49(5):326–337. German.
    1. Bonvicini KA, Perlin MJ, Bylund CL, Carroll G, Rouse RA, Goldstein MG. Impact of communication training on physician expression of empathy in patient encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;75(1):3–10.
    1. Stewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ. 1995;152(9):1423–1433.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors en medewerkers

Medische omstandigheden

Geneesmiddelinterventies

3
Abonneren