Effectiveness of a Web-Based Computer-Tailored Multiple-Lifestyle Intervention for People Interested in Reducing their Cardiovascular Risk: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Vera Storm, Julia Dörenkämper, Dominique Alexandra Reinwand, Julian Wienert, Hein De Vries, Sonia Lippke, Vera Storm, Julia Dörenkämper, Dominique Alexandra Reinwand, Julian Wienert, Hein De Vries, Sonia Lippke

Abstract

Background: Web-based computer-tailored interventions for multiple health behaviors can improve the strength of behavior habits in people who want to reduce their cardiovascular risk. Nonetheless, few randomized controlled trials have tested this assumption to date.

Objective: The study aim was to test an 8-week Web-based computer-tailored intervention designed to improve habit strength for physical activity and fruit and vegetable consumption among people who want to reduce their cardiovascular risk. In a randomized controlled design, self-reported changes in perceived habit strength, self-efficacy, and planning across different domains of physical activity as well as fruit and vegetable consumption were evaluated.

Methods: This study was a randomized controlled trial involving an intervention group (n=403) and a waiting control group (n=387). Web-based data collection was performed in Germany and the Netherlands during 2013-2015. The intervention content was based on the Health Action Process Approach and involved personalized feedback on lifestyle behaviors, which indicated whether participants complied with behavioral guidelines for physical activity and fruit and vegetable consumption. There were three Web-based assessments: baseline (T0, N=790), a posttest 8 weeks after the baseline (T1, n=206), and a follow-up 3 months after the baseline (T2, n=121). Data analysis was conducted by analyzing variances and structural equation analysis.

Results: Significant group by time interactions revealed superior treatment effects for the intervention group, with substantially higher increases in self-reported habit strength for physical activity (F1,199=7.71, P=.006, Cohen's d=0.37) and fruit and vegetable consumption (F1,199=7.71, P=.006, Cohen's d=0.30) at posttest T1 for the intervention group. Mediation analyses yielded behavior-specific sequential mediator effects for T1 planning and T1 self-efficacy between the intervention and habit strength at follow-up T2 (fruit and vegetable consumption: beta=0.12, 95% CI 0.09-0.16, P<.001; physical activity: beta=0.04, 95% CI 0.02-0.06, P<.001).

Conclusions: Our findings indicate the general effectiveness and practicality of Web-based computer-tailored interventions in terms of increasing self-reported habit strength for physical activity and fruit and vegetable consumption. Self-efficacy and planning may play major roles in the mechanisms that facilitate the habit strength of these behaviors; therefore, they should be actively promoted in Web-based interventions. Although the results need to take into account the high dropout rates and medium effect sizes, a large number of people were reached and changes in habit strength were achieved after 3 months.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01909349; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT01909349 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6g5F0qoft) and Nederlands Trial Register NTR3706 http://www.trialregister.nl/ trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=3706 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6g5F5HMLX).

Keywords: Web-based intervention; cardiovascular disease; computer tailoring; habit strength; planning; self-efficacy.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of participants through the study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Conceptual model with standardized regression coefficients showing the effect of the intervention for fruit and vegetable consumption (FVC) and physical activity (PA) habit strength at follow-up controlling for age, gender, employment status, highest education, marital status, country, BMI, and baseline levels for self-efficacy and planning.

References

    1. Gößwald A, Schienkiewitz A, Nowossadeck E, Busch M. Prevalence of myocardial infarction and coronary heart disease in adults aged 40-79 years in Germany: results of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults (DEGS1) Bundesgesundheitsblatt. 2013;56:650–655.
    1. Leening MJ, Siregar S, Vaartjes I, Bots ML, Versteegh MI, van Geuns RJ, Koolen JJ, Deckers JW. Heart disease in the Netherlands: a quantitative update. Neth Heart J. 2014 Jan;22(1):3–10. doi: 10.1007/s12471-013-0504-x.
    1. Mendis S, Puska P, Norvving B, editors. Global Atlas on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Control. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
    1. Nichols M, Townsend N, Scarborough P, Rayner M. Cardiovascular disease in Europe 2014: epidemiological update. Eur Heart J. 2014 Nov 7;35(42):2950–2959. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu299.
    1. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Health at a Glance 2013: OECD Indicators. 2013. [2016-03-18]. .
    1. Lawler PR, Filion KB, Eisenberg MJ. Efficacy of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation post-myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am Heart J. 2011 Oct;162(4):571–584. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.07.017.
    1. Heran BS, Chen JM, Ebrahim S, Moxham T, Oldridge N, Rees K, Thompson DR, Taylor RS. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(7):CD001800. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001800.pub2.
    1. Li J, Siegrist J. Physical activity and risk of cardiovascular disease--a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012 Feb;9(2):391–407. doi: 10.3390/ijerph9020391.
    1. Taylor RS, Brown A, Ebrahim S, Jolliffe J, Noorani H, Rees K, Skidmore B, Stone JA, Thompson DR, Oldridge N. Exercise-based rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Med. 2004 May 15;116(10):682–692. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.01.009.
    1. Mente A, de Koning L, Shannon HS, Anand SS. A systematic review of the evidence supporting a causal link between dietary factors and coronary heart disease. Arch Intern Med. 2009 Apr 13;169(7):659–669. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.38.
    1. Wang X, Ouyang Y, Liu J, Zhu M, Zhao G, Bao W, Hu FB. Fruit and vegetable consumption and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. BMJ. 2014;349:g4490.
    1. Crowe FL, Roddam AW, Key TJ, Appleby PN, Overvad K, Jakobsen MU, Tjønneland A, Hansen L, Boeing H, Weikert C, Linseisen J, Kaaks R, Trichopoulou A, Misirli G, Lagiou P, Sacerdote C, Pala V, Palli D, Tumino R, Panico S, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Boer J, van Gils CH, Beulens JW, Barricarte A, Rodríguez L, Larrañaga N, Sánchez MJ, Tormo M, Buckland G, Lund E, Hedblad B, Melander O, Jansson J, Wennberg P, Wareham NJ, Slimani N, Romieu I, Jenab M, Danesh J, Gallo V, Norat T, Riboli E, European Prospective Investigation into CancerNutrition (EPIC)-Heart Study Collaborators Fruit and vegetable intake and mortality from ischaemic heart disease: results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-Heart study. Eur Heart J. 2011 May;32(10):1235–1243. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq465.
    1. Oyebode O, Gordon-Dseagu V, Walker A, Mindell JS. Fruit and vegetable consumption and all-cause, cancer and CVD mortality: analysis of Health Survey for England data. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014 Sep;68(9):856–862. doi: 10.1136/jech-2013-203500.
    1. Gardner B, Lally P, Wardle J. Making health habitual: the psychology of 'habit-formation' and general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 2012 Dec;62(605):664–666. doi: 10.3399/bjgp12X659466.
    1. Orbell S, Verplanken B. The automatic component of habit in health behavior: habit as cue-contingent automaticity. Health Psychol. 2010 Jul;29(4):374–383. doi: 10.1037/a0019596.
    1. Johnston DW, Johnston M, Pollard B, Kinmonth A, Mant D. Motivation is not enough: prediction of risk behavior following diagnosis of coronary heart disease from the theory of planned behavior. Health Psychol. 2004 Sep;23(5):533–538. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.23.5.533.
    1. DiMatteo MR, Haskard KB, Williams SL. Health beliefs, disease severity, and patient adherence: a meta-analysis. Med Care. 2007 Jun;45(6):521–528. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318032937e.
    1. Judah G, Gardner B, Aunger R. Forming a flossing habit: an exploratory study of the psychological determinants of habit formation. Br J Health Psychol. 2013 May;18(2):338–353. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8287.2012.02086.x.
    1. Froger-Bompas C, Laviolle B, Guillo P, Letellier C, Ligier K, Daubert J, Paillard F. Sustained positive impact of a coronary rehabilitation programme on adherence to dietary recommendations. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2009 Feb;102(2):97–104. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2008.10.020.
    1. Jackson L, Leclerc J, Erskine Y, Linden W. Getting the most out of cardiac rehabilitation: a review of referral and adherence predictors. Heart. 2005 Jan;91(1):10–14. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2004.045559.
    1. Schwarzer R, Lippke S, Luszczynska A. Mechanisms of health behavior change in persons with chronic illness or disability: the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA) Rehabil Psychol. 2011 Aug;56(3):161–170. doi: 10.1037/a0024509.
    1. Strecher VJ, McEvoy DeVellis B, Becker MH, Rosenstock IM. The role of self-efficacy in achieving health behavior change. Health Educ Behav. 1986 Jan 01;13(1):73–92. doi: 10.1177/109019818601300108.
    1. Carraro N, Gaudreau P. Spontaneous and experimentally induced action planning and coping planning for physical activity: A meta-analysis. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2013 Mar;14(2):228–248. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.10.004.
    1. Hagger MS, Luszczynska A. Implementation intention and action planning interventions in health contexts: state of the research and proposals for the way forward. Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2014 Mar;6(1):1–47. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12017.
    1. de Vries H, Eggers SM, Bolman C. The role of action planning and plan enactment for smoking cessation. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:393. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-393.
    1. Bandura A. Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Educ Behav. 2004 Apr;31(2):143–164. doi: 10.1177/1090198104263660.
    1. Allison MJ, Keller C. Self-efficacy intervention effect on physical activity in older adults. West J Nurs Res. 2004 Feb;26(1):31–46; discussion 47. doi: 10.1177/0193945903259350.
    1. Kreausukon P, Gellert P, Lippke S, Schwarzer R. Planning and self-efficacy can increase fruit and vegetable consumption: a randomized controlled trial. J Behav Med. 2012 Aug;35(4):443–451. doi: 10.1007/s10865-011-9373-1.
    1. Luszczynska A, Tryburcy M, Schwarzer R. Improving fruit and vegetable consumption: a self-efficacy intervention compared with a combined self-efficacy and planning intervention. Health Educ Res. 2007 Oct;22(5):630–8. doi: 10.1093/her/cyl133.
    1. Lally P, van Jaarsveld CH, Potts HW, Wardle J. How are habits formed: Modelling habit formation in the real world. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2009 Jul 16;40(6):998–1009. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.674.
    1. Fleig L, Pomp S, Schwarzer R, Lippke S. Promoting exercise maintenance: how interventions with booster sessions improve long-term rehabilitation outcomes. Rehabil Psychol. 2013 Nov;58(4):323–333. doi: 10.1037/a0033885.
    1. de Vries H, Eggers SM, Lechner L, van Osch L, van Stralen MM. Predicting fruit consumption: the role of habits, previous behavior and mediation effects. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:730. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-730.
    1. Fleig L, Lippke S, Pomp S, Schwarzer R. Intervention effects of exercise self-regulation on physical exercise and eating fruits and vegetables: a longitudinal study in orthopedic and cardiac rehabilitation. Prev Med. 2011 Sep;53(3):182–187. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.06.019.
    1. Webb TL, Sheeran P, Luszczynska A. Planning to break unwanted habits: habit strength moderates implementation intention effects on behaviour change. Br J Soc Psychol. 2009 Sep;48(Pt 3):507–523. doi: 10.1348/014466608X370591.
    1. Webb TL, Joseph J, Yardley L, Michie S. Using the internet to promote health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12(1):e4. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1376.
    1. Bennett GG, Glasgow RE. The delivery of public health interventions via the Internet: actualizing their potential. Annu Rev Public Health. 2009;30:273–292. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100235.
    1. Griffiths F, Lindenmeyer A, Powell J, Lowe P, Thorogood M. Why are health care interventions delivered over the internet? A systematic review of the published literature. J Med Internet Res. 2006;8(2):e10. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.2.e10.
    1. Wantland DJ, Portillo CJ, Holzemer WL, Slaughter R, McGhee EM. The effectiveness of Web-based vs. non-Web-based interventions: a meta-analysis of behavioral change outcomes. J Med Internet Res. 2004 Nov 10;6(4):e40. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6.4.e40.
    1. Hawkins RP, Kreuter M, Resnicow K, Fishbein M, Dijkstra A. Understanding tailoring in communicating about health. Health Educ Res. 2008 Jun;23(3):454–466. doi: 10.1093/her/cyn004.
    1. De Vries H, Brug J. Editorial. Patient Educ Couns. 1999 Feb;36(2):99–105. doi: 10.1016/S0738-3991(98)00127-X.
    1. Krebs P, Prochaska JO, Rossi JS. A meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change. Prev Med. 2010;51(3-4):214–221. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.06.004.
    1. Kreuter M, Wray R. Tailored and targeted health communication: strategies for enhancing information relevance. Am J Health Behav. 2003;27 Suppl 3:S227–S232.
    1. Smeets T, Kremers SP, Brug J, de Vries H. Effects of tailored feedback on multiple health behaviors. Ann Behav Med. 2007 Apr;33(2):117–123. doi: 10.1080/08836610701307801.
    1. Peels DA, Bolman C, Golsteijn RH, de Vries H, Mudde AN, van Stralen MM, Lechner L. Long-term efficacy of a printed or a Web-based tailored physical activity intervention among older adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013;10:104. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-104.
    1. van Stralen MM, de Vries H, Mudde AN, Bolman C, Lechner L. The long-term efficacy of two computer-tailored physical activity interventions for older adults: main effects and mediators. Health Psychol. 2011 Jul;30(4):442–452. doi: 10.1037/a0023579.
    1. Neville L, O'Hara B, Milat A. Computer-tailored physical activity behavior change interventions targeting adults: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009;6:30. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-6-30.
    1. Bossen D, Veenhof C, Dekker J, de Bakker D. The effectiveness of self-guided web-based physical activity interventions among patients with a chronic disease: a systematic review. J Phys Act Health. 2014 Mar;11(3):665–677. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2012-0152.
    1. Davies CA, Spence JC, Vandelanotte C, Caperchione CM, Mummery WK. Meta-analysis of internet-delivered interventions to increase physical activity levels. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:52. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-52.
    1. Springvloet L, Lechner L, de VH, Candel Math J J M. Oenema A. Short- and medium-term efficacy of a Web-based computer-tailored nutrition education intervention for adults including cognitive and environmental feedback: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(1):e23. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3837.
    1. Oenema A, Tan F, Brug J. Short-term efficacy of a web-based computer-tailored nutrition intervention: main effects and mediators. Ann Behav Med. 2005 Feb;29(1):54–63. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm2901_8.
    1. Schulz DN, Kremers SP, Vandelanotte C, van Adrichem MJ, Schneider F, Candel MJ, de Vries H. Effects of a web-based tailored multiple-lifestyle intervention for adults: a two-year randomized controlled trial comparing sequential and simultaneous delivery modes. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(1):e26. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3094.
    1. Broekhuizen K, Kroeze W, van Poppel M, Oenema A, Brug J. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored physical activity and dietary behavior promotion programs: an update. Ann Behav Med. 2012:259–286. doi: 10.1007/s12160-012-9384-3.
    1. Lustria ML, Noar SM, Cortese J, Van Stee SK, Glueckauf RL, Lee J. A meta-analysis of web-delivered tailored health behavior change interventions. J Health Commun. 2013;18(9):1039–1069. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2013.768727.
    1. Widmer RJ, Allison TG, Keane B, Dallas A, Lerman LO, Lerman A. Using an online, personalized program reduces cardiovascular risk factor profiles in a motivated, adherent population of participants. Am Heart J. 2014 Jan;167(1):93–100. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.09.019.
    1. Kuhl EA, Sears SF, Conti JB. Internet-based behavioral change and psychosocial care for patients with cardiovascular disease: a review of cardiac disease-specific applications. Heart Lung. 2006;35(6):374–382. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2006.02.004.
    1. Reinwand D, Kuhlmann T, Wienert J, de Vries H, Lippke S. Designing a theory- and evidence-based tailored eHealth rehabilitation aftercare program in Germany and the Netherlands: study protocol. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:1081. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1081.
    1. Schwarzer R. Modeling health behavior change: how to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Appl Psychol. 2008 Jan;57(1):1–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00325.x.
    1. Abraham C, Michie S. A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. Health Psychol. 2008 May;27(3):379–387. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.27.3.379.
    1. Compernolle S, Vandelanotte C, Cardon G, De Bourdeaudhuij I, De Cocker K. Effectiveness of a web-based, computer-tailored, pedometer-based physical activity intervention for adults: a cluster randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(2):e38. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3402.
    1. Sattelmair J, Pertman J, Ding E, Kohl H, Haskell W, Lee I. Dose response between physical activity and risk of coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis. Circulation. 2011;124(7):789–795.
    1. Lippke S, Ziegelmann J, Schwarzer R, Velicer W. Validity of stage assessment in the adoption and maintenance of physical activity and fruit and vegetable consumption. Health Psychol. 2009;28(2):183–193. doi: 10.1037/a0012983.
    1. Luszczynska A, Sutton S. Physical activity after cardiac rehabilitation: evidence that different types of self-efficacy are important in maintainers and relapsers. Rehabil Psychol. 2006;51(4):314–321. doi: 10.1037/0090-5550.51.4.314.
    1. Lippke S, Schwarzer R, Ziegelmann JP, Scholz U, Schüz B. Testing stage-specific effects of a stage-matched intervention: a randomized controlled trial targeting physical exercise and its predictors. Health Educ Behav. 2010 Aug;37(4):533–546. doi: 10.1177/1090198109359386.
    1. Verplanken B, Orbell S. Reflections on past behavior: A self-report index of habit strength. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2003;33:1313–1330. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01951.x.
    1. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
    1. Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 Nov;36(4):717–731.
    1. Enders CK. Applied Missing Data Analysis (Methodology In The Social Sciences) New York: The Guilford Press; 2010.
    1. Demirtas H, Freels SA, Yucel RM. Plausibility of multivariate normality assumption when multiply imputing non-Gaussian continuous outcomes: a simulation assessment. J Stat Comput Sim. 2008 Feb;78(1):69–84. doi: 10.1080/10629360600903866.
    1. Lippke S. Modelling and supporting complex behavior change related to obesity and diabetes prevention and management with the compensatory carry-over action model. J Diabetes Obes. 2014;1(2):1–5. doi: 10.15436/2376-0494.14.009.
    1. Thurn J, Finne E, Brandes M, Bucksch J. Validation of physical activity habit strength with subjective and objective criterion measures. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2014 Jan;15(1):65–71. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.09.009.
    1. Gardner B, de Bruijn G, Lally P. A systematic review and meta-analysis of applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to nutrition and physical activity behaviours. Ann Behav Med. 2011 Oct;42(2):174–187. doi: 10.1007/s12160-011-9282-0.
    1. Prince S, Adamo K, Hamel M, Hardt J, Connor GS, Tremblay M. A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008;5:56. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-5-56.
    1. Bravata DM, Smith-Spangler C, Sundaram V, Gienger AL, Lin N, Lewis R, Stave CD, Olkin I, Sirard JR. Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review. JAMA. 2007 Nov 21;298(19):2296–2304. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.19.2296.
    1. Combs GJ, Trumbo P, McKinley M, Milner J, Studenski S, Kimura T, Watkins SM, Raiten DJ. Biomarkers in nutrition: new frontiers in research and application. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2013 Mar;1278:1–10. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12069.
    1. Eysenbach G. The law of attrition. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7(1):e11. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.1.e11.
    1. Reinwand D, Crutzen R, Elfeddali I, Schneider F, Schulz D, Stanczyk NE, Tange H, Voncken-Brewster V, Walthouwer MJ, Hoving C, de Vries H. Impact of educational level on study attrition and evaluation of web-based computer-tailored interventions: results from seven randomized controlled trials. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(10):e228. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4941.
    1. Crutzen R, Ruiter R. Interest in behaviour change interventions: a conceptual model. Eur Health Psychol. 2015;17(1):6–11.
    1. Brouwer W, Kroeze W, Crutzen R, de Nooier J, de Vries NK, Brug J, Oenema A. Which intervention characteristics are related to more exposure to internet-delivered healthy lifestyle promotion interventions? A systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(1):e2. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1639.
    1. Kelders SM, Kok RN, Ossebaard HC, Van Gemert-Pijnen JE. Persuasive system design does matter: a systematic review of adherence to web-based interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(6):e152. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2104.
    1. Poirier J, Cobb NK. Social influence as a driver of engagement in a web-based health intervention. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(1):e36. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1957.
    1. Oh HJ, Lauckner C, Boehmer J, Fewins-Bliss R, Li K. Facebooking for health: An examination into the solicitation and effects of health-related social support on social networking sites. Comput Hum Behav. 2013 Sep;29(5):2072–2080. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.017.
    1. World Health Organization . Food Based Dietary Guidelines in the WHO European Region. Copenhagen: World Health Organization; 2003.
    1. World Health Organization . Comparative Analysis of Nutrition Policies in the WHO European Region: A Comparative Analysis of Nutrition Policies and Plans of Action in WHO European. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006. [2016-03-18]. .
    1. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ernährung eV . Gemüse und Obst in der Prävention ausgewählter chronischer Krankheiten. Bonn: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ernährung eV; 2012. [2016-03-18]. .
    1. Voedingscentrum Den Haag . Gezonde basisvoeding met de schijf van vijf factsheet. Den Haag: Voedingscentrum Den Haag; 2011. [2016-03-18]. .
    1. Ashford S, Edmunds J, French DP. What is the best way to change self-efficacy to promote lifestyle and recreational physical activity? A systematic review with meta-analysis. Br J Health Psychol. 2010 May;15(Pt 2):265–288. doi: 10.1348/135910709X461752.
    1. Prestwich A, Kellar I, Parker R, MacRae S, Learmonth M, Sykes B, Taylor N, Castle H. How can self-efficacy be increased? Meta-analysis of dietary interventions. Health Psychol Rev. 2013 Jul 15;8(3):270–285. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2013.813729#.VVEoB6NwamE.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors en medewerkers

Medische omstandigheden

Geneesmiddelinterventies

3
Abonneren