Optimizing nutrition and oral health for caregivers-intervention protocol

Irma Nykänen, Tarja Välimäki, Liisa Suominen, Ursula Schwab, Irma Nykänen, Tarja Välimäki, Liisa Suominen, Ursula Schwab

Abstract

Background: The focus of care has shifted from institutional care to home care. Family caregivers provide the majority of home care that allows an opportunity for their care recipients to live at home and avoid costly institutional care. The aim of this study is to describe the nutritional status, oral health, and quality of life of family caregivers over the age of 65 and their care recipients, and to evaluate the impact of individually tailored diet and oral health advice to their nutritional status and oral health.

Methods/design: Altogether, 250 family caregivers aged 65 or over, and their care recipients are studied in this prospective randomized population-based multidisciplinary 6-month intervention study. Participants are randomly allocated to the intervention groups or the control group. Data collection is performed at three time-points: at baseline and 6 months and after a 6-month follow-up at 12 months. Caregivers' and their care recipients' nutritional and oral health status as a primary outcome, and functional ability, cognitive status, quality of life, depression symptoms, sense of coherence, morbidity, and medication of family caregivers as secondary outcomes will be measured using validated self-administered questionnaires and clinical examinations.

Discussion: To our knowledge, this is the first experiment to determine whether caregivers and their care recipients benefit from individual nutritional intervention and oral health intervention in terms of nutrition status, oral health status, and quality of life.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04003493 . Registered on June 28, 2019.

Keywords: Diet; Human; Nutrition; Older people; Oral health; Quality of life.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of the study

References

    1. Välimäki T, Martikainen J, Hallikainen I, Väätäinen S, Koivisto A. Depressed spousal caregivers have psychological stress unrelated to the progression of Alzheimer disease: a 3-year follow-up report, Kuopio ALSOVA Study. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2015;28(4):272–280. doi: 10.1177/0891988715598229.
    1. Ruokostenpohja N, Välimäki T, Martikainen J, Hallikainen M, Vehviläinen-Julkunen K, Koivisto A. Entitlement of carer’s allowance to support home care of persons with Alzheimer’s disease: evaluation of current decision criteria. Eur Geriatr Med. 2018;9(4):477–483. doi: 10.1007/s41999-018-0060-4.
    1. Finnish Institute for health and welfare . Support for informal care, carers who have made an official care agreement in services funded by the municipality. 2018.
    1. Verbakel E, Metzelthin SF, Kempen G. Caregiving to older adults: determinants of informal caregivers’ subjective well-being and formal and informal support as alleviating conditions. J Gerontol: Series B. 2018;73(6):1099–1111. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbw047.
    1. Tombini M, Sicari M, Pellegrino G, Ursini F, Insarda P, Di Lazzaro V. Nutritional status of patients with Alzheimer’s disease and their caregivers. J Alzheim Dis. 2016;54(4):1619–1627. doi: 10.3233/JAD-160261.
    1. Välimäki T, Martikainen J, Hongisto K, Väätäinen S, Sintonen H, Koivisto A. Impact of Alzheimer’s disease on the family caregiver’s long-term quality of life: results from an ALSOVA follow-up study. Qual Life Res. 2016;25(3):687–697. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1100-x.
    1. Rullier L, Lagarde A, Bouisson J, Bergua V, Barberger-Gateau P. Nutritional status of community dwelling older people with dementia: associations with individual and family caregivers’ characteristics. Int Psychogeriatr. 2013;28(6):580–588. doi: 10.1002/gps.3862.
    1. Puranen TM, Pietilä SE, Pitkälä KH, Kautiainen H, Raivio M, Eloniemi-Sulkava U, Jyväkorpi SK, Suominen M. Caregivers’ male gender is associated with poor nutrient intake in AD families (NuAD-trial) J Nutr Health Aging. 2017;18(7):672–676. doi: 10.1007/s12603-014-0499-z.
    1. Pölönen S, Tiihonen M, Hartikainen S, Nykänen I. Individually tailored dietary counseling among old home care clients – effects on nutritional status. J Nutr Health Aging. 2017;21(5):567–572. doi: 10.1007/s12603-016-0815-x.
    1. Guigoz Y, Vellas B, Garry PJ. Assessing the nutritional status of the elderly: the mini nutritional assessment as part of the geriatric evaluation. Nutr Rev. 1996;54(1pt2):S59–S65. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.1996.tb03793.x.
    1. Bassey EJ. Demi-span as a measure of skeletal size. Ann Hum Biol. 1986;13(5):499–502. doi: 10.1080/03014468600008661.
    1. WHO . Oral Health Surveys. Basics methods. 4. Geneva: WHO; 1997.
    1. Silness J, Löe H. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. II. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condition. Acta Odontol Scand. 1964;22(1):121–135. doi: 10.3109/00016356408993968.
    1. van der Putten JJ, Hobart JC, Freeman JA, Thompson AJ. Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation: comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel index and the Functional Independence Measure. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999;66(4):480–484. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.66.4.480.
    1. Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969;9(3):179–186. doi: 10.1093/geront/9.3_Part_1.179.
    1. Crum RM, Anthony JC, Bassett SS, Folstein MF. Population-based norms for the Mini-Mental State Examination by age and educational level. JAMA. 1993;269(18):2386–2391. doi: 10.1001/jama.1993.03500180078038.
    1. Sheik J, Yesavage J. Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS): recent evidence and development of a shorter version. Clin Gerontol. 1986;5(1-2):165–172. doi: 10.1300/J018v05n01_09.
    1. The WHOQOL Group. WHOQOL-BREF. Field trial version. Program on Mental Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1996. . Accessed 12 Dec 2018.
    1. Antonovsky A. The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. Soc Sci Med. 1993;36(6):725–733. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90033-z.
    1. Groll DL, Heyland DK, Caeser M, Wright JG. Assessment of long-term physical function in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients: comparison of the Charlson Comorbidity Index and the Functional Comorbidity Index. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;85(7):574–581. doi: 10.1097/01.phm.0000223220.91914.61.
    1. Jyrkkä J, Enlund H, Lavikainen P. Association of polypharmacy with nutritional status, functional ability and cognitive capacity over a three-year period in an elderly population. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011;20(5):514–522. doi: 10.1002/pds.2116.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors en medewerkers

Medische omstandigheden

Geneesmiddelinterventies

3
Abonneren