The acceptability of an online intervention using positive psychology for depression: A qualitative study

Sophie Walsh, Paulina Szymczynska, Stephanie J C Taylor, Stefan Priebe, Sophie Walsh, Paulina Szymczynska, Stephanie J C Taylor, Stefan Priebe

Abstract

Background: Positive psychology interventions may usefully treat depression and can be delivered online to reduce the treatment gap. However, little is known about how acceptable patients find this approach. To address this, the present study interviewed recent users of a positive psychology self-help website.

Methods: In-depth semi-structured interviews explored the experiences of twenty-three participants from a larger feasibility study. A stratified purposive sampling strategy selected participants with varying intervention experience according to their intervention logins, as well as varying age, gender and depressive symptoms. Framework analysis was used to explore patterns and linkages within and between participants' accounts.

Results: Acceptability varied between participants. Those who found it more acceptable felt it was relevant to their depression and reported feeling empowered by a self-help approach. Conversely, participants for whom it was less acceptable perceived the positive focus irrelevant to their depression and found the emphasis on self-action unsupportive.

Conclusions: The acceptability of an online positive psychology intervention may be facilitated by a patients' preference for a psychological focus on the positive. However, patients may also have distinct preferences for online self-help. Future research should investigate the importance of the therapeutic orientation of online self-help interventions and whether patients' preferences for these can be reliably identified. This could help to target online self-help in clinical practice.

Keywords: Depression; Online interventions; Positive psychology; Qualitative.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Final sampling frame for sample target (n = 20)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Explanatory factors of differing perceptions of the benefit online positive psychology intervention.

References

    1. Bolier L., Abello K.M. State of the art and future directions. In: Parks A.C., Schueller S.M., editors. The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Positive Psychological Interventions. Wiley Blackwell; Chichester, West Sussex: 2014. pp. 286–309.
    1. Bolier L., Haverman M., Kramer J., Westerhof G.J., Riper H., Walburg J.A.…Bohlmeijer E. An internet-based intervention to promote mental fitness for mildly depressed adults: randomized controlled trial. J. Med. Internet Res. 2013;15:e200.
    1. Bolier L., Haverman M., Westerhof G.J., Riper H., Smit F., Bohlmeijer E. Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:119.
    1. Bylsma L.M., Morris B.H., Rottenberg J. A meta-analysis of emotional reactivity in major depressive disorder. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2008;28:676–691.
    1. Carlbring P., Maurin L., Törngren C., Linna E., Eriksson T., Sparthan E.…Andersson G. Individually-tailored, Internet-based treatment for anxiety disorders: a randomized controlled trial. Behav. Res. Ther. 2011;49:18–24.
    1. Constantino M.J., Ametrano R.M., Greenberg R.P. Clinician interventions and participant characteristics that foster adaptive patient expectations for psychotherapy and psychotherapeutic change. Psychotherapy. 2012;49:557–569.
    1. Department of Health Chief Medical Officer (CMO) Annual Report: Public Mental Health. (D. of Health, Ed.) 2014. Retrieved from.
    1. Gale N.K., Heath G., Cameron E., Rashid S., Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2013;13:117.
    1. Hill C., Martin J.L., Thomson S., Scott-Ram N., Penfold H., Creswell C. Navigating the challenges of digital health innovation: considerations and solutions in developing online and smartphone-application-based interventions for mental health disorders. Br. J. Psychiatry. 2017;211:65–69.
    1. Hollis C., Morriss R., Martin J., Amani S., Cotton R., Denis M., Lewis S. Technological innovations in mental healthcare: harnessing the digital revolution. Br. J. Psychiatry. 2015;206:263–265.
    1. Kaczmarek L.D., Kashdan T.B., Kleiman E.M., Baczkowski B., Enko J., Siebers A.…Baran B. Who self-initiates gratitude interventions in daily life? An examination of intentions, curiosity, depressive symptoms, and life satisfaction. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2013;55:805–810.
    1. Knowles S.E., Toms G., Sanders C., Bee P., Lovell K., Rennick-Egglestone S.…Bower P. Qualitative meta-synthesis of user experience of computerised therapy for depression and anxiety. PLoS One. 2014;9
    1. Kroenke K., Spitzer R.L., Williams J.B.W. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2001;16:606–613.
    1. La Torre M.A. Positive psychology: is there too much of a push? Perspect. Psychiatr. Care. 2007;43:151–153.
    1. Layous K., Chancellor J., Lyubomirsky S., Wang L., Doraiswamy P.M. Delivering happiness: translating positive psychology intervention research for treating major and minor depressive disorders. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2011;17:675–683.
    1. McEvoy P., Richards D. Critical realism: a way forward for evaluation research in nursing? J. Adv. Nurs. 2003;43:411–420.
    1. Mental Health Network NHS Confederation . Mental Health and Technology. NHS Confederation. Retrieved from; London: 2014. The future's digital.
    1. Mental Health Taskforce. (2016). The Five Year Forward View for Mental Health. Retrieved from .
    1. Morse J.M., Barrett M., Mayan M., Olson K., Spiers J. Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. Int J Qual Methods. 2002;1:13–22.
    1. Moskowitz J.T., Hult J.R., Duncan L.G., Cohn M.A., Maurer S., Bussolari C., Acree M. A positive affect intervention for people experiencing health-related stress: development and non-randomized pilot test. J. Health Psychol. 2012;17:676–692.
    1. Muñoz R.F. Using evidence-based Internet interventions to reduce health disparities worldwide. J. Med. Internet Res. 2010;12
    1. Murray E., Khadjesari Z., White I.R., Kalaitzaki E., Godfrey C., McCambridge J.…Wallace P. Methodological challenges in online trials. J. Med. Internet Res. 2009;11:e9.
    1. O'Reilly M., Parker N. “Unsatisfactory saturation”: a critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research. Qual. Res. 2013;13:190–197.
    1. QSR International Pty Ltd . 2012. NVivo Qualitative Data Analysis Software.
    1. Richards D., Richardson T. Computer-based psychological treatments for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2012;32:329–342.
    1. Ritchie J., Spencer L. Qualitative Data Analysis for Applied Policy Research. In: Bryman A., Burgess R.G., editors. Analysing qualitative data. Routledge; London: 1994. pp. 173–194.
    1. Ritchie J., Lewis J., Elam G., Tennant R., Rahim N. Designing and selecting samples. In: Ritchie J., Lewis J., Nicholls McNaughton C., Ormston R., editors. Qualitative Research Practices: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. SAGE Publications; London: 2014. pp. 111–145.
    1. Roepke M.A., Jaffee S.R., Riffle O.M., McGonigal J., Broome R., Maxwell B. Randomized controlled trial of Superbetter, a smartphone-based/internet-based self-help tool to reduce depressive symptoms. Games Health J. 2015;4:235–246.
    1. Schueller S.M., Parks A.C. Disseminating self-help: positive psychology exercises in an online trial. J. Med. Internet Res. 2012;14 (e63)
    1. Seligman M.E.P., Rashid T., Parks A.C. Positive psychotherapy. Am. Psychol. 2006;61:774–788.
    1. Sin N.L., Lyubomirsky S. Enhancing well-being and alleviating depressive symptoms with positive psychology interventions: a practice-friendly meta-analysis. J. Clin. Psychol. 2009;65:467–487.
    1. Tong A., Sainsbury P., Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32- item checklist for interviews and focus group. Int. J. Qual. Health Care. 2007;19:349–357.
    1. Whooley M.A., Avins A.L., Miranda J., Browner W.S. Case-finding instruments for depression. Two questions are as good as many. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 1997;12:439–445.
    1. World Health Organization Global Health risks: mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks. Bull. World Health Organ. 2009;87:646.
    1. Yardley L., Morrison L., Bradbury K., Muller I. The person-based approach to intervention development: application to digital health-related behavior change interventions. J. Med. Internet Res. 2015;17:e30.
    1. Yeo A., Legard R., Keegan J., Ward K., Nicholls McNaughton C., Lewis J. In-depth interviews. In: Ritchie R., Lewis J., McNaughton N., Ormston C., editors. Qualitative Research in Practice. SAGE Publications; London: 2014. pp. 177–210.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors en medewerkers

Medische omstandigheden

Geneesmiddelinterventies

3
Abonneren