The effectiveness of Schroth exercises in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Marlette Burger, Wilna Coetzee, Lenka Z du Plessis, Larissa Geldenhuys, Francois Joubert, Elzanne Myburgh, Chante van Rooyen, Nicol Vermeulen, Marlette Burger, Wilna Coetzee, Lenka Z du Plessis, Larissa Geldenhuys, Francois Joubert, Elzanne Myburgh, Chante van Rooyen, Nicol Vermeulen

Abstract

Background: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is one of the most common structural spinal deformities in adolescents, becoming apparent around the time of puberty. Schroth scoliosis-specific exercises have demonstrated promising results in reducing the progression of AIS.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify, critically appraise and establish the best available evidence for the effectiveness of Schroth exercises in comparison to non-surgical management to reduce the progression of AIS.

Methodology: Seven databases were searched in April 2018. Main key search terms included AIS, Schroth exercises, physiotherapy, exercise, electrical stimulation, yoga, Pilates, tai chi and bracing. The quality of the trials was critically appraised according to the PEDro scale. Revman© Review Manager Software was used to pool the quality of life (QOL) results.

Results: Four randomised control trials with an average PEDro score of 6.75/10 were included in this study. Results indicated that Schroth exercises had a significant effect in decreasing the Cobb angle (p < 0.05) in comparison to non-surgical management. The pooled effect on QOL showed a significant result in favour of Schroth exercises at 12 weeks (p < 0.002) and at 24 weeks (p < 0.0004).

Conclusion: Level II evidence suggests that Schroth exercises have a significant effect on reducing the Cobb angle and improving QOL in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.

Clinical implications: This review's findings should be considered with caution for physiotherapy practice because of the limited number of identified articles and their methodologic limitations. Based on the current available and limited evidence, clinicians could combine supervised Schroth exercises with conventional physiotherapy care (observation, exercise, bracing and manual therapy) when treating adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.

Keywords: Cobb angle; Schroth exercises; adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; meta-analysis; physiotherapy; quality of life; systematic review.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationships that may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Search results.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Assessment of quality of life using the SRS-22 and SRS-23 questionnaire after 12 weeks.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Assessment of quality of life using the SRS-22 and SRS-23 questionnaire after 24 weeks.

References

    1. Agabegi S., Kazemi N., Sturm P. & Mehlman C, 2015, ‘Natural history of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in skeletally mature patients: A critical review’, Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 23(12), 714–723. 10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00037
    1. Altaf F., Gibson A., Dannawi Z. & Noordeen H, 2013, ‘Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis’, British Medical Journal 346(1), f2508 10.1136/bmj.f2508
    1. Asher M.A. & Burton D.C, 2006, ‘Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Natural history and long term treatment effects’, Scoliosis 1(2), 1–10. 10.1186/1748-7161-1-2
    1. Berdishevsky H., Lebel V., Bettany-Saltikov J., Rigo M., Lebel A., Hennes A. et al. , 2016, ‘Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises – A comprehensive review of seven major schools’, Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders 11(1), 1–52. 10.1186/s13013-016-0076-9
    1. Blum C.L, 2002, ‘Chiropractic and pilates therapy for the treatment of adult scoliosis’, Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 25(4), E1–E8. 10.1067/mmt.2002.123336
    1. Canavese F. & Kaelin A, 2011, ‘Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Indications and efficacy of nonoperative treatment’, Indian Journal of Orthopaedics 45(1), 7–14. 10.4103/0019-5413.73655
    1. Cheng J., Castelein R., Chu W., Danielsson A., Dobbs M., Grivas T. et al. , 2017, ‘Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis’, Nature Reviews Disease Primers, viewed 08 October 2017, from .
    1. Choudhry M.N., Ahmad Z. & Verma R, 2016, ‘Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis’, The Open Orthopaedics Journal 10, 143–154. 10.2174/1874325001610010143
    1. Coleman K., Norris S., Weston A., Grimmer-Somers K., Hillier S., Merlin T. et al. , 2009, ‘NHMRC additional levels of evidence and grades for recommendations for developers of guidelines’, BMC Medical Research Methodology 9(34), 1–23.
    1. De Morton N.A, 2009, ‘The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: A demographic study’, Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 55(2), 129–133. 10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70043-1
    1. Durlak J, 2009, ‘How to select, calculate, and interpret effect sizes’, Journal of Pediatric Psychology 34(9), 917–928. 10.1093/jpepsy/jsp004
    1. Fusco C., Zaina F., Atanasio S., Romano M., Negrini A. & Negrini S, 2011, ‘Physical exercises in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: An updated systematic review’, Physiotherapy Theory Practice 27(1), 80–114. 10.3109/09593985.2010.533342
    1. Hróbjartsson A., Sofia A. & Thomsen S, 2012, ‘Observer bias in randomised clinical trials with binary outcomes: Systematic review of trials with both blinded and non-blinded outcome assessors’, British Medical Journal 1119, 1–11. 10.1136/bmj.e1119
    1. Jack K., McLean S.M., Moffett J.K. & Gardiner E, 2010, ‘Barriers to treatment adherence in physiotherapy outpatient clinics: A systematic review’, Manual Therapy 15, 220–228. 10.1016/j.math.2009.12.004
    1. Katz D.E. & Durrani A.A, 2001, ‘Factors that influence outcome in bracing large curves in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis’, Spine 26(21), 2354–2361. 10.1097/00007632-200111010-00012
    1. Kim G. & HwangBo P, 2016, ‘Effects of Schroth and Pilates exercises on the Cobb angle and weight distribution of patients with scoliosis’, Journal of Physical Therapy Science 28(3), 1012–1015.
    1. Kuru T., Yeldan İ., Dereli E., Özdinçler A., Dikici F. & Çolak İ, 2016, ‘The efficacy of three-dimensional Schroth exercises in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A randomised controlled clinical trial’, Clinical Rehabilitation 30(2), 181–190. 10.1177/0269215515575745
    1. Liberati A., Altman D.G., Tetzlaff J., Mulrow C., Gøtzsche P.C., Ioannidis J.P. et al. , 2009, ‘The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration’, PLoS Medicine 6(7), e1000100 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100
    1. Lewis C, 2012, ‘A review of non-invasive treatment interventions for spinal deformities’, Physical Therapy Perspectives in the 21st Century – Challenges and Possibilities 3, 67–88.
    1. Monticone M., Ambrosini E., Cazzaniga D., Rocca B. & Ferrante S, 2014, ‘Active self-correction and task-oriented exercises reduce spinal deformity and improve quality of life in subjects with mild adolescent idiopathic scoliosis-results of a randomised controlled trial’, European Spine Journal 23(6), 1204–1214. 10.1007/s00586-014-3241-y
    1. Morrissy R.T., Goldsmith G.S., Hall E.C., Kehl D. & Cowie G.H, 1990, ‘Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have’, Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery American Volume 72(3), 320–327. 10.2106/00004623-199072030-00002
    1. Negrini S., Minozzi S., Bettany-Saltikov J., Zaina F., Chockalingam N., Grivas T. et al. , 2010, ‘Braces for idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents’, Spine 35(13), 1285–1293. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181dc48f4
    1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) , 2009, NHMRC additional levels of evidence and grades for recommendations for developers of guidelines, NHMRC, Canberra, viewed 01 April 2018, from .
    1. Park J.H., Jeon H.S. & Park H.W, 2018, ‘Effects of the Schroth exercise on idiopathic scoliosis: A meta-analysis’, European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 54(3), 440–449. 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04461-6
    1. Poolman R.W., Struijs P.A., Krips R., Sierevelt I.N., Marti R.K., Farrokhyar F. et al. , 2007, ‘Reporting of outcomes in orthopedic randomized trials: Does blinding of outcome assessors matter?’, Journal of Bone Joint Surgery 89(3), 550–558.
    1. Ramirez N., Johnston C.E.I. & Browne R.H, 1997, ‘The prevalence of back pain in children who have idiopathic scoliosis’, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 79(3), 364–368. 10.2106/00004623-199703000-00007
    1. Reichel D. & Schanz J, 2003, ‘Developmental psychological aspects of scoliosis treatment’, Pediatric Rehabilitation 6(3–4), 221–225.
    1. RevMan , 2008, IMS Cochrane, viewed 15 June 2018, from .
    1. Richards B., Bernstein R., D’Amato C. & Thompson G, 2005, ‘Standardization of criteria for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis brace studies’, Spine 30(18), 2068–2075. 10.1097/01.brs.0000178819.90239.d0
    1. Rigo M., Negrini S., Weiss H., Grivas T., Maruyama T. & Kotwicki T, 2006, ‘SOSORT consensus paper on brace action: TLSO biomechanics of correction-investigating the rationale for force vector selection’, Scoliosis 1(1), 1 10.1186/1748-7161-1-11
    1. Romano M., Minozzi S., Zaina F., Chockalingam N., Kotwicki T., Hennes A. et al. , 2012, ‘Exercises for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis-review’, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 8, 10–12.
    1. Romano M., Minozzi S., Zaina F., Saltikov J., Chockalingam N., Kotwicki T. et al. , 2013, ‘Exercises for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis’, Spine 38(14), E883–E893. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31829459f8
    1. Schreiber S., Parent E., KhodayariMoez E., Hedden D., Hill D., Moreau M. et al. , 2016, ‘Schroth physiotherapeutic scoliosis-specific exercises added to the standard of care lead to better Cobb angle outcomes in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis – An assessor and statistician blinded randomized controlled trial’, PLoS One 11(12), 1–17. 10.1371/journal.pone.0168746
    1. Schreiber S., Parent E.C., Moez E.K., Hedden D.M., Hill D., Moreau M.J. et al. , 2015, ‘The effect of Schroth exercises added to the standard of care on the quality of life and muscle endurance in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis – An assessor and statistician blinded randomized controlled trial: SOSORT 2015 award winner’, Scoliosis 10(1), 24 10.1186/s13013-015-0048-5
    1. Scoliosis Research Society , viewed 15 June 2018, from .
    1. Vasiliadis E. & Grivas T, 2008, ‘Quality of life after conservative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis’, Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 135, 409–413.
    1. Verhagen A.P., De Vet H.C., De Brie R.A., Kessels A.G., Broers M., Bouter L. et al. , 1998, ‘The Delphi list: A criteria for quality assessment of randomised clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus’, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 51(12), 1235–1241. 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00131-0
    1. Weinstein S.L., Dolan L.A., Cheng J.C.Y., Danielsson A. & Morcuende J.A, 2008, ‘Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis’, Lancet 371, 1527–1537. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60658-3
    1. Weiss H., Weiss G. & Petermann F, 2003, ‘Incidence of curvature progression in idiopathic scoliosis patients treated with scoliosis in-patient rehabilitation (SIR): An age- and sex-matched controlled study’, Pediatric Rehabilitation 6(1), 23–30. 10.1080/1363849031000095288

Source: PubMed

Sponsors en medewerkers

Medische omstandigheden

Geneesmiddelinterventies

3
Abonneren