Radiographic Assessment of the Quality of Root Canal Fillings Performed by Senior Dental Students

Adnan Asaad Habib, Mazen Deib Doumani, Mohammad Zakaria Nassani, Enass Shamsy, Basma Safwan Jto, Hiba Ahmad Arwadİ, Sagal Ahmad Mohamed, Adnan Asaad Habib, Mazen Deib Doumani, Mohammad Zakaria Nassani, Enass Shamsy, Basma Safwan Jto, Hiba Ahmad Arwadİ, Sagal Ahmad Mohamed

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the radiographic technical quality of root canal fillings performed by senior dental students at Alfarabi colleges for dentistry, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Methods: Radiographic assessment was conducted for 246 teeth (390 root canals) endodontically treated by senior dental students to evaluate the quality of root canal fillings. Three criteria were evaluated to assess the technical quality of root canal fillings: length, density, and taper. The root canal filling was considered acceptable if it had an adequate length with no voids and consistent taper from the orifice to the apex. Statistical analysis was conducted using Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney, and chi-square tests (P=0.05).

Results: Acceptable root canal fillings were detected in 127 (32.6%) patients. The frequency of an acceptable root canal filling was the highest for the upper anterior teeth (40%). There were significant differences in the length and density among the types of teeth (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the taper among the types of teeth (P>0.05).

Conclusion: The quality of root canal fillings performed by senior undergraduate dental students at AlFarabi colleges for dentistry was acceptable in 32.6% of patients. This outcome enhanced the poor performance of undergraduate dental students in the area of endodontics.

Keywords: Density; length; quality; root canal fillings; taper.

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures Conflict of interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

Copyright: © 2018 European Endodontic Journal.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Criteria for acceptable root canal fillings: adequate length, no voids, and consistent taper
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a-d) Criteria for unacceptable root canal fillings (a) Consistent taper, no voids but inadequate length (flush). (b)Inadequate length (short, i.e., >2 mm). (c) Inadequate length (over filling). (d) No consistent taper and presence of voids

References

    1. Ray HA, Trope M. Periapical status of endodontically treated teeth in relation to the technical quality of the root filling and the coronal restoration. Int Endod J. 1995;28(1):12–8.
    1. American Association of Endodontists. Endodontics:Colleagues for Excellence. [Accessed Mar 27 2018]. Available at: .
    1. European Society of Endodontology. Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment:consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology. Int Endod J. 2006;39(12):921–30.
    1. Qualtrough AJ. Undergraduate endodontic education:what are the challenges? Br Dent J. 2014;216(6):361–4.
    1. Khabbaz MG, Protogerou E, Douka E. Radiographic quality of root fillings performed by undergraduate students. Int Endod J. 2010;43(6):499–508.
    1. Balto H, Al Khalifah Sh, Al Mugairin S, Al Deeb M, Al-Madi E. Technical quality of root fillings performed by undergraduate students in Saudi Arabia. Int Endod J. 2010;43(4):292–300.
    1. Unal GC, Kececi AD, Kaya BU, Tac AG. Quality of root canal fillings performed by undergraduate dental students. Eur J Dent. 2011;5(3):324–30.
    1. Elemam RF, Abdul Majid ZS, Groesbeck M, Azevedo ÁF. Quality of Root Canals Performed by the Inaugural Class of Dental Students at Libyan International Medical University. Int J Dent. 2015;2015:135120.
    1. Hayes SJ, Gibson M, Hammond M, Bryant ST, Dummer PM. An audit of root canal treatment performed by undergraduate students. Int Endod J. 2001;34(7):501–5.
    1. Barrieshi-Nusair KM, Al-Omari MA, Al-Hiyasat AS. Radiographic technical quality of root canal treatment performed by dental students at the Dental Teaching Center in Jordan. J Dent. 2004;32(4):301–7.
    1. Lynch CD, Burke FM. Quality of root canal fillings performed by undergraduate dental students on single-rooted teeth. Eur J Dent Educ. 2006;10(2):67–72.
    1. Moussa-Badran S, Roy B, Bessart du Parc AS, Bruyant M, Lefevre B, Maurin JC. Technical quality of root fillings performed by dental students at the dental teaching centre in Reims, France. Int Endod J. 2008;41(8):679–84.
    1. Elsayed RO, Abu-Bakr NH, Ibrahim YE. Quality of root canal treatment performed by undergraduate dental students at the University of Khartoum, Sudan. Aust Endod J. 2011;37(2):56–60.
    1. AlRahabi MK. Technical quality assessment of root canal treatment performed by preclinical dental students at Taibah University, KSA. J Taibah Univ Med Sc. 2017;12(1):27–33.
    1. Kelbauskas E, Andriukaitiene L, Nedzelskiene I. Quality of root canal filling performed by undergraduate students of odontology at Kaunas University of Medicine in Lithuania. Stomatologija. 2009;11(3):92–6.
    1. Sjogren U, Hagglund B, Sundqvist G, Wing K. Factors affecting the longterm results of endodontic treatment. J Endod. 1990;16(10):498–504.
    1. Smith CS, Setchell DJ, Harty FJ. Factors influencing the success of conventional root canal therapy-a five-year retrospective study. Int Endod J. 1993;26(6):321–33.
    1. Kabak Y, Abbott PV. Prevalence of apical periodontitis and the quality of endodontic treatment in an adult Belarusian population. Int Endod J. 2005;38(4):238–45.
    1. Eriksen HM, Bjertness E, Orstavik D. Prevalence and quality of endodontic treatment in an urban adult population in Norway. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1988;4(3):122–6.
    1. Saunders WP, Saunders EM, Sadiq J, Cruickshank E. Technical standard of root canal treatment in an adult Scottish sub-population. Br Dent J. 1997;182(10):382–6.
    1. Boucher Y, Matossian L, Rilliard F, Machtou P. Radiographic evaluation of the prevalence and technical quality of root canal treatment in a French subpopulation. Int Endod J. 2002;35(3):229–38.
    1. Chen CY, Hasselgren G, Serman N, Elkind MS, Desvarieux M, Engebretson SP. Prevalence and quality of endodontic treatment in the Northern Manhattan elderly. J Endod. 2007;33(3):230–4.
    1. Er O, Sagsen B, Maden M, Cinar S, Kahraman Y. Radiographic technical quality of root fillings performed by dental students in Turkey. Int Endod J. 2006;39(11):867–72.
    1. Chueh LH, Chen SC, Lee CM, Hsu YY, Pai SF, Kuo ML, et al. Technical quality of root canal treatment in Taiwan. Int Endod J. 2003;36(6):416–22.
    1. Román-Richon S, Faus-Matoses V, Alegre-Domingo T, Faus-Llácer VJ. Radiographic technical quality of root canal treatment performed ex vivo by dental students at Valencia University Medical and Dental School, Spain. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2014;19(1):e93–7.
    1. Moradi S, Gharechahi M. Quality of root canal obturation performed by senior undergraduate dental students. Iran Endod J. 2014;9(1):66–70.
    1. Bierenkrant DE, Parashos P, Messer HH. The technical quality of nonsurgical root canal treatment performed by a selected cohort of Australian endodontists. Int Endod J. 2008;41(7):561–70.
    1. Ridell K, Petersson A, Matsson L, Mejàre I. Periapical status and technical quality of root-filled teeth in Swedish adolescents and young adults. A retrospective study. Acta Odontol Scand. 2006;64(2):104–10.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren