Plasma Neurofilament Light for Prediction of Disease Progression in Familial Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration

Julio C Rojas, Ping Wang, Adam M Staffaroni, Carolin Heller, Yann Cobigo, Amy Wolf, Sheng-Yang M Goh, Peter A Ljubenkov, Hilary W Heuer, Jamie C Fong, Joanne B Taylor, Eliseo Veras, Linan Song, Andreas Jeromin, David Hanlon, Lili Yu, Arvind Khinikar, Rajeev Sivasankaran, Agnieszka Kieloch, Marie-Anne Valentin, Anna M Karydas, Laura L Mitic, Rodney Pearlman, John Kornak, Joel H Kramer, Bruce L Miller, Kejal Kantarci, David S Knopman, Neill Graff-Radford, Leonard Petrucelli, Rosa Rademakers, David J Irwin, Murray Grossman, Eliana Marisa Ramos, Giovanni Coppola, Mario F Mendez, Yvette Bordelon, Bradford C Dickerson, Nupur Ghoshal, Edward D Huey, Ian R Mackenzie, Brian S Appleby, Kimiko Domoto-Reilly, Ging-Yuek R Hsiung, Arthur W Toga, Sandra Weintraub, Daniel I Kaufer, Diana Kerwin, Irene Litvan, Chiadikaobi U Onyike, Alexander Pantelyat, Erik D Roberson, Maria C Tartaglia, Tatiana Foroud, Weiping Chen, Julie Czerkowicz, Danielle L Graham, John C van Swieten, Barbara Borroni, Raquel Sanchez-Valle, Fermin Moreno, Robert Laforce, Caroline Graff, Matthis Synofzik, Daniela Galimberti, James B Rowe, Mario Masellis, Elizabeth Finger, Rik Vandenberghe, Alexandre de Mendonça, Fabrizio Tagliavini, Isabel Santana, Simon Ducharme, Chris R Butler, Alexander Gerhard, Johannes Levin, Adrian Danek, Markus Otto, Sandro Sorbi, David M Cash, Rhian S Convery, Martina Bocchetta, Martha Foiani, Caroline V Greaves, Georgia Peakman, Lucy Russell, Imogen Swift, Emily Todd, Jonathan D Rohrer, Bradley F Boeve, Howard J Rosen, Adam L Boxer, ALLFTD and GENFI consortia, Julio C Rojas, Ping Wang, Adam M Staffaroni, Carolin Heller, Yann Cobigo, Amy Wolf, Sheng-Yang M Goh, Peter A Ljubenkov, Hilary W Heuer, Jamie C Fong, Joanne B Taylor, Eliseo Veras, Linan Song, Andreas Jeromin, David Hanlon, Lili Yu, Arvind Khinikar, Rajeev Sivasankaran, Agnieszka Kieloch, Marie-Anne Valentin, Anna M Karydas, Laura L Mitic, Rodney Pearlman, John Kornak, Joel H Kramer, Bruce L Miller, Kejal Kantarci, David S Knopman, Neill Graff-Radford, Leonard Petrucelli, Rosa Rademakers, David J Irwin, Murray Grossman, Eliana Marisa Ramos, Giovanni Coppola, Mario F Mendez, Yvette Bordelon, Bradford C Dickerson, Nupur Ghoshal, Edward D Huey, Ian R Mackenzie, Brian S Appleby, Kimiko Domoto-Reilly, Ging-Yuek R Hsiung, Arthur W Toga, Sandra Weintraub, Daniel I Kaufer, Diana Kerwin, Irene Litvan, Chiadikaobi U Onyike, Alexander Pantelyat, Erik D Roberson, Maria C Tartaglia, Tatiana Foroud, Weiping Chen, Julie Czerkowicz, Danielle L Graham, John C van Swieten, Barbara Borroni, Raquel Sanchez-Valle, Fermin Moreno, Robert Laforce, Caroline Graff, Matthis Synofzik, Daniela Galimberti, James B Rowe, Mario Masellis, Elizabeth Finger, Rik Vandenberghe, Alexandre de Mendonça, Fabrizio Tagliavini, Isabel Santana, Simon Ducharme, Chris R Butler, Alexander Gerhard, Johannes Levin, Adrian Danek, Markus Otto, Sandro Sorbi, David M Cash, Rhian S Convery, Martina Bocchetta, Martha Foiani, Caroline V Greaves, Georgia Peakman, Lucy Russell, Imogen Swift, Emily Todd, Jonathan D Rohrer, Bradley F Boeve, Howard J Rosen, Adam L Boxer, ALLFTD and GENFI consortia

Abstract

Objective: We tested the hypothesis that plasma neurofilament light chain (NfL) identifies asymptomatic carriers of familial frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD)-causing mutations at risk of disease progression.

Methods: Baseline plasma NfL concentrations were measured with single-molecule array in original (n = 277) and validation (n = 297) cohorts. C9orf72, GRN, and MAPT mutation carriers and noncarriers from the same families were classified by disease severity (asymptomatic, prodromal, and full phenotype) using the CDR Dementia Staging Instrument plus behavior and language domains from the National Alzheimer's Disease Coordinating Center FTLD module (CDR+NACC-FTLD). Linear mixed-effect models related NfL to clinical variables.

Results: In both cohorts, baseline NfL was higher in asymptomatic mutation carriers who showed phenoconversion or disease progression compared to nonprogressors (original: 11.4 ± 7 pg/mL vs 6.7 ± 5 pg/mL, p = 0.002; validation: 14.1 ± 12 pg/mL vs 8.7 ± 6 pg/mL, p = 0.035). Plasma NfL discriminated symptomatic from asymptomatic mutation carriers or those with prodromal disease (original cutoff: 13.6 pg/mL, 87.5% sensitivity, 82.7% specificity; validation cutoff: 19.8 pg/mL, 87.4% sensitivity, 84.3% specificity). Higher baseline NfL correlated with worse longitudinal CDR+NACC-FTLD sum of boxes scores, neuropsychological function, and atrophy, regardless of genotype or disease severity, including asymptomatic mutation carriers.

Conclusions: Plasma NfL identifies asymptomatic carriers of FTLD-causing mutations at short-term risk of disease progression and is a potential tool to select participants for prevention clinical trials.

Trial registration information: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02372773 and NCT02365922.

Classification of evidence: This study provides Class I evidence that in carriers of FTLD-causing mutations, elevation of plasma NfL predicts short-term risk of clinical progression.

Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.

Figures

Figure 1. Baseline Plasma NfL Chain Concentrations…
Figure 1. Baseline Plasma NfL Chain Concentrations by Clinical Phenotype
(A) Original (Longitudinal Evaluation of Familial Frontotemporal Dementia Subjects [LEFFTDS]/Advancing Research and Treatment in Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration [ARTFL]) cohort. (B) Validation (Genetic Frontotemporal Dementia Initiative [GENFI]) cohort. Phenotypes are based on clinical diagnosis and did not rely on severity scales. Only the original cohort included clinically diagnosed prodromal disease (mild behavioral impairment [MBI] or mild cognitive impairment [MCI]). Horizontal bars represent median values. Upper and lower quartiles are delimitated by the boxes. Lowest and highest values are indicated by whiskers. bvFTD = behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia; CBS = corticobasal syndrome; FTD/ALS = frontotemporal dementia with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; NfL = neurofilament light chain; PPA = primary progressive aphasia (nonfluent or semantic). *Compared to normal. **Compared to normal and MCI, p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Baseline Plasma NfL Concentrations by…
Figure 2. Baseline Plasma NfL Concentrations by Disease Severity and Diagnostic Performance
(A–C) Original (Longitudinal Evaluation of Familial Frontotemporal Dementia Subjects [LEFFTDS]/Advancing Research and Treatment in Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration [ARTFL]) cohort. (D–F) Validation (Genetic Frontotemporal Dementia Initiative [GENFI]) cohort. Severity was determined by the CDR Dementia Staging Instrument plus Behavior and Language domains from the National Alzheimer's Disease Coordinating Center Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration module (CDR+NACC-FTLD). (A and D) Boxplots show plasma neurofilament light chain (NfL) concentrations in asymptomatic carriers (i.e., CDR+NACC-FTLD score 0), those with mild behavioral or cognitive impairment (mild behavioral impairment/mild cognitive impairment [MBI/MCI], CDR+NACC-FTLD score 0.5), and patients with full phenotypes (CDR+NACC-FTLD score ≥1). Horizontal bars represent median values. Upper and lower quartiles are delimitated by the boxes. Lowest and highest values are indicated by whiskers. (B and E) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves show that plasma NfL was a good discriminator between individuals with full phenotype and those either asymptomatic or with MBI/MCI. (C and F) Proportion of patients with low or high plasma NfL concentrations, determined by the ROC curve, is presented for each disease severity. AUC = area under the curve.
Figure 3. Plasma NfL Concentrations by Disease…
Figure 3. Plasma NfL Concentrations by Disease Severity in Each Genotype Group
(A–C) Original cohort. (D–F) Validation cohort. MBI/MCI = mild behavioral or cognitive impairment (CDR Dementia Staging Instrument plus Behavior and Language domains from the National Alzheimer's Disease Coordinating Center Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration module score 0.5); C90rf72 = chromosome 9 open reading frame 72; GRN = progranulin; MAPT = microtubule-associated protein tau; NC = noncarrier; NfL = neurofilament light chain.
Figure 4. Baseline Plasma NfL Concentrations According…
Figure 4. Baseline Plasma NfL Concentrations According to Conversion Status by Follow-Up
Severity was determined with the CDR Dementia Staging Instrument plus Behavior and Language domains from the National Alzheimer's Disease Coordinating Center Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration module (CDR+NACC-FTLD). (A–C) Original (Longitudinal Evaluation of Familial Frontotemporal Dementia Subjects [LEFFTDS]/Advancing Research and Treatment in Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration [ARTFL]) cohort. (D–F) Validation (Genetic Frontotemporal Dementia Initiative [GENFI]) cohort. (A and D) Median baseline neurofilament light chain (NfL) concentrations were higher in asymptomatic mutation carriers (CDR+NACC-FTLD score 0) who progressed to either mild behavioral or cognitive impairment (MBI/MCI; CDR+NACC-FTLD score 0.5) or full phenotype (CDR+NACC-FTLD score ≥1) on follow-up. (B and E) A similar trend was observed in individuals who had MBI/MCI at baseline and when all participants (asymptomatic mutation carriers and those with MBI/MCI) were combined (C and F). Horizontal bars represent median values. Upper and lower quartiles are delimitated by the boxes. Lowest and highest values are indicated by whiskers. Circles = asymptomatic; triangles = MBI/MCI; blue = chromosome 9 open reading frame 72(C9orf72) mutation carriers; red = microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) mutation carriers; yellow = progranulin (GRN) mutation carriers;.
Figure 5. Prediction of Clinical Progression by…
Figure 5. Prediction of Clinical Progression by Plasma NfL in Familial Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration
(A–C) Original (Longitudinal Evaluation of Familial Frontotemporal Dementia Subjects [LEFFTDS]/Advancing Research and Treatment in Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration [ARTFL) cohort. (D–F) Validation (Genetic Frontotemporal Dementia Initiative [GENFI]) cohort. Figure shows the results of models using data from all genotypes in each severity group. In the original cohort, patients with high (red; ≥13.6 pg/mL) baseline plasma neurofilament light chain (NfL) showed worse clinical scores at 2 years compared to patients with low (blue; p < 0.05.

References

    1. Blennow K, Zetterberg H. Biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease: current status and prospects for the future. J Intern Med 2018;284:643–663.
    1. Liu S, Jin Y, Shi Z, et al. . The effects of behavioral and psychological symptoms on caregiver burden in frontotemporal dementia, Lewy body dementia, and Alzheimer's disease: clinical experience in China. Aging Ment Health 2017;21:651–657.
    1. Olszewska DA, Lonergan R, Fallon EM, Lynch T. Genetics of frontotemporal dementia. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2016;16:107.
    1. DeJesus-Hernandez M, Mackenzie IR, Boeve BF, et al. . Expanded GGGGCC hexanucleotide repeat in noncoding region of C9ORF72 causes chromosome 9p-linked FTD and ALS. Neuron 2011;72:245–256.
    1. Baker M, Mackenzie IR, Pickering-Brown SM, et al. . Mutations in progranulin cause tau-negative frontotemporal dementia linked to chromosome 17. Nature 2006;442:916–919.
    1. Hutton M, Lendon CL, Rizzu P, et al. . Association of missense and 5'-splice-site mutations in tau with the inherited dementia FTDP-17. Nature 1998;393:702–705.
    1. Desmarais P, Rohrer JD, Nguyen QD, et al. . Therapeutic trial design for frontotemporal dementia and related disorders. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2019;90:412–423.
    1. Bacioglu M, Maia LF, Preische O, et al. . Neurofilament light chain in blood and CSF as marker of disease progression in mouse models and in neurodegenerative diseases. Neuron 2016;91:56–66.
    1. Sjogren M, Rosengren L, Minthon L, Davidsson P, Blennow K, Wallin A. Cytoskeleton proteins in CSF distinguish frontotemporal dementia from AD. Neurology 2000;54:1960–1964.
    1. Rosengren LE, Karlsson JE, Karlsson JO, Persson LI, Wikkelso C. Patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and other neurodegenerative diseases have increased levels of neurofilament protein in CSF. J Neurochem 1996;67:2013–2018.
    1. de Jong D, Jansen RW, Pijnenburg YA, et al. . CSF neurofilament proteins in the differential diagnosis of dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007;78:936–938.
    1. Pijnenburg YA, Janssen JC, Schoonenboom NS, et al. . CSF neurofilaments in frontotemporal dementia compared with early onset Alzheimer's disease and controls. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2007;23:225–230.
    1. Ljubenkov PA, Staffaroni AM, Rojas JC, et al. . Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers predict frontotemporal dementia trajectory. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2018;5:1250–1263.
    1. Scherling CS, Hall T, Berisha F, et al. . Cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament concentration reflects disease severity in frontotemporal degeneration. Ann Neurol 2014;75:116–126.
    1. Gunnarsson M, Malmestrom C, Axelsson M, et al. . Axonal damage in relapsing multiple sclerosis is markedly reduced by natalizumab. Ann Neurol 2011;69:83–89.
    1. Winter B, Guenther R, Ludolph AC, Hermann A, Otto M, Wurster CD. Neurofilaments and tau in CSF in an infant with SMA type 1 treated with nusinersen. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2019;90:1068–1069.
    1. Rohrer JD, Woollacott IO, Dick KM, et al. . Serum neurofilament light chain protein is a measure of disease intensity in frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 2016;87:1329–1336.
    1. Meeter LH, Dopper EG, Jiskoot LC, et al. . Neurofilament light chain: a biomarker for genetic frontotemporal dementia. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2016;3:623–636.
    1. Boeve B, Bove J, Brannelly P, et al. . The longitudinal evaluation of familial frontotemporal dementia subjects protocol: framework and methodology. Alzheimers Dement 2020;16:22–36.
    1. Rohrer JD, Nicholas JM, Cash DM, et al. . Presymptomatic cognitive and neuroanatomical changes in genetic frontotemporal dementia in the Genetic Frontotemporal Dementia Initiative (GENFI) study: a cross-sectional analysis. Lancet Neurol 2015;14:253–262.
    1. Miyagawa T, Brushaber D, Syrjanen J, et al. . Utility of the global CDR((R)) plus NACC FTLD rating and development of scoring rules: data from the ARTFL/LEFFTDS Consortium. Alzheimers Dement 2020;16:106–117.
    1. Heller C, Foiani MS, Moore K, et al. . Plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein is raised in progranulin-associated frontotemporal dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2020;91:263–270.
    1. Busner J, Targum SD. The Clinical Global Impressions Scale: applying a research tool in clinical practice. Psychiatry 2007;4:28–37.
    1. Fahn S, Elton RL. The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale. In: Fahn S, Marden SD, Calne DB, Goldstein M, eds. Recent Developments in Parkinson's Disease. New Jersey; Macmillan Healthcare; Vol 2; 1987: 153–163.
    1. Schwab R, England A. Projection Technique for Evaluating Surgery in Parkinson's Disease. London;ES Livingston; 1969.
    1. Pfeffer RI, Kurosaki TT, Harrah CH Jr, Chance JM, Filos S. Measurement of functional activities in older adults in the community. J Gerontol 1982;37:323–329.
    1. Cummings JL, Mega M, Gray K, Rosenberg-Thompson S, Carusi DA, Gornbein J. The Neuropsychiatric Inventory: comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia. Neurology 1994;44:2308–2314.
    1. Delis DC, Kramer JH, Kaplan E, Ober BA. California Verbal Learning Test–Adult Version-Manual.San Antonio; Psychological Corp; 2000.
    1. Possin KL, Laluz VR, Alcantar OZ, Miller BL, Kramer JH. Distinct neuroanatomical substrates and cognitive mechanisms of figure copy performance in Alzheimer's disease and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. Neuropsychologia 2011;49:43–48.
    1. Reitan RM. Validity of the Trail-Making Test as an indication of organic brain damage. Percept Mot Skills 1958;8:271–276.
    1. Ramos EM, Dokuru DR, Van Berlo V, et al. . Genetic screening of a large series of North American sporadic and familial frontotemporal dementia cases. Alzheimers Dement 2020;16:118–130.
    1. Staffaroni AM, Cobigo Y, Goh SM, et al. . Individualized atrophy scores predict dementia onset in familial frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Alzheimers Dement 2020;16:37–48.
    1. Brambati SM, Renda NC, Rankin KP, et al. . A tensor based morphometry study of longitudinal gray matter contraction in FTD. Neuroimage 2007;35:998–1003.
    1. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Statist Soc B 1995;57:298–300.
    1. van der Ende EL, Meeter LH, Poos JM, et al. . Serum neurofilament light chain in genetic frontotemporal dementia: a longitudinal, multicentre cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2019;18:1103–1111.
    1. Heuer HW, Wang P, Rascovsky K, et al. . Comparison of sporadic and familial behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (FTD) in a North American cohort. Alzheimers Dement 2020;16:60–70.
    1. Knopman DS, Kramer JH, Boeve BF, et al. . Development of methodology for conducting clinical trials in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Brain 2008;131:2957–2968.
    1. ALLFTLD Study. ARTFL-LEFFTDS Longitudinal Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration: A Multisite Research Consortium [online]. Available at: . Accessed May 5, 2020.
    1. Food and Drug Administration. Early Alzheimer's Disease: Developing Drugs for Treatment. Guidance for Industry: Silver Spring, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research; 2018.
    1. Csaky K, Ferris F III, Chew EY, Nair P, Cheetham JK, Duncan JL. Report from the NEI/FDA endpoints workshop on age-related macular degeneration and inherited retinal diseases. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2017;58:3456–3463.
    1. Thijssen EH, La Joie R, Wolf A, et al. . Diagnostic value of plasma phosphorylated tau181 in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Nat Med 2020;26:387–397.
    1. Preische O, Schultz SA, Apel A, et al. . Serum neurofilament dynamics predicts neurodegeneration and clinical progression in presymptomatic Alzheimer's disease. Nat Med 2019;25:277–283.
    1. Hoglinger GU, Melhem NM, Dickson DW, et al. . Identification of common variants influencing risk of the tauopathy progressive supranuclear palsy. Nat Genet 2011;43:699–705.
    1. Pottier C, Zhou X, Perkerson RB III, et al. . Potential genetic modifiers of disease risk and age at onset in patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration and GRN mutations: a genome-wide association study. Lancet Neurol 2018;17:548–558.
    1. Yokoyama JS, Karch CM, Fan CC, et al. . Shared genetic risk between corticobasal degeneration, progressive supranuclear palsy, and frontotemporal dementia. Acta Neuropathol 2017;133:825–837.
    1. Lu CH, Macdonald-Wallis C, Gray E, et al. . Neurofilament light chain: a prognostic biomarker in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurology 2015;84:2247–2257.
    1. Rojas JC, Karydas A, Bang J, et al. . Plasma neurofilament light chain predicts progression in progressive supranuclear palsy. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2016;3:216–225.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren