Prevalence of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: A prospective, population-based study

Johanna Andersson, Michelle Rosell, Karin Kockum, Otto Lilja-Lund, Lars Söderström, Katarina Laurell, Johanna Andersson, Michelle Rosell, Karin Kockum, Otto Lilja-Lund, Lars Söderström, Katarina Laurell

Abstract

Background: Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) causing gait impairment, dementia and urinary incontinence among the elderly, is probably under-diagnosed and under-treated. Despite being known since the 1960s, there is still a lack of prospective, population-based studies on the prevalence of iNPH. Such studies are warranted to minimize selection bias and estimate the true prevalence of the disease.

Methods: The prevalence of iNPH was determined in a randomly selected sample of residents, aged 65 years and older, in the Swedish county of Jämtland. Out of 1,000 individuals invited to participate, 673 (67.3%) completed a questionnaire with seven questions on iNPH symptoms. A subgroup, with and without self-reported symptoms, participated in clinical and radiological evaluations and were diagnosed according to international guidelines. Measurement of cerebrospinal fluid opening pressure was not performed as it was considered too invasive.

Results: Those who reported at least two symptoms in the questionnaire (n = 117) and 51 randomly selected individuals with 0-1 symptom participated in further examinations. Out of them, 25 individuals received the diagnosis probable iNPH according to American-European guidelines (except for the criterion of CSF opening pressure) corresponding to a prevalence of 3.7%. The prevalence of iNPH was four times higher among those aged 80 years and older (8.9%) than among those aged 65-79 years (2.1%) (p <0.001). The difference in prevalence between men (4.6%) and women (2.9%) was not significant (p = 0.24). When iNPH was diagnosed according to the Japanese guidelines the prevalence was 1.5.

Conclusions: In this prospective, population-based study the prevalence of iNPH was 3.7% among individuals 65 years and older, and more common in the higher age group, 80 years and above. INPH should be increasingly recognized since it is a fairly common condition and an important cause of gait impairment and dementia among the elderly that can be effectively treated by shunt surgery.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Screening questionnaire (“yes” or “no”…
Fig 1. Screening questionnaire (“yes” or “no” answers) in English (bold) and Swedish (italics).
Fig 2. Flow chart of sample selection.
Fig 2. Flow chart of sample selection.
Note: a Gait disturbance mandatory. b Including 49 individuals reporting two symptoms of incontinence and cognition but no gait disturbance. c Randomly selected, including five individuals reporting two symptoms on incontinence and cognition but no gait disturbance.
Fig 3. Prevalence of iNPH (possible iNPH…
Fig 3. Prevalence of iNPH (possible iNPH excluded) in relation to age and sex with the American-European and Japanese guidelines, respectively.

References

    1. Trends in aging—United States and worldwide. MMWR Morbidity and mortality weekly report. 2003;52(6):101–4, 6 Epub 2003/03/21. .
    1. Marmarou A, Young HF, Aygok Ga. Estimated incidence of normal pressure hydrocephalus and shunt outcome in patients residing in assisted-living and extended-care facilities. Neurosurgical focus. 2007;22:E1 10.3171/foc.2007.22.4.2 .
    1. Virhammar J, Laurell K, Cesarini KG, Larsson E-M. The callosal angle measured on MRI as a predictor of outcome in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Journal of neurosurgery. 2014;120:178–84. 10.3171/2013.8.JNS13575 .
    1. Hashimoto M, Ishikawa M, Mori E, Kuwana N. Diagnosis of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus is supported by MRI-based scheme: a prospective cohort study. Cerebrospinal fluid research. 2010;7:18 10.1186/1743-8454-7-18 .
    1. Toma AK, Papadopoulos MC, Stapleton S, Kitchen ND, Watkins LD. Systematic review of the outcome of shunt surgery in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochirurgica. 2013;155:1977–80. 10.1007/s00701-013-1835-5 .
    1. Andren K, Wikkelsø C, Tisell M, Hellström P. Natural course of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2014;85:806–10. 10.1136/jnnp-2013-306117 .
    1. Adams RD, Fisher CM, Hakim S, Ojemann RG, Sweet WH. Symptomatic occult hydrocephalus with "normal" cerebrospinal-fluid pressure. A treatable syndrome. The New England journal of medicine. 1965;273:117–26. Epub 1965/07/15. 10.1056/NEJM196507152730301 .
    1. Japanese Society of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Guidelines Committee. [Guidelines for Management of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus]. Osaka, Medical Review. 2004 (Japanese).
    1. Relkin N, Marmarou A, Klinge P, Bergsneider M, Black PM. INPH guidelines, part II: Diagnosing idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery. 2005;57:4–16. 10.1227/01.NEU.0000168185.29659.C5 .
    1. Iseki C, Kawanami T, Nagasawa H, Wada M, Koyama S, Kikuchi K, et al. Asymptomatic ventriculomegaly with features of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus on MRI (AVIM) in the elderly: A prospective study in a Japanese population. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 2009;277:54–7. 10.1016/j.jns.2008.10.004 .
    1. Jaraj D, Rabiei K, Marlow T, Jensen C, Skoog I, Wikkelsø C. Prevalence of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurology. 2014;82:1449–54. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000342 .
    1. Tanaka N, Yamaguchi S, Ishikawa H, Ishii H, Meguro K. Prevalence of possible idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus in Japan: The Osaki-Tajiri project. Neuroepidemiology. 2009;32:171–5. 10.1159/000186501 .
    1. Martin-Laez R, Caballero-Arzapalo H, Valle-San Roman N, Lopez-Menendez LA, Arango-Lasprilla JC, Vazquez-Barquero A. Incidence of Idiopathic Normal-Pressure Hydrocephalus in Northern Spain. World Neurosurg. 2016;87:298–310. Epub 2015/11/10. 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.10.069 .
    1. Iseki C, Takahashi Y, Wada M, Kawanami T, Adachi M, Kato T. Incidence of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH): A 10-year follow-up study of a rural community in Japan. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 2014;339:108–12. 10.1016/j.jns.2014.01.033 .
    1. Brean A, Eide PK. Prevalence of probable idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus in a Norwegian population. Acta neurologica Scandinavica. 2008;118:48–53. 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2007.00982.x .
    1. Hiraoka K, Meguro K, Mori E. Prevalence of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus in the elderly population of a Japanese rural community. Neurologia medico-chirurgica. 2008;48:197–9; discussion 9–200. 10.2176/nmc.48.197 .
    1. Martin-Laez R, Caballero-Arzapalo H, Lopez-Menendez LA, Arango-Lasprilla JC, Vazquez-Barquero A. Epidemiology of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Systematic Review of the Literature. World neurosurgery. 2015;84:2002–9. 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.07.005 .
    1. SCB Statistics Sweden. Population statistics [cited 2014 20 August]. .
    1. SPAR. Swedish Population Register [cited 2014 4 August]. .
    1. Factora R, Luciano M. When to consider normal pressure hydrocephalus in the patient with gait disturbance. Geriatrics. 2008;63(2):32–7. Epub 2008/03/04.
    1. Kockum K, Lilja-Lund O, Larsson EM, Rosell M, Söderström L, Virhammar J, et al. The idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus Radscale: a radiological scale for structured evaluation. European journal of neurology. 2018;25(3):569–76. Epub 2017/12/28. 10.1111/ene.13555 .
    1. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 1991;39(2):142–8. Epub 1991/02/01. .
    1. Hellström P, Klinge P, Tans J, Wikkelsø C. A new scale for assessment of severity and outcome in iNPH. Acta neurologica Scandinavica. 2012;126:229–37. 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2012.01677.x .
    1. Cockrell JR, Folstein MF. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Psychopharmacology bulletin. 1988;24:689–92. .
    1. van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJ, van Gijn J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation. 1988;19:604–7. .
    1. Mori E, Ishikawa M, Kato T, Kazui H, Miyake H, Miyajima M, et al. Guidelines for management of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: second edition. Neurologia medico-chirurgica. 2012;52:775–809. 10.2176/nmc.52.775 .
    1. Andersson J, Rosell M, Kockum K, Söderström L, Laurell K. Challenges in diagnosing normal pressure hydrocephalus: Evaluation of the diagnostic guidelines. eNeurologicalSci. 2017;7:27–31. Epub 2018/01/06. 10.1016/j.ensci.2017.04.002 .
    1. Sundström N, Malm J, Laurell K, Lundin F, Kahlon B, Cesarini KG, et al. Incidence and outcome of surgery for adult patients with hydrocephalus in Sweden. British Journal of Neurosurgery. 2017;31:21–7. 10.1080/02688697.2016.1229749 .
    1. Brean A, Fredo HL, Sollid S, Muller T, Sundström T, Eide PK. Five-year incidence of surgery for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus in Norway. Acta neurologica Scandinavica. 2009;120(5):314–6. Epub 2009/10/17. 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2009.01250.x .

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren