Robotically assisted gynecologic surgery: 2-year experience in the French foch hospital

Julie Goetgheluck, Marie Carbonnel, Jean Marc Ayoubi, Julie Goetgheluck, Marie Carbonnel, Jean Marc Ayoubi

Abstract

Robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery has seen rapid expansion over the past few years and it constantly evolves with a progressive enlargement of its range of indications. In the present paper we would like to share our 2-year experience regarding the use of robotics in various laparoscopic procedures, including hysterectomy, myomectomy, adnexal surgery, and sacrocolpopexy.

Keywords: adnexal surgery; hysterectomy; myomectomy; robotic laparoscopy; sacrocolpopexy.

References

    1. Reynolds RK, Advincula AP. Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: technique and initial experience. Am J Surg (2006) 191:555–60.10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.01.011
    1. Payne TN, Dauterive FR. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice. J Minim Invasive Gynecol (2008) 15(3):286–91.10.1016/j.jmig.2008.01.008
    1. Gaia G, Holloway RW, Santoro L, Ahmad S, Di Silverio E, Spinillo A. Robotic-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial cancer compared with traditional laparoscopic and laparotomy approaches: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol (2010) 116(5):1422–31.10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181f74153
    1. Matthews CA, Reid N, Ramakrishnan V, Hull K, Cohen S. Evaluation of the introduction of robotic technology on route of hysterectomy and complications in the first year of use. Am J Obstet Gynecol (2010) 203(5):499.e1–5.10.1016/j.ajog.2010.07.022
    1. Landeen LB, Bell MC, Hubert HB, Bennis LY, Knutsen-Larson SS, Seshadri-Kreaden U. Clinical and cost comparisons for hysterectomy via abdominal, standard laparoscopic, vaginal and robot-assisted approaches. S D Med (2011) 64(6):197–9, 201, 203 passim.
    1. Kho RM, Hilger WS, Hentz JG, Magtibay PM, Magrina JF. Robotic hysterectomy: technique and initial outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol (2007) 197:113.e1–4.10.1016/j.ajog.2007.05.005
    1. Lenihan JP, Jr, Kovanda C, Seshadri-Kreaden U. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery? J Minim Invasive Gynecol (2008) 15:589–94.10.1016/j.jmig.2008.06.015
    1. Beste TM, Nelson KH, Daucher JA. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy utilizing a robotic surgical system. JSLS (2005) 9(1):13–5.
    1. Fiorentino RP, Zepeda MA, Goldstein BH, John CR, Rettenmaier MA. Pilot study assessing robotic laparoscopic hysterectomy and patient outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol (2006) 13:60–3.10.1016/j.jmig.2005.11.001
    1. Nezhat C, Saberi NS, Shahmohamady B, Nezhat F. Robotic-assisted laparoscopy in gynecological surgery. JSLS (2006) 10(3):317–20.
    1. Advincula AP, Xu X, Goudeau S, IV, Ransom SB. Robotic assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short term surgical outcomes and immediate costs. J Minim Invasive Gynecol (2007) 14:698–705.10.1016/j.jmig.2007.06.008
    1. Advincula AP, Song A, Burke W, Reynolds RK. Preliminary experience with robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc (2004) 11(4):511–810.1016/S1074-3804(05)60085-0
    1. CNGOF. Update of myoma management: guidelines for clinical practice-text of the guidelines. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (2011) 40(8):953–6110.1016/j.jgyn.2011.09.025
    1. Bonney V. The techniques and results of myomectomy. Lancet (1931) 220:171–710.1016/S0140-6736(00)40479-4
    1. Semm K. New methods of pelviscopy (gynecologic laparoscopy) for myomectomy, ovariectomy, tubectomy and adnectomy. Endoscopy (1979) 11:85–93.10.1055/s-0028-1098329
    1. Falcone T, Bedaiwy MA. Minimally invasive management of uterine fibroids. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol (2002) 14:401–7.10.1097/00001703-200208000-00007
    1. Daraï E, Dechaud H, Benifla JL, Renolleau C, Panel P, Madelenat P. Fertility after laparoscopic myomectomy: preliminary results. Hum Reprod (1997) 12:1931–4.10.1093/humrep/12.9.1931
    1. Nezhat C, Lavie O, Hsu S, Watson J, Barnett O, Lemyre M. Robotic assisted laparoscopic myomectomy compared with standard laparoscopic myomectomy – a retrospective matched control study. Fertil Steril (2009) 91(2):556–9.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.11.092
    1. Bedient CE, Magrina JF, Hsu S, Watson J, Barnett O, Lemyre M. Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic myomectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol (2009) 201(6):e1–566.10.1016/j.ajog.2009.05.049
    1. Barakat E, Bedaiwy A, Zimberg S, Nutter B, Nosseir M, Falcone T. Robotic assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of surgical outcomes. Obstet Gynecol (2011) 117:256–65.10.1097/AOG.0b013e318207854f
    1. Ascher-Walsh C, Capes T. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy is an improvement over laparotomy in women with a limited number of myomas. J Minim Invasive Gynecol (2010) 17(3):306–10.10.1016/j.jmig.2010.01.011
    1. Falcone T, Goldberg J, Garcia-Ruiz A, Margossian H, Stevens L. Full robotic assistance for laparoscopic tubal anastomosis: a case report. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A (1999) 9(1):107–13.10.1089/lap.1999.9.107
    1. Dharia Patel SP, Steinkampf MP, Whitten SJ, Malizia BA. Robotic tubal anastomosis: surgical technique and cost effectiveness. Fertil Steril (2008) 90(4):1175–9.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.07.1392
    1. Rodger AK, Golberg JM, Hammel JP, Falcone T. Tubal anastomosis by robotic compared with outpatient mini-laparotomy. Obstet Gynecol (2007) 109:1375–80.10.1097/01.AOG.0000264591.43544.0f
    1. Goldberg JM, Falcone T. Laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis with and without robotic assistance. Hum Reprod (2003) 18:145–7.10.1093/humrep/deg011
    1. Caillet M, Vandromme J, Rozenberg S, Paesmans M, Germay O, Degueldre M. Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis: a retrospective study. Fertil Steril (2010) 94(5):1844–8.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.10.028
    1. Geller EJ, Siddiqui NY, Wu JM, Visco AG. Short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy with abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol (2008) 112:1201–6.10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818ce394
    1. Weinbreg L, Rao S, Escobar PF. Robotic surgery in gynecology: an updated systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Int (2011) 2011:852061.10.1155/2011/852061
    1. Elliot DS, Chow GK, Gettman M. Current status of robotics in female urology and gynecology. World J Urol (2006) 24(2):188–9210.1007/s00345-006-0071-5
    1. Pasic RP, Rizzo JA, Fang H, Ross S, Moore M, Gunnarsson C. Comparing robot-assisted with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: impact on cost and clinical outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol (2010) 17(6):730–8.10.1016/j.jmig.2010.06.009

Source: PubMed

Sponsors en medewerkers

Medische omstandigheden

Geneesmiddelinterventies

3
Abonneren