Efficacy and safety of controlled-release oxycodone/naloxone versus controlled-release oxycodone in Korean patients with cancer-related pain: a randomized controlled trial

Kyung-Hee Lee, Tae Won Kim, Jung-Hun Kang, Jin-Soo Kim, Jin-Seok Ahn, Sun-Young Kim, Hwan-Jung Yun, Young-Jun Eum, Sung Ae Koh, Min Kyoung Kim, Yong Sang Hong, Jeong Eun Kim, Gyeong-Won Lee, Kyung-Hee Lee, Tae Won Kim, Jung-Hun Kang, Jin-Soo Kim, Jin-Seok Ahn, Sun-Young Kim, Hwan-Jung Yun, Young-Jun Eum, Sung Ae Koh, Min Kyoung Kim, Yong Sang Hong, Jeong Eun Kim, Gyeong-Won Lee

Abstract

Background: Controlled-release oxycodone/naloxone (OXN-CR) maintains the effect of opioid-induced analgesia through oxycodone while reducing the occurrence rate of opioid-induced constipation through naloxone. The present study was designed to assess the non-inferiority of OXN-CR to controlled-release oxycodone (OX-CR) for the control of cancer-related pain in Korean patients.

Methods: In this randomized, open-labeled, parallel-group, phase IV study, we enrolled patients aged 20 years or older with moderate to severe cancer-related pain [numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score ≥4] from seven Korean oncology/hematology centers. Patients in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population were randomized (1:1) to OXN-CR or OX-CR groups. OXN-CR was administered starting at 20 mg/10 mg per day and up-titrated to a maximum of 80 mg/40 mg per day for 4 weeks, and OX-CR was administered starting at 20 mg/day and up-titrated to a maximum of 80 mg/day for 4 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in NRS pain score from baseline to week 4, with non-inferiority margin of -1.5. Secondary endpoints included analgesic rescue medication intake, patient-reported change in bowel habits, laxative intake, quality of life (QoL), and safety assessments.

Results: Of the ITT population comprising 128 patients, 7 with missing primary efficacy data and 4 who violated the eligibility criteria were excluded from the efficacy analysis. At week 4, the mean change in NRS pain scores was not significantly different between the OXN-CR group (n = 58) and the OX-CR group (n = 59) (-1.586 vs. -1.559, P = 0.948). The lower limit of the one-sided 95% confidence interval (-0.776 to 0.830) for the difference exceeded the non-inferiority margin (P < 0.001). The OXN-CR and OX-CR groups did not differ significantly in terms of analgesic rescue medication intake, change in bowel habits, laxative intake, QoL, and safety assessments.

Conclusions: OXN-CR was non-inferior to OX-CR in terms of pain reduction after 4 weeks of treatment and had a similar safety profile. Studies in larger populations of Korean patients with cancer-related pain are needed to further investigate the effectiveness of OXN-CR for long-term pain control and constipation alleviation. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01313780, registered March 8, 2011.

Keywords: Constipation; Naloxone; Oxycodone; Quality of life; Safety.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of patients with cancer-related pain who were randomized to receive either controlled-release oxycodone/naloxone (OXN-CR) or controlled-release oxycodone (OX-CR). aThe patient was found to have significant structural/functional abnormalities of the gastrointestinal tract which was deemed to be not appropriate for oral medicine administration
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Reduction in pain scores from baseline to week 4 in the OXN-CR and OX-CR groups (full analysis set, FAS). The error bars represent standard deviation (SD). NRS numeric rating scale
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Patient-reported change in bowel habits from baseline to week 4 in OXN-CR-treated patients and OX-CR-treated patients (FAS). aPatients with available data at week 4

References

    1. Green CR, Hart-Johnson T, Loeffler DR. Cancer-related chronic pain: examining quality of life in diverse cancer survivors. Cancer. 2011;117:1994–2003. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25761.
    1. Portenoy RK. Treatment of cancer pain. Lancet. 2011;377:2236–2247. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60236-5.
    1. Yang Y, Ma Y, Huang Y, Zhao Y, Xu F, Tian Y, et al. The good pain management (GPM) ward program in China and its impact on Chinese cancer patients: the SYSUCC experience. Chin J Cancer. 2014;33:323–329. doi: 10.5732/cjc.013.10102.
    1. Jost L, Roila F, ESMO Guidelines Working Group Management of cancer pain: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2010;21(Suppl. 5):257–260. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq224.
    1. DePriest AZ, Miller K. Oxycodone/naloxone: role in chronic pain management, opioid-induced constipation, and abuse deterrence. Pain Ther. 2014;3:1–15. doi: 10.1007/s40122-014-0026-2.
    1. Kumar L, Barker C, Emmanuel A. Opioid-induced constipation: pathophysiology, clinical consequences, and management. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2014;2014:141737. doi: 10.1155/2014/141737.
    1. Holzer P. Pharmacology of opioids and their effects on gastrointestinal function. Am J Gastroenterol Suppl. 2014;2:9–16. doi: 10.1038/ajgsup.2014.4.
    1. Holzer P. Opioid receptors in the gastrointestinal tract. Regul Pept. 2009;155:11–17. doi: 10.1016/j.regpep.2009.03.012.
    1. Burness CB, Keating GM. Oxycodone/naloxone prolonged-release: a review of its use in the management of chronic pain while counteracting opioid-induced constipation. Drugs. 2014;74:353–375. doi: 10.1007/s40265-014-0177-9.
    1. Helm S, Trescot AM, Colson J, Sehqal N, Silverman S. Opioid antagonists, partial agonists, and agonists/antagonists: the role of office-based detoxification. Pain Physician. 2008;11:225–235.
    1. Leppert W. Oxycodone/naloxone in the management of patients with pain and opioid-induced bowel dysfunction. Curr Drug Targets. 2014;15:124–135. doi: 10.2174/13894501113149990210.
    1. Ahmedzai SH, Nauck F, Bar-Sela G, Bosse B, Leyendecker P, Hopp M. A randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, double-dummy, parallel-group study to determine the safety and efficacy of oxycodone/naloxone prolonged-release tablets in patients with moderate/severe, chronic cancer pain. Palliat Med. 2012;26:50–60. doi: 10.1177/0269216311418869.
    1. Droney J, Ross J, Gretton S, Welsh K, Sato H, Riley J. Constipation in cancer patients on morphine. Support Care Cancer. 2008;165:453–459. doi: 10.1007/s00520-007-0373-1.
    1. Laugsand EA, Skorpen F, Kaasa S, Sabatowski R, Strasser F, Fayers P, et al. Genetic and non-genetic factors associated with constipation in cancer patients receiving opioids. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2015;18(6):e90. doi: 10.1038/ctg.2015.19.
    1. Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: visual analog scale for pain (VAS pain), numeric rating scale for pain (NRS pain), McGill pain questionnaire (MPQ), short-form McGill pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ), chronic pain grade scale (CPGS), short form-36 bodily pain scale (SF-36 BPS), and measure of intermittent and constant osteoarthritis pain (ICOAP) Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63:S240–S252. doi: 10.1002/acr.20543.
    1. Muller-Lissner S, Wald A. Constipation in adults. BMJ Clin Evid. 2010;07:0413–0437.
    1. Scott NW, Fayers PM, Aaronson NK, Bottomley A, de Graeff A, Groenvold M, et al. EORTC QLQ-C30 reference values. 2008. . Accessed 25 Apr 2017.
    1. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. 2009, May 28. . Accessed 25 Apr 2017.
    1. Rentz AM, Yu R, Muller-Lissner S, Leyendecker P. Validation of the Bowel Function Index to detect clinically meaningful changes in opioid-induced constipation. J Med Econ. 2009;12:371–383. doi: 10.3111/13696990903430481.
    1. Napp Pharmaceuticals Ltd. OxyContin 5 mg, 10 mg, 15 mg, 20 mg, 30 mg, 40 mg, 60 mg, 80 mg and 120 mg prolonged release. . Accessed 2 Dec 2014.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren