Effect of selenium supplementation on musculoskeletal health in older women: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Jennifer S Walsh, Richard M Jacques, Lutz Schomburg, Tom R Hill, John C Mathers, Graham R Williams, Richard Eastell, Jennifer S Walsh, Richard M Jacques, Lutz Schomburg, Tom R Hill, John C Mathers, Graham R Williams, Richard Eastell

Abstract

Background: Observational and preclinical studies show associations between selenium status, bone health, and physical function. Most adults in Europe have serum selenium below the optimum range. We hypothesised that selenium supplementation could reduce pro-resorptive actions of reactive oxygen species on osteoclasts and improve physical function.

Methods: We completed a 6-month randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. We recruited postmenopausal women older than 55 years with osteopenia or osteoporosis at the Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive selenite 200 μg, 50 μg, or placebo orally once per day. Medication was supplied to the site blinded and numbered by a block randomisation sequence with a block size of 18, and participants were allocated medication in numerical order. All participants and study team were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was urine N-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen (NTx, expressed as ratio to creatinine) at 26 weeks. Analysis included all randomly assigned participants who completed follow-up. Groups were compared with analysis of covariance with Hochberg testing. Secondary endpoints were other biochemical markers of bone turnover, bone mineral density, short physical performance battery, and grip strength. Mechanistic endpoints were glutathione peroxidase, highly sensitive C-reactive protein, and interleukin-6. This trial is registered with EU clinical trials, EudraCT 2016-002964-15, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02832648, and is complete.

Findings: 120 participants were recruited between Jan 23, 2017, and April 11, 2018, and randomly assigned to selenite 200 μg, 50 μg, or placebo (n=40 per group). 115 (96%) of 120 participants completed follow-up and were included in the primary analysis (200 μg [n=39], 50 μg [n=39], placebo [n=37]). Median follow-up was 25·0 weeks (IQR 24·7-26·0). In the 200 μg group, mean serum selenium increased from 78·8 (95% CI 73·5-84·2) to 105·7 μg/L (99·5-111·9). Urine NTx to creatinine ratio (nmol bone collagen equivalent:mmol creatinine) did not differ significantly between treatment groups at 26 weeks: 40·5 (95% CI 34·9-47·0) for placebo, 43·4 (37·4-50·5) for 50 μg, and 42·2 (37·5-47·6) for 200 μg. None of the secondary or mechanistic endpoint measurements differed between treatment groups at 26 weeks. Seven (6%) of 120 participants were withdrawn from treatment at week 13 due to abnormal thyroid-stimulating hormone concentrations (one in the 200 μg group, three in the 50 μg group, and three in the placebo group) and abnormal blood glucose (one in the 50 μg group). There were three serious adverse events: a non-ST elevation myocardial infarction at week 18 (in the 50 μg group), a diagnosis of bowel cancer after routine population screening at week 2 (in the placebo group), and a pulmonary embolus due to metastatic bowel cancer at week 4 (in the 200 μg group). All severe adverse events were judged by the principal investigator as unrelated to trial medication.

Interpretation: Selenium supplementation at these doses does not affect musculoskeletal health in postmenopausal women.

Funding: UK National Institute for Health Research Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation programme.

Conflict of interest statement

JSW declares grants from the NIHR during the conduct of the study; and personal fees from Mereo and Sandoz, personal fees and non-financial support from Eli Lilly, grants from Alexion, and non-financial support from Consilient, outside the submitted work. RMJ declares grants from the NIHR during the conduct of the study. LS declares shares in selenOmed, outside the submitted work. TRH declares speaker fees from DSM, outside the submitted work. JCM declares grants from the NIHR during the conduct of the study. RE declares grants from Amgen, Alexion, and Roche; grants and personal fees from IDS; personal fees from GSK Nutrition, Mereo, Sandoz, AbbiVie, Samsung, Haoma Medica, Elsevier, CL Bio, the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health, Viking, the University of California San Francisco, Biocon, and Lyramid; and grants and personal fees from Nittobo, outside the submitted work. GRW declares no competing interests.

© 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.

Figures

Figure
Figure
Trial profile The number of participants included in the per-protocol analysis differs from the per-protocol NTx results table (appendix p 2) due to missing NTx measurements. AE=adverse event. BMD=bone mineral density. NTx=N-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen. TSH=thyroid-stimulating hormone.

References

    1. Jha S, Wang Z, Laucis N, Bhattacharyya T. Trends in media reports, oral bisphosphonate prescriptions, and hip fractures 1996-2012: an ecological analysis. J Bone Miner Res. 2015;30:2179–2187.
    1. Cervellati C, Bonaccorsi G, Cremonini E. Oxidative stress and bone resorption interplay as a possible trigger for postmenopausal osteoporosis. BioMed Res Int. 2014;2014
    1. Väänänen HK, Zhao H, Mulari M, Halleen JM. The cell biology of osteoclast function. J Cell Sci. 2000;113:377–381.
    1. Manolagas SC. From estrogen-centric to aging and oxidative stress: a revised perspective of the pathogenesis of osteoporosis. Endocr Rev. 2010;31:266–300.
    1. Hoeg A, Gogakos A, Murphy E. Bone turnover and bone mineral density are independently related to selenium status in healthy euthyroid postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:4061–4070.
    1. Duntas LH. Selenium and inflammation: underlying anti-inflammatory mechanisms. Horm Metab Res. 2009;41:443–447.
    1. Battin EE, Brumaghim JL. Antioxidant activity of sulfur and selenium: a review of reactive oxygen species scavenging, glutathione peroxidase, and metal-binding antioxidant mechanisms. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2009;55:1–23.
    1. Zhang Z, Zhang J, Xiao J. Selenoproteins and selenium status in bone physiology and pathology. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1840:3246–3256.
    1. Jakob F, Becker K, Paar E, Ebert-Duemig R, Schütze N. Expression and regulation of thioredoxin reductases and other selenoproteins in bone. Methods Enzymol. 2002;347:168–179.
    1. Cao JJ, Gregoire BR, Zeng H. Selenium deficiency decreases antioxidative capacity and is detrimental to bone microarchitecture in mice. J Nutr. 2012;142:1526–1531.
    1. Moreno-Reyes R, Egrise D, Nève J, Pasteels JL, Schoutens A. Selenium deficiency-induced growth retardation is associated with an impaired bone metabolism and osteopenia. J Bone Miner Res. 2001;16:1556–1563.
    1. Moreno-Reyes R, Suetens C, Mathieu F. Kashin-Beck osteoarthropathy in rural Tibet in relation to selenium and iodine status. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1112–1120.
    1. Beukhof CM, Medici M, van den Beld AW. Selenium status is positively associated with bone mineral density in healthy aging European men. PLoS One. 2016;11
    1. Zhang J, Munger RG, West NA, Cutler DR, Wengreen HJ, Corcoran CD. Antioxidant intake and risk of osteoporotic hip fracture in Utah: an effect modified by smoking status. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;163:9–17.
    1. Rayman MP. Selenium and human health. Lancet. 2012;379:1256–1268.
    1. Johnson CC, Fordyce FM, Rayman MP. Symposium on ‘geographical and geological influences on nutrition’: factors controlling the distribution of selenium in the environment and their impact on health and nutrition. Proc Nutr Soc. 2010;69:119–132.
    1. Lauretani F, Semba RD, Bandinelli S, Ray AL, Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L. Association of low plasma selenium concentrations with poor muscle strength in older community-dwelling adults: the InCHIANTI Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;86:347–352.
    1. Schomburg L, Orho-Melander M, Struck J, Bergmann A, Melander O. Selenoprotein-P deficiency predicts cardiovascular disease and death. Nutrients. 2019;11
    1. Alehagen U, Alexander J, Aaseth J. Supplementation with selenium and coenzyme Q10 reduces cardiovascular mortality in elderly with low selenium status. a secondary analysis of a randomised clinical trial. PLoS One. 2016;11
    1. Alehagen U, Johansson P, Aaseth J, Alexander J, Brismar K. Increase in insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1 after supplementation with selenium and coenzyme Q10. A prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial among elderly Swedish citizens. PLoS One. 2017;12
    1. Duffield-Lillico AJ, Reid ME, Turnbull BW. Baseline characteristics and the effect of selenium supplementation on cancer incidence in a randomized clinical trial: a summary report of the Nutritional Prevention of Cancer Trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002;11:630–639.
    1. Kohler LN, Foote J, Kelley CP. Selenium and type 2 diabetes: systematic review. Nutrients. 2018;10
    1. Marcocci C, Kahaly GJ, Krassas GE. Selenium and the course of mild Graves' orbitopathy. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1920–1931.
    1. Rayman MP, Blundell-Pound G, Pastor-Barriuso R, Guallar E, Steinbrenner H, Stranges S. A randomized trial of selenium supplementation and risk of type-2 diabetes, as assessed by plasma adiponectin. PLoS One. 2012;7
    1. Eastell R, Hannon RA, Garnero P, Campbell MJ, Delmas PD. Relationship of early changes in bone resorption to the reduction in fracture risk with risedronate: review of statistical analysis. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22:1656–1660.
    1. Hahn M, Conterato GM, Frizzo CP. Effects of bone disease and calcium supplementation on antioxidant enzymes in postmenopausal women. Clin Biochem. 2008;41:69–74.
    1. Eastell R, Barton I, Hannon RA, Chines A, Garnero P, Delmas PD. Relationship of early changes in bone resorption to the reduction in fracture risk with risedronate. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18:1051–1056.
    1. Rogers A, Glover SJ, Eastell R. A randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, trial to determine the individual response in bone turnover markers to lasofoxifene therapy. Bone. 2009;45:1044–1052.
    1. Frison L, Pocock SJ. Repeated measures in clinical trials: analysis using mean summary statistics and its implications for design. Stat Med. 1992;11:1685–1704.
    1. Hochberg YTA. Wiley; New York: 1987. Multiple comparison procedures.
    1. Naylor KE, Jacques RM, Paggiosi M. Response of bone turnover markers to three oral bisphosphonate therapies in postmenopausal osteoporosis: the TRIO study. Osteoporos Int. 2016;27:21–31.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren